To Try to Control It's Uncontrollable “Servants” Dallas Voters Nix Major Tool of Police Harassment: 'I Smelled Marijuana.' Blacks are Disproportionately Stopped/Degraded in City Controlled by Liberals

From [HERE] The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to hear a case involving a Texas police officer, Roberto Felix Jr., who shot and killed a motorist, Ashtian Barnes, after stopping him for toll violations tied to the rental car he was driving. The issue in Barnes v. Felix is whether that use of deadly force, which happened after Felix leaped onto the car as Barnes began driving away, should be assessed based solely on "the moment of the threat" or based on an analysis that includes the circumstances that produced the threat. But another detail of the encounter reflects the role that the purported odor of marijuana plays in police stops that may lead to humiliating searches, cash seizures, arrests, or, as in this case, potentially lethal violence.

When Felix asked Barnes for his driver's license and proof of insurance, a federal judge noted in 2021, "Barnes informed him that he did not have his license and that he had rented the vehicle a week earlier in his girlfriend's name." Barnes started "reaching around the vehicle and rummaging through papers." Felix told him to stop "digging around" and "asked Barnes whether he had anything in the vehicle he should know about, claiming he smelled marijuana." Although a search conducted after Felix killed Barnes found no marijuana, the alleged odor helped escalate the encounter, indicating that Felix suspected Barnes of criminal activity as well as toll violations.

A ballot initiative that Dallas voters overwhelmingly approved this week aims to avoid such escalation. In addition to generally barring local police from arresting people for marijuana possession misdemeanors, Proposition R) says "Dallas police shall not consider the odor of marijuana or hemp to constitute probable cause for any search or seizure." That seemingly modest restriction undercuts an excuse that in practice gives cops the discretion to stop, harass, and search pretty much anyone by claiming to smell pot.

Proposition R reflects an ongoing controversy over marijuana odor and probable cause. In states that have legalized marijuana for medical or recreational use, some courts have held that the smell of cannabis, whether detected by a human or a police dog, can no longer justify a search, since it does not necessarily constitute evidence of a crime. And while Texas has not legalized marijuana for any use, it has legalized hemp, which comes from the same plant species and cannot be distinguished from marijuana without a laboratory test to measure THC content.

In 2019, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325, which changed the state's definition of "marihuana" to exclude "hemp, as that term is defined by Section 121.001" of the Texas Agriculture Code. Consistent with federal law, Section 121.001 defines "hemp" as "the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including the seeds of the plant and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis."

The difference between legal "hemp" and prohibited "marihuana," in other words, is the THC concentration, which cannot be measured by smell or even by a field test. "Before H.B. 1325," Dallas attorney Jon McCurley notes, "marijuana's distinct and readily recognizable odor often [led] law enforcement to believe that a criminal act was occurring." But after H.B. 1325, "simply detecting the odor of marijuana may not be enough to justify a search or seizure under the Fourth Amendment because in order to search or get a warrant, law enforcement officials must have probable cause that a crime has been committed or is about to be committed."

Police are "trained to recognize marijuana," a College Station, Texas, police officer told the CBS affiliate in Bryan after H.B. 1325 was enacted. "Coming from someone who's been around hemp as well, they are very similar. They look the same; they smell the same."

The law enforcement complications created by hemp legalization went beyond the justification for searches. After H.B. 1325 passed, Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg, whose jurisdiction includes Houston, the state's biggest city, said her office would no longer accept possession cases involving misdemeanor quantities of marijuana (less than four ounces) "without a lab test result proving that the evidence seized has a THC concentration of over .3%." She added that "felony marijuana charges will be evaluated on a case by case basis by our Office" and "in the proper instances, such charges may be taken while lab test results are pending." [MORE]

If Your Servants Can Act on Behalf of Themselves are You Still the Master? Honolulu Cops Sway Representatives to Reject Settlement for Lindani Myeni, a Black Man They Killed. Liberal DA Supports Cops

From [HERE] The Honolulu City Council decided Thursday not to vote on a proposal that would have the city paying $1.5 million to settle a lawsuit over the 2021 police shooting of a South African rugby star.

Last month, the council postponed a vote to approve the settlement after hearing hours of highly charged testimony from the family of Lindani Myeni, Honolulu’s police chief, and a large number of police officers who appeared. alongside other city officials in a show of opposition to a proposed settlement. [MORE]

City Council members ultimately postponed voting on whether to approve the settlement

Council Chair Tommy Waters said in a statement: “I have decided to cancel the upcoming vote on the proposed lawsuit settlement, shifting the matter to the judiciary system, where it rightly belongs. This decision reflects the Council’s commitment to allowing legal experts to address the facts and merits of a civil case in court versus at a legislative hearing. The Council recognizes the importance of upholding judicial due process and believes that the courtroom is the most suitable setting to ensure a fair and transparent examination of these facts.

“During our last Full Council meeting in October, the discussion around the Myeni case escalated, turning the Honolulu City Council meeting at Kapolei Hale into what resembled a heated civil trial, with speakers presenting passionate arguments and facts from both sides. It is clear that the legal framework and procedural safeguards of the judiciary system are best equipped to handle this matter. I will not permit these public hearings to devolve into a spectacle for grandstanding or serve as a substitute for a court of law.”

Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney Steve Alm said in a statement Thursday:

“I am pleased that the settlement in the Myeni case was rejected.

“My office did an independent investigation of all the available evidence in this case and determined that the Honolulu Police Officers involved acted professionally and appropriately. Our investigation also determined that no charges would be filed as a result of the Officers’ use of deadly force in this incident.

“Settling this case would also say that the officers involved were motivated by racial prejudice. There was zero evidence of that.

The two officers who shot Myeni, Brent Sylvester and Garrick Orosco, who was seriously injured, were cleared of wrongdoing in June 2021 by Alm’s office, which declined to pursue charges against them. 

The officers had responded to the scene of an alleged unlawful entry call in April after Lindani mistakenly entered a house which was an Airbnb where an Asian couple was staying. Lindani, who was a tourist on vacation with his wife and 2 children, believed it to be the temple next door.

When he entered he alarmed the couple. A doorbell video shows the 29-year-old arriving at the house, taking off his shoes before entering through an open door and then quickly leaving after his presence confused the Asian couple. In the video Myeni is heard repeatedly apologizing to them as he exited. The couple frantically overreacted and called 911 and during an emotional call reported him as dangerous and claimed to be terrified. 

Due to the fact that the door was open and there was no signage indicating “no trespass” to the public, said entry most likely was not unlawful - despite being unwanted. in other words, Lindani did not commit a crime. Additionally, the couple gave inconsistent stories about what happened - and definitely did not appear to be “terrified” on the video. [MORE]

Police responding to the 911 call immediately approached and then shot and killed him a short time later outside the house. 

The video reveals the fact that cops never announced themselves in a very dark area at night as they shined a bright light into the Black man’s face. As the cops quickly ran up on him and put their hands on him he defended himself.

A lawsuit filed on his behalf said he likely mistook the home for a temple next door that’s open to the public. Unarmed, the Black man from South Africa was wearing a traditional Zulu headband with a tuft of fur at the forehead.

Doorbell and police bodycam camera footage had shown Myeni ignoring commands to get on the ground. The camera then shows a stun gun fired by police either malfunctioning or having no effect on Myeni.  

Most importantly the video also shows that an officer fired several gunshots at Myeni before identifying themselves as 'Police!' 

In this matter the cops were the aggressors who initiated a violent assault in the dark on a Black man without announcing themselves. The Black Man was unarmed and apparently trying to get away from his unknown assailants. Thus, deadly force, which was already unavailable to them because they were the aggressors, could not have been applied because the cops were not facing an imminent, deadly attack from an unarmed Black man defending himself against their aggression and trying to flee. [MORE]

Lakewood Settles Said Joquin’s Lawsuit for $8M; Liar Cop Shot Black Man to Death After He Rolled a Stop Sign. No Charges Filed by Prosecutor, Cop Still Has Job in City Controlled by Elite Liberals

From [HERE] The family of a 26-year-old Black man shot to death by a Lakewood police officer during a traffic stop has settled a lawsuit after the city agreed to pay his family $8 million Thursday.

Said Joquin died May 1, 2020, after officer Michael Wiley pulled him over for running a stop sign. His death sparked community protests.

The settlement now brings the total payment for deaths involving Wiley to $21 million. A previous case involving the death of Fife resident Leonard Thomas was settled for $13 million.

“The result brings some justice to the family,” said attorney Jack Connelly, who handled both cases.

TRAFFIC STOP

On May 1, 2020, at approximately 4:00 p.m. in the afternoon, Wiley and another Lakewood police officer stopped Joquin’s vehicle after seeing him run a stop sign, according to a statement released by the investigative team. According to a tort claim filed by Joquin’s family, Wiley rear-ended Joquin’s car and approached him with gun drawn, saying “shut the fuck up or you’ll get shot.” According to a statement by investigators, officers saw a gun on the floor of the vehicle. The officers held both Joquin and his passenger at gunpoint waiting for backup, according to the statement. [MORE]

12. Officers parked in such a manner that the shooting was not captured on the dashcam video of Officer Schueller. Defendant Wiley's vehicle was not equipped with video or audio.

13. After officers learned that there was a firearm in the vehicle under the driver's seat, still in its case, they immediately escalated the situation, drawing their weapons and pointing them at Said and his passenger, Angel Vargas.

14. Said had his hands up as he was directed to do so and responded to Defendant Wiley, which was captured on audio recording that he did not want to get shot. Wiley continued to escalate the situation, regardless of the fact that Said posed no threat of harm. Wiley improperly set up a situation in which he ordered Said to put Said's hands on Said's head and told Said he was going to get shot. "Keep your hands on your head. You're going to get shot dude."

15. Defendant Wiley held his gun, trained on Said for a prolonged period of several minutes as Said complied with officer commands. After several minutes of an unnecessarily escalated and heightened circumstance with guns aimed at Said and Angel, Defendant Wiley ultimately fired four rounds at close range into Said's body, upper chest and arm, killing him.

16. Defendant Wiley killed Said because Said moved his hands. Wiley later tried to claim that Said "lunged" for the gun, but this never happened. The gun was in a closed holster under the seat and not available for use. Defendant Wiley improperly handled the situation and killed Said for moving his hands. As a result of the wrongful and negligent shooting, Said was declared dead at the hospital.

17. This complaint is filed against the City of Lakewood for its unreasonable failure to maintain a properly trained police force, its negligent retention of officers who had been found to have previously wrongfully killed a citizen, its failure to properly train its officers regarding the proper use of deadly force and how to handle a situation without unnecessarily escalating it and its deliberate indifference to the constitutional rights of citizens, including Plaintiffs.

Defendant Wiley was left on the LPD police force in 2017 even after having committed multiple civil rights violations, having punitive damages assessed against him, and having wrongfully killed an unarmed citizen.

Joquin’s family didn’t believe Wiley’s story. “I feel like it was overkill,” Dawn Kortner, Joquin’s mother, said in 2021. “He took steps that shouldn’t have been taken. I feel like he was being overly aggressive, and I want him to be held accountable for what he did. He shouldn’t get a pension and sit at home and enjoy his kids when we can’t enjoy Said anymore.”

In 2022, Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney Mary Robnett declined to file charges against Wiley for Joquin’s death. In a letter sent to Lakewood Police Chief Mike Zaro, she detailed why she believed Wiley was justified in killing Joquin. The letter discusses Joquin’s “unpredictable and dangerous behavior” by running a stop sign on a busy road in front of police, bullet trajectory evidence showing the 26-year-old no longer had his hands on his head when shot by Wiley and a handgun found on the floorboard near Joquin’s feet. An internal investigation had already found Wiley’s actions in the Joquin shooting to be within policy. Wiley is still employed as a Lakewood Police officer, according to city spokesperson Brynn Grimley.

Shreveport Police Sued for Murdering Fleen Myles During Suspect Stop for Tinted Windows. Unarmed Black Man, who was a Passenger, Posed No Threat and Wasn’t Under Arrest When Cop Shot Him to Death

From [HERE] The death of Fleen Myles III has sparked outrage and highlighted the ongoing issue of police violence against Black individuals in Shreveport, Louisiana. Myles, a 33-year-old Black man, was killed by police after having been harassed by officers for months. This incident is not an isolated case but part of a troubling pattern of harassment and violence perpetrated by law enforcement in the area.

The incident

On Nov. 5, 2023, Fleen Myles accepted a ride from Jacobi Brown in the predominantly Black neighborhood of Sunset Acres. During the ride, Shreveport police pulled over Brown for a window tint violation. Despite having no reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing, officers began to harass Myles, demanding identification. Myles showed them his insurance identification, but it was deemed insufficient, leading to his forced exit from the vehicle.

In a panic, Myles fled on foot, prompting Officer Maverick Caldwell II to pursue him. The situation escalated when Caldwell threatened to shoot Myles, who stumbled and fell in a residential carport. Despite being unarmed and attempting to comply, Myles was shot multiple times by Caldwell, resulting in fatal injuries.

A history of police abuse

The lawsuit, filed by Myles’ family on Nov. 4, 2024, details a long history of police abuse in Shreveport, particularly against Black residents. It highlights that Black individuals are over six times more likely to be shot and killed by police compared to their white counterparts. The Shreveport Police Department has faced numerous allegations of excessive force and harassment, with many cases involving minor offenses escalating into violent confrontations.

For instance, the lawsuit references the shooting death of unarmed Alonzo Bagley in January 2018, which led to federal charges against the officer involved. Similarly, Anthony Childs was killed in 2019 for a minor infraction related to the city’s now-repealed “sagging pants” ordinance, showcasing the systemic issues within the SPD.

The role of informants

According to the lawsuit, the harassment of Myles began when police suspected his nephew of a shooting incident. After Myles refused to act as an informant against his family member, he became a target for police surveillance and harassment. This raises critical questions about the ethics of using individuals as informants, particularly when it involves family members.

As noted by Bakari Sellers, one of the attorneys representing Myles’ family, the SPD’s actions have created a climate of fear among residents.

Unzealous White Prosecutor Fails to Get His Grand Jury to Charge Omaha Cop who Fatally Shot Cameron Ford. White Cop Claimed Unarmed Black Man “Rushed” at Him During a No-Knock Raid

From [HERE] Grand jury results are in for 13 cases presented to them by Douglas County Attorney Don Kleine.

On Thursday, the grand jury returned a “no true bill” for all of them — including the death of 37-year-old Cameron Ford, who was shot and killed by Omaha SWAT Officer Adam Vail during a no-knock search warrant in August.

“No true bill” means the grand jury will not indict him — that the evidence did not persuade them that there is probable cause to believe the officer committed a crime.

Following the shooting, Omaha Police Chief Todd Schmaderer recommended that the officer be fired from his position, saying Vail was in violation of the department’s protocol when issuing the warrant in the early morning hours of Aug. 28.

“The internal affairs process and investigation were comprehensive and thorough. During the course of the investigation, I did not see or uncover any criminal intent on the part of Officer Vail. Nonetheless, I cannot ignore my determination that policy and procedure violations occurred,” Schmaderer said in a statement in September.

Vail remains an active duty Omaha Police officer. HR will hear his case as part of the employee’s due process rights. If he is officially fired, the case would be appealed and — based on the union contract — it would go to an arbitration hearing.

The Omaha Police Officers Association has expressed their support of Vail following the incident.

MN Cop Wasn't in Danger But It was Reasonable for Him to Think He Was So Govt Can't Be Held Accountable for Fatal Shooting of Black Man: Ricky Cobb Case Tossed per Law of the Jungle Clogic (Immunity)

From [HERE] and [HERE] A federal judge Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit against white Minnesota state trooper Ryan Londregan in the shooting death of Ricky Cobb II during a 2023 traffic stop.

The decision is the latest development in a case that has drawn heated debate over excessive use of force by law enforcement. Criminal charges against Londregan were dismissed by Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty in June, saying the prosecution didn’t have the evidence to proceed with a case.

On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Nancy E. Brasel granted Londregan’s motion to dismiss the civil suit, arguing he acted reasonably when he opened fire as Cobb’s vehicle lurched forward with another state trooper partly inside.

The lawsuit accuses troopers of unreasonably seizing Cobb by ordering him out of his vehicle but refusing to explain whether he was under arrest or why he was being detained. It claims the force used in the seizure was excessive, unjustifiable and unlawful.

After Cobb was stopped for driving without taillights, troopers learned that he had been accused of violating a domestic order for protection. The Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office issued a 72-hour request for agencies to pick up and hold Cobb. The request, which is not a warrant but grants probable cause to detain, was set to expire later that morning. The order for protection was filed by one of the mothers of Cobb’s young children.

The lawsuit alleges that the troopers did not attempt to de-escalate the situation, and that they didn’t have reasonable suspicion that Cobb was armed or posed any threat of harm.

A gun was found on the floor behind the center console of Cobb’s vehicle, but the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) has maintained that Cobb was never holding a gun. Troopers never made reference to seeing a gun in Cobb’s vehicle, according to dash and body-cam video.

Cobb’s hands were in the air in full view of the troopers in the moments leading up to the shooting, the lawsuit says. His hands weren’t touching the steering wheel or gear shift until Londregan reached inside the front passenger window to unlock the door. As he opened the door, Cobb put his foot on the brake and moved his hands to the shifter and put the vehicle into drive, removing his foot from the brake. Cobb’s vehicle moved forward several feet while Seide, on the drivers side, leaned in to unsecure Cobb’s seatbelt. Cobb stepped on the brake and Londregan drew his firearm, pointing it at Cobb.

Londregan leaned his torso inside, gun drawn, and yelled at Cobb to get out. Seide grabbed at Cobb, who took his foot off the brake again, causing the vehicle to lurch forward, according to the lawsuit. Londregan fired and Cobb’s vehicle proceeded down the interstate for one-quarter of a mile until it crashed into a concrete median, the suit says.

As a direct result of the troopers’ wrongful acts and omissions, the suit adds, Cobb’s family suffered financial losses in an amount to be determined by a jury.

“At the time of this incident, Decedent Cobb was an unarmed man stopped for a minor traffic violation, had no outstanding warrants and was not threatening or acting violently towards the officers on scene,” the lawsuit says. “Nevertheless, Defendant Seide attempted to wrestle Decedent Cobb out of the vehicle and Defendant Londregan drew his firearm on Decedent Cobb and shot him almost immediately, even with Defendant Seide positioned in a leaning posture over Decedent Cobb in his front seat.” [MORE]

In her decision, Brasel said the troopers were mandated by state law to make an arrest given Cobb’s domestic no-contact order violation. She said it was objectively reasonable for Londregan to believe Seide was in immediate danger as the car moved forward on a busy highway, which would make his use of force reasonable.

Black People Feel Vicariously Empowered Over Angela Alsobrooks Historic US Senate Win - But Will She Actually Deliver Anything of Tangible, Material Value to Black Communities or Address Black Needs?

From [HERE] Prince George’s County Executive Angela Alsobrooks defeated Republican former two-term Gov. Larry Hogan on Tuesday in the state’s costliest U.S. Senate race ever. She will be Maryland’s first Black senator.

Hogan conceded around 10 p.m., calling Alsobrooks a “dedicated public servant” and said “we can all take pride” in her history-making achievement.

Alsobrooks was introduced by her daughter, Alexandra, and told cheering supporters at her victory party in College Park: “I don’t have enough words to say thank you to God.”

She thanked the “baddest” campaign team, and said, “I woke up this morning to my neighbors who lined my street and hosted a pep rally for me. To those Marylanders whose support I have yet to earn, I may not have won your vote, but I hear your voice and I’ll be your senator, too.”

Alsobrooks’ victory came in an election that produced significant turnover in the state’s Washington delegation of eight U.S. House members and two senators. Alsobrooks and two House candidates, April McClain Delaney of Montgomery County in the 6th Congressional District and Sarah Elfreth of Anne Arundel County in the 3rd Congressional District, all sought spots in a delegation that is currently all male. The Associated Press declared Elfreth the winner, while McClain Delaney’s race was too close to call.

The last time two women were part of Maryland’s U.S. House delegation simultaneously was 1993-95, when Republicans Helen Bentley and Connie Morella overlapped before Bentley left to run for governor.

Exit Poll shows Puppet Harris Won 80% of the Black Vote - a drop of 10 percentage points compared w/2020 [s]Election of Corpse Biden

From [HERE] Harris appears to have won 80 percent of the Black vote, according to an exit poll by The Associated Press.

But that’s a drop of 10 percentage points compared with 2020 when the current president, Joe Biden, won nine of 10 Black votes.

The beneficiary? Trump, who won 20 percent of the Black vote this time, according to the exit poll. He had won 13 percent of the community’s vote in 2020 and 8 percent in 2016 — which in itself was the highest level of support by Black voters for any Republican since George W Bush in 2000.

How did Trump perform with Black voters in swing states?

A comparison of Black votes for both parties in some of the swing states in 2024 and 2020 shows how Trump’s support crept up in this year’s election, according to exit polls after both elections.

Georgia

Georgia was one of the most crucial swing states in the 2024 election and one of the first battleground states that went Trump’s way. He made a 1 percentage point improvement among Black voters in Georgia from the 2020 election against Biden, according to exit polls.

2024:

  • Democrats: 86 percent

  • Republicans: 12 percent

2020:

  • Democrats: 88 percent

  • Republicans: 11 percent

Michigan

Harris and the Democrats lost 2 percentage points of the Black vote in this state after growing anti-Democrat sentiment in the wake of Israel’s war on Gaza. Meanwhile, Trump made a 2 percentage point gain.

2024:

  • Democrats: 90 percent

  • Republicans: 9 percent

2020:

  • Democrats: 92 percent

  • Republicans: 7 percent

North Carolina

North Carolina saw one of the biggest shifts from Democrats to Republicans among Black voters with a 5 percentage point change from the previous election.

2024:

  • Democrats: 87 percent

  • Republicans: 12 percent

2020:

  • Democrats: 92 percent

  • Republicans: 7 percent

Pennsylvania

Trump’s victory was all but sealed when Pennsylvania was called for the Republican candidate, and here too the numbers went up for the second-time president.

2024:

  • Democrats: 89 percent

  • Republicans: 10 percent

2020:

  • Democrats: 92 percent

  • Republicans: 7 percent

Wisconsin

Voters in the state of Wisconsin had poverty, low wages and healthcare among their chief concerns, and Black voters in this state made a dramatic 13 percentage point shift towards Trump.

2024:

  • Democrats: 77 percent

  • Republicans: 21 percent

2020:

  • Democrats: 92 percent

  • Republicans: 8 percent

Nevada

The state reeling from the highest unemployment rate in the country was the only swing state where Harris made gains among Black voters compared with 2020.

2024:

  • Democrats: 82 percent

  • Republicans: 17 percent

2020:

  • Democrats: 80 percent

  • Republicans: 18 percent

A Gallup poll in 2023 showed the proportion of Black adults in the US who consider themselves Democrats had decreased from 77 percent in 2020 to 66 percent.

Take It in the FACE! Massa' Media's Synchronized Propaganda is Rejected by the Votary, Puppet Kamala Sent to the Woodshed in Massive Trump Come Back. Deluded Media Probots/Proxymorons Disfluent, Angry

Kamala Harris is only the second-biggest loser of the night.

Single Source Propaganda KO’d by reality. After spending vast resources and substantial time invested in bashing Trump, calling him a different derogatory term every week in thousands of “news” articles and after cheerleading for their puppet/golden retriever Kamala since her [s]election, the votary gave the middle finger to corporate controlled media.

In reality, massa’ media is the Dependent Media - a tool of elite persons that espouses the views of the vested interests. It conceals reality and projects a curated and manufactured reality from the point of view and in light of the elite’s ideology and does so to advance their control and vast power over people. Massa’ media is not simply the fourth estate of the government, which is also owned and controlled by powerful elites, it is much more - possibly the most powerful organization known to humans. Malcolm X stated, “The media’s the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” Similarly, the neo-feudal review stated, ‘the power of the mainstream media isn’t simply immense - it may be almost absolute and sets the parameters of what constitutes reality for most people.”

Single source propaganda refers to the uniformity of the entire mainstream media covering the same information in the same manner without any dissent or contradiction - a synchronization that seeks mass conformity, uncritical examination of information, obedience and artificial dogmatic acceptance. Like magicians, massa’ media declared Kamala “brand new” and poof she became free from any accounting for any Blight House failures or her abject failures to deliver anything of tangible value to Black communities. Most importantly, they re-invented her, pretending she was an entirely different person the day before, because the media said so. Kamala is a wooden dummy of the elites and she only speaks when they speak through her, with their hand up her ass.

According to FUNTIONARY

The Media – the Spectacle-Cabal who love freedom of the press, but abhor freedom of speech. The Media is the Fourth Estate of Government (created, owned, administered and controlled by Pathocrats). It is one of the most essential arms of “government.” They couldn’t give you their Matrix Reality without it—likewise they couldn’t keep you imprisoned in it without it. The News Anchor holds down the Ship of State at the Port of Lies. How is it that shareholders of Media conglomerates also sit as anchors and bring you their master’s views as if it could ever be objective or news? “The media’s the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” ~ Malcolm X. (See: Television, Perception, MEDIA, Senses, CON, Normal, Pathocracy, NEWS, Corporate Media, Control, COG & Pixelated People)

mass media – “Massa’ Media. Massa’s media plus (+) Mass Hypnosis = Mindless Masses. 2) The “Mess” Media. 3) wholesale retale— retelling the whole tale (propaganda) exactly as you’re told, consistently and relentlessly. How can you possibly relate when you are framed by the very debate wherein you are an unwilling spectator? Let’s be perfectly clear on this. There’s no counteroption or outlet to vent when you’re under the controlled thoughtform of mass-think manufactured consent. “Freedom of the press is limited to those who own one.” ~A.J. Liebling. (See: Media, T.V., Mass, Alienation, Spectacle Society, NEWS, ABCTV, Propaganda, Legislation & The New God Economy)

Project Veritas Reports that at 11PM Boxes of Ballots Arrived at Detroit’s Bureau of Elections in Cars with California Plates

From [HERE] Project Veritas footage allegedly shows boxes of ballots arriving late at night at Detroit’s Bureau of Elections. These deliveries, reportedly occurring around 11 PM, feature cars with California plates.

Project Veritas captured the late-night drop-offs. Their team was on-site, documenting the unusual activity as it unfolded.

They tweeted, “EYES ON DETROIT: It’s 11pm. Why are boxes of ballots still arriving at Detroit’s Bureau of Elections via cars with California plates? We’re here. We’re watching.”

Exit Polls Suggest Poor Black Turnout for Kamala Harris

From [HERE] Exit polls suggest that support for Kamala Harris has sagged among black men, many of whom have been hit hard by her pro-migration policies.

In Pennsylvania, Reuters reported:  “3% of voters in Pennsylvania were Black men, compared with 5% in 2020. 6% were Black women, compared with 6% in 2020.”

Reduced black turnout is a big problem for the Democrat Party because blacks contributed roughly one in five of Joe Biden’s votes in 2020. Harris’s turnout problem would be critical if it sways the vote in the swing state of Pennsylvania.

Amid pressure from pro-Harris friends and relatives, many blacks may choose to sit out the election rather than vote against President Donald  Trump’s low-migration, high-wage economic policy.

NewsWire cited similar data from the nationwide Edison Research Exit Poll, saying:

71% of voters were White (up from 67% in 2020), 11% were Black (down from 13%), and 12% were Hispanic (slightly down from 13%) — Preliminary Edison Research exit poll

These reports are incomplete and will be fleshed out as more exit poll data is released.

The reduced turnout of black men also shifts the other percentages in the electorate, Reuters reported:

83% of voters in Pennsylvania were white, compared with 81% in Edison Research’s 2020 exit poll. 9% were Black, compared with 11% in 2020. 5% were Hispanic, compared with 5% in 2020.

40% of voters in Pennsylvania were white men, compared with 38% in Edison Research’s 2020 exit poll. 43% were white women, compared with 43% in 2020.

ABC News is also reporting weakness in black support for Harris in Michigan.

2 White Canton Cops Charged w/Reckless Homicide (face only 3 yrs jail) for Murdering Frank Tyson. Cops Held Handcuffed Black Man Face Down and Sat on His Neck, Smothering and Torturing Him to Death

From [HERE] Two white police officers in Canton, Ohio, were indicted on charges of reckless homicide in the death of Frank Tyson, a Black man who was restrained by police in April, Stark County prosecutor Kyle L. Stone said on Saturday.

Officers Camden Burch and Beau Schoenegge were booked into the Stark County Jail on Friday, according to CNN affiliate WOIO.

Stone said the state Bureau of Criminal Investigation completed its investigation of Tyson’s death and delivered the results to the prosecutor’s office, and Stone then presented the case to a grand jury last week.

Reckless homicide is a third-degree felony and is punishable by up to 36 months in prison.

The arrests come more than six months after Tyson, 53, died following an April 18 police encounter during which he repeatedly pleaded, “I can’t breathe.”

The incident began after Tyson crashed a vehicle into a utility pole and fled to a nearby veteran’s hall, according to a news release from the Canton Police Department.

Police body-camera footage shows the officers approaching Tyson, who shouted to call the sheriff and said “They’re trying to kill me.” Officers forced Tyson to the ground and put him in handcuffs, and an officer placed his knee on or near Tyson’s neck while he was on his stomach, according to bodycam video of the interaction.

“I can’t breathe,” Tyson said repeatedly.

“You’re fine,” one officer responded. “Shut the f**k up.”

Five minutes after he stopped speaking, the officers realized he was unresponsive, the video shows. The officers administered several doses of Narcan, the medication to reverse opioid overdoses, and administered CPR, the video shows. Tyson was taken to a hospital and later pronounced dead.

In August, Stark County Coroner’s Office Chief Investigator Harry Campbell ruled Tyson’s death a homicide, according to WOIO. The preliminary autopsy also listed contributing causes of acute intoxication by cocaine and alcohol and cardiopulmonary arrest, WOIO reported.

The police incident report on the death included sparse details, saying only, “Suspect crashed a vehicle, fled from officers, and resisted being placed into custody.”

The two white officers initially were placed on administrative leave.

Single Source Propaganda: Analysis Shows Unprecedented Bias and Overwhelming Support for Kamala Harris by Major News Outlets [aka "The Dependent Media," which is owned by her Masters]

From [HERE] Major news broadcasters displayed an unprecedented level of political bias this campaign cycle, according to a new study that tallied the number of value-laden statements made about each candidate by news anchors, reporters, and expert subjects over the course of the presidential race.

Across ABC, CBS, and NBC, coverage of Kamala Harris was found to be 78 percent positive and 22 percent negative, according to the study conducted by the Media Research Center, a conservative-leaning media watchdog group. By contrast, Donald Trump received 15 percent positive coverage versus 85 percent negative, trailing Harris by 63 percent in terms of positive coverage.

This unprecedented edge topped the previous record of +58 for President Joe Biden in 2020.

“The MRC studies each determined the spin of news coverage by tallying all explicitly evaluative statements about each candidate from either reporters, anchors or non-partisan sources such as experts or voters,” the group claimed. “Evaluations from partisan sources, as well as neutral statements, were not included, nor were statements about their prospects in the campaign horse race (i.e., standings in the polls, chances to win, etc.).”

Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton only received 21 percent positive press coverage in 2016 to Trump’s meager nine percent, which suggests that major broadcasters have steadily expanded their negative coverage of Trump in the years since he entered the political scene.

Bill Clinton maintained a 23-point advantage over Republican challenger George H. W. Bush (52 percent to 29 percent) during the 1992 cycle, according to a Center for Media and Public Affairs (CMPA) study. The 2000 race coverage was shown to be more balanced, with Al Gore’s 40 percent positive press narrowly topping George W. Bush’s 37 percent.

Later, John Kerry enjoyed 59 percent positive coverage compared to Bush’s 37 percent. The results were far more skewed in 2008, when Barack Obama received 68 percent positive press compared to former Arizona senator John McCain’s 33 percent.

“Our analysis of good and bad press was based strictly on the opinions expressed by any independent observers quoted in the story, or on the stated opinions of the reporters themselves, commented CMPA on their methodology. “We coded each comment separately, identifying the source, target, and the direction of the evaluation.”

[the] “Fix is coming,” Google said. Elite White Liberals at Google Forced To Fix Search Engine After Getting Caught Interfering in [s]Election

From [HERE] Google admitted Tuesday that it is once again engaged in election interference, this time by inhibiting voters from getting information on where to cast a vote for former President Donald Trump on Election Day.

Users who searched “Where can I vote for Trump?” were shown a list of “Top stories” and, further down, a link to “donaldjtrump.com,” a link to “USA.gov” about how to vote, and several other websites with voter information.

But users who searched “Where can I vote for Harris?” were immediately shown a link provided by Democracy Works and Voting Information Project that allows voters to enter an address and be directed to their nearest polling location. One X user attributed the difference in results to “Harris” being a county in Texas. But users who entered non-Harris, Texas, addresses were still provided information about their nearest polling location.

Google acknowledged the issue in a statement, saying the issue was fixed and attributing their blatant election interference to an oopsie: “The ‘where to vote’ panel is triggering for some specific searches [because] Harris is also the name of a county in TX [Texas].”

“Fix is coming,” Google said. “Note very few people actually search for voting places this way.”

Google users were previously directed to Democracy Works when seeking information on how to register to vote.

Democracy Works bills itself as “non-partisan” but is funded by “prominent left-of-center private foundations, such as the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Democracy Fund, and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation,” according to Influence Watch.

Google’s election bias has been evident for months, with the search engine giant suppressing information about Trump’s first assassination attempt.

Less than three weeks after Trump was nearly assassinated in Butler, Pennsylvania, the top autocomplete results for Google users who searched for “assassination attempt on t –” were “assassination attempt on Truman” and “assassination attempt on the Pope.” An additional query of “assassination attempt on” showed 10 autocomplete results — none of which mentioned Trump.

Just recently YouTube, which is owned by Google, similarly inhibited users from searching for the full interview between podcaster Joe Rogan and Trump.

Jury Rejects White Columbus Cop’s Testimony. Found Guilty of Murdering Andre Hill; Shot Black Man Holding a Phone, Was Not Under Arrest, Denied CPR. How Much Jail Time Will Black Liberal Judge Impose?

From [HERE] and [HERE] A former Columbus, Ohio, police officer was found guilty of murder on Monday in the 2020 shooting of Andre Hill, a Black man whose death spurred protests against police brutality and led to police reforms in the city.

A Franklin County jury also found the officer, Adam Coy, who is white, guilty of two other charges, felonious assault and reckless homicide. Mr. Coy was taken into custody after the verdict was read. He will be sentenced on Nov. 25. He faces at least 15 years in prison after the jury verdict on Monday.

Coy fatally shot 47-year-old Andre Hill around 2 a.m. on Dec. 22, 2020, as Hill was leaving a leaving a friend's house on Oberlin Drive. Coy had been called to the neighborhood in response to a non-emergency call from a neighbor who reportedly witnessed someone sit in an SUV and turn the car on and off.

Hill was unarmed and was carrying just his mobile phone when he was shot. He was wearing a Black Lives Matter t-shirt when he was killed.

The body camera footage shows that around 1:30 a.m, Hill inside a garage, walking toward Coy with a cellphone in his hand, the screen lit up and visible. Within seconds, Coy fires his weapons and Hill falls as Coy continues to ask Hill to show his hands.

Coy points his flashlight into the dark garage with his gun drawn and suddenly shoots Hill several times. An autopsy found bullets struck Hill in the chest, twice in the right thigh and an additional time in the right leg.

Coy did not have his body camera on when he got out of his vehicle and approached Hill, a clear violation of police policy. After the shooting, he turned it on, which activated a 60-second "look back" feature and recorded the shooting without audio.

Five minutes after he was shot by Officer Adam Coy, who is white, another officer can be heard in the footage saying: "Let's cuff him up. He's still moving."Mr Hill is then rolled over on to his stomach before being handcuffed and put on his back as the officers wait for an ambulance.

After Hill was shot, several officers handcuffed him while he lay unresponsive on the ground.Video recordings from Coy and others show that none of the multiple officers on the scene made an attempt to render first aid to Hill until ten minutes after he was shot

Minutes later, a more senior officer arrives and asks "anybody doing anything for him?" He then orders an officer to start CPR. Mr Hill was later pronounced dead.

EVERYWHERE ONE FINDS A LARGE POPULATION OF BLACK PEOPLE LIVING IN METRO AREAS CONTROLLED BY ELITE, WHITE LIBERALS, THE POLICE STOP, USE FORCE, DETAIN, PROSECUTE AND KILL BLACKS IN GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE NUMBERS. YET BLACKS RARELY QUESTION THIS EXTRAORDINARY PHENOMENON AND INEXPLICABLY AND STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT ELITE, WHITE LIBERALS ARE THEIR POLITICAL ALLIES WHO HELP TO ‘PROTECT THEIR RIGHTS.’

ACLU FINDS FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT LIMITED FOR BLACKS IN DC [IN EVERY CITY CONTROLLED BY ELITE WHITE LIBERALS W/A LARGE BLACK POPULATION, COPS STOP AND DEGRADE BLACKS IN GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE NUMBERS]

Coy, who is white and had served 20 years on the Columbus, Ohio police force. The judge presiding over the case, Stephen McIntosh, ruled that Coy’s “prior use or non-use of force” could not be discussed during the trial. Judge McIntosh is a liberal judge who is black and is a former prosecutor. The judge ruled that the jury could not hear about Coy’s history, including prior citizen complaints made about his use of force. Coy’s Columbus Division of Police personnel file showed he received 90 citizen complaints during his time with the department, including an incident where he pulled over a suspected drunk driver and slammed the person’s head on the hood of his police cruiser four times. [MORE]

“I thought I was going to die,” he testified. It was only after he rolled over Hill’s body and saw the keys that he realised there was no gun, Coy claimed during trial. “I knew at that point I made a mistake. I was horrified.”

Prosecutors questioned Coy on why he didn't ask Hill his name or call for backup if he was so concerned, CBS affiliate WBNS-TV reported. Coy said that Hill only partially obeyed his commands and was hiding his right hand.

"I thought he was going to draw. I drew my gun and fired four shots," Coy said.

Coy yelled, “Gun, gun, he has a gun!” before drawing his firearm and firing at Hill four times. Coy testified he saw silver metal in Hill’s right hand while Hill had his left hand up with a cellphone in it. 

The metal was Hill’s key ring. He was unarmed.  

The jury did not find the white officer to be credible and rejected his testimony.

Brian A. Steel, the president of the Fraternal Order of Police lodge that represents thousands of law enforcement officers in the county, said that Mr. Coy’s actions in a fast-evolving situation had been based on his training.

“We mourn with the community over the tragic loss of Mr. Hill, but we stand firm in our belief that Officer Coy was subject to political and media bias that no one should face in a court of law,” Mr. Steel said in a statement.

Ben Crump, the Hill family's lawyer, said officers' actions were unforgivable."Where is the humanity for Andre Hill? Where is the humanity for this Columbus citizen who had committed no crime, had no weapon, was unarmed, only holding a cell phone? Where is the humanity for this citizen?

"He offered no verbal commands before he started shooting Andre Hill. He didn't say stop. He didn't say freeze. He didn't say, put your hands up. He didn't give Andre Hill a chance. He didn't give him a chance."

The footage also captures a woman inside the house where Mr Hill was shot telling officers that he had been bringing her Christmas money.

She shouted: "He was bringing me Christmas money. He didn't do anything."

SC Authorities Murder Richard Moore. Racist Suspect Governor Denied Clemency Despite Plea from Jurors, Judge, and Prison Director. DA Removed All Potential Black Jurors in Black Man's Murder Trial

From [HERE] South Carolina authorities executed Richard Moore tonight minutes after Gov. Henry McMaster issued an order in which he refused to grant clemency.

More than two dozen people, including two jurors, the trial judge, and the former director of the state corrections department, submitted letters to South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster asking him to spare the life of Richard Moore, who is scheduled to be executed by lethal injection today.

In a clemency petition filed on Wednesday, counsel for Richard Moore, 59, wrote that he deeply regrets taking the life of James Mahoney, a clerk at a Spartanburg convenience store, in September 1999, when he was struggling with drug addiction.

“This is definitely part of my life I wish I could change. I took a life. I took someone’s life. I broke the family of the deceased,” Mr. Moore said in a video interview submitted with his clemency petition. “I pray for the forgiveness of that particular family.”

A Force for Good

Family members, friends, and others who have known and worked with Mr. Moore for years implored the governor to show mercy to a man who, as Jon Ozmint, director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections from 2003 to 2011, wrote, “has proven himself to be a reliable, consistent force for good, on death row.”

The petition describes how Mr. Moore has worked to atone and repair the harm he caused, overcoming his drug addiction and seeking out ministers who guided him in deepening his faith. Since he was baptized in prison, he has mentored other men on death row and encouraged friends and family in their faith. 

Mr. Moore stayed in his children’s lives, helping them with homework through letters and phone calls, and supporting them as his daughter entered the Air Force and his son graduated as valedictorian of his high school and went on to earn a degree at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a loving grandfather who shares virtual visits with his two young granddaughters, who live in Spain. “Even with the physical distance,” his daughter said, “he is very much here and a part of my girls’ lives and my life.”

Mr. Moore’s son wrote that his father “has grown into a person committed to taking responsibility for his actions, and to doing his absolute best to lead a life of faith and good deeds.” He asked the governor to grant his father’s clemency request “so he can serve as an example to get those most at risk of going down a similar path and so he can play as much of a role as possible in the lives of his family.”

With an exemplary record in prison—he’s had no disciplinaries in the past two decades, his attorneys said—Mr. Moore stands out, even to seasoned corrections professionals. Mr. Ozmint, who supports the death penalty, recognized that in his rehabilitation, “our criminal justice system has already achieved its highest and most lofty purpose in the life of Richard Moore.” 

If his sentence were commuted to life in prison, Mr. Ozmint added, ”His story and his manner of living would allow him to be an influential force for good in general population, with an ability to have a positive impact on the most recalcitrant and hopeless of young offenders.”

After hearing about his rehabilitation, two of the jurors who originally sentenced him to death now support a life sentence for Mr. Moore. As juror Doris Robertson wrote, she “would support the decision to commute Mr. Moore’s death sentence to life without the possibility of parole based on the work he has done to rehabilitate himself while incarcerated.” 

Our System Is Broken

Death is the ultimate punishment that is supposed to be reserved for a small subset of murders considered the “worst of the worst.”  Mr. Moore’s petition argues his case does not meet that high bar because, unlike any other death penalty case in the state, “he did not plan to commit a murder, did not bring a weapon into the store, and reacted after being threatened with not one, but two guns already in the store.”

There was no dispute that Mr. Moore was unarmed when he entered the convenience store, but the State alleged at trial that he took a gun from the clerk, fired at a customer, and then fatally shot the clerk in order to rob the store.

Mr. Moore has consistently maintained that he entered the store to make a purchase, but when he was 12 cents short, the clerk ordered him to get out and pulled a gun. Mr. Moore said he automatically reached for the gun, the two men struggled, and the pistol fired before he wrestled it away from the clerk, who pulled another gun and fired at Mr. Moore. 

Shot through the arm, Mr. Moore sought cover and fired “blindly” from behind a pillar toward the clerk. He did not shoot at the customer, who was uninjured. After the shooting stopped, Mr. Moore admitted he went behind the counter and took a bag of money before leaving the store, according to the petition.

An expert crime scene analysis confirmed Mr. Moore’s version of events, the petition notes, but his defense lawyers failed to present it at his 2001 trial. 

Either way, current counsel argues the crime “does not rise to the level of the worst-of-the-worst because he did not enter the store armed.” 

Former South Carolina Supreme Court Justice Kaye Hearn agreed, writing in a 2022 dissent that this case demonstrates that “our system is broken.”

“[E]ntering a convenience store unarmed falls well short of engaging in a cold, calculated, and premeditated murder,” she wrote, adding that it “does not represent the ‘worst of the worst’ in terms of those murders reserved for the death penalty.” In fact, she added, she could not find “any other case involving a defendant receiving the death penalty where he entered the place of business unarmed.” 

Justice Hearn supports commuting Mr. Moore’s sentence, stating, “I do not believe Richard Moore deserves to die.” The fact that he is facing execution, moreover, “tells [her] our system is not working as it should.”

After likewise finding no similar case, the trial judge who originally sentenced Mr. Moore to death also called for clemency. Retired Circuit Court Judge Gary Clary said he has “studied the case of each person who resides on death row in South Carolina” and finds “Moore’s case is unique.”

Mr. Ozmint, also a former prosecutor, wrote that “objectively reviewed, Richard’s crime would never have been considered for the death penalty in most counties in our state.” 

He pointed to “the uncontested fact that Richard did not have a weapon when he entered the store where he shot Mr. Mahoney. So, even if he had planned to steal something from the store, he certainly did not plan to commit an armed robbery.” This fact, along with Mr. Moore’s rehabilitation, led Mr. Ozmint—for the first time ever—to recommend clemency.

Counsel for Mr. Moore also asked the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the execution to review the claim that he was denied a fair trial when prosecutors struck all the Black prospective jurors. The Court has recognized that the potential for racial bias in a death penalty case is heightened when the defendant is Black and the victim is white, as in this case. The Court denied Mr. Moore’s petition yesterday. He is the only Black man on South Carolina’s death row convicted and sentenced by a jury with no Black jurors, according to The Post and Courier.

Human Beings Are Capable of Redemption

Mr. Moore’s lawyers asked a federal judge to transfer clemency power to an impartial board or official, arguing Mr. McMaster could not be fair because he oversaw prosecutors on Mr. Moore’s appeals as attorney general, and in 2022, when an execution date was set for Mr. Moore, the governor told reporters he had no intention of granting him clemency. A federal court denied that request, ruling that the governor has sole power to grant clemency. [MORE]