GET THE F*** OUTTA HERE! From [HERE] New York City Mayor-elect Eric Adams reiterated support for "stop and frisk" in a new op-ed piece published Sunday reacting to last week’s Thanksgiving Eve shooting that wounded two police officers. 

Adams, who will be the city’s second Black mayor, praised the "professional conduct" of NYPD officers Alejandra Jacobs and Robert Holmes in their handling of suspect Charlie Vasquez in the Bronx last week. Judging by the NYPD’s account, Adams said the officers handled the situation correctly – they approached the suspect matching a 911 caller’s description and asked him to show his hands. 

But Vasquez open fired. Shot in the arm, Jacobs returned fire, and then, "the threat was neutralized. One more gun off the street. One more blow against the bad guys," Adams wrote in an op-ed for the New York Daily News. "Yet there are some in our city who would say these officers should never have confronted Vasquez, that he never should have been stopped and questioned."

Adams rejected his opponents’ calls to "end stop and frisk forever," making the distinction in the op-ed that the tactic "stop, question and frisk" must be reinstated because it can actually help reduce crime "without infringing on personal liberties and human rights." 

But Vasquez open fired. Shot in the arm, Jacobs returned fire, and then, "the threat was neutralized. One more gun off the street. One more blow against the bad guys," Adams wrote in an op-ed for the New York Daily News. "Yet there are some in our city who would say these officers should never have confronted Vasquez, that he never should have been stopped and questioned."

Clearly this Black borg is an ignorant simpleton who has confused lawful and unlawful stops and acted as if they are the same - sort of like acting like stealing an item is the same as paying for it! What a fuck-up. Cops may make lawful stops within the bounds of the 4th Amendment; such stops do not include stopping, frisking, touching, searching and detaining people based on skin color or targeting people by skin color or perceived status or appearance. The cops Adams referred to in his op-ed apparently had reasonable suspicion that a crime had been committed and reasonable suspicion to believe that the suspect had committed the crime because ‘he matched the description provided by police dispatch.’ The cops did not stop the man simply because he was Black - which is what this straw-boss is referring to when he refers to “stop and frisk” as a tactic of policing. Adams appears to be woking on a barbaric level of consciousness in service of white authority.

In order for the police to stop you the Supreme Court has ruled that police must have reasonable articulable suspicion that there is criminal activity afoot and the person detained is involved in the activity. In order to frisk you the Supreme Court has ruled that the police must have independent reasonable articulable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous before they may touch you (a cursory patdown for weapons). Police may not act on on the basis of an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or a hunch - there must be some specific articulable facts along with reasonable inferences from those facts to justify the intrusion. 

Clearly these rules are only intended for white people. Non-whites are stopped and then frisked because they are Non-white - regardless of income, education, political affiliation or skin color. ‘The NYPD has been stopping and questioning Blacks & Latinos first and then developing reasonable suspicion later. 

Brazen cops so frequently abuse their power that no Black pedestrian, motorist, juvenile, adult or Black professional of any kind—could make a compelling argument that the so-called 4th Amendment affords any meaningful protection from police or the government.