[Color Always Replaces Non-Color] Fearing Replacement, White Nationalists in France Seek Govt Power to Legitimately Commit Genocidal Acts of Violence on Non-Whites & Enforce a Re-Migration Fantasy
/
Neuropean Marie Le Pen is a French PUPPETICIAN and lawyer serving as President of the National Rally political party (previously named National Front) since 2011, with a brief interruption in 2017. She is known as the trump of france
FUNKTIONARY explains that a "Caucasian" - is "One whose worst and most basic fear still remains genetic annihilation in the form of the fear of the impending "Black Planet." Whither goest thou white man? (See: Weiteko Disease, Yurungu, Western Civilization, Recessive Genes, Colored People, Melanin & Mutant).
As explained by Dr. Frances Cress Welsing, “color always annihilates non-color.” Rarely discussed, it is scientific fact that white people are genetic recessive and are unable to produce color or melanin. Social integration or intermixing sexual relations with non-whites is considered white genocide to racists. Most white people consciously or subconsciously understand the following;
White plus Black equals Colored.
White plus Brown equals Colored.
White plus Yellow equals Colored.
Most white people participate in the global system of racism white supremacy, a behavioral system created for their survival. 90% of the world’s 7 billion people are non-white. White people's behavior in all areas of people activity (economics, education, entertainment, labour, law, politics, religion, sex and war) is motivated by their fear of genetic annihilation. According to racist logic, white supremacy domination and oppression of all non-white people is essential for white global genetic survival. Welsing states, the white global collective remains genetically recessive to the black, brown, red and yellow global majority and lives each day and each minute of every hour in the continuous fear of white annihilation by the global majority of genetic dominants.
As explained by Dr. Blynd, Yurugu is in a vicious spiral increasingly at odds with his own humanity—as fragmented, pathological, and distorted as it is. [MORE] FUNKTIONARY further defines;
Weitko Disease - the caucasian’s patapathetic fascination with the exploitation and control of nature and exploitation and genocide of his fellow man. [more]
European psychology - the pathological notion that: "If you can't understand it, fabricate it, identify with it, compete with it. discredit it, or assimilate it, then destroy it." (See: Yurugu & Weiteko Disease) [MORE]
The Al jazeera documentary above shows the National Front’s attempt to attain governmental power for the sole purpose of Yurugu’s survival. Here, they are going through great pains to attain a popular level of legitimacy in a quest to attain government authority. Like a wave pretending to maintain “its” separateness from the ocean, racists’ psychopathic goals are to maintain their imaginary separate species or “race.”
These stupid (unconscious) people are believers caught up in Doggy’s trickbags. That is, they are ruled through empty representations or granfalloons; race, authority and government. A closer look reveals that these things are as real as Santa. According to FUNKTIONARY
believer - one who accepts that which has no basis in reality. 2) a person who enjoys being deceived. A believer does not seek—just accepts theologies and/or ideologies. 3) one who is addicted to vanity and/or chained to convention with conviction. - one who lives in a cloud of illusions, confounded by language and its deceptions. Believers are people who make their lives subjective slaves to a mere belief—engineered my limited and fragmented understanding and fostered by erroneous conclusions raised solely on effects and appearances. {MORE]
Race - a totally artificial theologically-driven, biologically-based, and scientifically-invalid "European" ideology of human genetic evolution and classification coinciding with the emergence of colonialism and the rise of the transatlantic slave trade. 2) hue-man's greatest and most manipulated myth—just a pigment of your imagination. Race is not real but the psycho-socio-economic effects of racism surely is. Race as a biological construct has been created to be wrongly confused with ethnic identity in order to establish the sense of "otherness" and de-humanization of melanated peoples around the globe. [MORE]
Racists live in a state of constant comparison, which Dr. Blynd defines as follows:
comparison - a disease of the mind due to the ignorance of uniqueness. Each individual is unique and beyond the scope of comparison. Those who fall victim to comparison will either become egoistic or bitter. You don't belong to any hierarchy - nobody is lower or higher than what "you" imagine yourself and "others" to be. Comparison creates differences or distinctions only when there is not uniformity. Comparison limits the possibility of living in the moment. (See: Judgment, Problems, Moment, Running Man, Surrender, Value, Exchange Value, Uniqueness, Awareness & Compassion). [MORE]
Race is a "psychological retro-virus in people's minds." Suffering from the disease of constant comparison racists imagine themselves to be a part of a hierarchy wherein persons unable to produce color & lacking melanin are supreme and they imagine themselves to be higher than what they imagine non-whites be. They play their imaginary survival game with white propaganda - “a game two can play—which consists simply in repeating '"i am better than you" and "you are utterly unlike (opposite to) me" over and over again; despite the historical record to the contrary.
The only purpose of race is to practice racism. Having little biological validity, the term "race" is better translated to mean organization. The sole purpose of such organization is to maintain white domination and world control of non-whites, who have been frictionalized into made up classifications of people by racists. [MORE]
Government - The control of the mind." 2) an abstraction (hoax) created for the sole purpose of making theft respectable and mind-control acceptable. 3) the societal manifestation of mass individual psychological reversal, i.e., the statutes, regulations, agencies, and agents (so-called bureaucrats) needed to threaten and shrink one's comfort zone. 4) a granfalloon. 5) a fiction supported by those who kill on command and steal on demand under the guise of "protecting" their victims. [MORE]
Government “authority” can be summed up as the right to rule. “The concept of “government” is about certain people having some special right to rule. And that idea, the notion that some people – as a result of elections or other political rituals, for example – have the moral right to control others, in situations where most people would not, is the concept being addressed here. It is the idea that some people have the moral right to forcibly control others, and that, consequently, those others have the moral obligation to obey.” [MORE]
According to statist belief “the people” have delegated powers to politicians. And politicians have transferred or given government orderlies [such as cops] the moral right to commit acts of unprovoked violence on people. That is, police officers have acquired the moral right to initiate violence and commit acts of aggression against others (by way of so-called “laws”) “to protect” the people for their own benefit. [MORE]
Question here: can you delegate a right to someone that you don’t have? where does authority, the right to rule others, come from? Asked differently, you don’t have the right to initiate unprovoked acts of force against other people - so how can you delegate or authorize another person to do such things? How did politicians, judges, police and other orderlies acquire such super-human powers?
Undeceiver Larken Rose states, “Despite all of the complex rituals and convoluted rationalizations, all modern belief in “government” rests on the notion that mere mortals can, through certain political procedures, bestow upon some people various rights which none of the people possessed to begin with. The inherent lunacy of such a notion should be obvious. There is no ritual or document through which any group of people can delegate to someone else a right which no one in the group possesses, And that self-evident truth, all by itself, demolishes any possibility of legitimate “government.
The average person believes that “government” has the right to do numerous things that the average individual does not have the right to do on his own. The obvious question then is, How, and from whom, did those in “government” acquire such rights? How, for example – whether you call it “theft” or “taxation”– would those in “government” acquire the right to forcibly take property from those who haw earned it? No voter has such a right. So how could voters possibly have given such a right to politicians? All modern statism is based entirely on the assumption that people can delegate rights they don’t have.” [MORE]
Rose states, “the belief in “authority,” which includes all belief in “government,” is irrational and self-contradictory; it is contrary to civilization and morality, and constitutes the most dangerous, destructive superstition that has ever existed. Rather than being a force for order and justice, the belief in “authority” is the arch-enemy of humanity.” People cannot delegate rights they do not have, which makes it impossible for anyone to acquire the right to rule (”authority”). People cannot alter morality, which makes the “laws” of “government” devoid of any inherent “authority.” Ergo, “authority”-the right to rule-cannot logically exist. A human being cannot have superhuman rights, and therefore no one can have the inherent right to rule. A person cannot be morally obliged to ignore his own moral judgment; therefore, no one can have the inherent obligation to obey another. And those two ingredients-the ruler’s right to command and the subject’s obligation to obey-are the heart and soul of the concept of “authority,” without which it cannot exist. And without “authority;” there is no “government.” If the control which the gang called “government” exerts over others is without legitimacy, it is not “government;’ its commands are not “laws;’ its enforcers are not “law enforcement.” [MORE]
Dr. Blynd explains "the difference between an outlaw and a lawman is mainly on paper - not on principle." Said principle is based entirely on people’s perceptions. Conduct carried out by non-government actors is characterized as trespass, robbery, extortion, assault and murder and is perceived as immoral, unjustified, and criminal. The same conduct carried by government orderlies is seen as valid and legitimate, “legal” and good.
Here the White Nationalist or facist outlaws above seek governmental power - as all psychopaths tend to do in order to enforce their stupid beliefs down other people’s throats. Thus, a problem featured here is not just the system of racism/white supremacy but the belief in authority and government itself. Not just that the wrong people seek to be masters in France but that masters exist in the first place.
Dr. Blynd states “There is no freedom in the presence of so-called authority, i.e. outside of one's Self and Self-Nature.) He further states, authority is rule through coercion. The real threat to "authority" is the masses overcoming info-gaps and verigaps through self-knowledge and the proliferation of symbols of opposition, not crime or destruction of property.”
