From [HERE] When the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that 28 State House and Senate districts were unconstitutionally racially gerrymandered, the North Carolina General Assembly and its actions became illegal.

That’s the argument the plaintiffs in North Carolina v. Covington plan to make next week, according to court documents filed Friday.

“Arguably, under State v. Lewis and Van Amringe v. Taylor upon issuance of that mandate the members of the illegally constituted General Assembly lost the protection of the de facto doctrine and became usurpers unauthorized to act to protect the health and [safety] of all North Carolinians,” the document states. “It is entirely possible that any legislative actions they take without being elected from legal districts could be subject to challenge under state law. This risk is not merely speculative.”

A usurper is someone who takes a position of power illegally or by force. The de facto doctrine is designed to validate the past acts of public officers illegally in office, according to the court document.

A court hearing is set Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. A three-judge panel will decide a timeline for state lawmakers to redraw the illegal district maps, in addition to deciding whether a special election will be ordered to remedy the constitutional violations.

All parties in the case had to file any extra briefs or arguments and witness lists by midnight Friday.

Attorney General Josh Stein, who is representing both the state of North Carolina and the State Board of Elections, plans to call witness Kim Westbrook Strach, Executive Director of the Bipartisan State Board of Elections & Ethics Enforcement.

Strach’s husband, Phillip Strach, is one of the attorneys representing the legislative defendants, which means he could potentially cross-examine her at the hearing.

The legislative defendants did not file a brief or witness list. They did file one exhibit they plan to use in court: the North Carolina Supreme Court’s dismissal in Cooper v. Berger of Gov. Roy Cooper’s request to stop the Bipartisan Board.

The lawsuit is over Senate Bill 68, which merges the functions of the State Board of Elections and State Ethics Commission, along with campaign finance and lobbying functions.

The dismissal of the motion for temporary stay states that the court must preserve the status quo of the Bipartisan Board during its expedited consideration of the case and that the parties are prohibited from taking further action regarding the unimplemented portions of the act.

The exhibit document does not state why legislative defendants plan to use the dismissal in their Covington arguments.

The plaintiffs in Covington plan to call six witnesses: Milo Pyne, a plaintiff; Rep. Grier Martin (D-Wake); Rep. Robert T. Reives II (D-Chatham, Lee); Gary Bartlett, former Executive Director of the State Board of Elections; George Gilbert, former director of the Guilford County Board of Elections; and Rep. David Lewis (R-Harnett).

The plaintiffs also filed a brief to support their request to give the General Assembly two weeks to redraw the unconstitutional maps and to order special elections for March 2018.

The brief lays out the argument that the General Assembly became illegitimate when the U.S. Supreme Court made its ruling in Covington. It includes an exhibit declaration from Derb Stancil Carter Jr., Director of the Chapel Hill office of the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC).

In the declaration, Carter says it is the position of SELC that the General Assembly no longer has the authority to override gubernatorial vetoes, and will not have that authority until constitutional districts are drawn and a legal, de jure legislature is elected.

He also states (and wrote a letter to the Governor and legislative leaders) that if lawmakers attempt to override the veto of House Bill 576, entitled “Allow Aerosolization of Leachate,” at the scheduled Aug. 3 or Sept. 6 legislative sessions, they could be sued. [MORE]