Judge Rules Against NYC’s Irrational COVID Injection Mandate, Orders City to Reinstate Terminated Cops

From [HERE] A Manhattan judge ruled against the city’s coronavirus (COVID-19) mandate as it applies to members of the city’s large police union, and ordered members of that union who were terminated or put on leave to be reinstated.

State Supreme Court Judge Lyle Frank said the mandate is invalid as a condition of employment for members of the Police Benevolent Association (PBA), which brought the suit against the city.

Union President Pat Lynch has been a vocal critic against the mandate, and is party to the lawsuit brought in February.

“This decision confirms what we have said from the start: the vaccine mandate was an improper infringement on our members’ right to make personal medical decisions in consultation with their own health care professionals,” Lynch said. “We will continue to fight to protect those rights.”

In addition to Frank’s ruling against the mandate, he ordered the city to reinstate any PBA members who had been fired or put on leave after not complying with the rule.

Staten Island Borough President Vito Fossella commended the PBA for initiating the effort.

“Our hope is that the city does not appeal this decision, and allows the police officers who were terminated to get reinstated as soon as possible, as well as all the other city employees who were wrongfully terminated,” said Fossella.

A spokesman for the Law Department said that the city filed a notice of appeal freezing the judge’s decision and pointed to previous similar cases that the city has won, including a Tuesday win in a suit brought by the Uniformed Firefighters Association.

“We are immediately appealing this ruling. It is at odds with every other court decision upholding the mandate as a condition of employment,” the spokesman said.

The city’s case qualifies the vaccine mandate as a condition of employment similar to the city employee residency requirement, but the judge ruled that the rule lacked statutory authority. [MORE]

FDA to Vax Injured: We Got Nothin’

From [HERE] Twenty people who were harmed by Covid-19 vaccines came to Washington D.C. this week—sick, bereaved, from a dozen states—seeking help from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.  

This is what they got: One hour with the top vaccine official in the United States—in a Zoom call to their hotel conference room. 

Two had lost sons, 16 and 34 years old, soon after their shots. Three were in wheelchairs, including a girl, 14. A surgeon, nurse practitioner, teacher, and most others can no longer work. Once healthy and fit, many had been eager to be vaccinated.

“They were hiding behind a monitor,” said Brianne Dressen, 41, a Utah mother of two who was incapacitated in a vaccine trial for which she enthusiastically volunteered in November 2020. “All of us, we came out here, and Peter Marks could not get out of his house and meet with us.” [MORE]

Getting Paid Off Making Bioweapon in Lab and Hyping Fake Emergency: Cloutlaw Fauci’s Net Worth Nearly Tripled during COVID Scamdemic, soaring from at least $5M in 2021 to more than $12.6M today

From [HERE] Not nearly enough has been said about Tony Fauci’s numerous covid scamdemic profit streams, which enriched him massively.

Auditors from OpenTheBooks.com received and took a look at Fauci’s FY2021 financial disclosures from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), revealing massive new profits.

From 2019 through 2021 when Operation Warp Speed was launched, Fauci’s net worth hovered around $5 million. Today, billions of “vaccines” administered later, Fauci is said to be worth at least $12.6 million.

Where, oh where, did all that new money come from? The answer is the jab contracts, mask mandates, lockdowns and other globalist fascism that enriched not only Fauci but also many of his fellow criminals. (Related: Billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates also profited handsomely from the scamdemic.)

Fauci tried to hide his FY2019 and FY2020 financial disclosures until Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) forced him to release unredacted copies of both. Following a heated exchange on the Senate floor, Marshall could be heard calling Fauci a “moron.”

“It was Fauci’s ‘code red moment’ when America’s ‘top doctor’ melted down on national television in the Senate hearing. (When Marshall cited ‘Forbes,’ that was our research on Fauci’s financials published in my then-column at Forbes.)” writes Adam Andrzejewki for OpenTheBooks.

“It’s been a dogfight to open the books on the Fauci finances. For example, our organization has filed four federal lawsuits versus NIH to open the books.” [MORE]

Not Safe or Effective. COVID Shots are the Most Dangerous "Vaccine" in History, Causing More Injuries and Deaths than All Other Vaccines Combined. COVID has a 99% Recovery Rate (the same as the flu)

From [HERE] The Covid Vaccines are the most dangerous vaccines ever created and have caused more injuries and deaths in 18 months than all other vaccines combined over 30 years for a disease that has a 99.7% recovery rate, which is the same as the flu.

​Governments, the mainstream media and social media giants Facebook, Google, Youtube and to a lesser extent Twitter have gone out of their way to censor and hide this information and some doctors are even fired from their jobs for revealing this information.

Healthy young people who have taken the covid vaccine are dropping dead, over 800 athletes have dropped dead after taking the vaccine in 18 months (Avg. per year is 69) and mainstream media try to normalise it by saying it is a mystery or it is SARS (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome).

In America one of the biggest insurance companies has said there has been a 40% increase in deaths in the 18 to 45 age group in 2021.  This age group don’t die from covid so what caused the increase in death?  The only difference is the covid vaccines got rolled out in early 2021.  The 40% increase is unheard of as it never goes above 10%.  The only time it would go anywhere near 40% for this age group is during war time such as WW2 or Vietnam.

The safe and effective narrative as spouted by government officials, the mainstream media and Big Pharma is one of the biggest lies, propaganda and deceptions ever perpetuated onto human beings.

There is plenty of evidence.

Vaccine narrative collapses as Harvard study shows jab more dangerous than COVID

 As boosters that have not been tested on humans are being rolled out across the country, a new study indicates that the jab is far more dangerous than COVID-19 itself. And the CDC has provided false information regarding their tracking of adverse events linked to the vaccines.

As government officials and mainstream media urges the vaccinated to inject a second so-called "bivalent" booster said to be targeting the Omicron variant, it turns out that this substance hasn't been tested on humans. And the only animal trial that has been performed included eight mice.

STUDY: WORSE THAN THE VIRUS
A new study conducted by scientists from Harvard and Johns Hopkins, currently in pre-print, reveals that the COVID-19 vaccines were up to 98 times worse than the virus itself. The study is critical of the booster requirement for American university students, stating in the abstract: "Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities."

​Harvard study is below.

​https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4206070

​https://www.sott.net/article/472137-Vaccine-narrative-collapses-as-Harvard-study-shows-jab-more-dangerous-than-COVID

​'Unethical' and up to 98 times worse than the disease: Top scientists publish paradigm-shifting study about COVID-19 vaccines

A team of nine experts from Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and other top universities has published paradigm-shifting research about the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines and why mandating vaccines for college students is unethical.

This 50-page study, which was published on The Social Science Research Network at the end of August, analyzed CDC and industry-sponsored data on vaccine adverse events, and concluded that mandates for COVID-19 boosters for young people may cause 18 to 98 actual serious adverse events for each COVID-19 infection-related hospitalization theoretically prevented.

https://www.sott.net/article/472034-Unethical-and-up-to-98-times-worse-than-the-disease-Top-scientists-publish-paradigm-shifting-study-about-COVID-19-vaccines

International Medical Crisis Declared Due to Unprecedented Illnesses and Deaths from Covid Vaccines

At a press conference on September 10th 2022, over 400 doctors and scientists from more than 34 countries declared an international medical crisis due to diseases and deaths associated with Covid injections. 

https://expose-news.com/2022/09/11/medical-crisis-declared-due-to-vaccine-harm/

Israeli Health Officials Covered Up Serious Safety Problems With Pfizer COVID Vaccine

A leaked video recording reveals researchers in June shared data with the Israeli Ministry of Health showing serious and long-term side effects associated with Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, but Israeli health officials told the public in an August report that serious side effects were “rare” and short-term.

​https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/israeli-health-officials-safety-problems-pfizer-covid-vaccine/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=91af1ce5-c6c1-4690-b28f-b9f0543533bb

​Gov. Documents prove Bill Gates is Primary Funder of UK Medicine Regulator despite owning major shares in Pfizer & BioNTech
An investigation has revealed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the primary funder of the UK’s Medicine & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, and the Foundation also owns major shares in both Pfizer and BioNTech.  

The Medicine & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) extended the emergency authorisation of the Pfizer / BioNTech mRNA jab in the UK to allow it to be given to children between the ages of 12 – 15 on the 4th June 2021.

https://expose-news.com/2022/09/15/bill-gates-mhra-pfizer-corruption/

NEJM study confirms that covid jabs destroy natural immunity

Within the first few months following “vaccination” for covid, a new study has found, a person’s immune system degrades to the point of developing negative immunity.

The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) published the disturbing paper, which looked at 887,193 children aged five to 11 in North Carolina, 30.8 percent (273,157) of whom received at least one dose of Pfizer’s mRNA (messenger RNA) shot between Nov. 1, 2021, and June 3, 2022.

​https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2209371

Using a form of statistical modelling that carefully adjusts for confounding factors such as underlying health conditions, scientists determined that the shots fail rather quickly post-injection and eventually eat away at immunity in a manner similar to AIDS – hence why many now refer to post-injection immune degradation as vaccine-induced AIDS, or VAIDS.

​https://www.vaccines.news/2022-09-15-nejm-study-covid-vaccines-destroy-natural-immunity.html

​Evidence of harm
A short collection of key pieces of evidence showing the COVID vaccines are not "safe and effective." Not even close. They are the most deadly vaccines we've ever produced. Here’s a high level collection of some of the most compelling pieces of evidence I’ve seen to date. This is not an exhaustive list, but just the key pieces of data that are impossible to explain if the vaccines are safe and effective.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-evidence

​Pfizer COVID Vaccine alters your DNA according to Study

A Swedish study has demonstrated and confirmed that the mRNA in the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid injections infiltrates cells and transcribes its message onto human DNA within 6 hours, altering our own DNA. 

https://expose-news.com/2022/09/22/pfizer-covid-vaccine-alters-your-dna/

​The Pfizer 6 month data shows that Pfizer's COVID-19 inoculations cause more illness than they prevent.

Plus, an overview of the Pfizer trial flaws in both design and execution.  Plus, poor trial design, missing data, underpowered studies, passive surveillance and more.

https://rumble.com/vqx3kb-the-pfizer-inoculations-do-more-harm-than-good.html

For the PDF of this presentation visit: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/the-pfizer-inoculations-for-covid-19-more-harm-than-good/

​VAERS estimate: 388,000 Americans killed by the COVID vaccines

The VAERS data, which is the official adverse event reporting system used by the US government, shows that an estimated hundreds of thousands have died and millions have been injured. If these weren’t caused by the vaccine, what caused them? Why are there more adverse events reported for these vaccines than for all other vaccines in history combined? Nobody can answer that question

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/latest-vaers-estimate-388000-americans [MORE]

State Media Continues to say "Safe and Effective" but the Fed Government’s Own Conservative, Underreported Data Show COVID Shots Have Caused at Least 1.4 Million Adverse Events including 31,000 Deaths

From [HERE] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,418,220 reports of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Sept. 16, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). That’s an increase of 10,811 adverse events over the previous week.

VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 31,074 reports of deaths — an increase of 139 over the previous week — and 258,480 serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period —  up 1,253 compared with the previous week.

There were a total of 563 reports of adverse events following the new bivalent booster COVID-19 vaccine as of Sept. 16, 2022. The data included a total of 5 deaths and 31 serious injuries.

Of the 31,074 reported deaths, 19,934 cases are attributed to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, 8,385 cases to Moderna, 2,704 cases to Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and no cases yet reported for Novavax.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 868,175 adverse events, including 14,531 deaths and 90,422 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Sept. 16, 2022.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 14,531 deaths reported as of Sept. 16, 7% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination and 15% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination.

In the U.S., 600 million COVID-19 vaccine doses had been administered as of Sept. 14, including363 million doses of Pfizer, 231 million doses of Moderna and 19 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J). [MORE]

Fact Checker Probots at “Health Feedback” Use Myth-Information to Criticize Dr Palmer/ Dr Bhakdi’s article, “Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality”

From Michael Palmer, MD and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD. On August 19, 2022, we published on this website an article [1] which summarized evidence from autopsies that demonstrated autoimmune-like inflammation in the blood vessels and tissues of patients who had died after receiving a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. In the foci of inflammation, the vaccine-induced expression of spike protein had also been demonstrated, indicating very strongly a causal chain from vaccination to vascular and organ damage and ultimately death. [MORE]

Our conclusions were disputed by Dr. Iria Carballo-Carbajal in a post on the website “Health Feedback” [2]. We here rebut Dr. Carballo-Carbajal’s more important assertions; but we will let slide some minor ones, because life is short. In the following, Dr. Carballo-Carbajal’s statements will be typeset in italics, whereas our own text will appear in upright font shape.

1. “A history of spreading misinformation”

Early on in her article Dr. Carballo-Carbajal denounces us as having “a history of spreading misinformation about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines.” In support of this statement, she merely assembles a list of links, but she makes no argument as to the facts whatsoever. Her statement therefore amounts to no more than slander.

2. Does the vaccine stay in the injection site?

If one considers the possibility of vaccine-induced damage to the organs of the body, then a crucial question is whether or not the vaccine distributes from the injection site to those organs.

In our article, we had shown data from an animal study conducted by Pfizer, which showed the rapid appearance of an intramuscularly injected model vaccine in the bloodstream and its subsequent accumulation in several organs, including the liver, the spleen, the adrenal glands, and the ovaries [3]. What our article did not say is that all of the vaccine leaves the injection site. It is indeed correct that in those rat experiments a large proportion was retained at the injection site—at least during the time period of observation, which was limited to 48 hours.

The headline of Dr. Carballo-Carbajal’s section on the subject asserts that “Only a tiny fraction of the lipid nanoparticles in COVID-19 vaccines travel through the body.”However, further down in her text she states that 52.6% are retained at one hour after the injection. What she does not mention is that already after two hours that value has dropped to below one third of the total. A problem with this entire data set, however, is that the total of all of the organs combined never adds up to 100%. Without going into too much detail, this is to be expected, given the technical difficulties of such measurements.

Not only is the exact proportion of distributed vaccine difficult to ascertain, however, but it also does not really matter. It was determined in rats, not humans, and in rats of a fairly uniform age and genetic make-up at that; and furthermore, it used a model vaccine that contained the correct lipid mixture but a different mRNA. It is illusory to base exact predictions of the distribution of the vaccine in humans on these rat data, and on this model vaccine—there is a reason why pharmacokinetics studies in humans are normally considered necessary during drug development. Distribution in humans would likely be much more variable than in these rats—injection into the highly vascularized deltoid muscle of a young athlete should result in substantially higher systemic distribution than that into the typically much less used and less perfused muscle of an elderly person.

What really matters is only this: a substantial fraction of the vaccine must be assumed to be taken up into the system, where it may give rise to spike protein expression and subsequent organ damage—and no more than this was expressed in our article. In summary, Dr. Carballo-Carbajal misrepresents both our article and the data from the Pfizer study at issue.

3. For how long is the spike protein expressed after vaccination?

Aside from the spatial distribution of the vaccine, another crucial question concerns the duration of its activity—the longer the spike protein is expressed, the more sustained and destructive the resulting autoimmune-like inflammation will be. Dr. Carballo-Carbajal’s blankly states that there is “no evidence” of long-lasting expression, and that “the idea that mRNA from COVID-19 vaccines can remain in our bodies in the long term is a common myth.”

The “common myth” is in fact supported by solid evidence. The mRNA, and the spike protein expressed from it, were demonstrated in lymph nodes near the injection site for up to 60 days after injection by Röltgen et al. [4]. Long-lasting persistence of the vaccine mRNA in skeletal muscle tissue distant from the injection site was recently reported by Magen et al. [5]. The patient in question suffered debilitating myositis (muscle inflammation). Finally, long-lasting persistence of the spike protein in the bloodstream, and therefore again long-lasting expression, was also confirmed by Bansal et al. [6]. Burkhardt’s detection of long-lasting spike protein expression by immunohistochemistry thus fits the overall picture of the available evidence, but it does extend the time horizon of persistence to up to nine months after injection.

True to form, Dr. Carballo-Carbajal addresses none of these reported findings. Instead, she focuses exclusively on one hypothetical explanation for the observed long-lasting expression, which we had proposed in our study. This explanation involved the reverse transcription of the Pfizer vaccine mRNA into DNA, which was observed in a liver cell line in vitro by Aldén et al. [7], followed by the integration of the DNA copies into the cellular genome; from such inserted copies, mRNA encoding the spike protein might then be continuously transcribed.

In her critique of our hypothesis, Dr. Carballo-Carbajal manages to present the single correct argument contained in her entire piece: she points out that Aldén et al. demonstrated the reverse transcription of the vaccine mRNA into DNA, but did not strictly show its integration into the genome. We note, however, that the LINE retrotransposons—which include LINE-1, which is far and away the most common retrotransposon in humans, and thus the one most likely to have copied the vaccine mRNA into DNA—are target-primed [8], which means that the two processes of reverse transcription and genomic insertion of the DNA are inextricably linked. Therefore, in the absence of direct evidence for or against genomic insertion, it must be considered highly likely. In any case: regardless of whether or not the DNA copies will insert into the genome, and if so, whether such inserted copies will indeed drive continued expression—the long-lasting expression of spike after vaccination as such is supported by ample evidence, all of which Dr. Carballo-Carbajal simply ignores.

4. Are Dr. Burkhardt’s findings and interpretations credible?

The autopsy findings discussed in our article were provided to us by Dr. Arne Burkhardt, an emeritus professor of pathology with extensive diagnostic experience—he has evaluated approximately 40,000 autopsies over the course of his career. He reviewed and approved the text of our article before its publication.

What arguments does Dr. Carballo-Carbajal adduce in order to discredit Dr. Burkhardt and his findings? She quotes anonymous members—how many? how senior, and with what credentials?—of the German register of COVID-19 autopsies:

The team of the German register of COVID-19 autopsies at the University Hospital RWTH Aachen … explained that the accumulation of lymphocytes was similar to “those found in many autopsy cases.” Furthermore, they said that no conclusions could be drawn from Burkhardt’s data because the criteria for selecting the cases were “unclear.”

To get the “unclear criteria for selection” out of the way: Burkhardt always clearly stated that all of the cases he reviewed were brought to his attention by the bereaved families who were seeking a second opinion, and he never extrapolated his limited case statistics to the population at large. To anyone with open eyes, those limited statistics will nevertheless be cause for grave concern.

The heart of the matter, however, are of course the pathological findings themselves. What exactly is proven by the statement that “many autopsy cases” show similar accumulations of lymphocytes? Nobody will dispute that other causes of lymphocyte infiltrations exist—such as for example autoimmune diseases or viral infections. Such diseases, however, usually have characteristic features of their own, for example the involvement of specific tissues and organs. In virus infections, one typically can find the viral antigens in the affected tissues. The detection of such viral antigens within a focus of inflammation is generally accepted as proof of causation.

And lo and behold—the same standard was applied by Burkhardt and by his his pathology colleagues, some of whom have so far not appeared in public but have very much contributed their time and expertise. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the inflamed tissues and blood vessels was demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, which is a standard method for detecting specific antigens (be they viral or cellular) in tissue sections. What is more, the absence of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein was also shown. Nucleocapsid will be present in patients who are infected with the virus, but it will be absent in the vaccinated, since the vaccine encodes only the spike protein. Thus, the presence of only spike protein implies that its expression must have been caused by vaccination. We further note that the expression of spike protein in heart muscle tissue samples from multiple vaccinated patients with myocarditis has in the meantime been verified by another team of pathologists [9]; and these authors, too, consider their demonstration proof of causation by the vaccine.

This, then, is the current state of the evidence, which Dr. Carballo-Carbajal would have to address in order to make a meaningful and relevant argument. However, she does not even pretend to address it; instead, she offers up some more stale third party commentary, such as this one from the The Federal Association of German Pathologists (Bundesverband Deutscher Pathologen):

As far as we know, the opinions presented in the video by Professor Burkhardt and Professor Lang are currently neither sufficiently supported by scientific evidence nor are they available in a format worthy of comment.

The video referred to in this quote represents the very first public statement by Burkhardt and Lang, which dates from the summer of 2021. They shared this preliminary report because of the perceived urgency, even though the crucial corroboration by immunohistochemistry was not yet available at the time. Based on their long-standing experience, Burkhardt and Lang had understood that they were looking at novel and unusual findings, which suggested a novel and unusual cause; and as we have seen, their attribution of these findings to the vaccines has in the meantime been proven correct. Burkhardt and Lang must be commended for their courage to come out with their findings as soon as they did in order to warn the public of the dangers posed by the gene-based vaccines.

5. Summary

Throughout her entire commentary, Dr. Carballo-Carbajal has avoided to substantially address the evidence presented by Dr. Burkhardt and his colleagues, as well as our interpretations of it. Her article is quite simply a hit job without any scientific merit.

References

1. Palmer, M. and Bhaki, S. (2022) Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality.

2. Carballo-Carbajal, I. (2022) Unsubstantiated claims by Michael Palmer and Sucharit Bhakdi don’t demonstrate that COVID-19 vaccines harm organs.

3. Anonymous, (2020) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine (BNT162, PF-07302048) 2.6.4 Summary statement of the pharmacokinetic study [English translation].

4. Röltgen, K. et al. (2022) Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Cell (preprint)

5. Magen, E. et al. (2022) Clinical and Molecular Characterization of a Rare Case of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Myositis. Vaccines 10 (preprint)

6. Bansal, S. et al. (2021) Cutting Edge: Circulating Exosomes with COVID Spike Protein Are Induced by BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) Vaccination prior to Development of Antibodies: A Novel Mechanism for Immune Activation by mRNA Vaccines. J. Immunol. 207:2405-2410

7. Aldén, M. et al. (2022) Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 44:1115-1126

8. Beauregard, A. et al. (2008) The take and give between retrotransposable elements and their hosts. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42:587-617

9. Baumeier, C. et al. (2022) Intramyocardial Inflammation after COVID-19 Vaccination: An Endomyocardial Biopsy-Proven Case Series. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:6940

Dr Meryl Nass: Intentional Manipulation of COVID Data and Testing Was Done to Create Fear and Acceptance of Ineffective, Dangerous Shots. The FDA Has Not Approved or Licensed a Single PCR Test

From [MERCOLA] The manipulation of data and testing during the Covid-19 pandemic was done intentionally to create fear in the population, driving them to accept the experimental Covid-19 jabs that we’re now learning are both dangerous and ineffective at stopping transmission.

In the episode of the Children’s Health Defense “Against the Wind” program below,1 Dr. Meryl Nass, a board-certified internal medicine physician with special expertise in vaccine safety and vaccine mandates, shares some astonishing figures on the blatant testing fraud that occurred — including the fact that 281 tests for Covid-19 have received emergency use authorisation (“EUA”) by the US Food and Drug Administration, but not one has received approval. This means their manufacturers have zero liability if the tests don’t work.

Covid’s Laboratory Roots

Nass summarises some prominent examples of malfeasance by Big Pharma and abuse of power of governments throughout the years, from the Vioxx scandal that killed more than 60,000 people to the opioid epidemic. But all may pale in comparison to the Covid-19 pandemic. To understand the roots of how the SARS-CoV-2 shots came to be, it’s important to understand, Nass says, that Covid-19 was born in a lab:2

Covid the illness clearly came out of a laboratory … if you’re an honest scientist there’s no question about that. Even Jeffrey Sachs, who is a Nobel Prize-winning economist and who was the leader of the Covid Recommendations Committee of The Lancet, has come out and said that it came from a lab …

Whether the disease was designed to cause harm to people or whether it was just an experiment gone awry, we don’t know. But because of this lab origin, the potential exists that certain features were actually built in deliberately to the virus that causes the disease. So, it seems to cause more autoimmunity, more clotting, more damage to the inside of blood vessels, the vascular endothelium, than other coronaviruses.

The Origins of ‘Delicious’ mRNA Covid-19 Shots

The platforms behind Covid-19 shots were already in the works well before the pandemic. They were just waiting for the opportunity to go mainstream. Covid provided that, Nass said:3

The powers that be, and I can’t identify who they are, but powers in Washington — this is probably some combination of federal, regulatory and research agencies like Tony Fauci and Francis Collins and officials at the FDA and CDC — they have been looking for new, what they call, platforms of vaccines.

They don’t want to make vaccines with eggs; it takes a long time, it’s expensive, they want something faster, and messenger RNA or DNA vaccines are another platform …

For some reason, the mRNA platform was extremely delicious for our regulators and industry. So, there were many start-ups, Moderna being one of them. Moderna’s whole reason for being is to develop messenger RNA gene therapy products either for cancer or for genetic diseases or, later, when those didn’t work out for them, they turned to vaccines.

And these companies — BioNTech is another one — have gotten huge grants from governments as well as entities like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. So, the Gates Foundation in 2019, the year before the pandemic, invested $50 million in BioNTech. And Tony Fauci has been working with the Moderna company on messenger RNA vaccines for quite a while. So, these were platforms waiting for an excuse to make a product.

Moderna, together with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”), sent mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill on December 12, 2019, before the pandemic — raising significant red flags.4

December 18, 2020 — about one year after the material transfer agreement was signed — the FDA issued emergency use authorisation for Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine for use in individuals 18 years of age and older.5 “Moderna had actually patented a sequence a few years ago that is found in SARS-CoV-2, which is another clue that it came from a lab,” Nass said.6

The PCR Testing Fiasco

Problems with testing began almost immediately after the pandemic began. In the beginning, only tests from the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention were allowed, and the tests were virtually meaningless, as asymptomatic people were plagued by false positives. Host Dr. Paul Thomas described it as an epidemic of positive test results that got translated into an epidemic of the infection.7 According to Nass:8

For the first two months of the pandemic, the CDC only offered its own test, and it knew very early on that its test didn’t work … so the SARS-CoV-2 infection spread throughout the US during January, February and early March of 2020, when CDC only allowed a few hundred people, maybe 1,000 people during that period of time, to be tested with their tests. And they all had to have a clinical picture that almost proved they had Covid.

After the whole country was really frustrated with this, FDA did two remarkable things … in the beginning of March, Stephen Hahn, the [now former] FDA commissioner, said OK, we’re going to now allow other entities — universities, labs, anybody who has developed or can develop a test for Covid — to do so, and send us the paperwork and we’ll work really fast to get it done and allow your tests to get out there.

The paperwork, however, was so complicated that it took companies a week to complete it. By then it was the middle of March 2020 and there were still only a few tests available in the entire U.S.

“So, then Stephen Hahn did something else. He said, OK, anyone who has a test for Covid, you start using it, you put it out there. You can start testing people, you’re allowed … you send us the paperwork in a few weeks.”9 At this point, testing basically turned into a free for all, with tests from China, Germany and other countries overseas coming in.

Nearly 300 EUA PCR Tests — Not One Approved

As of Nass’ latest count, the FDA has given emergency use authorisation to 281 different PCR tests for Covid-19. Not a single one has been approved or licensed.

This means, under emergency use authorisation, you can’t sue the manufacturer if your test is no good,” Nass said. “And that means FDA doesn’t have to stand by any of those authorisations … no one’s responsible. So that’s a disaster. They’ve also authorised about 50 antibody tests and other rapid tests. So we have a testing mess, and we’ve always had a testing mess.10

The CDC also created an “odd” set of case definitions for Covid-19, basically turning “a positive test into a positive diagnosis even if you didn’t have symptoms.” The case definitions, Nass said, were so complicated they required reading through several pages of information and included whether or not the person was in an area where Covid-19 was present, whether the person had had an exposure to a known Covid case and a list of symptoms that helped formulate the definition.

She continued, “Despite all that, a positive PCR test was labelled a probable case. That’s all you really needed. And then the CDC relabelled probable cases as cases. So as everybody else has noticed, that meant we had a case-endemic. We didn’t exactly have an epidemic.”11

Hospitals Paid to Diagnose Covid Cases

The number of people who actually had and/or died from Covid in the beginning of the pandemic is unknown because everybody who died “with Covid” was labelled a “Covid-caused” death. Health officials could count deaths from unrelated causes — even gunshots12 and motorcycle accidents13 — as Covid-19 deaths if the person had the virus within the last 30 days. According to Nass:14

At the beginning, the number of cases, the number of people who died with Covid … everybody who died with Covid was called a Covid-caused death, and that was again due to the CDC playing with their definitions and hand coding all of their Covid deaths and requiring doctors, even if you went into the hospital with a heart attack and then they tested you in the hospital, you wound up being labelled a Covid death.

Hospitals had every reason to go along with the questionable labels, as they earned more money if they diagnosed Covid-19 more often. They didn’t even need a positive test to do so. The end result is that the actual number of Covid-19 cases was heavily skewed and it may be impossible to sort out the real figures at this point:15

Hospitals were financially incentivised to up the number of Covid cases because they got paid more if their patients had a Covid diagnosis. And they were told by the CDC that they didn’t even need a positive test. If it looked like a Covid case, you could call it a Covid case and then up your reimbursement. So, we were all stuck with that kind of shenanigans, and it’s hard to know now who were the Covid cases and who were the Covid deaths.

This means all the numbers of Covid deaths you hear being bandied about by mainstream are major misinformation. They are nothing more than cleverly inflated statistics based on the major incentive to identify virtually every death they could as due to SARS-CoV-2. Best estimates are the number of deaths authentically due to Covid are at least half what they say they are.

US Life Expectancy Drops

The CDC released its provisional life expectancy estimates for 2021,16 which reveals life expectancy dropped from 77 years in 2020 to 76.1 years in 2021. “It was the first time life expectancy dropped two years in a row in 100 years,” NPR noted.17 The media is, of course, blaming the drop in life expectancy primarily on Covid-19,18 largely ignoring the increasingly clear dangers of the Covid-19 shots that were forced on many in the US and throughout the world.

As mentioned in the last section, the number of Covid deaths are likely half of what the inflated numbers the mainstream claims, which makes their contribution to the decrease in life expectancy essentially irrelevant. What mainstream fails to say in their misinformation coverage is that the average age of those dying of Covid were above the average life expectancy!

According to Nass, “mRNA Covid vaccines in the US, after you get a shot, for about two or three weeks, your immune system is not as strong as it was, and viruses that are in your body can come out, like the chicken pox virus … you’re also more susceptible to Covid for the first couple of weeks after a shot.”19

After about six months, most of the protection you may have gained from the shot wanes, and then, as time goes on, you get “negative immunity, which means you’re more susceptible to Covid,” she continued. “Unfortunately, now we’re seeing data … that you’re more susceptible to dying from any cause. Mortality goes up in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.”20

When it comes to products issued under emergency use authorisation, like Covid-19 shots, there’s no liability for the manufacturers or the government officials who recommended them. “There hasn’t been a single claim that has been adjudicated regarding injuries from the Covid vaccines,” Nass said.21 This is all part of the scam they have created to protect themselves.

In the US, vaccine makers already enjoy full indemnity against injuries occurring from this or any other pandemic vaccine under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act. If you’re injured, you’d have to file a compensation claim with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP),22 which is funded by US taxpayers via Congressional appropriation to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).

While similar to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), which applies to non-pandemic vaccines, the CICP is even less generous when it comes to compensation. The maximum payout you can receive — even in cases of permanent disability or death — is $250,000 per person.

However, you’d have to exhaust your private insurance policy before the CICP gives you a dime.23 The CICP also has a one-year statute of limitations, so you have to act quickly, which is also difficult since it’s unknown if long-term effects could occur more than a year later.

A Pledge to Fix the Injustice and Restore Our Values

Nass has created a pledge to restore the US and its values,24 which will roll out soon and provide a way to speak out against the injustice of vaccine mandates, propaganda and censorship that’s run rampant since March 2020. She explained:25

What we have to do is redo the emergency laws in the US, and I’ve suggested a pledge that we can ask people and candidates to take that will cause legislatures to review emergency rules.

So, when an emergency is declared, you only get it for two weeks, if you’re a governor or a secretary of health or the president, and then by the end of two weeks, the legislature or the Congress has to convene and hold hearings on whether they’re still in an emergency and whether they’ve done the right things for that emergency.

The pledge also asks for mandates to be lifted. It’s against US law to mandate experimental products and everything under EUA is an investigational, experimental product. I’m happy for anyone to be vaccinated or wear masks who wants to, but there should be no mandates for those products.

The pledge also asks to end censorship, the restriction of communication between people, the propagandising by government and private enterprises and the collusion between government and social media, as well as ban gain-of-function research, which likely contributed to the creation of SARS-CoV-2 in the first place.

“The founders paid, in blood, for the freedoms we have,” Nass said. “And we have a lot of freedoms enshrined in law, but they’ve been taken from us under the guise of a pandemic. Now we have to fight with everything we’ve got to get them back before they’re gone forever.”26

Resources:

• 1 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022

• 2 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 28:45

• 3 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 32:20

• 4 The Daily Expose June 18, 2021

• 5 U.S. FDA December 18, 2020

• 6 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 35:38

• 7 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 36:50

• 8 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 37:11

• 9 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 38:53

• 10 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 39:39

• 11 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 41:00

• 12 CBS Local December 14, 2020

• 13 FOX 35 Orlando July 16, 2020

• 14 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 41:00

• 15 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 42:31

• 16 CDC, NVSS August 2022

• 17 NPR August 31, 2022

• 18 STAT August 31, 2022

• 19 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 43:53

• 20 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 43:53

• 21 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 55:46

• 22 HRSA.gov CICP

• 23 Antraxvaccine.blogspot.com December 4, 2020

• 24 AnthraxVaccine.blogspot.com August 13, 2022

• 25 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 55:46

• 26 Children’s Health Defense, Against the Wind, August 31, 2022, 59:30

‘The Entire Plandemic was/is Primarily Based on Useless PCR Testing b/c Inflated Case Counts and Deaths are the Number 1 Tool for Fear Mongering.’ Atty Reiner Fuellmich in Documentary, “The Big Reset”

Among others in the new documentary, The Big Reset, features Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, an experienced trial lawyer licensed in Germany and California who co-founded the Corona Committee.

With the COVID-19 crisis, policies have been implemented that would seem unthinkable under normal conditions. And all this has been achieved by means of an instrument as effective as it is old: fear.

There are two laboratories in this story: one, the one in Wuhan, the other the great sociological laboratory where the social engineering of the pandemic would have been designed and programmed.

This documentary includes the testimonies of geneticists, molecular biologists, epidemiologists, biochemists, lawyers, prestigious journalists and Nobel Laureates who are contributing very different versions of the pandemic to which the media have accustomed us. [MORE]

The COVID Injection Slow Motion Extermination: Massive Spike In US Cancer Deaths, Blood Disease, Renal Failure & More

17 Year Old Active Black Girl Dies Unexpectedly & Suddenly from an Unknown Illness. What Could It Be? The Dependent Media Won't Say b/c It's Complicit in COVID Vax Genocide

According to FUNKTIONARY:

coincidence theories – the naïve belief that problems (and solutions to them) happen spontaneously, that nothing is ever foreseen, plotted, planned or conspired through collusion by the wealthy and powerful. (See: Pathocracy, Fronts, Predictive Programming, Conspiracy Theories, Laws, Technetronic Age, WARS & Council on Foreign Relations)

The Media – the Spectacle-Cabal who love freedom of the press, but abhor freedom of speech. The Media is the Fourth Estate of Government (created, owned, administered and controlled by Pathocrats). It is one of the most essential arms of “government.” They couldn’t give you their Matrix Reality without it—likewise they couldn’t keep you imprisoned in it without it. The News Anchor holds down the Ship of State at the Port of Lies. How is it that shareholders of Media conglomerates also sit as anchors and bring you their master’s views as if it could ever be objective or news? “The media’s the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” ~ Malcolm X. (See: Television, Perception, MEDIA, Senses, CON, Normal, Pathocracy, NEWS, Corporate Media, Control, COG & Pixelated People)

Healthy Woman’s Brain Inflammation Caused by Moderna COVID Injection, Authors of Case Study Conclude

From [HERE] A healthy 35-year-old woman who experienced a seizure two days after her second dose of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine was diagnosed with limbic encephalitis, a rare form of brain inflammation.

The authors of a recent case study on the patient stated:

“We believe that this episode of limbic encephalitis, which occurred quickly after COVID-19 vaccination, is an uncommon side effect of the [Moderna] vaccine.”

Limbic encephalitis is an acute condition of noninfectious inflammation of the brain that affects the limbic system.

The limbic system is a group of structures involved in processing emotion and memory. It includes the hippocampus, medial temporal lobe, cingulate cortex and frontonasal cortex.

The symptoms of limbic encephalitis include amnesia (memory loss), behavioral changes, psychiatric symptoms, seizures and a disturbed level of consciousness.

The pathophysiology (functional changes that accompany a particular syndrome or disease) of limbic encephalitis is known to be mediated (indirectly caused) by an antigen that stimulates an antibody-mediated host immune response that inadvertently targets cells in the limbic area.

There are two causes of limbic encephalitis: paraneoplastic and autoimmune.

“Paraneoplastic” means “caused by or resulting from the presence of cancer in the body but not the physical presence of cancerous tissue in the part or organ affected.”

The patient was screened for tumors, and cancer was ruled out as the cause in this patient’s case. [MORE]

In the Context of the Plandemic is it Time to Assume that Health Research and Anything Else from the Medical Industrial Complex is fraudulent until proven otherwise? yup

From [HERE] Health research is based on trust. Health professionals and journal editors reading the results of a clinical trial assume that the trial happened and that the results were honestly reported. But about 20% of the time, said Ben Mol, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at Monash Health, they would be wrong. As I’ve been concerned about research fraud for 40 years, I wasn’t that surprised as many would be by this figure, but it led me to think that the time may have come to stop assuming that research actually happened and is honestly reported, and assume that the research is fraudulent until there is some evidence to support it having happened and been honestly reported. The Cochrane Collaboration, which purveys “trusted information,” has now taken a step in that direction.

As he described in a webinar last week, Ian Roberts, professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, began to have doubts about the honest reporting of trials after a colleague asked if he knew that his systematic review showing the mannitol halved death from head injury was based on trials that had never happened. He didn’t, but he set about investigating the trials and confirmed that they hadn’t ever happened. They all had a lead author who purported to come from an institution that didn’t exist and who killed himself a few years later. The trials were all published in prestigious neurosurgery journals and had multiple co-authors. None of the co-authors had contributed patients to the trials, and some didn’t know that they were co-authors until after the trials were published. When Roberts contacted one of the journals the editor responded that “I wouldn’t trust the data.” Why, Roberts wondered, did he publish the trial? None of the trials have been retracted.

Later Roberts, who headed one of the Cochrane groups, did a systematic review of colloids versus crystalloids only to discover again that many of the trials that were included in the review could not be trusted. He is now sceptical about all systematic reviews, particularly those that are mostly reviews of multiple small trials. He compared the original idea of systematic reviews as searching for diamonds, knowledge that was available if brought together in systematic reviews; now he thinks of systematic reviewing as searching through rubbish. He proposed that small, single centre trials should be discarded, not combined in systematic reviews.

Mol, like Roberts, has conducted systematic reviews only to realise that most of the trials included either were zombie trials that were fatally flawed or were untrustworthy. What, he asked, is the scale of the problem? Although retractions are increasing, only about 0.04% of biomedical studies have been retracted, suggesting the problem is small. But the anaesthetist John Carlisle analysed 526 trials submitted to Anaesthesia and found that 73 (14%) had false data, and 43 (8%) he categorised as zombie. When he was able to examine individual patient data in 153 studies, 67 (44%) had untrustworthy data and 40 (26%) were zombie trials. Many of the trials came from the same countries (Egypt, China, India, Iran, Japan, South Korea, and Turkey), and when John Ioannidis, a professor at Stanford University, examined individual patient data from trials submitted from those countries to Anaesthesia during a year he found that many were false: 100% (7/7) in Egypt; 75% (3/ 4) in Iran; 54% (7/13) in India; 46% (22/48) in China; 40% (2/5) in Turkey; 25% (5/20) in South Korea; and 18% (2/11) in Japan. Most of the trials were zombies. Ioannidis concluded that there are hundreds of thousands of zombie trials published from those countries alone.

Others have found similar results, and Mol’s best guess is that about 20% of trials are false. Very few of these papers are retracted.

We have long known that peer review is ineffective at detecting fraud, especially if the reviewers start, as most have until now, by assuming that the research is honestly reported. I remember being part of a panel in the 1990s investigating one of Britain’s most outrageous cases of fraud, when the statistical reviewer of the study told us that he had found multiple problems with the study and only hoped that it was better done than it was reported. We asked if had ever considered that the study might be fraudulent, and he told us that he hadn’t.

We have now reached a point where those doing systematic reviews must start by assuming that a study is fraudulent until they can have some evidence to the contrary. Some supporting evidence comes from the trial having been registered and having ethics committee approval. Andrew Grey, an associate professor of medicine at the University of Auckland, and others have developed a checklist with around 40 items that can be used as a screening tool for fraud (you can view the checklist here). The REAPPRAISED checklist (Research governance, Ethics, Authorship, Plagiarism, Research conduct, Analyses and methods, Image manipulation, Statistics, Errors, Data manipulation and reporting) covers issues like “ethical oversight and funding, research productivity and investigator workload, validity of randomisation, plausibility of results and duplicate data reporting.” The checklist has been used to detect studies that have subsequently been retracted but hasn’t been through the full evaluation that you would expect for a clinical screening tool. (But I must congratulate the authors on a clever acronym: some say that dreaming up the acronym for a study is the most difficult part of the whole process.)

Roberts and others wrote about the problem of the many untrustworthy and zombie trials in The BMJ six years ago with the provocative title: “The knowledge system underpinning healthcare is not fit for purpose and must change.” They wanted the Cochrane Collaboration and anybody conducting systematic reviews to take very seriously the problem of fraud. It was perhaps coincidence, but a few weeks before the webinar the Cochrane Collaboration produced guidelines on reviewing studies where there has been a retraction, an expression of concern, or the reviewers are worried about the trustworthiness of the data.

Retractions are the easiest to deal with, but they are, as Mol said, only a tiny fraction of untrustworthy or zombie studies. An editorial in the Cochrane Library accompanying the new guidelines recognises that there is no agreement on what constitutes an untrustworthy study, screening tools are not reliable, and “Misclassification could also lead to reputational damage to authors, legal consequences, and ethical issues associated with participants having taken part in research, only for it to be discounted.” The Collaboration is being cautious but does stand to lose credibility—and income—if the world ceases to trust Cochrane Reviews because they are thought to be based on untrustworthy trials. [MORE]

Judge dismisses AstraZeneca fraud case over Covid vaccine disclosures

From [HERE] A federal judge threw out securities fraud claims against AstraZeneca over statements it made during clinical trials of its Covid-19 vaccine, saying the plaintiffs failed to identify any false information or fraudulent intent to support their case.

“Read generously, the amended complaint does not state a claim because it does not identify any statement made misleading by any alleged omission,” concluded U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken in New York. 

The ruling was a loss for lawyers at Robbins Geller and Vanoverbeke Michaud, who hoped to assemble a class action with Monroe County, Mich., as lead plaintiff. 

During Operation Warp Speed, the federal government offered AstraZeneca as much as $1.2 billion for 300 million doses of its experimental vaccine, although the company said it would manufacture the drug at no profit during the epidemic and only hope to make money on the technology later. [MORE]

Petition for Grand Jury says 86% of COVID Deaths Weren’t Caused by COVID; Fed Authorities “Hyperinflated” Deaths/Cases/Hospitalizations by Changing Death Certificate Rules and Incentivizing Hospitals

PLANDEMIC. From [HERE] A petition for a grand jury filed in a federal court in Oregon by 2 Oregon state senators and a doctor claims federal authorities defrauded taxpayers over 3 trillion dollars and caused various harms by “hyperinflating” the number of COVID deaths, cases and hospitalizations. The suit seeks to empanel a citizens federal grand jury to indict federal authorities from the Trump and Biden administrations.

The petition was filed on March 7, 2022. The government filed a motion to dismiss on August 28, 2022 and petitioners filed their response on September 12, 2022.

The grand jury petition names the following defendants: Rochelle Walensky (CDC Director), Xavier Becerra (HHS Secretary), Brian Moyer (NVSS Director), Alex Azar (former HHS Secretary), and Robert Redfield (former CDC Director).

The petitioners are Dr. Henry Ealy, Senator Dennis Lithicum and Senator Kim Thatcher.

Court filings explain that “Respondents altered the instructions for the completion of death certificates without going through a lawful process with mandatory public comment and federal oversight. This change caused COVID-19 to be identified as the cause of death when the actual cause of death was from a pre-existing comorbidity. The result was that 88.6% to 94.0% of deaths reported as COVID-19 were not, in fact, caused solely by COVID-19.” Supporting documentation to the filing estimates that the actual death count from COVID-19 is 54,000 people not 890,000.

The petition also documents various ways the federal government manipulated case counts with useless PCR testing and manipulating guidelines. According to the petition, under manipulated guidelines “a single cough of undetermined origin [is] sufficient to diagnose a patient as COVID-19 positive. Even without confirmatory symptoms or lab testing, a patient with a single cough can be included in data collection such as for cases, hospitalizations, and even as a COVID death….”

The petitioner’s response motion states;

“Respondents illegally created a system of diagnosis that inflated the number of COVID-19 cases that counted as unique “new” cases, multiple positive tests from same person. Respondents simultaneously proscribed the PCR test for diagnosis with fundamental defects that resulted in high rates of false positive results were additionally counted as unique “new” cases.

Further, Respondents created financial incentives for medical facilities inflate the number of COVID cases, hospitalizations, and deaths.

Federal data collection is subject to exacting controls for accurate data collection, analyses and publication. Respondents flouted these rules to create a system that inaccurately inflated COVID cases, hospitalizations, and deaths. These intentional acts of data fraud were used to panic the public into going along with unprecedented government seizure of power via emergency declarations based upon the fraudulently inflated data.”

Specifically, the petition explains the following;

Summary of Facts

The Petitioners allege that the Defendants violated federal law with respect to data integrity for COVID-19. The Petitioners allege that the Defendants failed to ensure, and/or willfully manipulated data being collected, analyzed, and published.

The Petitioners allege the Defendants’ violation of federal law led to a significant hyperinflation of COVID-19 case, hospitalization, and death counts, which was subsequently used to defraud the US Taxpayer out of at least $3.5 Trillion dollars in misappropriation of public funds between 2020 to 2022. For comparison, the US federal government typically allocates a maximum of $25.3 Billion annually in response to infectious disease with similar hospitalization and death rates. (Please refer to Exhibit M for detail and citations of COVID economic impact).

The Petitioners further allege that the Defendants:

• utilized the Medicare/Medicaid insurance reimbursement systems to

  financially incentivize compliance by hospital administrators, medical

  insurance billing specialists, and medical professionals

• that the publication of inaccurate data constitutes willful misconduct by public officials to intentionally defraud the American people and misappropriate US Taxpayer dollars, and

• that the actions of the Defendants constitute fraud, reckless and negligent misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty and public trust.
  

Public officials have the implicit duty to tell the truth, and that duty is only more magnified during a time of crisis.

Violation of Federal Laws

The Defendants Redfield, Azar and subordinates, without notification to the Federal Register or initiating oversight and public comment, as required by the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”) and Paperwork Reduction Act (“PRA”), unilaterally changed how data was defined, collected, analyzed, and published exclusively for COVID. In doing so, the Defendants compromised the accuracy and integrity of all COVID data including cases, hospitalizations, and deaths leading to significant hyperinflation of all COVID data in clear violation of the Information Quality Act (“IQA”). (Please refer to Section 1 below for detail)

Acts of Criminal and Willful Misconduct

The Defendants Redfield, Azar, Moyer, and subordinates allegedly committed acts of willful misconduct by instructing medical professionals to emphasize COVID as the primary cause of death and simultaneously deemphasize comorbidities and other relevant causes of death data beginning on March 24, 2020, and again in April 2020. Further, the HHS financially incentivized hospitals to comply with the CDC’s and NVSS’s instruction by offering a greater financial reimbursement to hospitals for patients with Medicare/Medicaid health insurance coverage. According to the HHS, from April through July 2020, Medicare/Medicaid patients made up 274,000 of the 294,770 patients hospitalized due to COVID when compared against the CDC’s COVID-Net hospitalization database.14,15 With an estimated 92.9% of COVID hospitalizations in the age 50 and older demographic relying on Medicare/Medicaid for coverage, this makes accurate diagnosis essential for recovery and insurance reimbursement. Additionally, decisions to provide significant bonus compensation to hospitals appears to be an attempt to coerce hospitals into compliance and participation in the for-profit insurance fraud scheme authored by the HHS, CDC, and NVSS. (Please refer to Section 1 below for detail)

Communication of Fraudulent Data that Adversely Influenced and Continues to Influence Public Health Policy at National, State, & County Levels

The HHS, CDC and NVSS significantly hyperinflated COVID data which has had a demonstrably harmful impact upon citizens in each state. National, state, and county COVID public health policies have been based on published CDC COVID data and the complicity of state level public health directors, who by and large failed in their duty to ensure that requests made by the CDC and NVSS for COVID data collection would not lead to significantly inaccurate case, hospitalization, and death data. The root cause of the COVID plague that has gripped this country for more than two years can be best understood in how data has been illegally manipulated by the Defendants, now spanning two administrations. A lie told for years is no less a lie, even if that lie has been unfortunately accepted as truth. Defendants Walensky, Becerra, and Moyer have elected to continue to collect and publish fraudulent COVID data based upon the illegal practices of their predecessors Defendants Redfield and Azar. Additionally, Defendants Walensky and Becerra, in an effort to coverup the failures of the experimental COVID inoculations to prevent infection, intentionally terminated all publication of surveillance data for ‘vaccine breakthrough’ (aka ‘vaccine failure’) on October 30, 2021, one month prior to the beginning of exponential rises in ‘vaccine breakthrough’ cases, hospitalizations, and deaths nationwide. ‘Vaccine breakthrough’ occurs when a ‘fully vaccinated’ person contracts COVID despite being ‘fully vaccinated’. This is key data used to assess the efficacy of the experimental COVID inoculations. In the place of real numbers of confirmed ‘vaccine breakthrough’ cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, Defendants Walensky and Becerra have promoted a new fraudulent metric termed ‘vaccine efficacy’ that groups partially vaccinated individuals with unvaccinated individuals and refers to the group collectively and misleadingly as ‘unvaccinated’, which again constitutes data fraud. That the COVID data being published has been defined and collected in violation of federal law and that a new administration has continued to perpetuate these violations, we allege this constitutes acts of willful misconduct that has harmed millions of citizens across our great nation physically, emotionally, and economically.

The image above displays 5 columns of COVID data published through February 6, 2022.

Looking left to right, column one displays that COVID death count published by the CDC. This is the total number of deaths published using the March 24th, 2020 COVID Alert No. 2.

The 2nd column displays a projected value assuming that soft audits of all death certificates would be similar to what occurred in Santa Clara & Alameda Counties and produce a 25% reduction in death counts.

The middle column displays the projected maximum reduction in death counts if a full audit of all records was based upon the 2003 death certificate reporting handbooks published by the CDC and still in use for all causes of death except COVID. It is important to note that the CDC states as of February 6, 2022 that, “For over 5% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death.” This statement has remained unchanged since at least July 2021.

The 4th column is the total number of deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) as of February 4, 2022.

The 5th column is the estimated number of actual deaths based upon the case filing filed by attorney Tom Renz in the US District Court of Alabama on July 19, 2021, which asserts under penalty of perjury that data being reported to VAERS is significantly under reported by a factor of 5 at the very minimum.

Collectively, this graphic contends that a full audit of all COVID death certificates could reveal that more people have died in connection with the experimental COVID inoculations than due to complications from the SARS-CoV-2 infection had federal laws not been violated, hyper-inflating COVID data published by the CDC. [MORE]

Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases

From [HERE] The Department of Justice announced today that the Chair of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department and two Chinese nationals have been charged in connection with aiding the People’s Republic of China.  

Dr. Charles Lieber, 60, Chair of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University, was arrested this morning and charged by criminal complaint with one count of making a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement. 

Yanqing Ye, 29, a Chinese national, was charged in an indictment today with one count each of visa fraud, making false statements, acting as an agent of a foreign government and conspiracy. Ye is currently in China. 

Zaosong Zheng, 30, a Chinese national, was arrested on Dec. 10, 2019, at Boston’s Logan International Airport and charged by criminal complaint with attempting to smuggle 21 vials of biological research to China.  On Jan. 21, 2020, Zheng was indicted on one count of smuggling goods from the United States and one count of making false, fictitious or fraudulent statements.  He has been detained since Dec. 30, 2019.

Dr. Charles Lieber

According to court documents, since 2008, Dr. Lieber who has served as the Principal Investigator of the Lieber Research Group at Harvard University, which specialized in the area of nanoscience, has received more than $15,000,000 in grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Defense (DOD).  These grants require the disclosure of significant foreign financial conflicts of interest, including financial support from foreign governments or foreign entities. Unbeknownst to Harvard University beginning in 2011, Lieber became a “Strategic Scientist” at Wuhan University of Technology (WUT) in China and was a contractual participant in China’s Thousand Talents Plan from in or about 2012 to 2017.  China’s Thousand Talents Plan is one of the most prominent Chinese Talent recruit plans that are designed to attract, recruit, and cultivate high-level scientific talent in furtherance of China’s scientific development, economic prosperity and national security.  These talent programs seek to lure Chinese overseas talent and foreign experts to bring their knowledge and experience to China and reward individuals for stealing proprietary information.  Under the terms of Lieber’s three-year Thousand Talents contract, WUT paid Lieber $50,000 USD per month, living expenses of up to 1,000,000 Chinese Yuan (approximately $158,000 USD at the time) and awarded him more than $1.5 million to establish a research lab at WUT.  In return, Lieber was obligated to work for WUT “not less than nine months a year” by “declaring international cooperation projects, cultivating young teachers and Ph.D. students, organizing international conference[s], applying for patents and publishing articles in the name of” WUT.

The complaint alleges that in 2018 and 2019, Lieber lied about his involvement in the Thousand Talents Plan and affiliation with WUT.  On or about, April 24, 2018, during an interview with investigators, Lieber stated that he was never asked to participate in the Thousand Talents Program, but he “wasn’t sure” how China categorized him.  In November 2018, NIH inquired of Harvard whether Lieber had failed to disclose his then-suspected relationship with WUT and China’s Thousand Talents Plan.  Lieber caused Harvard to falsely tell NIH that Lieber “had no formal association with WUT” after 2012, that “WUT continued to falsely exaggerate” his involvement with WUT in subsequent years, and that Lieber “is not and has never been a participant in” China’s Thousand Talents Plan. 

Yanqing Ye

According to the indictment, Ye is a Lieutenant of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the armed forces of the People’s Republic of China and member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).  On her J-1 visa application, Ye falsely identified herself as a “student” and lied about her ongoing military service at the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT), a top military academy directed by the CCP.  It is further alleged that while studying at Boston University’s (BU) Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering from October 2017 to April 2019, Ye continued to work as a PLA Lieutenant completing numerous assignments from PLA officers such as conducting research, assessing U.S. military websites and sending U.S. documents and information to China.

According to court documents, on April 20, 2019, federal officers interviewed Ye at Boston’s Logan International Airport. During the interview, it is alleged that Ye falsely claimed that she had minimal contact with two NUDT professors who were high-ranking PLA officers.  However, a search of Ye’s electronic devices demonstrated that at the direction of one NUDT professor, who was a PLA Colonel, Ye had accessed U.S. military websites, researched U.S. military projects and compiled information for the PLA on two U.S. scientists with expertise in robotics and computer science.  Furthermore, a review of a WeChat conversation revealed that Ye and the other PLA official from NUDT were collaborating on a research paper about a risk assessment model designed to decipher data for military applications.  During the interview, Ye admitted that she held the rank of Lieutenant in the PLA and admitted she was a member of the CCP.

Zaosong Zheng

In August 2018, Zheng entered the United States on a J-1 visa and conducted cancer-cell research at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston from Sept. 4, 2018, to Dec. 9, 2019. It is alleged that on Dec. 9, 2019, Zheng stole 21 vials of biological research and attempted to smuggle them out of the United States aboard a flight destined for China.  Federal officers at Logan Airport discovered the vials hidden in a sock inside one of Zheng’s bags, and not properly packaged.  It is alleged that initially, Zheng lied to officers about the contents of his luggage, but later admitted he had stolen the vials from a lab at Beth Israel.  Zheng stated that he intended to bring the vials to China to use them to conduct research in his own laboratory and publish the results under his own name.

The charge of making false, fictitious and fraudulent statements provides for a sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.  The charge of visa fraud provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.  The charge of acting as an agent of a foreign government provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. The charge of conspiracy provides for a sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.  The charge of smuggling goods from the United States provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.  Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers, United States Attorney Andrew E. Lelling; Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Boston Field Division Joseph R. Bonavolonta; Michael Denning, Director of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Boston Field Office; Leigh-Alistair Barzey, Special Agent in Charge of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Northeast Field Office; Philip Coyne, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General; and William Higgins, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Export Enforcement, Boston Field Office made the announcement. Assistant U.S. Attorneys B. Stephanie Siegmann, Jason Casey and Benjamin Tolkoff of Lelling’s National Security Unit are prosecuting these cases with the assistance of trial attorneys William Mackie and David Aaron at the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section.

The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

These case are part of the Department of Justice’s China Initiative, which reflects the strategic priority of countering Chinese national security threats and reinforces the President’s overall national security strategy. In addition to identifying and prosecuting those engaged in trade secret theft, hacking and economic espionage, the initiative will increase efforts to protect our critical infrastructure against external threats including foreign direct investment, supply chain threats and the foreign agents seeking to influence the American public and policymakers without proper registration.

UK Government Documents Prove Bill Gates is Primary Funder of UK Medicine Regulator Despite Owning Major Shares in Pfizer & BioNTech

From [HERE] An investigation has revealed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the primary funder of the UK’s Medicine & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, and the Foundation also owns major shares in both Pfizer and BioNTech.

The Medicine & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) extended the emergency authorisation of the Pfizer / BioNTech mRNA jab in the UK to allow it to be given to children between the ages of 12 – 15 on the 4th June 2021.

At the time, the Chief Executive of the MHRA, Dr June Raine said the MHRA had “carefully reviewed clinical trial data in children aged 12 to 15 years and have concluded that the Pfizer vaccine is safe and effective in this age group and that the benefits outweigh any risk”.

We are left wondering if Dr June Raine and the MHRA have even read the results of the extremely short and small study. If they have then they would have seen that 86% of children in the study suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely serious.

Just 1,127 children took part in the trial, however, only 1,097 children completed the trial, with 30 of them not participating after being given the first dose of the Pfizer jab. The results do not state why the 30 children did not go on to complete the trial.

The information is publicly available and contained within an FDA fact sheet which can be viewed here (see page 25, table 5 on-wards).

There was never any doubt that the MHRA would give emergency authorisation for the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine to be used in children when you consider that a certain Mr Bill Gates owns shares in both Pfizer and BioNTech and is the primary funder of the MHRA. [MORE]

[in The Spectacle (a constructed reality) elites pretend that over 1 Million People Injured by COVID Shots Don't Exist] Fakebook and BBC Shut Down "Vaccine" Injured Groups by Labelling Them "Anti-Vax"

From [HERE] A major media member of the Trusted News Initiative (TNI) has warned a primary tech member about vaccine injury groups gaming the system to avoid algorithm detection and thus scrutiny. In what could be described as a dangerous move, the BBC collaborates with Facebook to shut down vaccine injury support groups by universally referring to them as “anti-vaccine” or “anti-vaxxers” and calling out the ways that they use carrot emojis to hide from Facebook their true identity. Members of the TNI are collaborating to purge social media participants that are part of vaccine-injured groups. Even if some of them, or even many of them, are in fact vaccine injured, the policies of the BBC and Facebook, as well as other media and social tech companies assume that there are absolutely no vaccine-injured persons and that such persons have no rights whatsoever to share their stories. 

The BBC reports that a number of purported vaccine injury groups involving hundreds if not thousands of members used the emoji in place of the word “vaccine” in a bid to avoid Facebook algorithms.

The BBC reports that “several groups, one with hundreds of thousands of members, in which the emoji appears in place of the word ‘vaccine.’” The BBC’s Zoe Kleinman wrote that Facebook parent company Meta was alerted, and the groups were removed.

According to a statement from Facebook:

“We have removed this group for violating our harmful misinformation policies and will review any other similar content in line with this policy. We continue to work closely with public health experts and the UK government to further tackle Covid vaccine misinformation.”

Yet the BBC’s Kleinman reports that the groups are back even though they were taken down from Facebook.  According to Kleinman, the groups the BBC and Facebook label as anti-vax groups sought to rebrand themselves as places where people can share vaccine stories, for example sharing “banter, bets and funny video.”

But behind the scenes, the groups were using code words for communication purposes. For example, “Do not use the c word, v word or b word ever” (covid, vaccine booster). The particular group has 250,000 members.

Marc Owen-Jones, a misinformation specialist at Hamad Bin Khalifa University in Qatar,shared that instead of using words such as “Covid-19” or “Vaccine,” the group was instructed to use emojis of carrots as an example apparently to evade the fake news detection algorithms reports Ms. Kleinman.

In the BBC piece, it’s identified that an Online Safety Bill could come into law which would lead to “steep penalties for failing to identify removing harmful material on their platforms.”

What if there are actually vaccine-injured persons? Currently, the BBC doesn’t recognize that there are actually adverse events and some deaths, albeit rare, that occur with the COVID-19 vaccines. In fact, even at a rare rate of one-tenth of one percent hundreds, this would translate into hundreds of thousands of vaccines injured in the United States alone.

TrialSite has been chronicling dozens of deaths from COVID-19 vaccines involving governments making compensatory payouts. Is it not allowed by the Trusted News Initiative to speak the truth about this situation? In the United States, over 224 million people have received at least a primary series vaccine in the USA. Estimates of vaccine injury in the USA vary from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands and possibly even over one million. [MORE]

Study by Top Scientists says COVID Shots are Unethical and up to 98X Worse than COVID: Mandated Injections Cause Injury w/No Legal Remedy and Infringe on Freedom of Association and Occupational Choice

From [HERE] Reported by The Epoch Times, a 50-page study, co-authored by: 

1. Dr. Stefan Baral, an epidemiology professor at Johns Hopkins University; 

2. surgeon Martin Adel Makary, M.D., a professor at Johns Hopkins University; 

3. Dr. Vinayak Prasad, a haematologist-oncologist professor at UCSF; 

4. Salmaan Keshavjee, M.D., Ph.D., current Director of the Harvard Medical School Center for Global Health Delivery, and professor of Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School; 

concludes that mandates for COVID-19 boosters for young people may cause up to 98 actual serious adverse events for each COVID-19 infection-related hospitalization theoretically prevented.

The authors provide five reasons why the “vaccines” are unethical and should not be mandated:

1) Lack of policymaking transparency. The scientists pointed out that no formal and scientifically rigorous risk-benefit analysis of whether boosters are helpful in preventing severe infections and hospitalizations exists for young adults.

2) Expected harm. A look at the currently available data shows that mandates will result in what the authors call a “net expected harm” to young people. This expected harm will exceed the potential benefit from the boosters.

3) Lack of efficacy. The vaccines have not effectively prevented transmission of COVID-19. Given how poorly they work—the authors call this “modest and transient effectiveness” — the expected harms caused by the boosters likely outweigh any benefits to public health.

4) No recourse for vaccine-injured young adults. Forcing vaccination as a prerequisite to attend college is especially problematic because young people injured by these vaccines will likely not be able to receive compensation for these injuries.

5) Harm to society. Mandates, the authors insisted, ostracize unvaccinated young adults, excluding them from education and university employment opportunities. Coerced vaccination entails “major infringements to free choice of occupation and freedom of association,” the scientists wrote, especially when “mandates are not supported by compelling public health justification.”