New Oral Polio Vaccine Created by The Pathocracy [Bill Gates, WHO] Paralyzing Black Children in the Congo and Burundi

/

From [HERE] Experts have long understood that a new polio vaccine developed to try to minimize the risks associated with the oral polio vaccine made by Albert Sabin might also cause the problem it was created to sidestep. It’s now clear that theoretical risk is a real one.

The Global Polio Eradication Initiative announced Thursday that six children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and one in Burundi have been paralyzed by viruses from the new vaccine, which is referred to as novel oral polio vaccine, or nOPV2. (The “2” signals the vaccine targets type 2 polioviruses.) In addition, five environmental samples collected from Burundi contained the so-called type 2 circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses, or cVDPV2s.

“We are disappointed,” said Ananda Bandyopadhyay, deputy director for technology, research, and analytics on the polio team of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a partner in the polio eradication effort. “Any such outbreak is disappointing.”

The Gates Foundation is one of a half-dozen partners in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. The others include the World Health Organization; UNICEF, the United Nations Children’s Fund; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Gavi, the vaccine alliance; and the service club Rotary International. [MORE]

Strict Safety Standards for Cough Syrup, but Deadly mRNA Shots Get a Free Pass

/

From [HERE] The Telegraph recently reported that the public have been told to stop taking cough and cold medicines over safety fears concerning the drug, pholcodine, an opioid cough suppressant. 

Twenty of the common cough and cold medicines, including Day and Night Nurse capsules, have been urgently withdrawn from the market on the order of the drug regulators because of concerns about a “very rare” risk of anaphylaxis, a life-threatening adverse event. 

The ‘Class 2 Medicines Recall’ announcement taken from the UK government’s website, is shown below. 

When it comes to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, the regulatory double standards have never been so glaringly obvious. 

Anaphylaxis was identified as an important risk by the European Medicines Agency, as early as December 2020, in the EMA’s CHMP (Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use) assessment report on the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, seen below. [MORE]

Genocide Continues: Despite Documented Dangers, No Benefit and No Emergency, USDA Grants Emergency Use for 4th Experimental COVID Shot for Infants and Kids Under 5. No Liability for Injury or Death

/

“The federal government has given complete immunity to Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J for any injury caused by their Covid-19 vaccines.  That’s right: you cannot sue them if you are injured by their Covid-19 vaccine.  (See Note 1 to read the law yourself.)  So, while their product may not give you immunity, Pfizer and Moderna are guaranteed immunity.  Said immunity also shields doctors, hospitals and any other persons who administer or coerce people to take deadly COVID injections.

And it gets even worse.  These companies are even immune for – hold your breath – willful misconduct.  That may sound crazy, but it is shockingly true.  You can only sue them for willful misconduct if the federal government first sues them for such conduct.  (See Note 2 below to read the law yourself.)  And what are the odds the federal government will do so after wildly promoting the vaccine?  About as likely as the FDA ever admitting they promoted a vaccine that caused widespread harm.” [MORE]

From [HERE] Infants and children 6 months through age 4 who received the three-dose primary series of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine are now eligible for a fourth dose — Pfizer’s bivalent booster shot.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Tuesday amended the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of Pfizer bivalent COVID-19 booster vaccine for the younger age group, but only for those children who received the three-dose series before the FDA authorized Pfizer’s bivalent Omicron booster as the third shot in the primary series.

Under the amended authorization, children can receive their fourth shot two months after completing the three-dose primary series.

Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said the authorization gave parents the opportunity to “update their children’s protection.”

But critics including Peter McCullough, M.D., MPH, an internist and cardiologist, said the shots pose long-term safety concerns for children.

“I am greatly concerned about the long-term safety of accumulating novel mRNA and Wuhan spike protein in previously healthy children,” McCullough told The Defender. “Continued shots are not natural and cannot make their bodies healthier.”

Mary Holland, president and general counsel of Children’s Health Defense said:

“If one ever needed proof of which side the FDA is on, Pharma’s or the people’s, one need look no further than its authorization of a fourth COVID shot for children under 5.

“With knowledge that these shots don’t work and that they can cause severe harm, including death, this decision is simply obscene.”

Dr. Michelle Perro, a pediatrician with more than 40 years of experience in acute and integrative medicine, told The Defender, “Medical logic and reason have taken a back seat to an unfathomable policy based on fiction.”

Perro added:

“With the steady stream of information now available on VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] and other global vaccine reporting systems, the harm caused to children from this unnecessary ‘vaccine’ is nothing short of pediacide.”

Perro pointed out that according to some researchers’ estimates, children under 18 are 51 times more likely to die from the mRNA vaccines than from COVID-19 if unvaccinated.

Perro, who said she will deliver a conference lecture in April on how to help children who have been harmed by the COVID-19 vaccines, said:

“The time is now for parents to do what’s best for their children and refuse this experimental technology.”

New clinical trial had ‘no published results’

The agency said it based its decision to authorize the fourth shot on previous analyses of earlier Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine efficacy data and on new clinical trial data from 60 children ages 6 months through 4 who, after completing the three-dose primary vaccination and receiving the booster shot, “demonstrated an immune response” to both the original COVID-19 virus strain and the Omicron subvariants.

The new clinical trial “had no published results” but was presented to the FDA in a Jan. 26 meeting slide show, said blogger Igor Chudov.

According to Chudov’s analysis, the data included “the strangest count of participants.”

Slide 16 of the presentation showed there were 21 babies in the clinical trial before the fourth shot — and 23 babies after the shot, he pointed out.

“How is that even possible? And why did no one present at the FDA meeting ask questions?” Chudov asked.

Chudov pointed out that under the new authorization, the four-dose vaccination sequence could be completed within four months after starting at age 6 months.

“Therefore, a 10-month-old infant could have four mRNA Covid vaccine doses,” he said.

Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist and epidemiologist and member of the Children’s Health Defensescientific advisory committee, said the official data released by the U.K. and German governments suggest you are 20 times as likely to injure a child with an mRNA vaccine than to benefit them.

In a Substack post today, Nass said Dr. Scott Jensen, a family physician and former Minnesota State Senator, noted that the number of mRNA vaccine doses needed to vaccinate young children to prevent one hospitalization for severe illness is more than 224,000 doses.

Assuming the risk of injury due to the COVID-19 vaccine is similar for children to the overall risk the German health minister disclosed, you would have to vaccinate more than 112,000 5- to 11-year-old children with two shots and seriously injure 22 of them as a result, in order to prevent one COVID-19 hospitalization.

“Anyone who is cognizant of these data and recommends mRNA COVID vaccines for children is in my view guilty of professional malfeasance, a crime and needs to immediately be brought to justice,” said Nass.

Fauci Caught Going to Door to Door Lying to Black People About COVID Shots: Consent to Medical Experiments Obtained by Inducement, Coercion, HalfTruths, Nondisclosures, etc is Fraud, Battery or Murder

/

A newly surfaced 2021 video of Dr. Anthony Fauci going door to door with an entourage that included SNigger Muriel Bowser, the Mayor of DC has gone viral two years later. Bowser, a black rolebot in service of elite white liberals, functions as his “jungle guide” through the black neighborhood. The video shows Fauci making various misrepresentations, lies, omissions and half-truths in attempt to induce Black residents to take deadly COVID mRNA shots. Said experimental injections have no benefit and are harming and killing people globally in a slow motion extermination of humanity. In the short video most residents appear to pass the “IQ test” - that is, they reject Fauci and his rolebotic companion’s deceitful invitation to take genocidal COVID shots. Nevertheless, untold millions have been induced, coerced or tricked into taking said injections, thereby destroying their individual physical and mental integrity. [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

biocide – the attempted annihilation of all life, which is the intent of Doggy and CrimethInc. (See: Doggy & CrimethInc.)

genocide – the intentional decreasing of the people of a given population or asili, particularly in the interests of another population or value-system that wishes to control the resources of the victims. 2) the-cide-show of the World Health  Organization (WHO). Blindness to economic reality has placed mankind in a very precarious position. Our freedom and very lives depend on how (and how soon) we resolve resource misapplication and inequalities. (See: Population Control)

Family Members say Colorado HS Football Standout Markus Martinez's Massive Heart Failure Was Triggered by COVID Injections. Formerly Fit, Healthy and Strong Athlete Now Needs Heart Transplant

/

From [HERE] A local high school football star in the Denver area went from a fully healthy 17-year-old to near death due to massive heart failure with no apparent preexisting conditions that would indicate such an event even plausible. However, one intervention that did occur that no mainstream media is talking about is COVID-19 vaccination. According to Markus Martinez’s great aunt Valerie Pacheco, Markus received the jab before the incident and that is most certainly, in her opinion, the cause of this near-death experience. Now 18 years of age, Markus had to get a heart transplant in January 2023, and by February was back in Aurora Colorado hospitals for the dangers associated with blood clots. How does that happen—a totally fit, strong, award winning high school athlete goes from absolute health to the need for a new heart and massive blood clots? If great aunt Valerie Pacheco is correct, it all can be explained by the COVID-19 vaccination that occurred prior to Markus’ cardiovascular-based health crisis. Afterall, Markus fits into a category of known risk cohorts—young men with a higher probability for myocarditis, a cardiovascular condition.

Markus Martinez

The former Columbine High School football star has been in and out of hospitals as doctors earlier this year declared he would need a heart transplant—he received one during January of this year. The heart failure occurred during November of 2022.

TrialSite spoke with Markus Martinez’s great aunt, Ms. Valerie Pacheco to learn more about the incident after a review of local news coverage earlier in the year from local affiliate Fox31 Denver (KDVR).

Reporting for the local affiliate, Samantha Spitz spoke with both parents including Shelly Segura and Steven Martinez. According to his mother, his heart only functions now at 12% to 15%, meaning they realized at the time that her son would need a new heart as soon as possible. Segura was quoted, “His heart is just unfortunately too sick right now.” She continued, “We’ve all come together and have been praying for him. We’re really trying to stay positive for Markus.”

Martinez’s went on the record for the Denver area Fox News affiliate, “It’s been a little tough on him that he can’t get up, get out of bed and do his normal activities and stuff that he used to do, but he’s hanging in there.”

Markus’ brother Steven Martinez was approached by the Fox affiliate as well, stating, “I just couldn’t believe it was happening to someone so young and athletic.”

The Heart Transplant

The good news earlier this year, UTHealth University of Colorado Hospital in Aurora, was able to perform a successful heart transplant on January 26, 2023, according to his GoFundMe site.

With initially a successful procedure, conditions again worsened further burdening Markus’ health. Since the heart transplant less than two months ago Markus has been in and out of the hospital. While home in early February last month he started feeling severe pain in his chest, back, and legs.

His family took him back to the hospital where it became apparent the young man presented three blood clots, one in each lung and one in his right groin area. As reported on his Go-FundMe page, the blood clot in his right groin impacts the blood flow to the lower leg region, resulting in another surgery.

Not surprisingly, the healthcare costs have mounted, and the family faces severe financial difficulty due to the ongoing treatment.

What about the Vaccine Connection?

Not surprisingly, the Fox affiliate remained quiet about the fact that Markus not only received the COVID-19 vaccine, but that he was in the cohort of young men facing higher risk for cardiovascular safety incidents such as myocarditis. See the FDA label for the Pfizer vaccine as an example. According to the package insert:

“Postmarketing data demonstrate increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly within 7 days following the second dose.”  

Valerie Pacheco, Markus’ great aunt, spoke with TrialSite, sharing that the severe, dangerous cardiovascular event directly links to the COVID-19 vaccine administration.

Valerie said that it took a while for the family to internalize what is a truly painful reality: that this seemingly vaccine-induced severe injury has been avoided totally by all health providers involved. According to Ms. Pacheco, health providers won’t even discuss the potential of a COVID-19 vaccine injury despite the fact that the incident occurred after vaccination. TrialSite is probing to determine actual proximity. The incident has not been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, according to great aunt Pacheco.

TrialSite has reached out to Markus’ mother Ms. Segura for further discussion and will update this article should she want to come forward. TrialSite cannot be certain that this massive cardiovascular failure was caused by the vaccine, but this is certainly what family members believe.

Not Genocide but Genthanasia [a slow motion extermination]: Since Vax Rollout Death Claims Have Tripled. Media Conceals Reality that Record Numbers of People are Dropping Dead or Becoming Disabled

/

genthanasia - the non-violent weeding out of undesirables or the slow motion extermination of LARGE POPULATIONS OVER A PERIOD OF TIME THROUGH THE USE OF BIOWEAPONS, BIOCIDE, FAKE VACCINES, WATER AND FOOD POISONINGS, ETC. Benign extermination CARRIED OUT BY THE PATHOCRACY THROUGH SINGLE SOURCE MEDIA PROPAGANDA, CORPORATIONS AND GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. Subtler non-violent ethnic cleansing. [MORE]

From [HERE] This is the Afterword to Edward Dowd’s new book, “‘Cause Unknown’: The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022.”

A quick thought experiment:

Imagine that thousands of healthy young Americans died suddenly, unexpectedly, mysteriously — and then kept dying at an alarming and escalating rate. (Once upon a time), that would trigger an urgent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) inquiry to determine the cause of the deaths.

Imagine attentive and curious public health officials discover the decedents had all repeatedly ingested a new and little-understood drug. Next, the officials determine to a certainty that the drug these kids took has a clear mechanism of action for causing inflammation of the heart and other cardiac injuries in some people.

They learn that public health officials in other countries have seen the same thing and stopped recommending this same drug to young people. Next, some of the most senior and revered scientific advisors to the U.S. government publicly recommend the drug be stopped for young people.

Finally, thousands of doctors around the world sign petitions and write op-eds opposing the drug for young people. Experts from Harvard, Yale, MIT, Stanford and Oxford universities come forward to voice their concerns.

Alas, that thought experiment doesn’t require any imagination, because it’s exactly what’s occurred — except for the part about attentive and curious CDC officials rushing in to inquire. That part I had to make up.

In the pre-COVID-19 world, wouldn’t inquisitive reporters chase such a story, and wouldn’t the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pause administration of the new mystery drug until a comprehensive inquiry was complete?

And above all, wouldn’t such a drug have quickly become a leading suspect worth considering for its possible role in the deaths?

BUY NOW: Ed Dowd’s Must-Read Book — “Cause Unknown”

Somehow, those have become rhetorical questions.

But not to Edward Dowd. His pioneering exploration of these sad sudden deaths was months ahead of the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) story about a lethal conundrum facing insurance companies.

Apparently, as mass vaccination progressed in 2021, excess death claims in working-age Americans tripled. Given the temporal relationship, might there be a connection between vaccines and these deaths?

Apparently not, because the WSJ story didn’t even mention mass vaccination among the causes worth considering:

  1. Delayed medical treatment from 2020

  2. People’s fear of seeking treatment

  3. Trouble lining up appointments

  4. Drug abuse and other societal troubles

  5. People not taking care of themselves

  6. Long COVID

  7. Not-yet-known long-term effects of COVID-19

  8. People dying later “from the toll COVID has taken on their bodies”

Numbers 1, 2 and 3 are all subsets of the same concept: impact of lockdowns and fear. Numbers 6, 7 and 8 are all subsets of the same concept: the impact of COVID-19 illness.

Aside from drug abuse and trouble getting doctors’ appointments, did anything else happen in 2021 that might possibly-maybe-perhaps-call-me-crazy be worth considering?

The insurers attributed most of the 2021 excess deaths to heart and circulatory issues, neurological disorders and stroke. It’s a coincidence, apparently, that nearly all of their deceased customers had just been injected with something known to cause heart and circulatory issues, neurological disorders and stroke.

Head-scratching by insurance industry CEOs and experts interviewed for the WSJ article was understandable, because, you know, how in the world could deaths possibly be linked to some brand new, never-before-used drug that was minimally tested, maximally rushed, mass-administered, and oh yeah, and by the way, is known to cause the very medical issues their customers were dying of?

(If you have any doubt as to whether the mRNA vaccines cause cardiac problems, see Appendix Four, Page 190, for a sampling of 100 published papers on vaccine-induced cardiac injuries to young people.) [MORE]

COVID Fraud and Battery: Suit Says a Racist Suspect Georgetown Doctor Forced 2 Black Kids to Get Vaxxed w/o Mom's Consent, Prevented Kids from Leaving Clinic and Consulting w/Mom who Was Outside Door

/

From [HERE] The mother of two children who were given COVID-19 vaccines without the mother’s consent is suing the doctor who administered the vaccines.

An attorney representing NaTonya McNeil last week filed a lawsuit in Superior Court for the District of Columbia against Janine A. Rethy, M.D., M.P.H.

According to the complaint, on Sept. 2, 2022, McNeil took her two older children, ages 15 and 17, to the KIDS Mobile Medical Clinic/Ronald McDonald Care Mobile clinic, operated by Georgetown Hospital, to complete their required annual physical exam for the 2022-2023 school year.

The lawsuit alleges Rethy, director of the mobile clinic, held the children in the examination room longer than necessary for a regular check-up and vaccinated them against COVID-19 over their objections and without consulting their mother

In order to attempt to obtain the children’s consent — which they are not legally able to provide without a parent or guardian — the doctor falsely informed the children the COVID-19 vaccine was mandatory for school attendance and told them they could not lawfully decline it if they wanted to attend school.

The suit, filed by D.C. attorney Matthew Hardin, seeks damages for false imprisonment, battery and fraud.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is financing the lawsuit because, according to CHD President and General Counsel Mary Holland, “CHD couldn’t just sit still and not allow this wrong to go unpunished and not bring this to the public’s attention.”

In an exclusive conversation with The Defender, McNeil explained why she is suing the the doctor:

“I just feel like people shouldn’t be able to do whatever they want to do to other people and especially not to children. As a mother, I feel like, ‘You all just took all my rights away from me to do what you wanted to do to my kids.’

“I do want justice to be done in this case. I feel like something needs to be done. This can’t just continue to happen.”

‘I feel violated’

According to the complaint, Rethy’s stated goal is to vaccinate all children against COVID-19. The complaint quotes her statement to the press:

“Our goal is to increase vaccination rates in children here in D.C. … For more than 30 years our role has been to be in the community to help address the problem of health disparities, bringing families care where they are.

“For this particular effort, we are glad to be partnering with DC Health to provide both regular childhood vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines to all children.”

In addition to her role as director of the mobile clinic, Rethy is chief of MedStar Georgetown University Hospital’s Division of Community Pediatrics and assistant professor of pediatrics at Georgetown University School of Medicine.

McNeil said that when she took her older children to the clinic, she stayed outside the examination room to care for her infant. As soon as the children entered the doctor’s office, she called her daughter’s cellphone to let Rethy know she was just outside the door if the doctor needed to consult her for anything.

According to McNeil, the doctor did not ask or inform her about any vaccinations, and did not ask her to sign anything. At the end of the physical, Rethy came out to talk to her.

McNeil said the doctor explained her son’s asthma treatment plan, but that’s all they discussed.

As they were heading home, McNeil said she was shocked when her daughter complained that her arm hurt “pretty bad.” When McNeil asked her why it hurt, her daughter said she was given the COVID-19 shot, even though she told the doctor she didn’t want it.

When McNeil asked her why she allowed the doctor to administer the shot, her daughter said:

“When she had the needle in her hand and she was coming towards me, I backed up and I asked her what is that needle, and she said it was the COVID shot and I … told her I didn’t want it and she said, ‘Well it is mandatory, you have to get it in order to go to school.’”

Rethy allegedly administered the shot to her daughter, and then to her son. McNeil said:

“He’s 14 and he said they didn’t even ask him if he wanted it or not, but when they gave it to him, he said he thought he had to get it because his sister got it.”

According to the complaint, both children received the  Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, authorized for emergency use, and the meningococcal vaccine. Her son was also injected with TDaP.

Both children were upset and angry they had been coerced into vaccination, the complaint says.

No school mandate, despite what clinic and doctor alleged

When she got home, McNeil said she called the doctor’s office, and asked them why they vaccinated her children without her consent.

“I would have never consented to you all vaccinating my children,” she said. “I’m not vaccinated and I’m not getting vaccinated and my kids were never supposed to be vaccinated for COVID period, under no circumstances.”

She said the person on the phone said they were supposed to get them for school.

After hanging up, McNeil said she was “so irritated I even started crying” because she couldn’t believe “they put this poison” into her children’s bodies.

In July 2022, D.C. public schools imposed a vaccine mandate for schoolchildren ages 12 and up for the 2022-2023 school year. But on Aug. 26, just weeks after imposing the mandate, officials walked it back, postponing it until 2023.

That means when McNeil’s children saw the doctor, there was no school vaccine mandate in place, despite what the Rethy allegedly told the children.

The age of consent

The District of Columbia in March 2021 enacted the D.C. Minor Consent for Vaccination Amendment Act of 2020 (D.C. Minor Consent Act), allowing children 11 and older to consent to the administration of any vaccine — including COVID-19 shots — recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) — without parental knowledge or consent if the medical provider believed “the minor is capable of meeting the informed consent standard.”

The law also required healthcare personnel to provide accurate immunization records to the Department of Health and to the student’s school, but not to parents with religious exemptions.

CHD and Parental Rights Foundation filed a lawsuit seeking a court order to declare the D.C. Act unconstitutional.

A judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on March 18, 2022, granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting the D.C. mayor, Department of Health and public schools from enforcing the law.

That means at the time McNeil’s children visited the clinic, they could not legally provide consent to be vaccinated without their mother’s consent.

McNeil said:

“To do that to my little children, my innocent children. They took her rights. When she backed away from you [the doctor] and said she didn’t want it, that should have been the end of it.

“Or you [the doctor] should have called me on the phone to find out what I feel about the situation. But you [the doctor] basically told my child a lie so you [she] could do what you [she] wanted to do to my kid.”

Lawsuit Claims “Remdesivir,” the primary treatment for COVID in hospitals, Has Killed at Least 100,000 People and the USDA Knows It and Still Approves It and Provides Incentives for Its Usage

/

From [HERE] and [HERE] The antiviral drug remdesivir, brand name Veklury, is approved for use against COVID-19 despite research showing it lacks effectiveness and can cause high rates of organ failure

  • John Beaudoin is calling for a criminal investigation into remdesivir, citing data that it may have killed 100,000 people in the U.S.

  • Beaudoin received all the death certificates in Massachusetts from 2015 to 2022, finding 1,840 excess deaths from acute renal failure from January 1, 2021, to November 30, 2022, which he believes may be due to remdesivir

  • A study published in The Lancet found “no clinical benefit” from the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients

  • The U.S. government pays hospitals a 20% upcharge on the entire hospital bill when remdesivir is used

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized the experimental antiviral drug remdesivir, brand name Veklury, for emergency use against COVID-19 in May 2020.1 By October 2020, it had received full approval.2 It remains a primary treatment for COVID-19 in hospitals, despite research showing it lacks effectiveness3 and can cause high rates of organ failure.4

On Twitter, John Beaudoin is calling for a criminal investigation into the drug, citing data that it may have killed 100,000 people in the U.S. "They know," he says, "or they willfully refuse to know. Either way, it's homicide."5

Using drugs that cause organ failure, like remdesivir, isn't in the best interest of public health. The fact that U.S. health authorities have focused on this and similarly harmful drugs to the exclusion of all others, including older drugs with high rates of effectiveness and superior safety profiles, sends a very disturbing message.

Did Remdesivir Kill Thousands in Massachusetts?

Beaudoin has filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court and believes a spike in deaths from acute renal failure (ARF) in Massachusetts is due to remdesivir, which is produced by Gilead Sciences. Using a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, Beaudoin received all the death certificates in Massachusetts from 2015 to 2022.

He then graphed the FOIA data, finding 1,840 excess deaths from acute renal failure from January 1, 2021 to November 30, 2022. Beaudoin also revealed an increase in deaths from acute rental failure in every age group over 15 years old, from 2015 to 2022.6 "Thousands dead in Massachusetts ARF likely due to Remdesivir. This requires CRIMINAL investigation," he tweeted.7

Deaths, Kidney Injury Common With Remdesivir

Remdesivir use didn't become widespread until 2020. From that time until October 2021, at least 7,491 adverse drug reactions were reported to the World Health Organization's (WHO) VigiAccess, including 560 deaths, 550 serious cardiac disorders and 475 acute kidney injuries.8

For comparison, only 5,674 adverse drug reactions were reported for ivermectin from 1992 to October 13, 2021.9 Despite its strong safety profile and efficacy, ivermectin was widely vilified during the pandemic. Not to mention, remdesivir costs between $2,340 and $3,120,10 while the average treatment cost for ivermectin is $58.11 Do you think this has anything to do with remdesivir's promotion and ivermectin's vilification?

While WHO updated its guidance in April 2022 to recommend the use of remdesivir in "mild or moderate COVID-19 patients who are at high risk of hospitalization,"12 a study published in The Lancet found "no clinical benefit" from the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients.13 Further, the investigators believed three deaths during the study were related to remdesivir.14

Gilead's Political Ties Questioned as Remdesivir Use Persists

Still, the question remains why remdesivir continues to be used at all. In November 2020, WHO issued a bulletin recommending against the use of remdesivir in COVID-19 patients, stating, "There is currently no evidence that remdesivir improves survival and other outcomes in these patients."15

Is it possible that Gilead's strong political connections have influenced the government's approvals and recommendations? It's worth noting that Donald Rumsfeld was the chairman of Gilead from 1997 until he joined the Bush administration in 2001. Rumsfeld had previously served as secretary of defense under President Gerald Ford from 1975 to 1977, and again under President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2006.

FDA Even Approved Remdesivir for Children

In late April 2022, the FDA even approved remdesivir as the first and only COVID-19 treatment for children under 12, including babies as young as 28 days,16 an approval that boggles the mind, considering COVID-19 is rarely serious in children while remdesivir is ineffective and carries a risk of serious, and deadly, side effects.

What's worse, the drug is also approved for outpatient use in children, which is a first. Dr. Meryl Nass expressed her concerns about the FDA's approval of remdesivir for outpatient use in babies, stating:17

"The FDA just licensed Remdesivir for children as young as one month old. Both hospitalized children and outpatients may receive it. The drug might work in outpatients, but the vast majority of children have a very low risk of dying from COVID. If 7 deaths per 1,000 result from the drug, as … European investigators thought18 … it is possible it will harm or kill more children than it saves.

Shouldn't the FDA have waited longer to see what early outpatient treatment did for older ages? Or studied a much larger group of children? Very little has been published on children and remdesivir …

When we look at the press release issued by Gilead,19 we learn the approval was based on an open label, single arm trial in 53 children, 3 of whom died (6% of these children died); 72% had an adverse event, and 21% had a serious adverse event."

More Lawsuits Filed Against Remdesivir

Two women are suing Kaiser Permanente and Redlands Community Hospital in California for giving remdesivir to their husbands without consent. Both men died from kidney and organ failure after being administered remdesivir. "The day he was admitted on August 12 they started the remdesivir and on [August 17] is when they were done," Christina Briones told CBS News. "Five doses. [On] the 17th his kidneys started to fail."20

In California, lawsuits have been filed on behalf of at least 14 families against medical providers for prescribing remdesivir without providing necessary information about it, leading to the patients' deaths.21 Another wrongful death suit was filed in Nevada, after a patient died of kidney failure and respiratory failure a week after being given remdesivir.22

Safety Signal Revealed for Remdesivir and Kidney Failure

Meanwhile, a study published in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics in April 2021 detected a potential safety signal for remdesivir and acute renal failure:23

"The combination of the terms 'acute renal failure' and 'remdesivir' yielded a statistically significant disproportionality signal with 138 observed cases instead of the nine expected. ROR [reporting odds ratio] of ARF with remdesivir was 20-fold that of comparative drugs.

Based on ARF cases reported in VigiBase, and despite the caveats inherent to COVID-19 circumstances, we detected a statistically significant pharmacovigilance signal of nephrotoxicity associated with remdesivir, deserving a thorough qualitative assessment of all available data."

In May 2021, another pharmacovigilance analysis revealed red flags against remdesivir. "Compared with the use of chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, sarilumab, or tocilizumab, the use of remdesivir was associated with an increased reporting of kidney disorders," the study found.24 It concluded:25

"Our findings, based on postmarketing real-life data from >5000 COVID-19 patients, support that kidney disorders, almost exclusively AKI [acute kidney injury], represent a serious, early, and potentially fatal adverse drug reaction of remdesivir. These results are consistent with findings from another group. Physicians should be aware of this potential risk and perform close kidney monitoring when prescribing remdesivir."

In March 2022, yet another pharmacovigilance analysis warned of a significant association between remdesivir and acute kidney injury, especially in male patients and those over the age of 65 years. "Although causality was not confirmed," they noted, "the association between remdesivir and AKI should not be ignored, especially in the older, male COVID-19 inpatients."26

US Government Pays Hospitals to Use Remdesivir

Remdesivir was developed as an antiviral drug and tested during the Ebola breakout in 2014. The drug was found to have a very high death rate and was not pursued further. In the early months of 2020, however, the drug was entered into COVID trials.27 Those trials were also beyond disappointing.28,29,30

Not only was the drug ineffective against the infection but it also had significant and life-threatening side effects, including kidney failure and liver damage.31 Dr. Paul Marik, a pulmonary and critical care specialist and founding member of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), explained that during the pandemic the only drug he was allowed to prescribe was remdesivir.

When he refused to follow the remdesivir protocol, he was subjected to a "sham review," an unofficial but well-known process in which a "troublesome" doctor is accused of wrongdoing and basically railroaded out of practice. In the end, he was fired and reported to the National Practitioner Databank and the Board of Medicine.

The financial motivations to report doctors going against the grain run deep. According to Marik, the U.S. government pays hospitals a 20% upcharge on the entire hospital bill when remdesivir is used.32 Citizens Journal also reported that the U.S. government pays hospitals a "bonus" on the entire hospital bill if they use remdesivir.33 It described this practice as a bounty placed on your life, with payouts tied to declining health instead of recovery:34

"For remdesivir, studies show that 71% to 75% of patients suffer an adverse effect, and the drug often had to be stopped after five to 10 days because of these effects, such as kidney and liver damage, and death.

Remdesivir trials during the 2018 West African Ebola outbreak had to be discontinued because death rate exceeded 50%. Yet, in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals use to treat COVID-19, even when the COVID clinical trials of remdesivir showed similar adverse effects.

… We now see government-dictated medical care at its worst in our history since the federal government mandated these ineffective and dangerous treatments for COVID-19, and then created financial incentives for hospitals and doctors to use only those 'approved' (and paid for) approaches. Our formerly trusted medical community of hospitals and hospital-employed medical staff have effectively become 'bounty hunters' for your life."

Officials Push Expensive, Risky Treatments

In addition to remdesivir, Pfizer's Paxlovid was granted emergency use authorization to treat mild to moderate COVID-19 in December 2021.35 The drug consists of nirmatrelvir tablets — the antiviral component — and ritonavir tablets, which are intended to slow the breakdown of nirmatrelvir.36

But like remdesivir, there are many problems with Paxlovid. In this case, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a warning to health care providers and public health departments about the potential for COVID-19 rebound after Paxlovid treatment.37 Further, Pfizer stopped a large trial of Paxlovid in standard-risk patients because it didn't show significant protection against hospitalization or death in this group.38

Paxlovid costs $529 per five-day treatment39 and has cost U.S. taxpayers $5.29 billion,40 while safe and less expensive options exist. An investigation by Cornell University, posted on the University's preprint server January 20, 2022, found ivermectin outperformed 10 other drugs against COVID-19.41

Since the FDA and CDC cannot be trusted, and even physicians' hands are often tied by regulatory red tape, it's imperative to take responsibility for your own health. In the case of COVID-19, seek early treatment using an effective and safe protocol — not one that puts profits over patients.

 Sources and References

Restrictions in Free Range Prisons Tighten: Report Says Western Governments are Accelerating the Use of Non-Consensual Persuasion to Ensure Citizens Act and Speak in Ways Compatible w/Govt Narratives

/

From [HERE] Since the advent of the covid era in early 2020, Western liberal democracies have witnessed a marked acceleration in the systematic deployment of methods of non-consensual persuasion aimed at ensuring that people act and speak in ways that correspond to the dominant state-determined narrative. Throughout this period, everyone – politicians, academics, journalists, scientists and ordinary citizens – have been exposed to some combination of psychological manipulation, censorship, smearing and coercion (seehere for an overview). Disturbingly, two recent events suggest that the methods used by our government and other powerful actors to crush dissent are becoming more flagrant.

Last month, the civil liberties group Big Brother Watch published a document titled Ministry of Truth: the secret government unit spying on our speech. The report confirmed what many of us had long suspected: some of our day-to-day talk and behaviour is being covertly monitored by our own Government for any signs of deviation from their version of the ‘truth’. If the confirmation of such Orwellian activities was not alarming enough, what was arguably more striking was the scale of this state-funded enterprise. Dedicated clandestine units are embedded within a range of government departments, including: the Cabinet Office (‘Rapid Response Unit’); Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (‘Counter Disinformation Unit’); Foreign Office (‘Government Information Cell’); Home Office(‘Research, Intelligence & Communications Unit); and the Ministry of Defence (‘77th Brigade). Clearly, law-abiding citizens that say or do something that deviates from the official government line (on covid, climate change, or the war in Ukraine) risk being clocked and silenced.

Within this state-funded infrastructure to crush free speech, the activities of the ‘Counter Disinformation Unit’ (CDU) evoke particular concerns. Despite being based in the government department responsible for the processing of Freedom of Information requests, the CDU was, paradoxically, the least forthcoming with answers to transparency questions posed by Big Brother Watch. The primary aim of the CDU is to ‘monitor covid disinformation’ and to signal potentially problematic material to social media companies. The Government, via the CDU, holds “Trusted Flagger” status with social media companies while — somewhat disingenuously — claiming not to mandate platforms to remove content. This special relationship results in government concerns being more visible to platforms such as YouTube and therefore more likely to be actioned; an arm’s length mechanism for habitual state censorship.

The Big Brother Watch investigation found that the Department of Digital, Culture, Media & Sport had spent over £1 million pounds on outsourcing private companies to conduct this monitoring of social media outlets. Indeed, as described in a previous article, in summer 2021 HART itself was the victim of this dubious practice when – following an illegal hack – a commercial enterprise called ‘Logically AI’ attempted to undermine us by publicising out-of-context quotes from our informal chat logs. It was galling to discover that the UK Government was spending swathes of taxpayers’ money to monitor and smear a group of academics who were giving their time voluntarily to engage in the perfectly lawful activity of challenging some aspects of covid policy and questioning the dominant covid narrative.  

The second recent event that suggests that government methods for silencing dissent are becoming increasingly dictatorial concerns an interview Andrew Bridgen MP did with Dominique Samuels (a political commentator). The backbench Conservative, the only parliamentarian to openly express concerns about the safety of the covid vaccines, had already been suspended from the party andsmeared as being ‘antisemitic’ and part of an ‘anti-vax conspiracy’ for stating that a Jewish consultant cardiologist had told him that the vaccine rollout had been ‘the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust’. In the interview with Samuels, Bridgen reveals a couple of other consequences he has endured for daring to criticise the dominant narrative.

Bridgen – the democratically elected MP for North West Leicestershire – describes how he was contacted by the ‘welfare’ office at the Houses of Parliament and told that ‘a number of people had come to us to say that you were suicidal, Andrew’. He reassures Samuels that there is absolutely no basis to these concerns. Later in the interview Bridgen also discloses that, around January 2022 (in the aftermath of him submitting a letter of ‘no confidence’ in the serving Prime Minister, Boris Johnson), an advisor from number 10 messaged him to say ‘what do you want … back off and you can have anything you want’. Bridgen says he has taken screenshots of the pertinent messages to support his conclusion that ‘they tried to buy me’. [MORE]

10 Blatant Lies Parroted by Media About COVID to Induce Public Consent to Take Deadly, Experimental COVID Injections

/

  1. Misinformation #1: Natural immunity offers little protection compared to vaccinated immunity

  2. Misinformation #2: Masks prevent Covid transmission

  3. Misinformation #3: School closures reduce Covid transmission

  4. Misinformation #5: Young people benefit from a vaccine booster

  5. Misinformation #6: Vaccine mandates increased vaccination rates

  6. Misinformation #7: Covid originating from the Wuhan Lab is a conspiracy theory

  7. Misinformation #8: It was important to get the 2nd vaccine dose 3 or 4 weeks after the 1st dose

  8. Misinformation #8: It was important to get the 2nd vaccine dose 3 or 4 weeks after the 1st dose

  9. Misinformation #9: Data on the bivalent vaccine is “crystal clear”

  10. Misinformation #10: One in five people get long Covid

https://archive.today/2023.03.03-171938/https://nypost.com/2023/02/27/10-myths-told-by-covid-experts-now-debunked/

New Emails Show Liar Fauci Commissioned Scientific Paper to Disprove that COVID Wasn’t Made in a Lab (and that He Helped Create It)

/

From [HERE] New emails uncovered by House Republicans probing the COVID-19 pandemic reveal the deceptive nature of Dr. Anthony Fauci.  

They show he “prompted” or commissioned — and had final approval on — a scientific paper written specifically in February 2020 to disprove the theory that the virus leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China. 

Eight weeks later, Fauci stood at a White House press conference alongside President Donald Trump and cited that paper as evidence that the lab leak theory was implausible while pretending it had nothing to do with him and he did not know the authors.

“There was a study recently,” he told reporters on April 17, 2020, when asked if the virus could have come from a Chinese lab, “where a group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the sequences … in bats as they evolve and the mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human. 

“So, the paper will be available. I don’t have the authors right now, but we can make it available to you.” [MORE]

“Media is the Virus:” Government Building in Canada Plastered with Photos of People Killed and Injured by COVID Injections. Induced to Take Deadly Injections by Govt and Media Lies (genthanasia)

/

From [HERE] Watch our exclusive report of the activists plastering the CBC building on Front St. with stickers of people suspected of suffering Covid “vaccine” injuries and deaths.

Inspired by the UK’s “Media Is the Virus” protests that targeted the BBC in similar fashion, the activists hoped to share a voice for those affected while holding the CBC and other mainstream media to account for their complicity in promoting an unscientific and dangerous “safe and effective” narrative. (Bright Light News/Rumble)

Gullible Black Man Who Took 9 Deadly, Experimental COVID Injections is Now Undergoing Chemo, Trying to Stay Alive [yup, good luck mf]

/

Jim Crenshaw reports, “I guess he does not count cancer as a side effect?
He is now having or had a Cytokine Storm. What this is if you do not know is:

A cytokine storm occurs when your immune system releases too many molecules called cytokines. These molecules promote inflammation and can overstimulate the activity of other immune cells.

It is hard at work killing him. It looks like they are carving this poor dude up like a Christmas Turkey. His medical bills have lots of comma's I am sure. They cannot wait until he dies so they can list it as a covid death and really cash in.” 

"With all My Heart:" Another Canadian Puppetician Apologizes for Deadly COVID Shot Mandates [here Apologize Means ‘to Trick, to Lay the foundation for a Future Offense’ or to Reform One's Image]

/

According to FUNKTIONARY:

apologize – to lay the foundation for a future offense or affront. (See: Apologease, Forgiveness & Acceptance)

apology – a plea bargain in disguise. An apology is needed wherever there is no communion, contact or relationship; the “other” is a stranger. Explanation is needed because there is no love. Explanation is a trick to avoid conflict; apology is a device to avoid conflict. Apology is a trick—applied as an anger solvent—you need not be authentic in your apology as it is merely a social device (gesture) to detonate anger. Apologies, like excuses, are not for the benefit of the one to whom they are made, but the one who makes them. Apologizing does not always mean that you are wrong and the other person is right. It simply means that you value your relationship more than your ego. When there is no relationship and no love, both an apology and explanation is expected. When the other cannot understand, only then is apology needed. And if love cannot understand, what good is apology going to do? (See: Explanation, Rationalization, Forgretful, Forgiveness, Excuse, Promise, Regret, Rationalization, Anger, “Other” & Stranger)

biocide – the attempted annihilation of all life, which is the intent of Doggy and CrimethInc. (See: Doggy & CrimethInc.)

The Mask Mandates Did Nothing. Will Any Lessons Be Learned?

/

From [HERE] But whatever the reason, mask mandates were a fool’s errand from the start. They may have created a false sense of safety — and thus permission to resume semi-normal life. They did almost nothing to advance safety itself. The Cochrane report ought to be the final nail in this particular coffin.

There’s a final lesson. The last justification for masks is that, even if they proved to be ineffective, they seemed like a relatively low-cost, intuitively effective way of doing something against the virus in the early days of the pandemic. But “do something” is not science, and it shouldn’t have been public policy. And the people who had the courage to say as much deserved to be listened to, not treated with contempt. They may not ever get the apology they deserve, but vindication ought to be enough.