Moronic, Outgoing NYC Mayor Announces Mandatory Vaccine Requirement for All Private Employers w/No Testing Option. Businesses Cannot be Held Liable for Medical Harm that Results from a Mandatory Vax
/
From [HERE] Earlier today, NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio announced a first-in-the-nation vaccine mandate covering all private-sector workers in NYC that will take effect on December 27, 2021. According to Mayor de Blasio, the mandate will cover approximately 184,000 businesses.
NYC is set to publish guidelines for employers on December 15, which will provide employers with less than two weeks to implement and enforce the new mandate. Although we do not yet know the full scope of the new requirement, we anticipate that there will be few exceptions. We also anticipate that the mandate will be challenged in the courts. Mayor de Blasio announced that the mandate will apply to all in-person employees, and those employees will not have the option of getting regularly tested in lieu of vaccination. Employees must have at least one dose of the vaccine by December 27.
The mandate is slated to take effect just days before Mayor-elect Eric Adams replaces Mr. de Blasio.
“There’s no clarity around who and how this will be enforced,” Ms. Wylde said.
Evan Thies, a spokesman for Mr. Adams, said the mayor-elect would evaluate the mandate, as well as other Covid-19 strategies, when he takes office. [MORE]
Apparently the mandate will not make businesses liable for any medical harm that results from a mandatory vaccination.
It is undisputed that COVID “vaccines” do not prevent transmission or prevent individuals from getting COVID. A recent Harvard study shows no discernible relationship between the vaccination rate and new cases. Meanwhile, evidence in study after study has demonstrated that so-called COVID “vaccines” are extremely dangerous. Below professor Dr. Julie Ponesse raises several questions relevant to illogical mandates;
Consider these facts:
1) COVID-19 has an infection fatality rate not even 1% that of smallpox (and it poses even less risk to children)
2) a number of safe, highly effective pharmaceuticals exist to treat it (including monoclonal antibodies, Ivermectin, fluvoxamine, Vitamin D and Zinc), AND
3) The vaccines have reported more adverse events (including innumerable deaths) than every other vaccine on the market over the last 30 years.
In light of these facts, I have so many questions:
Why are the vaccinated granted vaccine passports and access to public spaces, when the Director of the CDC has stated that the COVID-19 vaccines cannot prevent transmission?
Why is vaccination the ONLY mitigation strategy when emerging evidence (including a recent Harvard study) shows no discernible relationship between the vaccination rate and new cases?
Why does our government continue to withhold Ivermectin as a recommended treatment when the U-S National Institutes of Health supports it, and when the state of Uttar Pradesh in India distributed it to its 230 million people, reducing its COVID death rate to almost zero? How has India surpassed Canada in Health Care?
Why are we about to vaccinate 5 year olds when COVID poses to them less risk than the potential vaccine reactions AND while there is NO effective monitoring system for the vaccines?
Why are we focused on the narrow benefits of vaccine-induced immunity when real-world studies show natural immunity is more protective, more potent, and more enduring?
Why do we shame the “vaccine hesitant” and not the “vaccine adamant”?
“Why,” as a nurse recently asked, “do the protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that did not protect the protected in the first place?”
By every measure and from every angle, this is a ‘house of cards’ about to crumble
But the question that interests me is why hasn’t it crumbled already? Why are these questions not the headlines of every major newspaper in Canada every day? [MORE]
