Black Parents of Cincinnati students file racism suit

USA Today

Parents of four black students filed a federal lawsuit against Northwest schools and the Colerain Township Police Department Tuesday alleging their children were kicked out of school and denied due process because of their race.

The $25 million lawsuit alleges the constitutional rights of four Colerain High School students were violated April 10.

That's when school administrators and Colerain Township police allegedly rounded up the students, "held them in a windowless room guarded by armed police officers for upward of six hours and interrogated them" about alleged gang-related affiliations discovered through social media.

Administrators accused more than a dozen students of making "street" signs and belonging to a gang.

The suit alleges white students engaged in similar conduct and were not questioned or disciplined.

"It is not a crime to be an African-American teenager. Yet, on April 10, 2014, Colerain High School administrators in coordination with Colerain Township police officer acted as if it were," the lawsuit states.

The lawsuit says the allegations were unfounded and the school district violated the students' right to free speech, to be free of unreasonable search and seizure and said it violated their due-process rights. It also said the students were harassed by the district and forbidden from participating in extra-curricular activities once they returned to school.

NY A.G. sues Evans Bank for Racial Discrimination

WGRZ

The narrative of Buffalo's renaissance focuses almost exclusively on the development of the waterfront, and, to an extent, the Buffalo Niagara Medical Campus. Between Canalside's revitalization, HarborCenter construction and the medical job boom, the Queen City has quickly built a name for itself as a thriving community on the mend.

But the city's East Side, home to roughly 85,000 people who still battle urban decay and high crime rates on a daily basis, rarely finds itself included in that conversation.

"It's important," VOICE-Buffalo President Duane Diggs said, "that our entire city is refurbished."

And on Tuesday, the state's Attorney General took a trip to Western New York to announce a lawsuit that addresses the plight of the East Side.

Eric Schneiderman, a Democrat, announced that his office has filed suit against Evans Bank, accusing it of systematically limiting loans in the East Side's African-American community based solely on their race. The lawsuit outlines discriminatory practices starting in 2009, coinciding with the end of the national economic recession— not to mention the very beginning of the waterfront and medical campus revival.

The discrimination by Evans Bank, the attorney general claims, has stunted the East Side's growth.

"They're deliberately engaging in traditional 'redlining,'" Schneiderman said, "with a substantial impact on the community."

According to a map presented by Schneiderman at a press conference on Tuesday, Evans Bank's trade zone has ignored most of the East Side of Buffalo, which would violate the Federal Fair Housing Act, the state's human rights law and the City of Buffalo's code. The attorney general accuses the bank of not only denying mortgage lending products, but also of intentionally advertising its products in newspapers inaccessible to the African-American community, as well as failing to place any branches or ATMs in this particular area.

Manager at American Apparel - "Look out for black girls, because they're always the ones shoplifting."

Gawker

When I graduated college I moved to a new city and wanted a low-stress job that would allow me time to focus on creative projects. I knew people who had worked for American Apparel in the past, both in sales and at the LA headquarters, so I decided to interview for a part-time position.

My friends had had mixed experiences. I was drawn to the company because I try to make ethical consumer decisions, and I appreciated that American Apparel pays their garment workers well and doesn't use sweatshops. But I was also very wary of the sexual harassment allegations against the company's former CEO, Dov Charney. Because he had recently been asked to step down from his position, it seemed like the company was making progress.

I decided to take a diary of my experience.

Interview process: The manager who interviews me seems mostly interested in whether I am "a good fit for the brand." She asks questions about my modeling background, and emphasizes the importance of employees representing the company well through how they dress. She says the company likes to emphasize that they are "vertically integrated," but doesn't know what the term means.

July 22: On my first day, my manager instructs me on how to seek out potential shoplifters: "Look out for black girls, because they're always the ones shoplifting." She says, "I know it's a stereotype, but it's true."

July 23: One of my coworkers insists that Dov Charney should not be blamed for the sexual harassment of employees because "it's not like he raped them" and "it seems like they were into it, too." She says that people often come into the store and ask employees what they think about their CEO being known for sexual harassment, and she "doesn't understand why they make such an issue out of it."

July 24: A coworker confirms my observation that the manager profiles shoppers and employees, by both race and attractiveness. "Every time a girl drops off her resume, the first thing she asks me is if the girl was cute," she tells me. "And she never hires black girls. We only have one, and she works in back stock." At American Apparel, there's an emphasis on having "the right kind of customer" wearing the clothes, and I notice that customers who fit the brand aesthetic (attractive, trendy) are helped with more enthusiasm.

July 25: A man asks for my help selecting underwear, and wants to know what size I think he is. I direct him to a size chart on the wall near the underwear. He offers to pay me to watch him try on underwear and let him know which I think are the best fit. When I tell a coworker, she's unconcerned. She says that at American Apparel, this "just happens" and that I shouldn't let it get to me.

July 29: While assisting a customer into a fitting room, the manager passes me a note that says "WATCH HER ITEMS!!!" The customer is black. It's clear that racial profiling not only occurred regularly, but that as an employee was expected to enforce it.

August 6: A coworker comes to the break room visibly upset. When I ask her what's bothering her, she says that while helping a man find clothes for his wife, he told her to try them on for him since she and his wife were about the same size. She wasn't comfortable doing it, since he picked out lots of mesh/sheer items that are intended to be worn without a bra, but she felt like it was her job to help him. When she tried the items on and came out of the fitting room, covering herself, he pulled her arms down so that her breasts were exposed. He then slipped a twenty dollar bill into her pants.

Trembling and upset, she told the manager what happened. The manager replied, "Well, it seems like he's gone now." There did not seem to be a protocol for employees who are sexually harassed, and the manager was completely unconcerned when an employee expressed distress over harassment. She was not allowed to leave work early, and she felt like the clothes she was wearing were partially to blame. "It's because we wear this stuff," she tells me, gesturing to her backless dress.

August 10: A coworker tells me that the man who harassed the salesperson at the fitting rooms had returned and asked another girl to try clothes on for him. She was also uncomfortable with this, but the manager told her she could do it as long as she wore something underneath, even though she knew that a girl had been harassed in this situation just days before. Another worker called the police upon recognizing the man; the cops encouraged everyone to ask the man to leave next time he showed up.

August 11: I quit the job without giving notice. I know it's unprofessional, but I feel like the work environment was toxic enough that I shouldn't spend any more time there for my own well-being. I've been deeply disturbed and upset by these unprofessional behaviors that seemed to be accepted by my coworkers and managers, and by the sexualized role that employees were expected to play in the selling of clothes.

I knew this was a design-oriented company, and that appearances are important to the brand. But I didn't realize is just how image-obsessed the employees and customers were going to be. The climate is hyper-sexual, and employees were expected to fit that image—even to the point of trying clothes on for customers. Workers are considered be models or representatives of the brand, and the managers were really concerned with how their female employees were wearing the clothes. It seemed to work—all of the employees were obsessed with the clothes, trying things on and painting their nails while they were clocked in and spending significant portions of their paychecks on American Apparel merchandise.

In retrospect, I should've been more wary of a company with a history of outrageous unprofessionalism. What I hoped would be a low-stress, part-time job turned out to be a major source of anxiety and a cesspool of harassment. The incompetent, appallingly racist management and belittling of employees were commonplace, and created a hostile work environment.

It's unfortunate that American Apparel requires employees to sign agreements saying they won't speak ill of the company upon leaving. I'm sure that there are many upset employees (including some that I worked with) that are afraid to speak out.

But it seems like in order to have a positive experience working at American Apparel, one must be quite loyal to the brand and the image that the brand aspires to. Many of my coworkers found community with each other, and emphasized that they enjoyed working there because it allowed them to meet like-minded people. They obsessed over the clothes together, tried things on together, created outfits for going out together. There's nothing wrong with that. But because of this enthusiasm, the employees often seemed willing to overlook the ways in which their workplace was profoundly unprofessional, or the ways in which they were being flat-out abused by managers and customers. While I was enthusiastic about certain aspects of the company, they simply were not enough for me to look past the practices I encountered.

August 20: Over a week after quitting my job, I still had not received my last paycheck, and had to threaten to report them to the labor board. The check was shipped to me overnight.

Haiti's Fragile Democracy

Jurist 

The latest chapter in a long series of preliminary legal actions against Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide has generated a series of standoffs. Outside Aristide's house in the suburb of Tabarre, his supporters have gathered several times in the past weeks to protest announced efforts to arrest him and have usually been dispersed with tear gas by Haitian police and UN soldiers. Inside the Courthouse Judge Lamarre Belizaire insists that the police execute an arrest warrant he issued on August 14, while his chief judge issues contradictory statements about whether the effort to have him recused—now before Haiti's Cour de Cassation (Supreme Court)—affects the warrant's validity. In the court of public opinion, Aristide's lawyers—who have not been allowed any hearings or access to the case file—argue that the Judge Belizaire is an illegally-appointed judge following a deeply flawed process to harass an opponent of the government that named him.

Judge Lamarre Belizaire issued the August 14 arrest warrant after Aristide failed to appear to answer a summons issued the day before, on what Aristide's lawyers contend are politically-motivated, time-barred charges. Mario Joseph, head of the Bureau des Avocats Internationaux, claims the summons was never properly served and that Aristide never received it. The criminal investigation centers on allegations of corruption, criminal conspiracy, money laundering and misappropriation of funds during Aristide's presidency that ended with a US-backed coup more than a decade ago.

This is not the first time that Aristide has been the target of charges that are brought with public fanfare and then dropped before Aristide has an opportunity to challenge the allegations. Aristide's supporters claim the repeated legal actions are aimed at discrediting him and Fanmi Lavalas, the country's most popular political party, that he founded, and intended to undermine a free and fair electoral process in Haiti. 

Aristide's lawyers Mario Joseph and Ira Kurzban claim the charges are wholly fabricated and reflect Belizaire's bias. Belizaire, who was appointed by President Michel Martelly, has a history of using his judicial role to pursue Martelly's political enemies. This practice led the country's Bar Association to suspend him for ten years, starting when he steps down from the bench. Joseph and Kurzban echo the concerns of others who suggest that the meritless charges were manufactured to hinder elections scheduled that have been overdue since 2011, when Martelly became president. Joseph also believes the reports were calculated to distract the public from the jailbreak of over 300 prisoners, including Clifford Brandt—a member of one of Haiti's wealthiest families with ties to the government, who is suspected in a number of high profile kidnappings—from a maximum security facility outside of Port-au-Prince on August 10; he has since been recaptured. Others have suggested that sullying Aristide's reputation diverts attention from the prosecution of former dictator Jean Claude "Baby Doc" Duvalier for financial malfeasance and crimes against humanity. Aristide's lawyers have also filed a precautionary measures (injunctive relief) petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, seeking to protect Aristide from the abuse of state power.

Aristide, the country's first democratically-elected president, has maintained a low profile since returning to Haiti from forced exile in 2011, focusing on education and health care for the country's impoverished masses. Yet he symbolizes a popular grassroots mobilization that those with a tight grip on the reins of power appear to find threatening.  

How The US Militarizes The World’s Police, Not Just Ferguson’s

BlackListedNews

On Aug. 9, a white police officer named Darren Wilson shot and killed an unarmed black teenager named Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.

Since then, the world has watched the streets of Ferguson turn into a battleground, as heavily armed police officers fired tear gas, shot rubber bullets and pointed guns at protesters denouncing Brown’s killing.

“Solidarity with Ferguson,” tweeted Mariam Barghouti from Palestine. “Remember to not touch your face when tear gassed or put water on it. Instead use milk or coke.”

Numerous people — domestic and abroad — have expressed outrage at the militaristic response of local police against protesters, journalists, and people of color.

“Urban Shield plays a leading role in the globalization of repression.”

Since the protests erupted earlier this month, many have called into question the US Defense Department’s 1033 program, which allows surplus military equipment to be transferred to local police departments for counter-narcotics and counter-terrorism operations.

The 1033 program is just one part of a larger story about how American police departments became militarized — a global story about the importation and exportation of equipment, tactics, and funds for the purposes of domestic and international security.

Here’s another part of the story: the international Urban Shield SWAT training and weapons vending exposition in Oakland, Calif.

The annual event, which will be hosted by the Alameda County Sherriff’s Office from Sept. 4 to 8, brings together local and national first responder agencies for a 48-hour exercise in simulated disaster preparedness, information exchange, and equipment demonstrations. And it does so while encouraging participation from international forces.

The U.S. Government Can Brand You a Terrorist Based on a Facebook Post

BlackListedNews

The US government’s web of surveillance is vast and interconnected. Now we know just how opaque, inefficient and discriminatory it can be.

As we were reminded again just this week, you can be pulled into the National Security Agency’s database quietly and quickly, and the consequences can be long and enduring. Through ICREACH, a Google-style search engine created for the intelligence community, the NSA provides data on private communications to 23 government agencies. More than 1,000 analysts had access to that information.

This kind of data sharing, however, isn’t limited to the latest from Edward Snowden’s NSA files. It was confirmed earlier this month that the FBI shares its master watchlist, the Terrorist Screening Database, with at least 22 foreign governments, countless federal agencies, state and local law enforcement, plus private contractors.

The watchlist tracks “known” and “suspected” terrorists and includes both foreigners and Americans. It’s also based on loose standards and secret evidence, which ensnares innocent people. Indeed, the standards are so low that the US government’s guidelines specifically allow for a single, uncorroborated source of information – including a Facebook or Twitter post – to serve as the basis for placing you on its master watchlist.

Of the 680,000 individuals on that FBI master list, roughly 40% have “no recognized terrorist group affiliation”, according to the Intercept. These individuals don’t even have a connection – as the government loosely defines it – to a designated terrorist group, but they are still branded as suspected terrorists.

French education ministry picture sparks racist abuse

France 24

A picture of a group of pre-school children posted on the French education ministry’s Facebook page (see above) was inundated over the weekend with racist comments – because most of the children in the photo were black.

“I wish a happy return to school for all the children of [Guinea] Conakry,” read one post that had not been deleted despite the ministry’s efforts to remove offensive comments from the page. Another post asked: “This picture is in France?”

One web user asked what the ministry was “trying to achieve with this picture” while another called the image “a deliberate provocation”, asking how it could be “normal to have a picture of French schoolchildren when only one of them is white?”

The ministry responded quickly, saying it would delete all racist and abusive comments, although there were still some visible on the social networking site when this article was published.

The picture had been shared 850 times by Facebook users, many of whom responded to the racist comments with supportive words of their own.

“The best example of everything wrong with our education system is summed up by these [racist] comments,” wrote one.

“Some see colours, I just see children,” wrote another.

Since her appointment last week as France’s new education minister last week, Moroccan-born Najat Vallaud-Belkacem has been targeted by right-wing social media users.

These attacks have included the circulation of a false image of her national identity card showing her “real name” as “Claudine Dupont”, with one commentator on Twitter asking if she had “changed her name to make herself more popular” with ethnic minorities.

Study Finds that Most Cops in Massachusetts are White

Boston.com

The state’s eight most ethnically and racially diverse communities are still policed by a predominantly white corps of officers, despite years of efforts to dispel perceptions of racism and diversify their ranks.

The Globe examined eight Massachusetts communities where a majority of the population is neither white nor Hispanic.

Some departments have grappled with accusations of racial profiling, an issue compounded by lack of diversity.

The town of Randolph, for example, was forced by the US Department of Justice a decade ago to provide cultural training for officers and build better community partnerships after two high-profile allegations of racial profiling: In one case, a black off-duty Boston police officer said he was harassed and mistaken for a shooting suspect as he was leaving a sandwich shop. In another case, officers allegedly used racial slurs and roughhoused young black men during an altercation at a fast-food restaurant.

The population of black residents in Randolph, a town of 32,383, nearly doubled between 2000 and 2010, according to Census figures, but the police force remains 81 percent white. The town is 38.4 percent white.

Randolph Police Chief William Pace said the town has tried to hire people of color into the department, but the number of open positions has been outpaced by the town’s rapidly changing demographics.

“It’s just taking time to filter through,” Pace said.

David Harris Jr., a Randolph civil rights activist who founded and once chaired the police advisory council, said that residents see “a disconnect between the police and the community of color.”

“The power structure is mostly white, and you have this tremendously diverse community. And [the police department] is not a reflection of the community itself,” Harris said.

James Madden, who interviewed dozens of Randolph residents for his 2010 MIT thesis for a master’s degree on city planning, said that people of color reported avoiding Route 28 heading into Randolph because they feared being stopped by town police. That practice has stopped, he said, but the memory lingers.

White Oklahoma cop accused of raping black women finds supporters on social media

RawStory

Supporters of an Oklahoma City police officer who was charged with raping or sexually abusing eight black women have raised more than $7,000 for the 27-year-old cop.

Daniel Holtzclaw was arrested in August on charges of rape, forcible oral sodomy, sexual battery, and indecent exposure for allegedly sexually assaulting women while on patrol. He is being held on $5 million bond.

Friends and family of the three-year veteran of the Oklahoma City Police Department have created a Facebook page called “Justice for Daniel Holtzclaw.” They insist the criminal allegations against him are false, and have been using the page to try to sell shirts that read, “Free the Claw” and “#JusticeForDanielHoltzclaw.”

More than 500 people have “liked” the Facebook page.

Supporters of Holtzclaw have also launched a crowdfunding campaign on the website GoFundMe. The page was created by Holtzclaw’s sister, who hopes to raise $100,000 for her brother, according to MLive.com. The crowdfunding campaign has raised $7,390 so far.

“The pursuit of Justice will be lengthy, but with the support of Family, Friends, and the Community, Daniel Holtzclaw will be vindicated and justice will prevail,” the page states. “All funds raised will assist Daniel and his Family as they seek the JUSTICE Daniel Holtzclaw so rightly deserves.”

ISIL completely fabricated enemy by US: Former CIA contractor

CLG

Former CIA contractor Steven Kelley says that the ISIL terrorist group is a completely fabricated enemy created and funded by the United States. "This is a completely fabricated enemy," he said in a phone interview with Press TV from Anaheim, California on Thursday. "The funding is completely from the United States and its allies and for people to think that this enemy is something that needs to be attacked in Syria or Iraq is a farce because obviously this is something that we create it, we control and only now it has become inconvenient for us to attack this group as a legitimate enemy," Kelley added.

Guantanamo Defense Lawyer Resigns, Says U.S. Is Crafting a 'show trial'

CLG

Last week, Maj. Jason Wright -- one of the lawyers defending [accused 9/11 mastermind, facing a military tribunal at Guantanamo Bay] Khalid Sheikh Mohammed -- resigned from the Army. He has accused the U.S. government of "abhorrent leadership" on human rights and due process guarantees and says it is crafting a "show trial." For nearly three years, he served on Mohammed's defense team. Wright says Mohammed in particular has faced a level of torture "beyond comprehension." He says his client was waterboarded by the CIA 183 times and subjected to over a week of sleep deprivation; there were threats that his family would be killed. "And those are just the declassified facts that I'm able to actually speak about," Wright says.

A little late: Hillary weighs on Ferguson, laments racial inequities

WashTimes

Hillary Clinton broke her silence on the unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, on Thursday, arguing Americans “cannot ignore the inequities” in the criminal justice system.

“Imagine what we would feel, what we would do if white drivers were three times as likely to be searched by police at a traffic stop as black drivers, instead of the other way around,” she said in response to the racially charged unrest that unfolded in Ferguson after the Aug. 9 police shooting of an unarmed black teenager, Michael Brown, Time reported. [of course this would never happen b/c "I and I would never live that way" and at any rate white people would not allow it in this white over black system so that requires no discussion see [MORE]

Hours After Brown's Killing, Police in Ferguson Let K-9 Urinate on Memorial Site [white supremacists are the most provocative people in the world]

ColorLines

It was bad enough that Ferguson police left Michael Brown's dead body in plain sight on a residential street for more than four hours after Darren Wilson shot and killed the unarmed 18-year-old. But what police did the evening of August 9 gives us a better understanding of why Ferguson's black community was even further enraged.

In an article over at Mother Jones, Mark Follman explains how police officers disrespected the still bloodstained spot where Brown was gunned down. It's unclear which police department was responsible, but according to witnesses, one unit allowed their K-9 dog to urinate directly on the memorial site.

And, as if that's not sufficiently horrific, Follman describes what happened to the flowers and candles that Brown's mother, Lesley McSpadden had brought to the site where her son was killed:

The day brought other indignities for Brown's family, and the community. Missouri state Rep. Sharon Pace, whose district includes the neighborhood where the shooting occurred, told me she went to the scene that afternoon to comfort the parents, who were blocked by police from approaching their son's body. Pace purchased some tea lights for the family, and around 7 p.m. she joined Brown's mother, Lesley McSpadden, and others as they placed the candles and sprinkled flowers on the ground where Brown had died. "They spelled out his initials with rose petals over the bloodstains," Pace recalled.

By then, police had prohibited all vehicles from entering Canfield Drive except for their own. Soon the candles and flowers had been smashed, after police drove over them.

Things got so bad that local residents began using their own bodies to block police cars from entering the street where Brown was killed.

Immigration Courts = epicenters of white supremacy

ThinkProgress

Take everything you think you know about how courts work, throw it out the window, and you’ll get an approximation of the nation’s immigration courts. Those who can’t afford a lawyer have to represent themselves—even if they can’t speak English, have no formal education, or are a child. The burden of proof is on the accused, making them guilty of illegally entering the country until proven innocent. Hearsay is sometimes admitted as solid evidence against someone, and individuals from certain countries can be deported without ever seeing a courtroom.

Speaking to reporters at the National Press Club in DC, immigration judge Dana Leigh Marks called the courts “an alternate legal universe” and “a Through the Looking Glass world where the normal laws don’t seem to seem to function.”

“Most members of the public don’t have a clue about the realities of our world,” said Marks, who has presided for more than 25 years in a San Francisco immigration court. “When they come face to face with it, they are often dismayed.”

Immigration judges are usually banned from speaking out publicly about what happens in their courtrooms. But Marks and her fellow judge Denise Noonan Slavin took the podium Thursday on behalf of the National Association of Immigration Judges (NAIJ) to demand a complete overhaul of the current system.

Their first complaint is that the court system is underfunded and under-staffed, an old problem recently exacerbated by the influx of hundreds of thousands of unaccompanied minors from Central America. By the NAIJ’s count, there are currently only 227 field judges across the country taking on a docket of more than 375 thousand pending cases. In some areas, like Judge Slavin’s jurisdiction in Miami, Florida, judges are trying to hear at least 50 cases a day—raising serious concerns about due process.

“We feel the pressure to move things through quickly,” Slavin told ThinkProgress. “But I know that rushing things through will only result in more appeals. The less due process we have at the lower levels, the more we’ll see a crisis in the federal courts.”

And despite calls from members of Congress to the contrary, the judges said these are cases that should not be fast-tracked.

“We deal with cases that are, in effect, death penalty cases,” Marks added. “Some of the defendants may be killed if they’re returned to their home countries.”

They said they’re asking Congress to at least double the number of immigration judges, something the comprehensive immigration bill passed by the Senate last year would have mandated. But that alone won’t fix them feeling like “an afterthought at best,” and the “forgotten stepchild of the Justice Department.”

In fact, they argue that they shouldn’t be a child of the Executive Branch at all, representing one agency (DOJ) that works with a fellow agency (the Department of Homeland Security) to prosecute and deport undocumented immigrants. The NAIJ is calling for immigration courts to be made independent like other civil and criminal courts, arguing that the current situation presents a serious conflict of interest.

“We are being asked to serve two masters at one time, and the masters have different priorities,” explained Slavin. “A judge is supposed to be an independent and fair arbitrator. How can we expected to do that if we’re also considered an attorney representing the same government as one of the parties that appears before us?”

The current executive control over the judges has other repercussions as well. Recently, facing a wave of political pressure, the Obama Administration ordered the courts to move the cases of the newly arrived Central American children to the front of the docket—bypassing hundreds of thousands of people who have waited years for a hearing.

“This should not be an amusement park where you can ‘fast pass’ proceedings,” said Slavin, adding that US and international law recognizes that “children are different,” and should thus be given more time to find lawyers and prepare their cases.

She cited other conflicts of interest, including rules that bar her from holding government attorneys in contempt, though she and other judges are free to declare private attorneys representing migrants in contempt.

Because these changes would require an act of Congress and a lot of money, the judges conceded that chances are slim in the current political environment. They’re currently talking to lawmakers and their staff, and are hoping someone will step forward soon to champion these reforms.

Republicans [white party] Threaten to Shut Down Government If Obama Extends Relief to Immigrants [non-whites]

Rep. Steve King (R-IA) floated the possibility of shutting down the government on Wednesday if President Obama issues an executive action granting deportation relief to more undocumented immigrants. King’s comments come just one day after Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) suggested that Republicans in the Senate use “funding mechanisms to address this issue.”

“If the president wields his pen and commits that unconstitutional act to legalize millions, I think that becomes something that is nearly political nuclear,” King said in remarks before the Westside Conservative Breakfast Club in Urbandale, Iowa, adding that “all bets are off” on passing a measure to keep the government running past October.

“I think the public would be mobilized and galvanized and that changes the dynamic of any continuing resolution and how we might deal with that,” he added.

ThinkProgress

Congress will have just 10 working days to pass a continuing resolution after it returns from summer vacation on September 8. Several Republicans have already threatened to hold up the measure over renewal of the Export-Import Bank and the administration’s proposed environmental regulations, though no party leaders have yet endorsed using must-pass legislation to prevent the administration’s forthcoming immigration action.

Speaking to Breitbart, Rubio said he would be “interested to see what kinds of ideas my colleagues have about using funding mechanisms to address this issue.”

Earlier this month, Sen. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) told a Politico reporter that Republicans would strong arm President Obama into adopting a host of Republican policy priorities, from repealing the Affordable Care Act to undoing environmental regulations, but did not specifically mention immigration.

In the House, Republicans approved a bill that would end the Obama administration’s Deferred Actions for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA), which has allowed young immigrants to obtain work permits and remain in the country. The measure would also prohibit the president from extending the program to other undocumented people. House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) did not say if he plans to attach the measure to the continuing resolution.

On Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest called King’s latest threat, “a real shame.” The government shutdown that ended last October took $24 billion out of the U.S. economy, according to a Standard & Poor’s estimate, and a loss of 120,000 new jobs by the White House’s estimate.

No Ice Bucket Challenge for Poor Black People in Detroit - Water Shut Offs are in Effect

Newser

Water shutoffs that sparked protests in Detroit have started again following a month's respite, the AP reports. Some 420 city customers were due to lose their water supply yesterday in a city where almost 45% of 173,000 residential water accounts are past due. Following appeals to the UN, experts have suggested that the shutoffs may violate human rights, the AP notes. Now, Detroit is dropping fees for water restoration and late payments; it's also allowing residents to enter payment plans by putting forward 10%—rather than the previously-required 30%—of money owed.

"The new system seems to be working very well," [for who?] says a rep for Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan. Some 25,000 are now on payment plans, per the city, compared to 17,000 a month back, the Los Angeles Times reports. Yet thousands still appear unable to pay their bills, the paper notes; some 38% of people in the city are living below the poverty line. One resident describes spending about three hours in line each time during several visits to the water department to try and figure out why her bill is so high. "If I had the money right now, I would leave Detroit," she says.