“No Justice, Just a Piece.” Coin-Operated Token Kamala is Owned by Big Pharma and Big Aborticide and Paid to Do Whatever Elites Say, While Providing Nothing of Tangible Value to Black People
/
From [HERE] Throughout her mystifying, skyrocketing political career, Kamala Harris has repeatedly demonstrated her fealty to the pharmaceutical, abortion, and tra nsgender industries, using her position of authority to feed their unquenchable thirst for profit by promoting their manufactured demands for dangerous experimental vaccines, for their monstrous so-called “sex-changing” medical and surgical treatments for young people and kids, and for the devaluing and destruction of human life through abortion.
Harris, along with her newly picked vice-presidential running mate Tim Walz, are dangerous radical extremists, more beholden to lining the pockets of demonic so-called “healthcare” industries than they are to protecting the dignity and flourishing of American lives.
Harris: Fighting for Big Pharma profits, not public health
Harris has promoted the COVID-19 (C19) vaccine from the start and continues to do so as evidenced by an “up to date” vaccination requirement for all who seek employment at her campaign headquarters.
Harris currently demands that those she employ continually update their C19 vaccination status, despite the fact that the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have admitted since August 2021 that the C19 jab does nothing to stop the transmission of COVID.
“Harris has steadfastly stood by Biden’s federal vaccine mandates, federal mask mandates, as well as lockdowns of businesses, schools, and places of worship all across America during COVID,” noted Nikos Biggs-Chiropolos of the Honest Media Project. “As someone who has spent her entire career trying to please Democratic Party elites and donors, rather than regular people, it is clear that her top priority is propping up powerful companies rather than fighting for better public health.”
In a remarkable, damning video from July 2021, Harris spouts off one lie after another about the efficacy of the C19 vaccine.
“Getting vaccinated is the single best defense against getting COVID-19 and its variants,” declared Harris, who has never corrected herself or bothered to change her guileful messaging.
“First, we all know it doesn’t stop transmission,” said Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, an expert who has documented vaccine safety and efficacy.
“Second, where’s the study comparing it to the Brownstein protocol? Or comparing vaccination to Ivermectin? Or comparing vaccination to hydroxychloroquine plus corticosteroids and zinc?” continued Lyons-Weiler. “There have been no randomized clinical trials that made these comparisons.”
“She’s literally making this up as she goes along,” he pointed out.
“Is it moral for the vice president of the United States to say a vaccine is ‘highly effective’ when it is unable to stop transmission of the virus it is intended to combat?” asked Biggs-Chiropolos.
It’s not moral, but her lies certainly helped pharmaceutical companies reap windfall profits from the C19 hysteria that Harris helped to foment.
“Her record clearly shows how she is a puppet of Big Pharma rather than a champion of the people,” said Biggs-Chiropolos.
But Harris’s confounding continued push to promote the COVID-19 jab is only part of a larger picture of a leader who in reality is nothing more than a tool of nefarious “healthcare” industries.
It gets worse. Far worse. [MORE]
Myth Information Spreader Dead at 56: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki Removed Over 1M Videos that Warned People About the Dangers of COVID Shots - Destroyed Informed Consent, Perpetuated Fraud and Death
/According to FUNKTIONARY:
censor – a type of strainer that passes everything but the facts, appropriate context, and reality. “A censor is a man who knows more than he thinks you ought to know.” ~Granville Hicks. (See: Oughtism & Transparent)
censorship – the rape of the human mind. Take away the word “fuck” and you take away the right to say, “fuck the government.” ~Lenny Bruce. Feel free to say nothing. (See: Iron Rule, Patriot Act, Nine-Eleven, Justice & MEDIA)
Elites at Big Pharma Pay Fact Checkers such as FactCheck.Org to Lie About the Safety of COVID Injections, thereby Destroying Informed Consent
/From [HERE] FactCheck.org, the organization that flags “misleading” COVID-19 content for Facebook, is supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a philanthropic organization funded by pharmaceutical giant and vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson (J&J), YouTube commentator Jimmy Dore reported.
Dore said his own shows have often been slapped with a “misleading” label when he covered issues related to COVID-19 or vaccines.
“These fact check organizations aren’t there to check facts,” Dore said. “They’re there to push a political point of view and an agenda and to discredit people.”
Dore said when the organization “fact-checked” his work in the past, its claims were always “bogus.” He said FactCheck.org never reached out to consult him about his content, it twisted his words and it never even pointed to any erroneous facts.
Instead, he said, “They didn’t like my headlines,” and they would say they were misleading.
Johnson & Johnson’s viral vector COVID-19 vaccine received emergency use authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in February 2021. After the shot was linked to dangerous blood clots, its use was suspended a couple of months later and it was eventually completely pulled from the market in May 2023.
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation was established in 1952 by Robert Wood Johnson II, who ran J&J with a bequest of shares from the pharmaceutical giant. Today, although the foundation says it has diversified its holdings, it holds nearly $2 billion in J&J stock. [MORE]
Dr Vernon Coleman: The PCR Test Can Kill You – and Could Be Used to Vaccinate You
/From [HERE] Right from the start of 2020, my articles and videos about covid attracted an enormous amount of abuse. But the one article which seemed to attract most abuse was one in which I warned about the dangers of the PCR test. Journalists and broadcasters who wouldn’t know what to do with a scientific paper if they were given one, jumped up and down with great indignation. I was vilified for having said such a thing. But now that more and more doctors are belatedly beginning to wake up to the fact that there was no pandemic, that covid was just the annual flu and that the heavily promoted vaccine doesn’t work and is dangerous, it is time to take another look at the evidence about the PCR Test. (For the record I have a one inch thick stack of scientific papers proving that the PCR test is dangerous and can be lethal. Curiously, those scientific references appear to have disappeared from the internet – or are at least difficult to find.)
We all know now that PCR tests are useless for finding cases of covid-19 but very good at helping governments keep us in our own homes under house arrest. In some parts of the world, the PCR tests are banned as utterly useless. I explained precisely what’s wrong with these misused tests in an article on this website subtly called ‘The PCR Test Is Useless for Covid-19 (But Useful for Crooked Governments).
The big problem, of course, is that the British Government, for example, deliberately ignores the WHO guidelines and does the test in a crooked way which would, in a just and sensible world, result in Johnson, Hancock and their advisors crowded into the dock.
You’d get as good a result if you just divided people into two groups: those with a vowel in their surname and those without a vowel, and then announced that the ones with the vowel all had covid-19 and the rest all needed to change their names within seven days or pay a huge fine.
So, everyone with functioning brain tissue knows that the PCR test is useless, except for political reasons, and that the whole testing programme is an outrageously expensive and disruptive shambles. Only government ministers, scientific advisors and pseudo-journalists at the wretched BBC think that PCR tests are valuable. Did you know, by the way, that the Government has allegedly hired 900 consultants to help with the test and trace scheme? The consultants are being paid £1,000 a day each though what they do for that I cannot imagine. That’s £900,000 a day. I suspect that 99.99% of the population would be happier if the £900,000 a day were spent on dentists.
But that’s not the half of it. Most people seem to have accepted the need for regular PCR testing. Indeed, people in the UK queue up to have it done as often as possible – as though they get some sort of thrill out of having a complete stranger stuff something into a bodily orifice – pushing it in as far as it will go, twizzling it about a bit, and then pulling it out and buggering off without so much as ‘a thank you very much I’ll give you a ring tomorrow and we’ll have dinner and then do it again’.
There is talk of children having daily tests though I haven’t been able to find any evidence that this would be a good idea for anyone other than the hugely profitable industry now involved in making and looking at the swabs.
What no one ever mentions is that the PCR tests are dangerous and can, if done improperly, case excruciating pain. This is probably why some countries don’t like them. There is indeed a great deal of confusion about how far the swab should go. (Or should that be the Klaus Schwab) In Australia, the guidelines are that the swab should only go a few centimetres up the nostril but nasopharyngeal swabs can go much further. The United States Department of Health and Human services says that the swab should reach a depth equal to the distance from the nostrils to the outer opening of the ear. That’s a huge distance. In Ottawa, Canada, the recommendation is half that distance.
In October last year (2020) I reported on at least one case where a healthy individual had noticed cerebrospinal fluid pouring out of her nose after an invasive PCR test. That really isn’t something you want happening. The woman concerned, who was in her 40s, had a PCR nasal swab test and later went to see a doctor complaining of vomiting, a runny nose, a headache and a stiff neck. The pseudo-journalists at the BBC can, if they are interested in facts, find the details in the JAMA Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Surgeons found that the fluid running down her nose was cerebrospinal fluid – the fluid that protects the brain. [MORE]
‘Idea that COVID Shots Saved Lives is Ridiculous:’ Largest Study of Its Kind Finds Excess Deaths During Pandemic were Caused by Public Health Response, Not "the Virus"
/
From [HERE] A study released today of excess mortality in 125 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic found the major causes of death globally stemmed from public health establishment’s response, including mandates and lockdowns that caused severe stress, harmful medical interventions and the COVID-19 vaccines.
A study released today of excess mortality in 125 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic found the major causes of death globally stemmed from public health establishment’s response, including mandates and lockdowns that caused severe stress, harmful medical interventions and the COVID-19 vaccines.
“We conclude that nothing special would have occurred in terms of mortality had a pandemic not been declared and had the declaration not been acted upon,” the authors of the study wrote.
Researchers from the Canadian nonprofit Correlation Research in the Public Interest and the University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières analyzed excess all-cause mortality data prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, beginning with the March 11, 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic declaration and ending on May 5, 2023, when the WHO declared the pandemic over.
The results, presented in a detailed 521-page analysis, establish baseline all-cause mortality rates across 125 countries and use those to determine the variations in excess deaths during the pandemic.
The researchers also used the baseline rates to investigate how the individual country variations in excess death rates correlated to different pandemic-related interventions, including vaccination and booster campaigns.
Not all of the results on a country-by-country basis were the same. For example, in some countries, mortality spikes occurred before the vaccines were rolled out, while in other places, the mortality spikes tracked closely with vaccine or booster campaigns.
In some places, excess mortality rates returned to baseline or close to baseline in 2022, while in others, the rates persisted well into 2023. Denis Rancourt, Ph.D., lead author of the study, told The Defenderthe disparities result from the complex nature of pandemic measures — and the data — in different areas.
Once Rancourt’s team was able to establish the baseline and excess mortality data for each place, they clustered and examined the data through different filters to interpret it, and drew several conclusions.
The researchers established that there was significant excess mortality worldwide between March 11, 2020, and May 5, 2023.
Overall excess mortality during the three years in the 93 countries with sufficient data to make an estimate is approximately 0.392% of the 2021 population — or approximately 30.9 million excess deaths from all causes.
The conventional explanation for the excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic, Rancourt said, is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus caused virtually all deaths — and there would have been even more deaths if there hadn’t been a vaccine.
The variations in excess all-cause mortality rates across space and time, the authors wrote, “allow us to conclude that the Covid-period (2020-2023) excess all-cause mortality in the world is incompatible with a pandemic viral respiratory disease as a primary cause of death.”
They said the theory that the virus caused the deaths is propped up by mass virus-testing campaigns that should be abandoned.
‘Idea that vaccines saved lives is ridiculous’
Rancourt and his team cited several factors they believe disprove the theory that the virus caused a spike in all-cause mortality.
For example, they wrote that excess mortality surged almost simultaneously across several continents when a pandemic was declared, while there were no comparable surges in areas that had not yet declared a pandemic.
This suggests that pandemic interventions like lockdowns, which were implemented synchronously across many countries, likely caused the surges.
The researchers also pointed out the significant variation in mortality rates during the pandemic in all time periods, even across different political jurisdictions directly adjacent to each other. If the virus caused the deaths, it would follow that the infection fatality rate would be the same, or at least similar across political boundaries.
The researchers also found a lot of variability in death rates within countries over time, which also would not be an expected outcome if those deaths were caused by a pathogen.
Rancourt said they found “the idea that the vaccine saved lives is ridiculous,” and based on flawed modeling as he and colleagues also showed in a previous paper.
Here again, they found no systematic or statistically significant trends showing that vaccination campaigns in 2020 and 2021 reduced all-cause mortality.
Instead, they found that in many places, there was no excess mortality until the vaccines were rolled out, and most countries showed temporal associations between vaccine rollouts and increases in all-cause mortality.
Medical interventions — including denial of treatment — caused premature deaths
Rancourt said the excess deaths his team identified are strongly associated with the combination of two major factors — the proportion of elderly in a country’s population and the number of people living in poverty. Both factors increased peoples’ vulnerability to “sudden and profound structural societal changes” and “medical assaults.”
While the proximal cause of death may be classified on death certificates as a respiratory condition or infection, the researchers noted, they argue the true primary causes of death are actually biological stress, non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions and the COVID-19 vaccination rollouts.
The study provides an overview of plausible mechanisms for this hypothesis, including research showing that some people experienced severe biological stress from measures like mandates and lockdowns.
“If you structurally change the society by preventing people from moving, breathing, working, having their lives, having to stay at home, lock them in. If you do all these incredibly huge changes, structural changes in society, that is going to induce biological stress,” Rancourt told The Defender.
“There’s very compelling scientific evidence that biological stress is a massive killer,” he added.
Rancourt also pointed out that the stress of lockdowns affected poor people quite differently than it did people who could easily work from home, have food delivered and live relatively comfortably.
The authors also pointed to extensive evidence showing that medical interventions — including denial of treatment — caused premature deaths.
Such interventions included but were not limited to the denial of antibiotics and ivermectin against bacterial pneumonia, the systematic use of mechanical ventilators, experimental treatment protocols, new palliative medications and overdoses, isolation of vulnerable people and encouraged voluntary or involuntary suicide.
The March-April 2020 COVID-19 peak they identified in several countries is difficult to explain without such medical interventions, they wrote.
17 million excess deaths tied to COVID vaccines
Finally, the researchers projected that 17 million of the excess deaths they identified were associated with the COVID-19 vaccines, confirming the findings of their previous research on a smaller sample of countries.
Those vaccine-related estimations were based on analyses of places that had large spikes immediately following vaccination or booster campaigns and also by examining the numbers of vaccine doses and their relation to deaths over time.
Thirty percent of the countries they analyzed had no excess deaths until either the vaccine rollouts or the booster campaigns. And there were significant correlations between COVID-19 vaccine rollouts and peaks or increases in excess all-cause mortality. Ninety-seven percent of countries showed a late-2021 or early-2022 peak in excess all-cause mortality temporally associated with booster rollouts.
It is highly unlikely, the researchers wrote, that the vaccine-mortality associations are coincidental.
Rancourt noticed that people critical of this idea point to the fact that in some places, there are sometimes campaigns or booster campaigns that aren’t associated with spikes in excess mortality.
However, he said vaccination campaigns don’t always lead to such spikes because vaccination was not related to death in the same way in every situation. Vulnerability factors like the age of those vaccinated, the health of the population and other sociological factors related to stressors on the immune system change how they are affected by vaccine toxicity or the vaccines’ effects on the immune system.
Based on their analysis and interpretations, they concluded, “We are compelled to state that the public health establishment and its agents fundamentally caused all the excess mortality in the Covid period.”
Individuals Have a ‘Stunning’ 620% Higher Risk of Myocarditis After Getting mRNA COVID Injection
/
From [HERE] A peer-reviewed study of 9.2 million South Koreans published in Nature Communications uncovered a 620% increased risk of myocarditis and 175% higher risk of pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Researchers also noted increased risks of several autoimmune conditions, especially after booster doses.
A large-scale peer-reviewed South Korean study has found significantly increased risks of serious cardiac and neurological conditions following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, and lesser risks of several autoimmune diseases.
The nationwide population-based cohort study, published Tuesday in Nature Communications, followed nearly 4.5 million people for an average of 15 months after vaccination.
Researchers found a striking 620% increased risk of myocarditis and 175% increased risk ofpericarditis in people who received the vaccine compared to historical controls.
The study also revealed a 62% increased risk for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a rare neurological disorder.
The researchers did not highlight the the cardiac and GBS risks, but only used the data to confirm the validity of their study design, which focused on determining the risks of autoimmune diseasesassociated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
The researchers found a 16% increased chance of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE — the most common lupus type) and a 58% higher risk of bullous pemphigoid (BP — large, fluid-filled blisters).
The study also revealed that booster shots were associated with slightly increased risks of severalautoimmune connective tissue diseases (AI-CTDs), including alopecia areata (patchy hair loss),psoriasis (scaly, inflamed skin) and rheumatoid arthritis.
“Given that the risk of SLE and BP was increased in certain demographic conditions such as age and sex, long-term monitoring is necessary after mRNA vaccination for the development of AI-CTDs,” the study authors noted.
Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer at Children’s Health Defense (CHD), noted how the authors minimized the most alarming data but told The Defender the study was otherwise “very robust.”
Hooker said several other studies also show relationships between autoimmune disorders — including systemic lupus — and mRNA vaccination.
The Nature Communications article follows another South Korean study published in May that found significant increases in the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. [MORE]
South Korean Study Finds COVID Shots Linked to Increased Risk of Alzheimer’s and Mild Cognitive Impairment
/
From [HERE] A South Korean peer-reviewed study found statistically significant increases in the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment in people who received a COVID-19 vaccine — particularly mRNA vaccines — within three months of post-vaccination.
The South Korean researchers — who on May 28 published their findings in QJM: An International Journal of Medicine — said they undertook the study due to concerns of COVID-19 vaccine side effects, “particularly potential links to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease.”
Medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., who analyzed the study on a July 22 episode of his YouTube show, asked why Western countries such as the U.S. or U.K. aren’t investigating such potential links. “Why is it often the Asian countries that seem to be leading the way in openness on this?”
According to Campbell, part of what’s preventing Western countries is that governments and pharmaceutical companies have refused to release low-level participant data. “Could it be that researchers in the West are working under limitations?”
In the South Korean study, researchers analyzed data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service from more than half a million residents of Seoul, South Korea, age 65 and older.
The study participants were randomly selected, Campbell said. “That’s important. The sample was random so it shouldn’t have any systematic biases.”
After dividing the individuals into vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, the researchers compared the incidence of both mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease between the groups.
Mild cognitive impairment is sometimes a stage in the progression of Alzheimer’s disease, according to the Mayo Clinic. However, some people with mild cognitive impairment get better over time.
Those in the vaccinated group received either an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and/or a cDNA vaccine. However, the researchers later looked at just those who had received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and found there to be an especially high incidence of cognitive decline when compared to the unvaccinated.
mRNA shots linked to a more than double rate of mild cognitive impairment
The authors of the South Korean study reported that after three months of receiving the vaccine, the mRNA vaccine group showed a roughly 22% increase in the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease (odds ratio: 1.225, p-value = 0.026) compared with the unvaccinated.
“This is significant because developing Alzheimer’s disease over three months is a very rapid development of Alzheimer’s disease,” Campbell said.
Similarly, the mRNA vaccine group after three months post-vaccination showed nearly 2.4 times the rate of mild cognitive impairment compared with the unvaccinated (odds ratio: 2.377, p-value < 0.001).
The researchers found no significant link between COVID-19 vaccination and vascular dementia or Parkinson’s disease, “which is encouraging,” Campbell said.
The researchers concluded that their study “suggests a potential link between COVID-19 vaccination, particularly mRNA vaccines, and increased incidences” of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. [more]
Elites are Trying to Kill Us: 20 Universities Still Forcing Students to Get Dangerous COVID Injections
/From [HERE] Twenty United States colleges continue to require their students to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, according to the watchdog organization No College Mandates.
These mandates face increasingly heavy criticism from medical doctors and scholars who point to concerns regarding the vaccine’s safety, efficacy, and necessity.
Lucia Sinatra, co-founder of No College Mandates, an organization that tracks and advocates for the abolition of vaccine mandates, told The College Fix that such policies are “unreasonable and discriminatory.”
Many schools have been quietly retiring their vaccine mandates over the past year. The most recent of these include Wayne State University, which announced this month that it “strongly” recommends but no longer requires the vaccine.
Reiner Fuellmich Update from Prison: Attorney was Kidnapped and Locked Up by German/Mexican Authorities after Investigating COVID Shots as Genocide and Attempting to Convene “2nd Nuremberg” Trial
/
From [HERE] It appears as if German lawyer, Reiner Fuëllmich, who recognized the COVID crimes against humanity as early as 2020, has been set up. Fuëllmich was spearheading a project known as the “Second Nuremberg”, and co-founded the Corona Investigative Committee. His Committee consulted about a hundred and fifty scientists and experts from around the world, as well as former employees of the World Health Organization, and their findings showed them that the COVID measures were the first steps in a plan to destroy regional economies in order to make populations dependent upon global supply chains, and were intended to reduce the population and install a world government under the United Nations.
The Corona Committee received a lot of donations which they believed were not safe due to the recent history of bank accounts being seized by complicit governments. One million Euros in gold was purchased and put in holding. To fund operations, both Reiner Fuëllmich and Viviane Fischer took out secured loans. Reiner’s loan was for seven-hundred-thousand euros and was to be repaid with the proceeds from selling his home. All documented and agreed upon by the committee.
Members of the Corona Committee met with a law firm in August of 2022, and filed criminal charges against Fuëllmich. Committee members, Justus Hoffmann, Marcel Templin and Antonia Fischer, claimed that Füllmich embezzled seven-hundred-thousand euros, the loan that he officially took out. They claimed he was a violent anti-Semite and that if he were given the opportunity to comment before criminal proceedings began, they would not file the complaint.
Two warrants were issued for his arrest, from Germany and from the E.U., without Reiner’s knowledge. Without an international arrest warrant, German and Mexican authorities illegally abducted Füllmich at the German embassy in Mexico. He was then flown to the Frankfurt Airport where he was arrested and put in jail. International law experts are calling his arrest an illegal kidnapping. [MORE]
ALL COVID MRNA SHOT GENOCIDE GRAND JURY RECORDINGS ARE [HERE]
Former Pfizer Vice President Dr Yeadon Claims the COVID-19 Virus Does Not Exist, which Means there was No Pandemic but Instead a Coordinated ‘Long Planned Attack’ upon Civilians
/From [HERE] Dr. Michael Yeadon, who formerly served as Pfizer’s vice president and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory, joined a host of other scientists in arguing there is no sufficient evidence that either the COVID-19 virus or any other virus actually exists. And thus, there was no pandemic but rather the killing of many with “a monstrous, long planned attack on helpless civilians by coordinated, lethal, central planning.”
“Face it. The evidence is that our governments hate us and want us dead,” the retired executive wrote in an extended statement to LifeSiteNews.
Yeadon, who spent over 30 years working for the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world, rose to the most senior research position in his field at Pfizer before resigning in 2011 to start his own biotech company, Ziarco, which he later sold to Novartis in 2017.
The British scientist is well-known for his acute criticism of the COVID-19 “supranational operation,” particularly the so-called vaccines that he charged are intended to “maim and kill deliberately.”
In a 2022 interview, Yeadon shared that as a result of conversations with fellow scientists who came to the conviction that virology itself was based on the unestablished premise that “viruses” actually exist, he was bothered by their reasoning. And after significant personal research he eventually “realized over time” he could “no longer maintain” his “understanding of respiratory viruses,” and after obtaining further information, this “collapsed the possibility that respiratory viruses, as described, exist at all. They don’t,” he concluded.
For at least a few decades, some medical scientists have pointed out that “no particle has ever been sequenced, characterized, studied with valid controlled experiments and shown to fit the definition of a virus,” and thus, virology “has consistently failed to fulfill its own requirements to prove” viruses even exist.
Furthermore, Canadian researcher Christine Massey has made freedom of information (FOI) requests to hundreds of scientific institutions in 40 different countries “asking for any records of anyone in the world ever finding this alleged (SARS-CoV-2) virus in the bodily fluid or tissue or excrement of any people anywhere on earth by anyone ever.”
“To date, we have responses from 216 different institutions in 40 different countries. And so far, no one has been able to provide us with even one record,” and further, “they can’t cite any record,” she said. “So they have all admitted that they don’t have a sample of the alleged virus and they don’t even know of anyone else who ever did obtain a sample of this alleged virus.”
Massey and her colleagues followed up to make similar FOI requests seeking “any record of any alleged virus that supposedly infects humans being purified from a sick person. And they admitted that they didn’t have any whatsoever.”
Asked to respond to a statement defending the dominant view that viruses have beendemonstrated to exist, by the widely respected Dr. Peter McCullough, Yeadon provided an extended reply seeking to offer readers further challenging arguments to consider for themselves.
In proposing one point in his reasoning, McCullough said, “for those who are kind of denying the presence of the (COVID-19) virus, I think we’re approaching 300,000 peer-reviewed papers on the topic. I mean, this is a mountain of evidence to dismiss out of hand.”
Yeadon replied, proposing,
My initial concerns are mainly with the attempt to pretend that lots of papers asserting the same unproven thing bolsters the unproven claim. It simply doesn’t.
Back in the day when people thought the earth was stationary and the sun orbited earth, had there then been ‘peer reviewed papers’, all the reviewers would pass papers on earth centric systems. The numbers don’t make it correct. Merely that once group think sets in, almost everyone will interpret evidence in that light. This continues until unequivocal evidence emerges to counter the errors of thinking.
The doctoral expert in respiratory pharmacology went on to offer three general points for readers to “weigh up” on this topic with the goal of showing:
There was no COVID-19 pandemic,
The cause of increased deaths was not due to any virus but rather “a monstrous, long planned attack on helpless civilians by coordinated, lethal, central planning” incorporating deadly hospital and care home protocols, lockdowns, fraudulent PCR tests, and gene-based injections “designed intentionally to injure, kill and reduce fertility.”
The most difficult point for readers to believe, for which he provides this “trigger warning,” is the scientific literature actually reveals “Acute respiratory illnesses” such as colds and the flu, “are NOT caused by viruses and also, are NOT CONTAGIOUS.” Therefore, “they cannot be infectious. That rules out the mendacious description of these illnesses as being caused by submicroscopic, infectious particles called viruses.”
Yeadon, who is also a specialist in toxicology, then provides some speculations on what actually causes illness if there are no viruses to do so and warns that having gotten away with this massive crime with regard to the COVID-19 attack, “the perpetrators are going to do it again.”
The rest of Dr. Yeadon’s entire statement is below. LifeSiteNews has provided some format and typographical edits, added noted sources, relevant “related” article inserts, and sectional titles. [MORE]
New Study Demonstrates COVID Did Not Cause Excess Deaths During 2020 - 2023. In Contrast, COVID Injections Have Caused 16 Million Associated Deaths
/From [HERE] A new study published on Friday found that the excess all-cause mortality for the years 2020 to 2023 in 125 countries is incompatible with a pandemic viral respiratory disease.
The authors argue that the three primary causes of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality over this period are due to mandated measures such as lockdowns; harmful medical interventions such as the use of ventilators and the denial of use of antibiotics; and, covid injections.
A study published on Thursday analysed excess mortality across the world during the covid years of 2020 to 2023. It was conducted by researchers from the Canadian non-profit Correlation Research in the Public Interest and the University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières.
The paper, titled ‘Spatiotemporal variation of excess all-cause mortality in the world (125 countries) during the Covid period 2020-2023 regarding socio economic factors and public-health and medical interventions’, was authored by Denis Rancourt, Joseph Hickey and Christian Linard.
At 521 pages it is a comprehensive report containing hundreds of figures and a detailed examination of excess all-cause mortality during the years 2020 to 2023 in 125 countries, comprising approximately 2.7 billion people which is about 35% of the world’s population.
Not all countries had sufficient data necessary for calculations. For example, only 93 countries had sufficient data to calculate excess all-cause mortality rates. From these countries, the researchers calculated the overall excess all-cause mortality rate for the 3 years 2020-2022 to be 0.392 ± 0.002 % of the 2021 population. That is between 0.390% and 0.394% of the total population of the 93 countries.
Using the excess all-cause mortality rate for the 93 countries, the researchers were able to calculate the global excess deaths in numbers of people as between 30.7 and 31.1 million people.
“Our calculated excess mortality rate [ ] corresponds to 30.9 ± 0.2 million excess deaths projected to have occurred globally for the 3-year period 2020-2022, from all causes of excess mortality during this period,” the authors wrote.
More than half of those global excess deaths, about 57%, the authors attributed to covid vaccines.
Using the data from 78 countries the researchers calculated the population-wide risk of death per injection. From this, they estimated the global all-ages excess mortality associated with covid vaccines up to 30 December 2022. They calculated that the deaths, globally, associated with covid vaccines up to 30 December 2022 was 16.9 million people.
Not only did the vaccines significantly contribute to excess mortality but the authors argued that lockdowns and harmful medical interventions also contributed to excess deaths. The paper stated:
We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary causes of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and after) the covid period [2020-2023] are:
(1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes.
(2) Non-covid-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics).
(3) Covid-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the same populations.
We understand the covid period mortality catastrophe to be precisely what happens when governments cause global disruptions and assaults against populations. We emphasise the importance of biological stress from sudden and profound structural societal changes and of medical assaults (including denial of treatment for bacterial pneumonias, repeated vaccine injections, etc.). We estimate that such a campaign of disruptions and assaults in a modern world will produce a global all-ages mortality rate of >0.1 % of population per year, as was also the case in the 1918 [“Spanish flu”] mortality catastrophe.
Denis G. Rancourt, Joseph Hickey, Christian Linard. Spatiotemporal variation of excess all-cause mortality in the world (125 countries) during the Covid period 2020-2023 regarding socio economic factors and public-health and medical interventions. CORRELATION Research in the Public Interest, Report, 19 July 2024. https://correlation-canada.org/covid-excess-mortality-125-countries, pgs. 4 and 5
The hypothesis that excess all-cause mortality in the world is caused by viral respiratory disease, although believed to be supported by testing campaigns, should be abandoned, the authors stated.
The study concluded:
We are compelled to state that the public health establishment and its agents fundamentally caused all the excess mortality in the covid period, via assaults on populations, harmful medical interventions and covid-19 vaccine rollouts.
We conclude that nothing special would have occurred in terms of mortality had a pandemic not been declared and had the declaration not been acted upon.
Denis G. Rancourt, Joseph Hickey, Christian Linard. Spatiotemporal variation of excess all-cause mortality in the world (125 countries) during the Covid period 2020-2023 regarding socio economic factors and public-health and medical interventions. CORRELATION Research in the Public Interest, Report, 19 July 2024. https://correlation-canada.org/covid-excess-mortality-125-countries, pg. 316
CONSENT OBTAINED BY LIES, HALFTRUTHS, NON-DISCLOSURES, FRAUD, COERCION IS NOT LAWFUL CONSENT - IT IS INDUCED CONSENT, WHICH IS UNLAWFUL.
A PLAINTIFF CANNOT ORDINARILY BE REGARDED AS ACTUALLY CONSENTING TO THE DEFENDANT'S CONDUCT IF THE PLAINTIFF ASSENTED TO THE CONDUCT WHILE MISTAKEN ABOUT THE NATURE AND QUALITY OF THE INVASION INTENDED BY THE DEFENDANT. LIKEWISE, AN OVERT MANIFESTATION OF ASSENT OR WILLINGNESS WOULD NOT BE EFFECTIVE APPARENT CONSENT IF THE DEFENDANT KNEW, OR PROBABLY IF HE OUGHT TO HAVE KNOWN IN THE EXERCISE OF REASONABLE CARE, THAT THE PLAINTIFF WAS MISTAKEN AS TO THE NATURE AND QUALITY OF THE INVASION INTENDED.... THE DECISIONS IN THIS AREA HAVE INVOLVED ASSENT INDUCED BY FRAUD, IN THE SENSE THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS EITHER AWARE OF THE PLAINTIFF'S MISTAKE OR IGNORANCE AND FAILED TO DISCLOSE THE TRUTH, OR THE DEFENDANT INDUCED THE MISTAKE WITH REPRESENTATION WHICH HE KNEW WAS FALSE. PROSSER AND KEETON ON TORTS § 18, AT 119-20 (5TH ED. 1984).
THE FAILURE TO PROVIDE INFORMED CONSENT IS A BASIS OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE. BUT IT ALSO MAY BE THE BASIS OF A LAWSUIT FOR AN INTENTIONAL BATTERY (MURDER), NEGLIGENCE OR FRAUD.
BATTERY IS AN INTENTIONAL, UNWANTED OR OFFENSIVE TOUCHING BY ANOTHER. A LAWSUIT FOR BATTERY INCREASES THE LIKELIHOOD OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES AND UNLIKE A CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENCE, NO PROOF OF INJURY OR HARM IS NECESSARY. A LAWSUIT FOR BATTERY GENERALLY HAS A SHORTER STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS THAN A CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENCE. [MORE]
‘Things in Your Body that Don't Belong There:’ Dr Mihalcea Provides More Evidence COVID Shots and PCR Tests Contain Nanotechnology that Self Assembles in the Blood Causing Illness and Death
/
From [HERE] Dr Ana Mihalcea explains, I will continue to report on what people should not forget about - that self assembly nanotechnology has now been deployed in the blood of all people, via the COVID19 bioweapons, geoengineering, food, water etc. Making people aware so they can do something about their contamination status, remains and important effort to ensure the survival of our species. Mortality rates everywhere are on the rise and I know that part of what is causing this is the self assembly nanotechnology in people’s blood.
This is the correlation of self assembly nanotechnology in the COVID19 bioweapons, the RF frequency transmission of the deceased COVID19 injected. This week on my show I am interviewing Dr Pedro Chavez, whom we have seen in the documentary Bluetruth comusav, where he showed his experimentation and study of vaccinated people emitting MAC addresses, as well as grave sites of the COVID injected. Dr Chavez has had excellent results with Chlorine Dioxide and I am so happy that he now is incorporating my treatment protocols with EDTA, Vitamin C and Methylene Blue as well, including other supplements I have been using at my clinic to disable and detoxify this diabolical technology. Don’t miss this weeks show! We have some stunning new revelations for you!
I would like to remind people that I have shown evidence of self assembly nanotechnology from embalmed blood of a COVID19 injected individual who had died 8 months prior with the rubbery clots - I had received this sample from embalmer Richard Hirschman and first reported on this in June 2023 on Maria Zeee’s show:
I also have shown that the same technology can be found in unvaccinated blood which is what I am very concerned about. Dr Chavez has confirmed - and you will see this Thursday - that 1/3 of unvaccinated people who received the PCR swab also are emitting a MAC address, indicating fully functional installed AI programmable software. I have documented this extensively in COVID19 unvaccinated live blood:
I have also documented the microchip assembly in COVID 19 unvaccinated individuals and have shown that these mesogen DNA biosensors are what Dr. Hildegard Staninger documented in 2012 in Targeted Individuals.
I and Clifford Carnicom have long been documenting that the same self assembly nanotechnology that has been sprayed via chemtrails is in the COVID 19 bioweapons and that there is chemical overlap of environmental polymer filaments and the COVID lipid nanoparticle technology.
[Revealing Truth When Lies are No Longer Necessary] Former CDC Director Tells US Senate, 'Mandating COVID Shots was a Great Mistake.’ Says Govt was “not transparent about the potential side effects”
/From [HERE] Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Robert Redfield confirmed the dangers of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in a U.S. Senate hearing Thursday, calling them “toxic” and saying they should never have been mandated.
Redfield’s admissions came during a Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on government oversight of taxpayer-funded high-risk virus research.
The late admission of vaccine injuries underscores the failure of public health agencies and the medical establishment to provide informed consent to the billions of vaccine recipients worldwide.
“It’s important that he is telling the truth now,” vaccine researcher Jessica Rose, Ph.D., told The Defender. “Adverse events were hidden and still are being hidden to prevent injection hesitancy.”
Redfield, who led the CDC from 2018 to 2021, didn’t stop there. He declared biosecurity “our nation’s greatest national security threat,” calling for a halt to gain-of-function research pending further debate.
The hearing, which featured contentious exchanges between senators and witnesses, also touched on controversial topics such as the COVID-19 origins lab-leak theory and allegations that health agencies suppressed data.
During the hearing Redfield, who oversaw the CDC during the crucial early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, elaborated on his recent statements about mRNA vaccine safety.
“I do think one of the greatest mistakes that was made, of course, was mandating these vaccines,” Redfield said. “They should have never been mandated. It should have been open to personal choice.”
Redfield went further, admitting that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is “toxic to the body” and triggers “a very strong pro-inflammatory response.”
He noted that in his own medical practice, he doesn’t administer mRNA vaccines, preferring “killed protein vaccines” instead.
Redfield’s statements stand in stark contrast to the CDC’s official stance during his tenure, which strongly promoted mRNA vaccine uptake as safe and effective.
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) pressed Redfield on the issue, highlighting concerning data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Johnson presented figures showing over 37,000 deaths reported following COVID-19 vaccination, with 24% occurring within two days of injection.
Redfield acknowledged there was “not appropriate transparency from the beginning about the potential side effects of these vaccines.” He criticized attempts to “underreport any side effects because they argued that would make the public less likely to get vaccinated.”
‘FDA should release all of the safety data’
Redfield’s criticism of data withholding extended beyond vaccine side effects. He expressed disappointment in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration‘s (FDA) handling of vaccine safety information.
“The FDA should release all of the safety data they have,” Redfield said. “I was very disappointed to hear that they were planning to hold on to that until 2026. That really creates a sense of total lack of trust in our public health agencies towards vaccination.”
Johnson echoed these concerns, revealing his frustration with the lack of follow-through by health agencies and the committee itself.
“I’m not getting cooperation out of the chairman of the permanent subcommittee investigation to issue subpoenas to get this,” Johnson said, referring to unreleased data and documents. [MORE]
[consent to take medicine obtained thru misinformation is Fraud, Battery and/or Murder] Gov Authorities, “Vaccine” Makers and Media Had No Safety Data to Claim COVID Shots Safe for Pregnant Women
/From [HERE] British Columbia attorney Lee Turner joins Rebel News to unpack disturbing findings uncovered by freedom of information requests, proving the 'safe and effective' COVID-19 vaccine narrative told to pregnant and lactating women contradicts what's written in the government's confidential contract with Pfizer and more.
However, as recent as December 2023, Health Minister Mark Holland confirmed in an order paper question response that “the safety and efficacy of these vaccines in pregnant women have not yet been established.” The ministry further disclosed that “Health Canada has not approved any safety claims with regard to pregnant and lactating women.”
Such statements directly contradict what public health officials previously promised Canadians, including B.C.’s Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry, who professed that she could “say unequivocally these vaccines do not affect fertility in women or boys or young men” back in 2021. [MORE]
After decades of Dr. Stanley Plotkin and his vaccinologist disciples insisting vaccines are the most well studied products on the planet, they just admitted exactly the opposite
/After decades of Dr. Stanley Plotkin and his vaccinologist disciples insisting vaccines are the most well studied products on the planet, they just penned an articleadmitting precisely the opposite.
They just admitted vaccines are not properly studied—neither pre-licensure nor post-licensure. They admitted, for example, “prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes [and] follow-up durations” and that “there are not resources earmarked for postauthorization safety studies.”
That is an incredible reversal. But let me provide context so nobody is fooled at what they are clearly up to:
For decades, the medical community insisted vaccines are the most thoroughly studied product ever; for example, Dr. Paul Offit said, "I think we should be proud of vaccines as arguably the safest, best tested things we put in our body.”
For decades, parents of vaccine injured children, vaccine injured adults, and other stakeholders contested these claims only to be shunned and attacked by the medical community and health agencies. [MORE]
