Is BLM Getting Reformed Into the System? BLM’s Leaders Used Charitable Funds To Enrich Themselves And Their Families, New Documents Show

/

From [HERE] Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation (BLMGNF) has paid out millions in contracts to insiders, newly released tax documents show.

The nation’s largest BLM organization approved lucrative contracts to firms owned by members of the organization’s leadership and their family members between July 2022 and June 2023, tax filings show. The shuffling of charitable funds to private companies owned by interested parties raises considerable ethical concerns given the lack of oversight and the possible conflicts of interest, experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

“Whether a person loves this charity’s mission or hates it, they should be angry that significant amounts of charitable dollars are being channeled to interested parties without adequate oversight in place,” Charity Watch Executive Director Laurie Styron told the DCNF. “Charities are expected to avoid both real and perceived conflicts of interest to maintain public trust. This charity is doing the opposite. The optics here are really, really bad.”

BLMGNF “has no independent oversight” as the charity’s board is too small to effectively guard against the misuse of funds from those in charge of the organization, Styron said.

The organization paid the consulting firm BOWERS* nearly $2.6 million during the time frame for “staffing and management services,” according to tax filings. Shalomyah Bowers, the secretary of the charity’s board, owns at least 35% of that firm. [MORE]

DOJ says Phoenix Cops Routinely Unlawfully Stop, Detain and Arrest Black, Latino and Homeless People and DA Disproportionately Charge and Over Charge Them w/Crimes, Violating Their Imaginary "Rights"

/

QUICK QUIZ FOR LEGAL SCHOLARS: DO SO CALLED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS EXIST A) ON THE STREET B) ONLY IN LAW BOOKS C) ONLY IN THE COURT HOUSE OR D) ONLY IN YOUR MIND? [MORE]

Thanks for Your Vote NGHR but Keep the Change: Treadmilling Black Puppeticians Run Their Mouths About Police Brutality But Cops are Murdering Black People in Cities Where White Liberals are in Control

From [HERE] The U.S. Department of Justice found on Thursday that the Phoenix Police Department uses excessive force, violates constitutional rights, particularly those of homeless people, and discriminates against Black, Hispanic and Native American people.

The results came after a lengthy investigation, which found a "pattern" of violations by the police department, saying they frequently stop, detain and arrest homeless people without reasonable suspicion that they've committed any crime. The city and its police department also seize and destroy the property of homeless people without providing adequate notice of fair opportunity to collect their belongings, the DOJ said.

The DOJ also said certain laws, which include drug-related crimes and certain misdemeanors, have been applied with greater severity to Hispanic, Black and Native American people, also finding that the Police Department used "dangerous tactics that lead to unnecessary and unreasonable use of force."

The behavior violated the First, Fourth and 14th Amendments of the Constitution, which protect free speech, prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures and guarantee equal protection under the law, according to Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division. She recapped the Department's finding in the 126-page report.

"This finding is historic," Clarke said. "This marks the first time that the Justice Department has found violations of the civil and constitutional rights of people who are homeless." [what a clown! homeless people’s so-called “rights” have been destroyed by authorities for decades. the real question is where do these MF rolebots come from?]

She also highlighted that about 37% of the department's misdemeanor offenses were against unhoused individuals.

At the same time, she noted, officers are disproportionately targeting communities of color. For instance, Black drivers in Phoenix are 144 times more likely than white drivers to be arrested or cited for low-level moving violations, while Hispanic drivers are 40% more likely to be arrested or cited for the same thing.

Similarly, DOJ data shows that Phoenix cites and arrests Black people for marijuana possession at nearly seven times the rate of white people and Hispanic people more than three times the rate. Black, Hispanic and Native American people are disproportionately charged with pedestrian traffic violations and loitering, the Justice Department said.

These behaviors are applied to children of color as well, who are often treated the same as adults, according to the DOJ.

"Not only does such conduct harm children but it can contribute to fear and distrust of law enforcement by the next generation of Phoenix residents," Clarke said.

The police department referred requests for comment about the findings to the city. Then, Mayor Kate Gallego said the city had received the report at the same time as the public.

"The City Council will meet this month— in Executive Session on June 25— to receive legal advice, better understand the report, and discuss next steps," Gallego said in a statement. "I will carefully and thoroughly review the findings before making further comments."

Clarke said the DOJ will work with the city to find solutions. She stopped short of saying the department would be out under a consent decree, which typically is used to create and enforce changes within a local or state governmental agency when evidence of misconduct is found, according to NBC News.

DOJ Probes Trenton Cops Use of Excessive Force, Violating Civil Rights of Black People, Racism Not Alleged [enforcing "Rights" After they are violated means rights only Exist if an Authority says so]

/

From [HERE] The U.S. Department of Justice has launched a federal civil rights investigation into New Jersey's capital city and its police department's use of force, stops, searches and arrests.

The "pattern or practice investigation" will determine whether the Trenton Police Department has systemically violated federal law or the Constitution. It will include a comprehensive review of the department's policies, training, supervision, internal investigation protocols, disciplinary decisions and other protocols regarding complaints, the Department of Justice said in a statement Tuesday.

"Unfortunately, we have reviewed numerous reports that Trenton police officers may have used force inappropriately and conducted stops, searches, and arrests with no good reason in violation of individuals’ constitutional rights," U.S. Attorney Philip R. Sellinger said Tuesday. "Today’s announcement reflects our office’s commitment to ensuring effective, constitutional policing in Trenton and throughout New Jersey."

The investigation was welcomed by Mount Laurel attorney Gregg Zeff, who represents a former Burlington City resident who was shot and paralyzed by Trenton police in February 2022.

"I'm also frustrated that it took the paralysis of Jajuan Henderson to bring this to the attention of the federal government, but it did not wake up Trenton," Zeff said.

Henderson's lawsuit contends police officers approached his parked car shortly after midnight, smashed the driver's side window and shot him as he tried to call for help on his cellphone.

But police said Henderson, then 29, was unable to produce an ID or driver's license, and that he refused to leave the vehicle after being told he was under arrest. Police also alleged Henderson reached around the vehicle's interior, "including below seats."

Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke, who oversees the Justice Department's civil rights division, said the investigation was not prompted by a specific incident and the department is not alleging racial discrimination.

Video Catches Seattle Police Bang On Black Man Like a Drum w/Metal Batons in Secluded Area. White Cops Grab Hair, Put a Knee on His Neck to Force Obedience to Authority During Arrest for Unknown Crime

/

Deeanthony Marcell, who recorded the video, also uploaded it to his Instagram, where it had been viewed nearly 15,000 times as of Thursday afternoon. Marcell, a musician, said he was on a bus headed to a rehearsal when he came upon the incident in South Seattle.

He said that he did not know what preceded the beating but that he believed he was witnessing an injustice. The officers were likely unaware they were being recorded, he said, because the area was inaccessible by foot. Marcell said the man was screaming for help as he was beaten. [MORE]

A White Bluffton Cop Pulled a Handcuffed Black Man's legs out from Under him Causing Him to Fall Face First Into the Pavement. Govt Settles Case for $750k [the power to Use Force Offensively is Evil]

/

From [HERE] Almost seven years have passed since Bluffton Police Officer Cody Kirkman flipped Ted Ellis face first onto the May River Road pavement, kneeling on the handcuffed man's back while blood leaked from his chin.

Since that humid August afternoon in 2017, Ellis pursued a lawsuit that slowly wound its way through the courts. Attorneys, allegations and defendants came and went as he pressed his claim, challenging the officer's actions during the traffic stop that day. But in March, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dispatched Kirkman's final challenge. Ellis accepted a $750,000 settlement offer after his excessive force claim prevailed. The money was paid out by the agency overseeing the state insurance reserve fund, according to his attorney.

Kirkman fought wrongdoing appearances and allegations from the arrest to the appellate court, but evidence in the case challenges the officer's narrative. 

Kirkman's attorneys argued that Ellis could pose a danger without a thorough search. A magistrate who reviewed the case found that argument unconvincing. 

Kirkman leaned down, grabbed the handcuffed Ellis below the knee, and pulled his legs out from under him. Nothing broke Ellis' fall. His face hit the pavement. Kirkman said in the incident report he reached around Ellis' waist to control his center of gravity, a claim refuted by video, reports from both of the other officers at the scene, and, eventually, his own deposition.

Kirkman knelt on Ellis' back. Ellis was shocked, "Oh, no," he repeated before the shock resided. He threatened that he would "find" Kirkman.

On top of the man prone on the pavement, Kirkman yelled at Ellis to "stop moving." In the reflection of the car's sheen, Kirkman's hand appeared on top of his leg, pressed onto Ellis' back, his black wedding ring stark against Ellis' white tank top and the officer's pale skin. Ellis' blood dribbled from his chin under the car toward the side of the road. Gibson held Ellis' feet.

Kirkman knelt on Ellis' back for almost nine minutes, a detail omitted in his incident report description.

At one point, Kirkman dismounted and Ellis requested he return. During other moments, Ellis asked to be helped off the ground, with Kirkman remaining on top.

Eventually, officers helped Ellis sit up.

"Officer, you had no business doing that," Ellis said.

Kirkman stammered. What ensued was a brief argument that mirrored litigation each side's attorneys would make in the simplest terms.

Ellis repeated his position: Kirkman was in the wrong.

Ellis' attorneys said he had a fractured jaw, was diagnosed with post-concussive syndrome and lost a number of teeth, which they argued stemmed from the incident.

In the waning moments of the video, a firefighter hosed Ellis' blood off the street.

Bluffton's excessive use of force report found that Kirkman used a "reasonable amount of force necessary to conduct a proper search of Ellis." It also said that the three officers at the scene "did not prevent Ted Ellis from hurting himself."

Kenney said the case was about "the proposition that a police officer cannot use potentially deadly force against a handcuffed suspect who is not attempting to fight or flee."

Kirkman was promoted in 2018. He ultimately resigned from the department in 2021. His LinkedIn page shows he works for a Beaufort-based tree care organization and owns a personal training company. Gibson resigned in October 2017. Swinehamer quit in March 2019.

Jefferson Parish Cops Claim They Had to Shoot Calvin Cain to Death b/c He Started to Drive Toward Them but a Witness says the Car Never Moved. 1 Year Later Cops Refuse to Release Body Cam, Suit Filed

/

From [HERE] A Black family in New Orleans has announced they're filing a lawsuit against Jefferson Parish Sheriff Joe Lopinto and some of his deputies accusing them of using excessive force. Last summer a deputy shot and killed a man they say was trying to escape and then drove towards a deputy. 

WWL Louisiana's Eleanor Tabone sat down with Calvin Cain's mother and his best friend days after the shooting, now the family is suing the sheriff's office.

At the time of the shooting, Lopinto said NOPD asked for help in locating the man suspected in a shooting in New Orleans. Armed with the information that the suspect lived in The Lumiere apartment complex in the 3300 block of West Esplanade, Lopinto said officers found a car identified in the New Orleans shooting and waited for the suspect."

At a press conference after the shooting, the sheriff said, "They attempted to block that vehicle in which he tried to make his escape from it. Running into the back of the fence, turning the vehicle wheels forward, where I had one of my deputies approaching him at that time. My deputy ended up firing shots into the windshield."

Mallory Woodfork, Calvin's mother told Eleanor Tabone last year she watched her child die, saying, "My son Calvin, walked out the building...  I'm watching my son, I could tell he was on FaceTime because of how he was holding the phone. I saw when he turned where the car was at, and as soon he got in the car, I saw a white F-150, whatever pickup truck, when boom, bam, and I heard shots instantly."

The family maintains Calvin never started the car and drove towards a deputy. Woodfork said last year, "He didn't move, he didn't have the opportunity to move. And I was there. His mama witnessed his murder. I was just 15 feet away."

Martin said on that fatal day she was on Facetime with him as he was walking to his car, saying, "He put the phone up, he sit down. As soon as gets ready to start the car, I just heard a car crash, the phone just dropped to the floor. So I am like 'Calvin, Calvin, Calvin,' he's not saying nothing. So I hung up the phone. I call back he doesn't answer. I call back again, he doesn't answer. I call back, he doesn't answer."

Now the family is calling for justice. Lawyer Bobby DiCello said, "She needs to know that her community is safe and this lawsuit is about exploring the problems in Jefferson Parish." 

The family's legal team is pushing for JPSO to release the body camera video.

DiCello said, "It's a chance to get to the bottom of the story, a story the Jefferson Parish sheriff will not allow to be told. If Calvin did wrong, it would be on that video."

Woodfork said, "I want him to release the bodycam, release the camera." 

Lawyers say the suit is being filed in federal court. Calvin would have turned 20 next week.

Fed Ct Rules COVID Shots are Not Vaccines b/c They Don’t Prevent the Spread of COVID. Thus, the LA Mandate is Not Rationally Related to Preventing Disease, Violates the Right to Refuse Med Treatment

/

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the COVID mandate in LA is unlawful and violates the individual’s right to refuse medical treatment. The court held that mRNA COVID injections are not “vaccines” within the meaning of Supreme Court case precedent because they don’t prevent transmission or provide immunity from COVID. As such, COVID shots are simply medical treatments and do not the pass strict scrutiny under the Constitution because individuals have the fundamental right to refuse medical treatment.

While the decision is considered a victory to many people who take their freedom seriously, it is nevertheless cowardly because it is so late. That is, most mandates are no longer in effect and the decision comes after millions have already been forced by the government to take deadly, experimental injections - which was the point. Such is the nature of the lex-icon in the free range prison.

The ruling centers on a lawsuit brought by Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) and other plaintiffs who challenged Los Angeles Unified School District’s (LAUSD) adoption of a policy that required its employees to get the Covid-19 vaccine to keep their jobs. LAUSD issued the initial vaccine policy March 4, 2021.

There was no trial. The government requested the court to make a judgement on the pleadings, which is a pre-trial motion like a motion to dismiss. To make a decision the court must accept all factual allegations in the complaint as true and construe them in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. The district court granted the government’s motion by ruling that “mandatory vaccination laws are generally constitutional” and that “Supreme Court precedent did not require that a vaccine have the specific purpose of preventing disease.’ According to the District Court, Supreme Court precedent states that rational basis review (a low standard of review) applied to these facts and under rational basis review no case can plausibly challenge a mandatory vaccination policy. The plaintiffs appealed the ruling.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the district court misapplied Supreme Court precedent which states that “the principle of vaccination is to prevent the spread of disease and or provide immunity.” The court must balance the an individual’s liberty interest with the government’s societal interest in preventing disease. The government’s interest of preventing societal disease will generally supersede an individual’s liberty rights with regard to a vaccine mandate.

However, in this case the plaintiffs alleged that due to the fact that COVID shots do not prevent the spread of COVID or provide immunity, they were simply individual medical treatments - not vaccines. The complaint stated, “According to most official sources, the most the shot could arguably do was to reduce an infected person’s symptoms. Thus, it is a therapeutic, no different than taking an aspirin or other medicine to reduce the symptoms of illness.” Plaintiffs argued that “the Covid-19 shots do not prevent the spread of Covid-19 and thus must be considered as a private health matter - compulsory medication - not a public one.” Importantly, the government did not properly dispute those claims and argued that the shots are intended to reduce an individual’s symptoms of COVID and were “safe and effective” at doing so. As such, the court overruled the district court decision due to the fact that COVID shots do not meet “the principle of vaccination” or legal standard for vaccinations because they don’t prevent transmission or provide immunity. The court explained that ‘a government has power to mandate prophylactic measures aimed at preventing a person from spreading disease to others but it may not force medical treatment that is solely for the recipient’s benefit.’ The court explained that even under rational basis review (‘not crazy review’), which is a very low standard of review, the COVID mandate is unlawful because its purpose is not rationally related to preventing the spread of COVID. This is so because the injections don’t prevent transmission or provide immunity. Rather, COVID mandates have the purpose of reducing an individual’s symptoms - thus Supreme Court precedent concerning vaccines does not apply to the COVID mandate.

Furthermore, the concurrence from judge Collins explained that the district court applied the wrong standard of review and should have applied strict scrutiny review because the mandate invoked the plaintiff’s Constitutional right to refuse medical treatment. Collins said, ‘a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment.’ The Supreme Court’s case law clarifies that compulsory treatment for the health benefit of the person treated—as opposed to compulsory treatment for the health benefit of others—implicates the fundamental right to refuse medical treatment.’ Collins explained that the plaintiff’s allegations have invoked that right.’ Accordingly, the district court erroneously applied rational basis review and should used a higher standard to review the mandate because it infringed on fundamental Constitutional rights. Nevertheless, as explained, even under the lowest legal standard of review the mandate is unlawful because COVID shots are mere individual medical treatment, not a vaccine as defined by Supreme Court case law. [MORE]

The complaint stated that individuals have a Constitutional right to refuse to inject themselves with the Covid-19 shots. It stated,

The Supreme Court has recognized the right to bodily integrity as one of the most fundamental rights known to man. Indeed, it has been called “first among equals”. As the Supreme Court has said: ‘No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law.’” Guertin v. State of Michigan, 912 F.3d 907, 918 (6th Cir. 2019) (quoting Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250, 251 (1891)). Indeed, the Supreme Court has “never retreated ... from [its] recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests.” Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. 141, 159 (2013). For more than a hundred years, the Supreme Court has applied meaningful judicial review to government actions that invaded this right to bodily integrity. It did so even before creating the modern tiers of constitutional scrutiny.

[MORE HERE] and [HERE]

In a similar suit that also challenges a federal COVID mandate in the US District Court for the District of Utah (funded by Dr. David Martin) the same arguments were made. The complaint in that case explains,

“Because the Injections are treatments, and not vaccines, strict scrutiny applies. The US Supreme Court has recognized a “general liberty interest in refusing medical treatment.” Cruzan v. Dir., Mo. Dep’t of Health, 497 U.S. 261, 278, 110 S. Ct. 2841, 2851, 111 L.Ed.2d 224, 242 (1990). It has also recognized that the forcible injection of medication into a nonconsenting person’s body represents a substantial interference with that person’s liberty. Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 229, 110 S. Ct. 1028, 1041, 108 L.Ed.2d 178, 203 (1990), see also id. at 223 (further acknowledging in dicta that, outside of the prison context, the right to refuse treatment would be a “fundamental right” subject to strict scrutiny).32

As mandated medical treatments are a substantial burden, Defendants must prove that the CMS Mandate is narrowly tailored to meet a compelling interest.

No such compelling interest exists because, as alleged above, the Injections are not effective against the now dominant Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 in that they do not prevent the recipient from becoming infected, getting reinfected, or transmitting SARS-CoV-2 to others. Indeed, evidence shows that vaccinated individuals have more SARS-CoV-2 in their nasal passages than unvaccinated people do.

Further Analysis of Data from Berkeley Earth Clearly Indicate that Climate Change During the Period 1860 to 2020 is Driven by the Sun

/

From [HERE] In a recent analysis of global temperature data from Berkeley Earth (1), I found that the main factor driving the temperature increase from 1860 to 2020 is the earth's orientation to the sun. Despite criticism from those who believe in anthropogenic climate change, accusing me of being sponsored by the oil industry and lacking “climate science” qualifications, I responded politely. I also made a mental note that industry sponsorship could supplement my pension. Critics did not engage with the data or provide a compelling argument. I questioned what qualifications are needed to conduct basic data analysis in Excel. A more relevant question is why this type of analysis hasn't been published already. Critics argued that Milankovitch cycles operate on longer timescales and cannot explain current climate change. While true, the specific timing within the solar cycles could be crucial, and the existence of unidentified shorter cycles is possible. I also overlooked the 11-year solar cycles that influence short-term changes in the sun's activity. If these cycles influence climate change, they could help identify a solar signal within temperature records.

Further reading revealed that there is strong evidence that the 11-year solar cycles do impact our climate (2). To maximise the ability to detect this solar signal in temperature data, we require a climate change-sensitive region, high-resolution monthly data, a specific time of year, and a relevant cycle period that aligns with the phase. Previous analysis showed that the northern hemisphere warms faster than southern latitudes, with winter having a more significant impact than summer. For example, the warming rate in January in Greenland from 1860 to 2020 is 6.5 times greater than in July. On this basis I conducted a specific analysis on the January temperature anomaly record in Greenland to identify any potential solar signature. [MORE]

["Doggy wants you to just barely survive—not to be fully alive"] 'If I Dont Comply I Lose My Freedom, My Career, My Business. What is Slavery Then? Rage at Elites Who Crammed COVID-19 Down Our Throats

/

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Doggy – Uncle Brother—the condition and conditioning which serves you your problem doubling as your very own ambition. 2) a situation such that the fulfillment of the conditions necessary to achieve a desired result produces its failure. 3) the entity that goes by many names, including bank-monopolized capitalism, the Spectacle, the Hall of Mirrors and the Looking Glass society, the Mega-machine, Statism, Global Imperialism, Scientific Socialism, cooperative federalism, corporate religion, and the phallacy of “progress”—the manifestation and embodiment of the tool of the Wallflower Order. 4) any shrewd trickster. 5) Leviathan’s Big Brother. 6) the creators of the source code for the global dis-information “system.” 7) Dr. Sam and Mr. Brother. 8) the collective name ascribed to inert abstractions that we have given artificial lifesupport to and unwittingly sanctioned or accorded superiority over life. Doggy is the cultural conditioning system that maintains its hold over all things and all people, even our minds and opinions, by getting us to be informers and informants on each other, by getting us to be the trustees in and of their mind prism prison. Doggy is any and all conditioning, often self-imposed and when necessary involuntarily inflicted, that promotes your belief in illusion (both grand and petit) as a way of life. Doggy creates the conditions wherein an undetected and undeclared war is waged on us directly through us. The result of this on-going psychological war is that you, like many others, willingly destroy your freedom without the possibility of recognizing or overcoming the oppressions of control. The belief in illusion is the agreement to oppression. Doggy is the violent programming we have sustained all of our lives. Doggy wants you to just barely survive—but not to be fully alive—wants you to remain barely alive, but not to fully live. Say Uncle! Bad Doggy. (See: “THEY,” Hidalgo, Vampires, Society, Thoughtforms, CrimethInc., Beasthood, Corporate State, Governments, Uncle Sam, Wallflower Order, Cell, The Collective, Fishbowlers, Big Brother & “Greater System”)

Master’s rent – Federal and state income tax and property tax. When citizen-slaves in America are not working, they can come and go when they want and therefore have the illusion of true freedom—called “free-range slavery.” They only work from January until May for their master and they get to keep part of the “money” the sale of their labor earns them. They have the illusion of owning their own home and their master will only evict them out of it if they fail to pay the master’s rent (which he calls income tax and property tax). The citizen-slaves are treated so well by their master that they don’t want to see, much less leave their cage. American citizen-slaves are content because they usually have enough “money” to buy all the roaming freedom they need. American citizen-slaves realize that they will be punished if they do not comply willingly with master’s demands or commands. A man ceases to be free anytime an obligation is forced upon him, regardless of how small. (See: Involuntary Servitude, Slavery, Citizen, Slave, Serf, Feudalism, Cooperative Federalism, Allegiance, Voluntiered Servitude, “Credit,” Usury, Interest, Labor, Freedom, Corporate State, Govern & Ruler)

Voluntiered Slavery – First Tier—working for the banksters (paying tribute on the cost of “capital,” i.e., debt used as-if it were, or even could ever truly be “money”) under global Hegelian Banking. Second Tier—working for Uncle $cam via the unlawful and criminal misapplication of the Internal Revenue Code coincident with the misinterpretation of the federal revenue taxing laws and apportionment provisions of the Constitution, manifested in the form of federal and state income tax withholding schemes and gambits from one’s paycheck and voluntary compliance with so-called “tax returns.” Third Tier—working for a corporation (a deadly cartoon) which has no existence but through your energy under the corporate fiction of its charter from yet another legal fiction—a Corporate State. (See: Banking, Declaration of Undiependance, Property, Slavery, Wealth, Labor, Asset, Paycheck, Real Tax & Constitution for the United States of America)

Speaking thru Their Dummy (Fauci) Elites Casually Admit there was No Scientific Basis for Social Distancing, Masking or COVID Lockdowns that Destroyed Small Businesses, Jobs and Freedom of Movement

/

From [HERE] In April 2020, The Daily Mail had absolutely no issue with publishing and promoting the obviously flawed Science™ of the pandemic Experts™ like Pantsdown Ferguson:

Meanwhile, Professor Neil Ferguson from Imperial College London, who is advising ministers, said 'significant' social distancing will most likely be needed until there is a vaccine.

He told the Today programme that as restrictions are eased, more testing will be needed to isolate individual cases and trace their contacts to keep future outbreaks under control.

'Because without that, our estimates show we have relatively little leeway,' he said.

'If we relax measures too much then we'll see a resurgence of transmission.

'What we really need is the ability to put something in their place. If we want to open schools, let people get back to work, then we need to keep transmission down in another manner.

'And I should say, it's not going to be going back to normal. We will have to maintain some form of social distancing, a significant level of social distancing, probably indefinitely until we have a vaccine available.'

Now, in June 2024, they casually report that Archcriminal Fauci, responsible for much of the worldwide plandemic response nonsense admits that he made it all up, conveniently forgetting the part they played in promoting it:

Speaking to counsel on behalf of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic earlier this year, Fauci told Republicans that the six foot social distancing rule 'sort of just appeared' and that he did not recall how it came about. 

'You know, I don't recall. It sort of just appeared,' he said according to committee transcripts when pressed on how the rule came about. 

He added he 'was not aware of studies' that supported the social distancing, conceding that such studies 'would be very difficult' to do. 

In addition to not recalling any evidence supporting social distancing, Fauci also told the committee's counsel that he didn't remember reading anything to support that masking kids would prevent COVID.

Oh, never mind all the social, economic and public health harms it caused then? Not to mention the detriment to a generation’s education?

I guess Fauci simply can’t remember the (in)famous Imperial paper then? Funny how someone in such an influential position has no recollection when a complete nobody like me has it all chronicled? Here’s a couple of concise analyses that might aid his memory: [MORE]

An NIH Scientist with Ties to Big Pharma Retracted a Journal Study Showing COVID Injections May Cause Cancer, according to Emails Compelled through FOIA Request

/

From [HERE] and [HERE] A recent investigation by Australian journalist Rebekah Barnett suggests politics and financial interests, not scientific concerns, led to the retraction of a 2021 peer-reviewed study finding the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2 and the mRNA vaccine impair critical DNA repair mechanisms, which could lead to cancer.

Viruses, published by MDPI, retracted the study in 2022, despite objections by the lead author, Ya-Fang Mei, Ph.D., of Sweden’s Umeå University.

Subsequent research and case studies have largely validated the findings of the retracted study conducted by Mei and Hui Jiang, Ph.D., of Stockholm University in Sweden.

Barnett’s investigation, built on work by independent journalist John Davidson and Dr. Ah Kahn Syed, included emails released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) revealing that Eric O. Freed, Ph.D., editor-in-chief of Viruses, oversaw its retraction.

Freed, a scientist with the National Institutes of Health (NIH), suggested the retraction could proceed without evidence of scientific misconduct, raising questions about his impartiality.

The study’s co-author originally requested the retraction. However, Mei strongly objected, claiming Stockholm University “forced” the retraction due to external pressure.

The NIH rejected Davidson’s FOIA request for Freed’s emails related to the retraction, citing trade secret exemptions. However, Barnett’s FOIA to Stockholm University uncovered some of these emails.

Barnett’s article contains images of many FOIA’d emails describing the progression of arguments among various scientists and journal and university personnel leading up to the retraction.

Retracted paper showed spike protein could cause cancer

Mei and Jiang found that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein — and its mRNA-vaccine-derived analog — significantly inhibits DNA damage repair, which is essential for maintaining genomic stability and preventing cancer.

The researchers demonstrated that the spike protein localizes in the cell nucleus and inhibits DNA repair by hindering the recruitment of key repair proteins BRCA1 (breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein) and 53BP1 (p53-binding protein 1) to the damage site.

The spike protein’s suppression of the p53 gene, known as the “guardian of the genome,” is particularly concerning, as the gene is crucial in preventing cancer development — particularly, breast, ovarian and other cancers affecting women.

Moreover, the study found that the spike protein impairs V(D)J recombination, a complex genetic process occurring in the early stages of T and B lymphocyte development, which are key components of the adaptive immune system.

This process is essential for generating a diverse repertoire of T-cell receptors and antibodies (immunoglobulins) that can recognize and combat a wide range of pathogens. [MORE]

Karen Kingston: COVID-19 was a Planned Bioweapon Attack. It and other ‘Pandemics’ are caused by mRNA viruses that can be aerosolized, used to contaminate food, beverages or injected into the blood

/

From [HERE] Per EcoHealth Alliance, DARPA, and peer-review publications COVID-19 was a pre-planned global bioweapon attack that used aerosolized mRNA nanoparticles to cause a pandemic of illness and fear.

December 20, 2023: Many influencers are stating that there was never a pandemic caused by a biological gain-of-function SARS-CoV-2 virus, but there was something that targeted select individuals and communities causing a range of symptoms from loss of taste and smell to severe respiratory infections and in some cases, cytokine storms or even massive blood clotting. Per my analysis, confirmed by Russian military General Igor Kirollov, COVID-19 and other ‘pandemics’ are caused by synthetic pathogens, or mRNA viruses that can be aerosolized, used to contaminate food, beverages, or surfaces, or…directly injected into a person’s bloodstream via ‘vaccination.’

May 16: 2023: (Originally published on December 15, 2022) To this day there is debate amongst medical freedom leaders and experts as to what caused the COVID-19 pandemic. Personally, I’ve invested many thousands of hours throughout 2021 and 2022, in reviewing documents such as EcoHealth’s Alliance pitch to DARPA, peer-reviewed publications regarding the ground zero attacks in China, Italy, and the US, scientific publications and manufacturer’s documents regarding nanoparticle technologies, Pfizer’s private and government contracts, dozens of patents, nanoparticle and SynBio forecasting reports, and reviewed many DARPA communications regarding the current and future applications of nanoparticle technologies.

In March of 2023, the Russian military issued a statement that COVID-19 and many other recent pandemics were caused by artificial pathogens or synthetic viruses. These artificial pathogens are mRNA nanoparticles, the same mRNA nanoparticle technologies found in the COVID-19 mRNA injections.

Stew Peters and I Reiterate that COVID-19 is Caused by BioSynthetic Pathogens on December 15, 2022

On December 15, 2022, Stew Peters allowed me on his platform so that I could make the following statement in order to clearly articulate to concerned citizens how the mRNA nanoparticle technology caused COVID-19:

“Residents of Wuhan and other cities of China, Italy and the United States, were victims of a coordinated nanoparticle bioweapon attack, a bioweapon attack using the same nanoparticles that are in all COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Most victims became infected with the nanoparticles via a direct aerosol attack, surface transmission, or food and beverage contamination.

US citizens should be horrified to learn that EcoHealth Alliance, the NIH, the DOD, and other departments within our US government refer to lipid nanoparticles (nanocarriers) as vaccine technology that can a deliver toxin, chemical weapon, and/or weapon of biowarfare.

The EcoHealth Alliance proposal to DARPA clearly identifies nanoparticle bioweapons as spike proteins, spike protein nanoparticles that are ‘bat vaccines.’ EcoHealth lays out the plan to ‘vaccinate’ residents of select Chinese cities as well as US residents with spike-protein nanoparticle bat-vaccines via aerosol attack, surface transmission, and food and beverage contamination. The purposes of the nanoparticle bat-vaccines are to suppress the human immune system while turning human beings into carriers of lethal diseases.

The DARPA proposal states that EcoHealth will ask the CDC to ‘vaccinate wild vampire bats’ in the United States. The US military will have an app so they can track the ‘vaccinated bats.’

There are three critical points that need to be stated regarding Wuhan, SARS-CoV-2, and COVID-19:

  • There weren’t mass COVID-19 deaths in 2020. Many people became ill, some became very ill, and some died, but 99.99% didn’t die. EcoHealth states that the point of the nanoparticle vaccines are to weaken the immune system so that animals (humans) can carry lethal viruses without dying from the viruses.

  • Most COVID-19 diagnoses in 2020 were diagnoses based on pure financial incentives and fraudulent.

  • COVID-19 is caused by an advanced nanoparticle bioweapon that uses mRNA technology to strategically deteriorate and destroy cardiovascular, neurological, immune and reproductive systems. COVID-19 is NOT caused by a virus, gain-of-function, wild-type or otherwise.

  • Lastly, the victims who were originally inoculated with the bioweapon in 2020 were not highly-contagious, if infectious at all. The first round of nanoparticle bioweapons did not contain mRNA codes. They were ‘empty rounds.’ There were also over 200 mRNA sequences of SARS-CoV-2 in early 2020. The virus was never isolated because multiple mRNA sequences were released. At ground zero, from the Wuhan Seafood Market, 9 patients who were sampled for the SARS-CoV-2 sequence, their sequences didn’t match. It’s scientifically impossible for a virus to mutate that quickly.

  • In regards to the injections, Sergeant Jason Murphy of the US Marines states in his letter that when victims are injected with mRNA nanoparticles that then directly enter into their blood streams, that in effect turns them into gain-of-function bioweapons labs capable of shedding and infecting others.

Details supporting these statements can be found in EcoHealth’s Alliance pitch to DARPA, and are substantiated by peer-reviewed publications regarding the ground zero attacks in China, Italy, and the US, as well as scientific publications and manufacturer’s documents regarding nanoparticle technology, including the patents.”

Note: It’s important to understand that ‘gain-of function viruses’ are lipid nanoparticle technologies programmed with mRNA codes. mRNA is not a biosynthetic substance itself, mRNA are software codes. SARS-CoV-2 is not a virus, it’s a software code programmed into nanoparticles. The nanoparticle is a modRNA-LNP (modified ribonucleic acid/lipid nanoparticle).