trying to be like them: Video surfaces of off duty Black NYPD cop’s road-rage shooting of Unarmed Black Man

An off-duty NYPD cop waited just one second before ­fatally gunning down another driver in a Brooklyn road-rage incident early Monday.

Exclusive video obtained by The Post shows the moment that Officer Wayne Isaacs fired two shots through his car window at Delrawn Small, who collapsed and died in the street.

The NYPD and the state Attorney General’s Office are investigating the shooting, which the victim’s family said was a clear case of excessive force.

The footage, from Atlantic Avenue and Bradford Street in East New York just after midnight, shows Small, 37, cross two lanes of traffic to reach Isaacs’ car.

He barely has time to look the cop in the eye or even utter a word before Isaacs opens fire, causing him to stagger back.

He stumbles to the ground, gets up for a moment and then collapses again for good.

Isaacs, meanwhile, lurches his car forward a few feet before slamming on the brakes and getting out. He appears to tuck the gun into his waistband as he walks over toward Small.

Isaacs looks in the direction of the dying man, pausing for a few moments near his body, before returning to his vehicle.

He is then seen pacing around and talking on the phone. Sources have said he called 911.

Small’s girlfriend, Zaquanna Albert, 35, then pulls the man’s car across the street before running toward the scene.

Then the footage cuts off.

More Than 200 People Arrested At Protests In Louisiana And Minnesota

npr

Protesters gathered around the country Saturday. And while the demonstrations were largely peaceful, tensions erupted in Minnesota and Louisiana, where police arrested more than 200 people.

Police in St. Paul, Minnesota, said they arrested 102 people after demonstrators blocked an interstate roadway for several hours.

As we reported, the protesters marched from the governor's mansion in St. Paul to Interstate 94, and police fired tear gas at demonstrators after they blocked the roadway. "21 officers from multiple agencies were injured on I-94 and other areas of the city," the St. Paul Police department said on Twitter, adding that protestors were setting off fireworks and throwing bricks. As Minnesota Public Radio reported, "none suffered serious injuries."

Of the 102 people arrested, the police said 52 were arrested for "public nuisance and unlawful assembly" and 50 for "3rd degree riot."

New Gallup Poll Shows Only 29% of Blacks "Have Confidence in the Police"

Gallup

The deaths of five police officers in Dallas, along with the recent deaths of two black men in Louisiana and Minnesota at the hands of police, highlighted -- again -- the importance of understanding attitudes of the American public, including blacks and whites, toward the police and criminal justice system.

A review of Gallup data, all collected prior to these most recent incidents, provides a social and cultural context for these issues.

1. Confidence in Police

Combined data from Gallup's annual update on confidence in institutions for the last three years (2014, 2015 and 2016) shows a 29-percentage-point gap in the percentage of whites and blacks who have a great deal or quite a lot of confidence in the police. Fifty-eight percent of whites have confidence in the police, compared with 29% of blacks.

Despite these differences, the police remain the third-most-highly rated institution of the 15 tested by Gallup in early June of this year, behind the military and small business. In that June survey, confidence in the police was up overall from the low point to which it dropped in 2015.

The racial gap in confidence in the police is not new and has been evident throughout the past decade and a half in Gallup's measurement of confidence in institutions.

2. How Racial Minorities Are Treated by Police

A Gallup analysis of blacks' and whites' attitudes toward the treatment of racial minorities by police in 2015 showed that black Americans were divided in their views, with about half saying minorities were treated fairly in their community and about half saying they were treated unfairly. Over three-quarters of whites felt that racial minorities were treated fairly by police.

A recent update for that question, based on interviewing conducted June 7-July 1, shows that these attitudes have not changed significantly. Blacks remain split, with 50% saying racial minorities are treated fairly and 48% unfairly, almost identical to last year. Whites' attitudes also remain unchanged from 2015.

3. Whites' Versus Blacks' Treatment by Police

Significant majorities of blacks have historically perceived that blacks in their community are treated less fairly than whites in dealings with police, such as traffic incidents. The percentages ranged from a high of 73% of blacks who felt this way in both 2007 and 2015, to a low of 55% in 1998. This year's June 7-July 1 update shows little material change, with 67% of blacks saying that blacks are treated less fairly by police than are whites in their community.

Whites typically have been much less likely to perceive minority mistreatment by police. This year's update shows that 40% of whites say that blacks are treated less fairly by police, up slightly from last year's 34%.

4. Whites' Versus Blacks' Treatment by Police: Reported Incidents

Despite the general perception among blacks that they are treated less fairly than whites in dealings with police, black Americans have historically been relatively unlikely to report having been mistreated by police within the 30 days prior to being interviewed. These self-reports have not changed substantially over the past several years and are actually down from reports a decade or more ago.

In Gallup's 2015 report, 18% of blacks reported that they could think of an occasion in the last 30 days when they felt treated unfairly "in dealings with the police, such as traffic incidents." That was similar to 17% in 2013. Data collected in this year's June 7-July 1 update also shows little change in this metric with 16% of blacks reporting such mistreatment at the hands of the police within the past 30 days.

5. Honesty and Ethics of Police Officers

Black and white Americans have significantly different opinions about the honesty and ethical standards of police officers. An analysis of an aggregate of three years of data -- collected in December of 2013, 2014 and 2015 -- shows that 60% of whites rate the honesty of police officers as very high or high, compared with 28% of blacks.

Overall, 56% of Americans highly rate police officers' honesty and ethical standards, putting police officers fifth on the list of professions tested, behind nurses, pharmacists, medical doctors and high school teachers. These five professions are the only ones for which a majority of Americans give high ratings of honesty and ethics.

6. Criminal Justice System Bias

Americans, taken as a whole, have become more likely to say that the American justice system is biased against blacks. Between 33% and 38% of Americans said that the system was biased in surveys conducted in 1993, 2008 and 2013. By last year, that number had risen to 47%, and it is at 49% in Gallup's just-completed update.

Perceptions of bias have risen among both whites and blacks, although a large gap remains between these two groups. As of the June 7-July 1 survey, 76% of blacks say that the justice system is biased against blacks, compared with 45% of whites.

7. Worry About Race Relations as Problem

A March Gallup report found that 35% of Americans said they are worried "a great deal" about race relations in the U.S., which as reported at that time was "higher than at any time since Gallup first asked the question in 2001." The percentage had been below 20% in measures from 2007 through 2014, rose to 28% in 2015 and hit 35% this year.

An analysis combining responses from 2015 and 2016 shows that 53% of blacks say they worry about race relations a great deal, compared with 27% of whites.

Even with the recent increase, however, worry about race relations is much lower than worry about a number of other issues and problems, including healthcare, the economy, and crime and violence.

8. Race as Most Important Problem

Between 5% and 7% of Americans have named race relations or racism as the most important problem facing the nation in the first six months of 2016. In June, race relations was tied with a number of other problems for sixth place on Americans' list of the most important problems facing the country. Blacks are significantly more likely than whites to mention race as the top problem.

Bottom Line

As reported in a similar Gallup review of American attitudes toward the police and race relations in 2014 after the death of Michael Brown at the hands of police in Ferguson, Missouri, there has been historically, and continues to be, a fundamental underlying gap in the ways in which whites and blacks view police in this country. That gap was evident in reactions of whites and blacks to the Rodney King trial verdict in 1992, to the verdict in the criminal murder trial of O.J. Simpson in 1995 and in on-going surveys conducted since that time.

When and how this fundamental aspect of contemporary race relations in the United States can be addressed and solutions found remains to be seen.

On Views of Race and Inequality, Pew Survey Blacks and Whites Are Worlds Apart

Pew

Almost eight years after Barack Obama’s election as the nation’s first black president –an event that engendered a sense of optimism among many Americans about the future of race relations1 – a series of flashpoints around the U.S. has exposed deep racial divides and reignited a national conversation about race. A new Pew Research Center survey finds profound differences between black and white adults in their views on racial discrimination, barriers to black progress and the prospects for change. Blacks, far more than whites, say black people are treated unfairly across different realms of life, from dealing with the police to applying for a loan or mortgage. And, for many blacks, racial equality remains an elusive goal.

An overwhelming majority of blacks (88%) say the country needs to continue making changes for blacks to have equal rights with whites, but 43% are skeptical that such changes will ever occur. An additional 42% of blacks believe that the country will eventually make the changes needed for blacks to have equal rights with whites, and just 8% say the country has already made the necessary changes.

A much lower share of whites (53%) say the country still has work to do for blacks to achieve equal rights with whites, and only 11% express doubt that these changes will come. Four-in-ten whites believe the country will eventually make the changes needed for blacks to have equal rights, and about the same share (38%) say enough changes have already been made.

These findings are based on a national survey by Pew Research Center conducted Feb. 29-May 8, 2016, among 3,769 adults (including 1,799 whites, 1,004 blacks and 654 Hispanics).2 The survey – and the analysis of the survey findings – is centered primarily around the divide between blacks and whites and on the treatment of black people in the U.S. today. In recent years, this centuries-old divide has garnered renewed attention following the deaths of unarmed black Americans during encounters with the police, as well as a racially motivated shooting that killed nine black parishioners at a church in Charleston, South Carolina, in 2015.

The survey finds that black and white adults have widely different perceptions about what life is like for blacks in the U.S. For example, by large margins, blacks are more likely than whites to say black people are treated less fairly in the workplace (a difference of 42 percentage points), when applying for a loan or mortgage (41 points), in dealing with the police (34 points), in the courts (32 points), in stores or restaurants (28 points), and when voting in elections (23 points). By a margin of at least 20 percentage points, blacks are also more likely than whites to say racial discrimination (70% vs. 36%), lower quality schools (75% vs. 53%) and lack of jobs (66% vs. 45%) are major reasons that blacks may have a harder time getting ahead than whites.

More broadly, blacks and whites offer different perspectives of the current state of race relations in the U.S. White Americans are evenly divided, with 46% saying race relations are generally good and 45% saying they are generally bad. In contrast, by a nearly two-to-one margin, blacks are more likely to say race relations are bad (61%) rather than good (34%). Blacks are also about twice as likely as whites to say too little attention is paid to race and racial issues in the U.S. these days (58% vs. 27%). About four-in-ten whites (41%) – compared with 22% of blacks – say there is too much focus on race and racial issues.

Blacks and whites also differ in their opinions about the best approach for improving race relations: Among whites, more than twice as many say that in order to improve race relations, it’s more important to focus on what different racial and ethnic groups have in common (57%) as say the focus should be on what makes each group unique (26%). Among blacks, similar shares say the focus should be on commonalities (45%) as say it should be on differences (44%). [MORE]

Mumia Abu-Jamal’s Fourth of July

4th Media 

Tens or even hundreds of thousands of Americans, like those in the visiting room of the State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy, drove often for hours on the Fourth of July weekend to visit relatives or friends who are locked in cages. Millions suffered the painful absence this weekend of a father, a mother, a brother, a sister, a son, a daughter or a friend. These people, mostly poor people of color, understand a dark truth about the cruelty and ultimate intentions of the corporate state. They know that “freedom,” “justice” and “liberty,” especially if you are poor, are empty slogans.

“We live in one of the most un-free systems on earth,” said the black revolutionary and author Mumia Abu-Jamal, whom I visited Saturday. “Mass incarceration is a reality endured by millions of people in prison and in the systems of repression that exist outside of prison. What does freedom mean to poor people who cannot walk freely down a street? What does freedom mean when they cannot find work? What does freedom mean when there is no justice in the courts? What does freedom mean when black people cannot attend a Bible study in a church without the fear of being murdered? Where is this American freedom they keep telling us about? I don’t see it. Black folks are more in danger, and being killed in even greater numbers, than during the reign of terror that was lynching and Jim Crow.”

Abu-Jamal, who is fighting off hepatitis C that the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and the privatized prison medical service refuse to treat, scoffed when I asked him about the differences between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

“Donald Trump is the real face of the ugly American empire,” he said. “Yes, he ain’t pretty. He ain’t black. He ain’t a woman. He has a fake tan and orange hair. His rhetoric is cruder. But his ideas are the same. The two major political parties are the abject servants of Wall Street and American empire über alles. They each support militarism, at home and abroad. They each support the indiscriminant murder of civilians from drones. They each support the worldwide archipelago of secret prisons. They each support mass incarceration of poor people, the suspension of habeas corpus and torture. It is only their talk that is different. What is the difference between being beaten up by a black cop or a white cop? The only solution is to rise up to stop the cops from beatin’ our asses and shootin’ us in the streets, our homes and our cars. I can assure you voting for Hillary Clinton won’t make a damn bit of difference. The Ku Klux Klan, after all, once served as the unofficial armed wing of the Democratic Party. You can’t invest hope in an organization with a history like that.

“The black political elites, including Barack Obama, are powerless,” he went on. “They are emblems. They are not the voice of black America. They are like a ventriloquist’s dummy. They mouth the same words the white corporate masters mouth. They do not make white America uncomfortable. They do not name unpleasant truths. They never lifted their voices to denounce Bill Clinton’s decision to massively expand our system of mass incarceration. And they do not lift their voices now. They go right along with the repression. And they are well paid for it.”

Abu-Jamal, a journalist and author of books such as “Live From Death Row” and a former member of the Black Panther Party, is serving a life sentence in the killing of a Philadelphia police officer. Despite flagrant irregularities in his trial and evidence tampering, he was sentenced to death in 1982. His sentence was later commuted to life without parole. He spent 30 years on death row.

The prison’s visiting room, with a wall lined by vending machines that only the visitors were allowed to use, was crowded with families. Children played in groups or ran across the floor, darting in and out of rows of chairs.

A guard, seated on a raised platform, periodically bellowed through a loudspeaker. He recited every admonishment twice. “Children must be supervised by an adult. Children must be supervised by an adult.”

“… Like every prisoner must be supervised by a prison guard who is a racist and an idiot,” Abu-Jamal muttered when one announcement ended.

Abu-Jamal understands that radical change exacts a high price. It takes years, sometimes decades, to achieve. It requires dedication, self-sacrifice, unwavering belief in a new vision of society, a trenchant understanding of the mechanisms of power, a willingness to suffer persecution, go to jail and even, when the elites truly feel threatened, face the daily possibility of being murdered. No political revolution was ever achieved without these qualities and this acceptance of risks and steadfastness.

“Black people will probably vote for Clinton,” he said with resignation, “but this symbolizes the emptiness of hope. They fear Trump. They should look closely at the pictures from Trump’s third wedding. Hillary Clinton is in the front pew of the church. Hillary, Bill, Trump and Melania are shown embracing at Trump’s estate afterwards during the reception. These people are part of the same elite circle. They represent the same financial interests. They work for the same empire. They have grown rich from the system. The words they shout back and forth during political campaigns are meaningless. Trump or Clinton will deliver the same political result. They will serve, like Obama, corporate and military power. And if they were not willing to serve these centers of power they would not be allowed to run. Their job is to manufacture hope during election campaigns that ultimately end in betrayal. This is why they spend billions on elections. They need to feed the illusion that our voices matter, that we are participants in their closed systems of power.

“The liberals and the Democrats are in many ways more dangerous than the right wing,” he said. “Repression and neoliberalism are more effectively instituted by Democrats such as Bill and Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. They sound reasonable. But because what they do is hidden it is more insidious and often more deadly.”

“Do not leave your trash in the cup holders. Do not leave your trash in the cup holders,” the loudspeaker blared.

Abu-Jamal looked toward the guards, all of whom were white.

“Bill Clinton developed a rural employment program called prisons,” he said. “Prisons are the economic lifebloodof these poor white communities. The only time these people have any contact with black people is when they put them in cells or escort them in shackles. Prisons are the gift William Jefferson Clinton gave to poor, rural whites that keeps on giving.

“The system is broken,” Abu-Jamal said. “It has to be torn up, root and branch. And this has to be done from the bottom up. If we keep electing and re-electing these puppets we will keep getting played. We have to form political parties that reflect our political ideas. We have to stop surrendering to false parties and politicians that do not represent us.”

He said he places his hopes in groups such as Black Lives Matter that have taken to the streets. He said that if he could he would be in the streets of Philadelphia, where he was raised, during the Democratic convention.

“This is our hour of protest,” he said. “We have to physically resist. We will reclaim our power when we say no, when we refuse to cooperate. We must, in everything we do, defy the architects of imperialism, neoliberalism and mass incarceration. We cannot enable, in any way, this system to perpetuate itself.

“It is time to raise holy hell,” he went on. “We need to demonstrate in the streets. We need to use megaphones. We need to hold teach-ins. We need to sell radical books. We need to make the streets our commons.”

Again the loudspeaker boomed: “Children must put away the toys they took out of the children’s room. Children must put away the toys they took out of the children’s room.”

Prisons, like the rest of the society, have been privatized. Prisoners are billed for an array of services and items that once were the responsibility of the state. Corporations, which make billions off the prison system, run phone services, food services, medical services and commissaries. They have established for-profit prisons and detention centers. Prices for basic services and necessities such as shoes have soared.

“Services that were once the responsibility of the state have been outsourced to corporations, as in the rest of society,” said Abu-Jamal, who works as a trash collector. “We are worth what we are able to pay. If we pay nothing, in their eyes, we are worth nothing.

“When [prisoners] fill out a sick call slip, a request for medical attention, we have to also sign a cash slip,” he said. “The medical visit costs five or 10 dollars. This may not sound like a lot. But a prison job only pays $30 a month. Prices are constantly going up. Wages in prisons have remained the same since the 1980s. Most prisoners can only go to buy items from the commissary after begging their mothers, grandmothers or girlfriends for money.

“In February, Global Tel Link began selling electronic tablets in the prison for $150,” he said. “They charge 25 cents for an email and $1.80 to download a song. And you have to pay them in advance. The state pays Wexford Health Services $298 million a year to run the medical services. The more medical services are cut, the greater the profit. You go to medical and most of the time they tell you to go to the commissary to buy Tylenol or throat lozenges. If you fall in the yard and need a wheelchair they charge you $25. If you can’t sit up they charge you $75 for a motorized cart. They will not treat my hepatitis C, saying it is not advanced enough, but of course it is because the medicine is expensive. It costs between $87,000 and $95,000. A price like this exists solely to enrich pharmaceutical companies. I could get the same drug from India for a few thousand dollars. There is a guy in my block, Joseph Kish Sr., with stage four hepatitis C and cirrhosis. They have denied him treatment because, they said, he will get out soon. There is always a reason not to treat us. Prisons have replaced state psychiatric hospitals. MHM Correctional Services is paid $89 million a year to handle the mentally ill. It does little more than medicate them. And remember most guards, especially with overtime, make more money, about $100,00 a year, than a full professor at a university.

“They are doing to us on the inside what they are doing to us on the outside,” he said. “They are letting poor people die or killing them for profit. Things will get worse and worse until people can’t take it anymore. These corporations won’t stop. No one in the political class will make them stop. It is up to us.”

Chris Hedges, spent nearly two decades as a foreign correspondent in Central America, the Middle East, Africa and the Balkans. He has reported from more than 50 countries and has worked for The Christian Science Monitor, National Public Radio, The Dallas Morning News and The New York Times, for which he was a foreign correspondent for 15 years.

Truth Dig

The Bahamas Issued a Travel Warning to its citizens going to the US: "young males are asked to exercise extreme caution in affected cities in their interactions with the police"

ThinkProgress

The Bahamas issued a travel warning to the United States on Friday, cautioning its citizens about police violence in the country.

“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Immigration has taken a note of the recent tensions in some American cities over shootings of young black males by police officers,” the statement read. “We wish to advise all Bahamians traveling to the US but especially to the affected cities to exercise appropriate caution generally. In particular young males are asked to exercise extreme caution in affected cities in their interactions with the police. Do not be confrontational and cooperate.”

The statement follows the tragic deaths of Philando Castile and Alton Sterling at the hands of police earlier this week, as well as five officers in Dallas in a sniper attack on Thursday.

The statement also warned citizens Bahamian citizens to “not get involved in political or other demonstrations under any circumstances and [to] avoid crowds.”

Protests and demonstrations against police brutality took place across the United States after the deaths of Castile and Sterling. The shooting in Dallas, Texas on Thursday occurred during one such demonstration. The gunman, who officers said acted alone out of a desire “to kill white officers,” shot and killed five Dallas police officers. Seven other officers and two civilians were also injured during the demonstration.

The Shocking Way ICE Neglected Immigrant Detainees As They Died

ThinkProgress

At least 18 people detained in U.S. federal immigration custody received subpar medical care that may have contributed to their deaths, a scathing new Human Rights Watch (HRW) report finds.

The people who have recently died in immigration detention included legal immigrants, undocumented immigrants, and people looking for protection under the country’s refugee law. The report reviews 31 cases of death after some of those details were released in June by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Office of Detention Oversight (ODO).

HRW researchers hired two independent medical experts to consult death reviews from mid-2012 to mid-2015, concluding that at least seven of 18 deaths were likely preventable. Thirteen other deaths weren’t independently reviewed because ICE didn’t release enough information about them, according to the HRW report.

A growing body of evidence points to immigration detention centers’ misuse of isolation for people with mental disabilities, inadequate mental health evaluation and treatment, and broader medical care failures, according to the report. In three cases where immigrants committed suicide inside detention, experts questioned the quality of the mental health care they received.

Manuel Cota-Domingo, a 34-year-old immigrant from Guatemala, was among the seven deaths in detention that the medical experts said could have been prevented.

A review found that a registered nurse waited two hours to pay attention to Cota-Domingo’s complaint of chest pain and failed to call emergency medical services because of a detention center policy that only allowed certain medical staff to call 911. Cota-Domingo was denied care for a total of eight hours before he was transported from the Eloy Detention Center, where he died of heart disease, untreated diabetes, and pneumonia at a hospital.

“If diagnosed properly and treated, diabetic ketoacidosis and pneumonia are treatable, ” Dr. Allen Keller, one of the two medical experts, said. “But both of these life-threatening diagnoses were missed at the detention facility.”

Medical experts also determined that Raul Ernesto Morales-Ramos, a 44-year-old immigrant from El Salvador, probably had undiagnosed cancer for years as his gastrointestinal symptoms went unaddressed at the Theo Lacy Facility, a detention center in Orange, California, until just a month before he died. Both Keller and his fellow expert Dr. Marc Stern concluded that Morales-Ramos wasn’t “appropriately referred for specialist care” — and, had he been treated earlier, the malignancy from which he died may have been treatable.

HRW researchers say their findings point to the need for additional reforms in immigration detention centers, which are facilities that the government uses to hold immigrants while they go through the legal process to determine whether or not they’ll be deported. Clara Long, a researcher at Human Rights Watch, noted that the Obama administration already promised to establish more direct oversight over the roughly 400,000 immigrant detainee population.

“In 2009, the Obama administration promised major immigration detention reforms, including more centralized oversight and improved health care,” Long said in a statement. “But these death reviews show that system-wide problems remain, including a failure to prevent or fix substandard medical care that literally kills people.”

Although the findings are upsetting, they weren’t surprising to immigrant advocates, who say that detention centers like Eloy and Theo Lacy are “notorious” for providing substandard medical care. A report came out earlier this year noting similar problems, including ICE’s failure to comply with the agency’s own medical standards.

“More people have died at Eloy since 2003 than at any other immigration detention facility,” Christina Fialho, co-executive director at the immigrant rights group Community Initiatives for Visiting Immigrants in Confinement (CIVIC), told ThinkProgress. “Of the 53 facilities we monitor, Eloy has the second highest rate of reported physical and sexual assault incidents. Yet, ICE continues to partner with CCA. It’s time for the federal government to end its misguided relationship with the private prison industry.”

The ACLU and the immigrant rights group Detention Watch Network named Theo Lacy as one of the ten worst detention centers in the U.S. in 2012. Conditions have yet to improve after 10 immigrants filed a complaint last year alleging physical abuse, medical neglect, and retaliatory transfers while they were detainees. The Eloy facility has reported 14 deaths since 2004, including several suicides.

Oscar Grant's Uncle Bobby Speaks on Alton Sterling, Phil Castile, Obama, Dallas and OPD on Block Report

BlockReportRadio.com interviews Oscar Grant's uncle Bobby Johnson aka Cephus Johnson about the recent police execution of Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge, and Phil Castile in Minneapolis. We talked about the role of new media in exposing these two cases. He also discusses Obama's response to the police executions of Black and Brown people and his lack of inaction as well as the inaction of other government officials like Kamala Harris, during his administration. We also discussed the Dallas sniper killing a number of police officers last night in response to the rampant police terrorism plaguing the Black communities of the U.S.

Missouri Governor [Another White Democrat Doing Nothing for Blacks] slashes $115 million from budget for Public Defenders

Stl Today

A plan to begin chipping away at unwieldy public defender caseloads was put on hold Wednesday after Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon, a Democrat, slashed more than $115 million from the state budget.

With state revenues growing slower than expected, the governor cut or removed funding for 131 programs out of the state’s recently adopted $27 billion spending blueprint, including some additional money for the public defenders, a GOP-led effort to study the University of Missouri’s operations and an audit of the St. Louis Regional Convention & Sports Complex Authority.

Nixon cautioned that further restrictions would be necessary if the Legislature overrides his vetoes of three tax breaks, which could reduce revenue by more than $60 million annually. By contrast, if revenue grows more quickly than expected, he could restore the cuts.

“In order to protect our shared priorities like public education, college affordability and mental health, a number of new and expanded programs will have to be pared back or put on hold,” Nixon said.

Added money for public defenders was among the larger cuts announced in a news conference in his Capitol office. Lawmakers had inserted $4.5 million in the budget as a way to hire additional public defenders and pay for outside contractors to help reduce the number of cases attorneys handle. Nixon, a former attorney general, reduced the increase to $1 million.

“We’re spending more money on the public defenders than when I was elected,” said Nixon, who took office in 2009.

The push for additional funds came after a 2014 study showed the system needed nearly 270 additional attorneys to meet a caseload that hovers between 70,000 and 100,000 cases a year.

State Public Defender Director Michael Barrett said the funding situation would be reviewed by the system’s board on Friday.

Nixon also eliminated $900,000 earmarked to finance a review of the University of Missouri System by a newly formed panel appointed by Republican legislative leaders.

“It’s more important to spend that money to keep a tuition freeze than it is to put together a $900,000 study when the people being studied have said they are going to cooperate fully,” Nixon said.

Also cut was funding for Harris-Stowe State University, which had sought added dollars to start graduate-level programs. Instead of $500,000, the St. Louis-based school will receive $250,000 for the expansion.

In a year that saw the Legislature attempt to eliminate funding for Planned Parenthood, which provides women’s health and abortion services, Nixon eliminated $2 million in increased funding for the Alternatives to Abortion Services Program.

The program, launched nearly 20 years ago, offers support services to pregnant women.

Other reductions include elimination of $50,000 in funding for a community garden project in northeastern St. Louis County.

At the heart of the cuts was a 35 percent drop in net corporate income taxes in the fiscal year that ended June 30. Increases in income and sales taxes offset the drop, leaving state finances slightly better than they previous year.

Under current law, the governor can withhold money when state revenue is less than the estimate the appropriations are based on, to be released if they improve.

But a measure approved by voters in 2014 allows lawmakers to override the withholdings much like they can when it comes to regular veto action. Lawmakers must have a two-thirds majority in both chambers to override a withholding — 109 in the House and 23 in the Senate.

Last year, Nixon withheld $46 million after the state learned it would not receive $50 million in tobacco settlement funds that lawmakers had banked on when crafting the budget.

Rep. Kurt Bahr, R-St. Charles, chairman of the Elementary and Secondary Education Appropriations Committee, bemoaned the cuts made to educational programs, including dyslexia training, various salary increases and dropout prevention.

“I am disappointed by the governor’s lack of support for programs that work to support both our students and teachers,” Bahr said.

Black & Brown Youth Still being Locked Up in Solitary Confinement at Rikers Island

NY Times

At the time, it was a momentous announcement: New York City officials said they would eliminate solitary confinement at Rikers Island for all inmates under age 22.

The declaration, made in January 2015, put the city’s long-troubled Correction Department in the vanguard of national jail reform efforts.

But a year and a half later, the administration of Mayor Bill de Blasio is still struggling to pull it off. The city missed another deadline last week, and it is now requesting a second six-month extension. City officials had originally promised to end the use of the punishment for young adults by January 2016.

Most of the 78 young adults who were in isolation at the beginning of the year have been moved out. But while the city has now eliminated segregation for the 16- to 18-year-olds, there are some older, more difficult inmates remaining who cause such serious disciplinary problems, according to the correction commissioner, Joseph Ponte, that at least for now segregation is still needed.

As solitary confinement has been emptied, the violence in the jail for young adults has significantly increased, Mr. Ponte wrote in a letter to the city jail watchdog agency last week. The correction officers’ union has long argued that ending the use of segregation would endanger guards and lead to greater violence.

Eliminating solitary confinement is an expensive, labor-intensive proposition. To replace it, the city has created enhanced supervision units, with two officers and one counselor for every 12 inmates. Not long ago, a typical cellblock was overseen by one guard for every 50 inmates.

A few weeks ago, The New York Times interviewed several of the nine remaining inmates under age 22 still in isolation at the part of the jail complex known as 3 South Segregation Unit. A correction officer and a member of the commissioner’s press office were present for the interviews; the inmates were shackled to a wall. [MORE]

Fourth Amendment Protections and Arrests at Other People's Homes

NY Law Journal 

This month, we discuss United States v. Bohannon, in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated an order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to the arrest of a defendant, who was apprehended while a guest in the residence of a third party. In the decision, written by Judge Reena Raggi and joined by Judge Richard C. Wesley and Judge Christopher F. Droney, the panel ruled that a suspect named in an arrest warrant, who is arrested while visiting another person's residence, cannot object to the arresting officers' unlawful entry into the home. United States v. Bohannon, No. 14-4679-CR, 2016 WL 3067993 (2d Cir. May 31, 2016). [MORE]

Investing More in Prisons: The states that spend more money on incarceration than college students

Wash Post

Since 1990, state and local spending on prisons and jails has risen more than three times faster than spending on schools, according to a new Department of Education report released Thursday.

Driving that disparity is the unprecedented rise in the incarcerated population over that time period, due in large part to the drug war and mandatory minimum sentencing policies designed to lock people up for long periods of time. The United States is now home to less than 5 percent of the world's population but nearly 25 percent of the world's imprisoned people.

The Department of Education report traces how that shift has impacted state and local budgets. Prison spending is still a fraction of overall pre-K through 12 education spending: States spend $71 billion on prisons and $534 billion on schools each year. But that combined state and local prison budget is now over an eighth the size of the school budget. Back in 1990, prison spending was a sixteenth the size of education spending.

"Budgets reflect our values, and the trends revealed in this analysis are a reflection of our nation’s priorities that should be revisited," said Education Secretary John B. King Jr. in a press release accompanying the report. "We need to invest more in prevention than in punishment, to invest more in schools, not prisons."

While prison spending has risen three times as quickly as school spending nationally, in some states the disparities are far greater. In Colorado, prison spending rose five times faster than school spending. Prison spending grew six times more quickly in South Dakota and seven times in Wyoming. In Texas, where the disparity is greatest, prison spending grew at nearly eight times the rate as school spending.

The disparities between prisons and higher education spending are even starker. State spending on colleges and universities has remained roughly flat, in inflation-adjusted dollars, since 1990. But spending on prisons has nearly doubled. There are now 18 states where taxpayers spend more on jails and prisons than they do on colleges and universities. [MORE]

Study Shows Police Use of Force Is More Likely on Blacks [no need for belief in stats. your own personal experience will do]

NY Times 

The vast majority of interactions between police officers and civilians end routinely, with no one injured, no one aggrieved and no one making the headlines. But when force is used, a new study has found, the race of the person being stopped by officers is significant.

The study of thousands of use-of-force episodes from police departments across the nation has concluded what many people have long thought, but which could not be proved because of a lack of data: African-Americans are far more likely than whites and other groups to be the victims of use of force by the police, even when racial disparities in crime are taken into account.

The report, to be released Friday by the Center for Policing Equity, a New York-based think tank, took three years to assemble and largely refutes explanations from some police officials that blacks are more likely to be subjected to police force because they are more frequently involved in criminal activity.

The researchers said they did not gather enough data specifically related to police shootings to draw conclusions on whether there were racial disparities when it came to the fatal confrontations between officers and civilians so in the news.

The study’s release comes at a particularly volatile time in the relationship between the police and minority communities after high-profile fatal police shootings of African-American men this week in Louisiana and Minnesota prompted widespread outrage.

Portions of the episodes, both captured on video and released publicly, have intensified calls for police reform as many departments across the nation have been slow to deploy body cameras or to mandate changes in officer training standards after the high-profile deaths of a number of African-Americans at the hands of police officers in the past two years.

African-American activists who have demanded greater police accountability since the 2014 fatal police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., set off days of rioting, said Thursday that the study was critical to the conversation, but far from surprising.

“It’s kind of like, ‘Is water wet?’” said Aislinn Sol, organizer of the Chicago chapter of Black Lives Matter. “But what we gain with each study, each new piece of information is that we are able to win people over who are on the fence. The evidence is becoming overwhelming and incontrovertible that it is a systemic problem, rather than an isolated one.”

The organization compiled more than 19,000 use-of-force incidents by police officers representing 11 large and midsize cities and one large urban county from 2010 to 2015. It is the sort of data the Obama administration and the Justice Department have been seeking from police departments for nearly two years, in many cases, unsuccessfully.

The report found that although officers employ force in less than 2 percent of all police-civilian interactions, the use of police force is disproportionately high for African-Americans — more than three times greater than for whites.

The study, “The Science of Justice: Race, Arrests, and Police Use of Force,” did not seek to determine whether the employment of force in any particular instance was justified, but the center’s researchers found that the disparity in which African-Americans were subjected to police force remained consistent across what law enforcement officers call the use-of-force continuum — from relatively mild physical force, through baton strikes, canine bites, pepper spray, Tasers and gunshots.

“The dominant narrative has been that this happens to African-Americans because they are arrested in disproportionate numbers,” said Phillip Atiba Goff, a founder and president of the Center for Policing Equity, based at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice. “But the data really makes it difficult to say that crime is the primary driver of this. In every single category, the anti-black disparity persists.”

The study found that the overall mean use-of-force rate for all black residents was 273 per 100,000, which is 3.6 times higher than the rate for white residents (76 per 100,000) and 2.5 times higher than the overall rate of 108 per 100,000 for all residents.

For those who were arrested, the mean rate of use of force against blacks was 46 for every 1,000 arrests, compared with 36 per 1,000 for whites.

The Obama administration has been nudging police departments to adapt de-escalation tactics and to fix broken relationships with poor and minority communities across the nation, which typically experience far more intensive policing because of what are frequently higher crime rates.

But because police departments often refuse to release use-of-force data that would illustrate such trends, the federal government has had a difficult time in determining whether police departments are employing force less often.

The federal government cannot generally compel police departments to hand over such material, and many local agencies say they do not require officers to submit use-of-force reports.

Other departments say they lack the resources to collect such information, and others acknowledge privately that they fear that the release of their data would subject them to unwanted scrutiny from the public and the federal government.

But when the Justice Department has had the ability to review use-of-force records, it has found evidence of abuse.

In Seattle, federal investigators found that one out of every five use-of-force episodes had been excessive.

In Albuquerque, the Justice Department determined that most police shootings from 2009 to 2012 had been unjustified.

Researchers for the center said Thursday that the compilation of the use-of-force material after years of failed efforts to determine whether racial bias was present represented a significant success. The data is so closely held by police departments that the agencies that cooperated with the project did so anonymously.

Though the 12 municipalities that provided data were not named, they represented a large urban county in California and 11 cities spanning the nation with populations that range from less than 100,000 to several million, with an average population of 600,000.

The center said that given the diversity of the municipalities — six are predominantly white, one is predominantly black or Latino, and five have populations in which no single racial or ethnic group represents 50 percent or more of the population — that the findings are likely to hold true for most other cities.

[I-phone 4?] Sounds Like More Bullshit: CNN Reports, an "anonymous," "Homeless man" "with a cell phone" called 911 in Alton Sterling Murder

BNBA 

After Alton Sterling, 37, refused to give him money, a homeless man called 911 and claimed that Sterling brandished a gun, which may have touched off a deadly shooting that highlights the perils of encounters between Blacks and police.

From CNN:

Sterling was selling CDs outside the Triple S Food Mart early Tuesday in Baton Rouge, the official said, when the homeless man approached him and asked for money.

The man was persistent, and Sterling showed him his gun, the official said.

“I told you to leave me alone,” Sterling told the man, according to the official.

The homeless man then used his cell phone to call 911, the official said.

Officer In Philando Castile Shooting Identified

BNBA

The Minnesota Department of Public Safety Bureau of Criminal Apprehension have released the names of the officers involved in the shooting death of Philando Castile.

Jeronimo Yanez and Joseph Kauser have been placed on administrative leave following the incident. Yanez, who has been on the force for four years, was identified as the officer who opened fire on Castile.