200+ communities around the nation reject prison-based gerrymandering
/|
How do officials in cities or counties that contain large prisons draw their electoral districts? Do they accept Census Bureau data that artificially inflates the population of the area containing the prison, or do they reject the Census Bureau’s prison counts in order to draw fair districts? We’ve been reaching out to cities and counties across the country, first to bring the problem of prison-based gerrymandering — and the solutions — to their attention, and then more recently following up to see what they decided to do. We're happy to report that most of these cities and counties exclude the prison populations in order to give all of their actual residents the same access to government. Just the other day, we hit a big milestone in the project when we verified the 200th county or city that refused to engage in prison-based gerrymandering: Prison Policy Initiative Legal Director Aleks Kajstura found that Howard County, Texas refused to use the 5,000+ people in private and federal prisons when drawing its new County Commissioner precincts. Had they engaged in prison-based gerrymandering, the First Precinct would have been more than 60% incarcerated, giving every four residents of that precinct the same influence in county government as ten residents in any other part of the county. This milestone in our research is further evidence that the national trend away from prison-based gerrymandering is gaining momentum. And even more exciting is the fact that 200 is a significant underestimate of the number of local governments that avoid prison-based gerrymandering. We know that the actual number is much higher in part because we’re still calling counties and because redistricting is not yet complete in some locations, but especially because we’ve largely skipped following up in states that require counties and municipalities to exclude prison populations. Instead, we’ve focused on the places that must independently choose whether or not to avoid prison-based gerrymandering. And there, the trend is clear: prison-based gerrymandering is on the decline. To celebrate reaching 200, we’ve updated our map of national progress towards ending prison-based gerrymandering:[MORE] |
