“WAS ARBERY KILLING A HATE CRIME?” The same headline is appearing throughout The Dependent Media. Was lynching a hate crime? Only NGHRS would answer these questions and indulge racists in their racist fantasy of white supremacy, a mind virus. Racists are always looking for NGHRS to deceive, as white supremacy is maintained by consensual master-servant relations. Fuck racism white supremacy.

JURISFICTION. To establish their case during a trial parties must attempt to re-create in the courtroom what happened in real life. When they do so courts presume a certain context exists, a sort of background reality. Beyond just assuming the same laws of gravity or time, this “constructed reality” also presumes certain relations and roles that people play. The imagined court world is very similar to the world presented to us in The Spectacle (social relations mediated by the mass media); a plastic world with bullshit characters where vaccines immunize people, no one is homeless and the government is a benign entity and many other false programmatic myths. The world re-created or simulated in courtrooms is a “race neutral,” free from bias, “fair,” post-racial world where non-discrimination is presumed. In it, relations between Blacks & whites are considered symbiotic as black and whites are assumed to engage in equal or arms lengths interactions. Racism is a four letter word in court, no matter the circumstances attorneys know to never raise it. It is literally seen and unseen as judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, court staff, etc could observe 100 arraignments of all black defendants, never see a white defendant and think nothing of it, everyday for years. As such, racism is as rare as UFO sighting, Within this world, a party raising racism must prove it to defeat this presumption. in order to establish that conduct was motivated by racism a party must generally provide tangible evidence of discriminatory intent from the mind of a bigoted decision-maker. Racial slurs, white kkk hoods, racist manifestos, explicit pronouncements like, "I'm assaulting you because you are Black" or other egregious conduct is what the court is looking for. Such smoking gun evidence is rare because in the real world racism/white supremacy is primarily carried out by deception. Racists rarely articulate their intentions or notify non-white people of their beliefs in white supremacy or plans to practice racism. In fact, in yurugu’s courts vast racial disparity evidenced by statistics does not ordinarily raise the presumption of racism without evidence of racial animus. For instance, the fact that 60% of a state’s death row is black while Blacks only make up 10 percent of the state’s population is not sufficient information by itself to establish discriminatory or racist application of the death penalty [government murders]. [MORE]

A most effective deception is decontextualization. Dr. Amos Wilson explains that "an objective of white supremacy is to decontextualize subject matter and project it as race neutral and objective." This leads to half explanations, half truths and false solutions - like court remedies.

In a system of white supremacy/racism it is logical to assume that most white people are racist and or the most powerful people are racist and participate in said system. If this were not so many of the problems (poverty, economic inequality, unemployment, drug addiction, infant mortality, health disparities, chronic welfare dependency, affordable housing, gentrification, homelessness, servant education, the unequal administration of justice, police brutality, jim crow incarceration and much more) caused by white supremacy would not exist. In said context all white people should be presumed to be or suspected of being racist [“racist suspect”] until proven otherwise.

The Court's fake search for truth or tangible evidence from the mind of a bigoted decision maker ignores reality. The legal system’s illusory decontextualized search for racism is done only for appearances, a show of process - as the appearance of justice is the only product of the criminal courts, justice is incidental, random, accidental, or granted under the most obvious circumstance in a system of injustice (racism/white supremacy).

If the courts were based on reality as opposed to legal truths once a victim presents minimal facts establishing racism, the other party should be required to prove no discrimination occurred with clear & convincing evidence.