Media Pretends Waukesha False Flag Theater is a Contested Trial; “Darrel Brooks” is Unrepresented, Can't Cross Examine, Do Discovery/Investigate, Contest Evidence or Defend Himself Like a Real Trial
/
According to FUNKTIONARY:
bullshit – a barnyard epithet expressing utter disbelief at a statement or discourse that has been suggested to one by another. 2) authentic, verifiable, and true; that which we should have really known all along. Up to 2016, the word used to refer to anything devoid of truth and/or significance. Bullshit is authentic or ordinary man’s psychological weapon of defiance in the face of his inability to change the circumstances surrounding the absurdity or naked lies being offered as reality. Wherever you have illogical thinking and irrational bias merging, you will find its by-product—Bullshit. Bullshit often comes in the form of semantic disinformation—the exploitation of language over perception. Bullshit is something you should be allergic to and never be immunized or inoculated against. “Bullshit” is a far better term than “rationalization” but they basically mean the same. “Bullshit” is an organic, living and breathing word; whereas rationalization is dead-letter clinical term used by academicians with Ph.D.’s. [MORE]
SOME BULLSHIT From [HERE] A member of a group of grandmothers that performs at local parades testified in court on Thursday about the deaths and injuries the group’s members suffered in a crash at a Waukesha, Wisconsin, Christmas parade last fall, and a medical examiner gave emotional testimony about the autopsy of an eight-year-old killed in the crash.
Laura Thein described the “sisterhood” between the Milwaukee Dancing Grannies in her testimony at the homicide trial of Darrell Brooks, who is accused of driving an SUV into a parade just before Thanksgiving last year, killing six people, including three members and one volunteer with the Dancing Grannies.
The group — membership of which requires only that one be a grandmother — was performing at the Christmas parade as part of its usual seasonal parade schedule, which involves costumed, choreographed dance routines in about 25 parades per year, according to their website.
Their pompom-heavy routine was interrupted that day, Thein said, by a commotion from behind her. All of a sudden, a red SUV drove near her and hit two members in front of her, one of whom initially survived but died later during surgery.
“It all happened so quick that I was still dancing,” Thein said.
Right. The victims may be real but this trial and this “Darrell Brooks” AFRO-INTELPRO negro are not real.
WHO BENEFITS FROM FALSE FLAG THEATER? Due to the contrived nature of the evidence and weird timing of the incident, Waukesha feels synthetic and should be suspected as a false flag operation conducted by the government until proven otherwise. If Crimethinc would create fake vaccines for the purpose of genthanasia and biocide then surely It would have no problem executing 6 white people at a X-Mas parade.
Unlike other false flags this one doesn’t involve a gun grab by liberal simpletons (however, its not clear why do-gooders don’t seek to ban cars based on this episode; thousands of felonies are committed using vehicles each year). But it involves race. Uncle Brother’s purpose here would be primarily to distract us and secondarily to make white people hate, fear or feel superior to Black people more than they already do.
Here, false flag means “staged psychological operations by government operatives and shadow elite orchestrated and perpetrated against the civilian population. False flag operations does not necessarily mean that oftentimes real people don’t die.” FUNKTIONARY
During the week of Thanksgiving and after the conclusion of multiple race related criminal trials involving white male defendants, we are now presented with Mr. “Darrel Brooks” and his conduct in a 90% white city of Waukesha. At the time of the incident observe the common name and generic look in which he can be easily confused with many other middle-aged light skinned Black males with long dreadlocks covering much of his head and a beard concealing much of his face. Dood looks and sounds like police or an actor not a rapper. Is the driver on the grainy video actually “Darrel Brooks?” No one will ever know.
What’s missing is cell phone video evidence of the actual incident – although there were probably hundreds of people present with their cell phones recording the parade, there appear to be only a few videos [HERE] and [HERE] of the incident – which is not normal but common in false flags. Like other false flags, Brooks’ alleged “intentional murder planning” is undermined by having no getaway plan, which we deduce due to the existence of a silly pre-arrest video from “a neighbor” – apparently “Darrel Brooks” planned to run people over during a holiday parade, crash the car, flee on foot and then catch an Uber to escape. Just days after the incident, the government completed its investigation and concluded he intentionally ran people over – probably based on his rap lyrics or an unproduced manifesto or diary perhaps to be released during the trial. Like other false flags, less than 7 days after the incident we had an open and shut case - no need for a trial anyway.
Allegations are the proof in totalitarian systems - ‘who needs to actually prove an allegation in an adversarial trial when you have “beliefs” and dogma? The media simply parrots the police version of events. Anyone who questions the government narrative is a conspiracy theorist. Lawyers call this burden shifting. And this is with all things, not just false flags - for instance, just ask the liberals who sincerely and genuinely believe the veracity of Herschel Walker’s anonymous accuser despite the fact that they have never seen or heard her and have no rational reason to find her credible. How does one acquire such a jesusized belief in an anonymous person? Here, the media and government have presented a very familiar narrative - like a Lifetime movie; easy to follow and one white folks want to believe- another tale told in accordance with the appetite of believers, here racist believers. As explained by Dr. Amos Wilson, “In the context of White American domination there is no innocent Black male, just Black male criminals who have not yet been detected, apprehended or convicted. Their mere presence inspires in White Americans, fears of being assaulted, raped, robbed, or some other indefinable dread of being criminally victimized. Fantasies of the sexual molestation of White females by rapacious Black males are common to the White American male and female consciousness, and are frequent themes of their literary, cinematic, and pornographic productions.”
Despite the facts that 1) nearly 99% of crimes committed against whites are committed by whites and 2) white people are totally unaffected by most street crime involving Black people, the dependent media nevertheless projects white people as the most frequent victims of street crime. As explained by Wilson, the myth of black violence serves important roles in justifying and rationalizing white supremacy and in supporting the white american ego and personality (fabrications). Thus, if Waukesha is a false flag, it is another easily believable delusion in conformance with Neuropeon and Neuropean beliefs and ego.
This episode is similar to the Buffalo supermarket false flag massacre and the Charleston Hoax with Dylann Roof - a tale of a young racist filled with hatred for Blacks who spent months planning to murder black people in a church in South Carolina. Both incidents presented Black people with a fear based narrative that was easy to believe; racist-klan-nazi whites are around every corner, getting ready to murder Blacks at anytime. Most Black individuals are pre-disposed to believing the Charleston/Buffalo narratives - as it confirms their beliefs and misperceptions about racism. As such, there is no need to critically examine facts and details. Similarly with Waukesha white people are presented with familiar racial stereotypes and memes.
Less than a week after it happened the media supplied us a ready made bio for “Darrell Brooks” containing info (faster than court pre-trial services) about childhood upbringing (not dissimilar to the readily found unauthenticated manifestos or diaries found in other false flag episodes), how his ex-girlfriend feels and a slick headshot photo (like ISIS press releases). The media has stated he is a rapist, depicted him as a serial criminal who is unreformable (because Blacks are inherently criminal) [MORE] and said he is a welfare recipient. We are told he is an auto-coon rapper (an unsigned artist of course “promoted” on a YouTube channel (formed days after the incident, probably by the government). In his video he apparently showcased the same Ford Escape he used to kill as a prop in a music video (an auto-coon rapper with a Ford Escape? Silly, only police think like this. Reminds BW of the “Black rapper” from SD allegedly found on the battlefield in Syria fighting for ISIS, confirmed of course by “his tweets”). The media also explained he hates Trump and white people (hate white folks? Although his conduct has been objectionable, there is no hate on display in court in hours of footage where he is clearly seeking approval from and trying to please the white judge and white courtroom staff, like a puppy, child or servant– this is beggar conduct, racists find it flattering). According to the media and the police, Brooks had a history of social media posts advocating for violence against white people, he rapped about being a "terrorist" and a "killer,” he was a "black nationalist” (when white people say that what does it mean? If it means living separate and apart from whites then could he do that in 90% white Waukesha?), a member of the Black Hebrew Israelites (is there a branch in Waukesha, which is 3% Black?), and believes in black supremacy (right, like a prisoner believing he is the warden) and so on [MORE]. Based on the generic profile he probably also loves fried chicken, watermelon, collards, white woman, rims, cereal etc. All this leads the believer to believe that he ran people over because they were white. Racists want to believe that.
Similar to the Charleston Hoax, Dylann Roof was also unrepresented during his trial (only had attorney for sentencing, fired his attorneys the day before trial) we will also get an uncontested trial in which no actual defense will be vigorously asserted, not a single meaningful objection will be raised to piles of double hearsay statements and unauthenticated evidence allegedly found online (probably all made by the government) and otherwise inadmissible evidence and testimony is presented to the jury due to “Mr. Brooks” legal incompetence, ignorance and ineffectiveness. His identification will not be actually contested. This is authoritarian theater for slaves. But slaves have their beliefs and the false flags confirm them. Nevertheless, the dependent media will claim it was a contested trial and pretend the conviction is proof that this false flag occurred just like the media and government said it did.
As with other uncontested false flag cases like Parkland (defendant pled guilty, media mischaracterized his sentencing hearing as a trial on the merits) or the Alex Jones cases (there was no contested trial on the merits, the court entered default judgments in all his cases due to discovery violations. The media mischaracterzied the proceeding to determine damages as an actual trial on the merits) or firing the entire Uvalde police force, this is theater for your mind – intended to make you believe that the underlying event occurred without ever having to actually prove it.
According to FUNKTIONARY:
AFRO-INTELPRO - an FBI created, CIA and NSA backed, black-on-black infiltration and snitch network. AFRO is the acronym for Africans For Revolution Only. The intelligence operatives infiltrate revolutionary organizations to disrupt and foment confusion, terror and distrust within the ranks of those organizations not unlike COINTELPRO. (See: SNigger)
Hoax - a mirage that appears as believable, popular (and marketable) as Jesus, as tempting as sin, and as captivating as a sweet taboo---without its consequences and side-effects too. The illusion of truth seems real--the "reality" of the reel (the Passing Show)--the surreal. The two most pervasive hoaxes we put over on ourselves is ego and money--neither have any existence. (See: Passing Show, Mirage, Rolling Mirror, Objectivity, Ego, Money, Utopia, Kansas & Alice in Wonderland)
belief-based truth - a description or perception of reality, (the content of which comprises what we call "truth"), that one desires or hopes to be true, despite external scientific, natural, or reproducible proof-based truth to the contrary. People all-too-often compromise their integrity and/or intelligence by devising truth which disallows any proof by design, as part and parcel of its ruse to allure its believers)—and even the truth that carries proof cannot be proven against the undeniable uncertainty of Reality. You fall prey to (or fall for) the illusions of proof if you ignore the pure subjectivity of reality. Illusions of scientific proof follow illusions of limits, and illusions of religious proof follow illusions of truth. Science makes truth out of proof, while belief-based religions make proof out of truth. (See: Infinity, Proof, Revelatory Truth, Absolute Truth & Belief System)
Belief- the psychological calm of imagined certitude safely beyond de-stabilizing doubt and troublesome reality-entanglement. 2) a construction of approximate truths, absolute truths, mass truths and primary myths, based on genetic predisposition, and environmental and socio-psychological conditioning. 3) the institutionalization of the unknowable, i.e., a conviction that is not necessarily based upon any empirical, direct-mind or experiential knowledge. 4) a non-physical surviving thought-form. 5) any conclusion based on a fundamental assumption; the evidence of things not seen, no longer actively sought. 6) an intellectual
rationalization surrounded by (based on) "'proofs," reasons and arguments. 7) that which springs out of cultural ideology. 8) the greatest fiction. 9) a trick of the mind to repress doubt. 10) a mental doubt-suppression tactic. A suppressed doubt is neither faith nor even trust. 11) repressed doubt. 12) an explicit or implicit assent to dogmatic propositions (with or without overgrown religious foliage) on someone else's authority. 13) reverential blindness that thwarts fresh perception and intuitive apperception. 14) a prejudice without any experience to support it. 15) a peculiar blend of fatiloquent assertion on one hand and adamant denial on the other. 16) a manic flirtation with the terminally unprovable. 17) certainty based in the unknown. 18) having another "see" it for you while seeing him see it (for you)—in effect being for another. 19) a conclusion without the verification of direct experience—make-believe made real. 20) the inability or unwillingness to master the requisite logic or reason to counterbalance (or overcome) the willingness to be misled. [MORE]
