Climate Change in Gaza: Pale Interloper Alien European Hebrews Reclaim Their Land and Ancestral/Genetic Connection to Afrikan Hebrews from Ancient Times: Video Shows Annihilation of Life, Destruction

IsrAliens [Pale Interloper Alien European Hebrews Faking Like they have an Ancestral Connection to Afrikan Hebrews from ancient times] are Holocausting the Rightful Dwellers of Palestine in Fake "War"

Video from Pelham Shows Total Destruction, Annihilation of Life. Photos are from [HERE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Israeliens – impostor (pale interloper alien) Hebrews—Eastern European stock Caucasians who adopted the philosophy, myths, fables, and traditions of the so-called “Jews” while living in Russia—masquerading as if they had any genetic or historical ancestry and cultural heritage to the Afrikan Hebrews, the Afrim people, who occupied Canaan (Palestine) from ancient times. 2) those who currently are occupying Palestine (the land of Canaan), colonizing and killing its rightful descendants, historic owners and dwellers), and are undeniably alien (foreign—not aboriginal) to that land. 3) impostor Hebrews originating from the Pale of Settlement in Kazzarian Russia currently an occupying force (militarily holed-up and propped-up by US financial support and British skullduggery) in occupied Palestine. 4) alien Jews—Pinchbeck Hebrews. Israeliens are East Europeans with no genetic or actual historic ties whatsoever to the land now called Palestine. Israeliens have brainwashed (and fooled) themselves and many others into believing this historical lie and propaganda that they are the descendents of “Jews” (a misnomer for African Hebrews, itself a misnomer for the Afrim people). Anyone with a modicum of research skills, knowledge of basic geography, philology, and an unbiased-by-religious-myth mind can easily confirm or validate this fact for his or herself. Both so-called Sephardim and Ashkenazim “Jews” are not historically tied to the Afrim. It’s not that Caucasians who have adopted the “Jewish” religion shouldn’t have a place to live—but how about suggesting relocating where they came from—the hills of Russia, and not on another peoples’ land. You don’t invade (break into) someone’s house (property) and expect them to just go away and not fight to get it back (despite how much force, murdering, deception, and propaganda that is brought to bear to justify such wrongful invasion and genocide). Psychological repression is both invisible and reflexive. (See: Zionism, USS Liberty, Gulf of Tonkin, Genocide, Immigrant Human, Jew, Twelve Tribes of Israel, Evolution, Caucasian, Pilgarlick, El & Judaism)

Farrakhan: ‘We Charge Genocide. Netanyahu Sanctioned the October 7th Attacks to Initiate Holocaust. Our Extermination is Planned as Well. The Government is Trying to Kill Us Slowly w/COVID Vaccines’

From [HERE] and [HERE]

Judge Denies San Francisco Government’s Claim that 2 White Cops are Immune from Suit after They Fabricated Evidence to Falsely Convict a Latino Man who Spent Most of His Life in Prison

From [HERE] San Francisco police inspectors will face a trial following a judge’s finding Tuesday that they can’t use qualified immunity to avoid claims that their investigation led to the wrongful imprisonment of a man for 32 years. 

U.S. Magistrate Judge Kandis Westmore deemed Joaquin Ciria’s case against two San Francisco police inspectors ripe for a trial, denying most of their requests for summary judgment. 

However, two conspiracy claims, a claim for nondisclosure of evidence, and all claims against one officer who filed a report based on the inspectors’ case against Ciria, will not proceed to trial. 

Attorneys for Ciria did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Jen Kwart with San Francisco's city attorney's office said in an emailed statement, “We are pleased the court granted portions of our motion for summary judgment, and we are evaluating all options moving forward.”

The trial of Inspectors James Crowley and Arthur Gerrans is set for July 1.

Joaquin Ciria challenged the city for charging him with a 1990 killing he didn’t commit, leading to a conviction of first-degree murder at the age of 29. After spending most of his life behind bars, he was officially exonerated in the shooting death of his friend Felix Bastarrica in 2022 at age 61. 

He accused the city in the same year of conspiracy and false imprisonment, among other claims, saying that officials deprived him of his civil rights by fabricating evidence "despite obvious evidence of his innocence."

Westmore said in a 24-page order Tuesday that Ciria made a sufficient case for “a triable issue as to the state of mind of Inspectors James Crowley and Arthur Gerrans.” She added that qualified immunity "cannot act as a shield to judicial deception." 

The judge detailed the shaky case built by the city to charge Ciria for the shooting and prosecute him, from misidentifying him to using witness interviews with very little basis in fact, which led to his exoneration several decades later. 

At least one interview was coerced, as when the inspectors threatened to charge witness George Varela with murder if he did not identify Ciria as the shooter they were looking for.

"Much of the other cited evidence and witness interviews were not based on personal knowledge, and, instead, are more akin to gossip or rumor, which may not be relied upon for a finding of probable cause," the judge wrote.

The case built in total “falls far short of what is required for a finding of probable cause to arrest,” Westmore said, adding that it creates a triable case to explore “whether there was probable cause to prosecute.”

“If the jury believes plaintiff’s version of events, it could find that Crowley and Gerrans’ conduct, at the very least, involved reckless or callous indifference,” Westmore said. 

However, the judge granted most claims for summary judgment against Nicholas Rubino, another officer involved in filing the case against Ciria.

Westmore also granted summary judgment on the claims of intraconspiracy and state law conspiracy, and of nondisclosure of evidence, for the inspectors. She said the plaintiff failed to build a plausible case that any San Francisco department policy, custom or training was in place that would have allowed the inspectors to carry out the actions which Ciria accuses them of.

The city argued in a hearing before Westmore earlier this month that inspectors proved their investigation met the legal standard for probable cause, and that only the facts they had at the time they got the warrant matters. Attorneys cited a Ninth Circuit ruling that probable cause to arrest a person can come from an identification, a physical description and a connection to a vehicle used in a murder. 

Ciria’s family also separately filed claims in June 2023, saying they want the city to pay for his wrongful detention. His son Pedro and former partner Yojana Paiz say his conviction resulted from the city and police department’s “unconstitutional investigative policies” and a failure to train or intervene or to implement remedial measures to address “tainted, reckless and unconstitutional investigation and interrogation techniques.” 

Ciria says it was a pattern of tactics the city used to craft unreliable suspect identifications — including by suggesting that witnesses make less-than-certain identifications, selectively recording portions of interviews, falsely documenting witness identifications and priming witnesses to identify specific suspects.

The Northern California Innocence Project and The Innocence Commission successfully cleared Ciria’s name in 2020, saying police relied on rumors and coerced another man who drove the actual shooter to falsely name Ciria. 

At least five Black men were falsely convicted of murders that occurred between 1990 and 1991 in San Francisco based on fabricated evidence, unconstitutionally influenced witness identification or improperly incentivized evidence from San Francisco Police Department officers and inspectors. 

Fed Judge Denies Immunity to a White Cop who Framed Desmond Green for Murder based on a “lying, drug-impaired jailhouse informant” whom she Steered to Select Black Man from a Photo lineup

From [HERE] The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi issued a compelling decision Monday denying qualified immunity to a detective who falsely accused Desmond Green of capital murder based on a “lying, drug-impaired jailhouse informant” whom she steered to select Mr. Green’s face from a photo lineup. 

The “horrifying wrong” of being wrongly accused and arrested was compounded by Mr. Green’s imprisonment for nearly two years in the Hinds County Detention Center, which was full of violence, rodents and snakes, and moldy food, where he endured “constant yelling, fighting, and threats,” often had to sleep on the bare floor, and “constantly feared for his life.”

After the informant recanted and prosecutors dropped the charges, Mr. Green filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the Jackson police detective (as well as the city itself and Hinds County, which runs the jail) seeking justice for his wrongful prosecution and conditions of confinement. 

The detective responded that Mr. Green’s suit should be dismissed under the doctrine of qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that, according to the court, “means people wronged by government agents cannot sue those agents unless the Supreme Court previously found substantially the same acts to be unconstitutional.”

In his 62-page order, District Judge Carlton W. Reeves concludes after a detailed legal analysis that the detective is not entitled to qualified immunity because her actions violated clearly-established law.

The court goes on, however, to address Mr. Green’s argument that qualified immunity is itself unlawful, setting out the historical context for the doctrine’s invention and tracing its evolution into what Justice Sonia Sotomayor has called “an absolute shield” against accountability for police officers accused of using excessive force. 

Qualified immunity “has no basis in law,” the court concludes. “It is an extra-constitutional affront to other cherished values of our democracy.”

“Waves of Terrorism”

The federal statute under which Mr. Green sued the police detective is usually called “section 1983,” but the court insists on using the law’s formal name—the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871—to underscore why Congress passed it in the first place. The decision sets the historical stage this way (citations omitted):

After the Civil War, white supremacists unleashed waves of terrorism across the South. Lawlessness was the order of the day. Groups like the Ku Klux Klan carried out “thousands of beatings, lynchings, and incidents of torture and mutilation.” “These atrocities were inflicted with impunity because judges, politicians, and law enforcement officers were fellow Klansmen and loyal sympathizers.” White supremacy empowered them to kill Black men, women, and children without fear of consequences.

EJI has documented nearly 2,000 confirmed racial terror lynchings of Black people by white mobs during Reconstruction, the 12-year period following the Civil War. Thousands more were attacked, sexually assaulted, and terrorized by white mobs and individuals who were shielded from arrest and prosecution. [MORE]

Alabama DA Seeks New Trial for Toforest Johnson, Black Man on Death Row. No Physical Evidence Connected Him to the Crime, 10 witnesses placed him at a nightclub and Liar Witness Paid by Government

From [HERE] On May 20, 2024, Jefferson County, Alabama District Attorney Danny Carr asked a circuit judge to grant a new trial to Toforest Johnson (center), an Alabama death row prisoner whose conviction DA Carr believes is “fundamentally unreliable.” This extraordinary request is the latest in a series of appeals for Mr. Johnson, who was sentenced to death in 1998 for the 1995 murder of Jefferson County Deputy Sheriff William Hardy but has always maintained his innocence. “A thorough review and investigation of the entire case leaves no confidence in the integrity of [Mr.] Johnson’s conviction,” DA Carr wrote. “The interest of justice demands that [Mr.] Johnson be granted a new trial.” DA Carr initially filed a motion requesting a new trial for Mr. Johnson in 2020, voicing similar concerns over the validity of his conviction. The United States Supreme Court declined to hear Mr. Johnson’s case in October 2023.

Mr. Johnson was convicted in the murder of Deputy Sheriff Hardy, who was killed in a hotel parking lot, despite his maintenance that he was at a nightclub across town. His conviction relied largely on testimony from Violet Ellison, who claimed to have listened to phone calls between her daughter and heard someone at Jefferson County Jail who identified himself as “Toforest” confess to the shooting. DA Carr wrote that Mr. Johnson’s original prosecutor has acknowledged that the case hinged on Ms. Ellison’s testimony and that “nobody contests that [Ms.] Ellison is the key to [Mr.] Johnson’s conviction and the reason he is on death row today.” In 2008, several individuals submitted affidavits in support of Mr. Johnson, claiming they had seen him across town on the night of the murder and in 2022, information was revealed indicating Ms. Ellison was a key witness in several other criminal cases for the State. “We also know the [Ms.] Ellison was not believed by law enforcement initially and that a different theory of the case that contradicted her account was pursued after [Mr.] Johnson’s trial and that the lead prosecutor now has such grave concerns about [Ms.] Ellison that he supports a new trial for [Mr.] Johnson,” DA Carr wrote.

Lawyers for Mr. Johnson have long argued that the prosecution suppressed evidence that Ms. Ellison had knowledge of the $5,000 reward being offered in the case and testified in hopes of receiving that money. In a 2018 hearing in Jefferson County, a copy of the check that was paid to Ms. Ellison surfaced after the US Supreme Court sent Mr. Johnson’s case back to state court. The Circuit court ruled that Mr. Johnson’s legal team could not establish that Ms. Ellison knew there was a reward when she talked with the police.

Former Alabama Attorney General Bill Baxley, former Chief Justice Drayton Nabers, and several former judges and prosecutors have also voiced support for a new trial for Mr. Johnson, as well as three former jurors on the case. Shanaye Pool, Mr. Johnson’s daughter, was grateful for DA Carr’s support of her father. “Our hope is that the courts will agree with him. Our hope is for our family to finally be reunited,” said Ms. Poole.

Video Surfaces of Israel’s Security Minister Appearing to Celebrate the Murder of a Palestinian Baby (Ali Dawabsha) Who Was Burned Alive. Israeli’s Laugh, Sing, Stab and Burn a Picture of the Child

From [HERE] 8 YEARS before Oct 7, Israel’s current security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, was partying with settlers celebrating the burning alive of a Palestinian BABY, Ali Dawabsha! They laugh, sing, stab the picture, burn it & hit it jubilantly

One-and-a-half year old Ali Saad Dawabsha became a victim of Israeli violence on July 31, 2025. He was burnt to death. Other members of his family were also severely burnt in a Jewish settlers’ attack on their home in the village of Duma, near Nablus, in the West Bank.

A spokesman for Rabbis for Human Rights told Al Jazeera Arabic that this is the tenth attack on Nablus by settlers in July. A statement issued by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) provided an even more alarming statistic, putting the number of Jewish settlers’ attacks, some of them lethal, at an estimated 11,000 since 2004.

Ali Dawabsha is not the first Palestinian child to be burnt to death, although the story of Mohamed Abu Khdeir who was tortured and burnt alive by a group of Jewish extremists in July 2014 now serves as a hideous benchmark for Israeli settler violence, which is often conducted under the watchful eye of – or as part of larger violent campaign led by – the Israeli army.

Despite Israeli political theater and statements of condemnations following Abu Khdeir’s grisly murder, Israeli violence against Palestinians is part and parcel of Israel’s Occupation policy, draped in numerous crimes gone unpunished. [MORE]

The IRS Finally Acknowledged that Racial Disparities in Taxpayer Audit Rates have Negatively Affected Black Taxpayers

From [HERE] The IRS finally acknowledged this month what Stanford’s Institute for Economic Policy research uncovered in 2023: Racial disparities in taxpayer audit rates have negatively affected Black taxpayers. The IRS has committed to reevaluating the mechanisms that caused the disparity and refining their compliance approaches—but tweaking the dials on the algorithm is insufficient.

We need true, fact-based accountability for why data-driven algorithms exhibited decidedly human biases in their outcomes. The tax system’s integrity depends on the IRS’s willingness to outline what went wrong and how taxpayers can be certain that the issue is resolved. Furthermore, open-sourcing the audit algorithms would provide both transparency and an opportunity to engage in a feedback loop with researchers and watchdog groups.

Biased Algorithms

Concern over racial disparities in IRS audits isn’t just about statistics. These disparities undermine how much taxpayers can trust the fairness of the tax system—especially if the IRS wants to foster voluntary compliance. Commissioner Danny Werfel has acknowledged that such disparities “degrade trust in our tax system,” and such degradation isn’t going to be improved with a mere assertion that the issue has been resolved.

Algorithms aren’t biased. But the people who write the algorithms—or the people who collect the data that the algorithms are applied to—may be. As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly popular for automating tasks and increasing operative efficiency, there are going to be more opportunities to scapegoat “the algorithm.” [MORE]

[racists spare no expense to Dominate non-whites] Costs to Arizona taxpayers to reach $314 Million in profiling verdict against Racist Sheriff Arpaio who Targeted Immigrants Based on Skin Color

Skin Color was the Criteria. The charge followed a 2011 court order by U.S. District Court Judge Murray Snow forcing Arpaio to stop racial profiling people based on the color of their skin. Arpaio’s police department was found to routinely racially profile Latinos, by prolonging traffic stops to determine the immigration status of individuals. In violation of the 4th Amendment Officers stopped people merely on the belief that 'they looked illegal.' [MORE]

From [HERE] Seven years after Joe Arpaio was ousted as sheriff of Arizona’s most populous county, taxpayers are still footing the bills from a racial profiling verdict over his signature immigration crackdowns — and those costs have been getting heavier since.

The tab for the legal and compliance costs in overhauling the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office is expected to reach $314 million by mid-summer 2025, including $41 million approved Monday by county officials — the most expensive for Maricopa County taxpayers since the lawsuit was filed in 2007.

Nearly 11 years ago, a federal judge concluded sheriff’s deputies had racially profiled Latinos in Arpaio’s traffic patrols that targeted immigrants. Consequently, the judge ordered costly overhauls of the agency’s traffic patrol operations and, later, its internal affairs unit.

The taxpayer spending is expected to continue until the sheriff’s office attains full compliance with the court-ordered changes for three straight years. Though progress has been made on some fronts, the agency hasn’t yet been deemed fully compliant. [MORE]

According to Pew Research FBI Data Shows the Violent Crime Rate Fell 49% between 1993 and 2022 and the Property Crime Rate Declined 59% between 1993 and 2022

From [HERE] A growing share of Americans say reducing crime should be a top priority for the president and Congress to address this year. Around six-in-ten U.S. adults (58%) hold that view today, up from 47% at the beginning of Joe Biden’s presidency in 2021. [MORE]

How have crime rates in the U.S. changed over time?

Both the FBI and BJS data show dramatic declines in U.S. violent and property crime rates since the early 1990s, when crime spiked across much of the nation.

Using the FBI data, the violent crime rate fell 49% between 1993 and 2022, with large decreases in the rates of robbery (-74%), aggravated assault (-39%) and murder/nonnegligent manslaughter (-34%). It’s not possible to calculate the change in the rape rate during this period because the FBI revised its definition of the offense in 2013.

[MORE]

The FBI data also shows a 59% reduction in the U.S. property crime rate between 1993 and 2022, with big declines in the rates of burglary (-75%), larceny/theft (-54%) and motor vehicle theft (-53%).

Using the BJS statistics, the declines in the violent and property crime rates are even steeper than those captured in the FBI data. Per BJS, the U.S. violent and property crime rates each fell 71% between 1993 and 2022.

While crime rates have fallen sharply over the long term, the decline hasn’t always been steady. There have been notable increases in certain kinds of crime in some years, including recently.

In 2020, for example, the U.S. murder rate saw its largest single-year increase on record – and by 2022, it remained considerably higher than before the coronavirus pandemic. Preliminary data for 2023, however, suggests that the murder rate fell substantially last year.

How do Americans perceive crime in their country?

Americans tend to believe crime is up, even when official data shows it is down.

In 23 of 27 Gallup surveys conducted since 1993, at least 60% of U.S. adults have said there is more crime nationally than there was the year before, despite the downward trend in crime rates during most of that period. [MORE]

BLACK CRIMINALS FUNCTION AS A NEGATIVE REFERENCE GROUP VITAL TO MAINTAINING THE WHITE AMERICAN SELF-IMAGE. THE BLACK CRIMINAL IS USED TO SUPPORT THE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY'S SELF-SERVING, SELF-JUSTIFYING JUDGMENTS OF ITSELF. WHITE AMERICA'S PREOCCUPATION WITH BLACK CRIMINALITY BETRAYS ITS OWN NEED FOR REASSURANCE; BETRAYS ITS OWN BASIC INSECURITY REGARDING ITS PROJECTED MORAL PURITY. CONSEQUENTLY, THE HIGHER THE INCIDENCE OF REPORTED BLACK CRIMINALITY, THE MORE EXCEPTIONALLY RIGHTEOUS WHITE AMERICA FEELS ITSELF TO BE. THE MORE RIGHTEOUS IT FEELS ITSELF TO BE THE MORE INTENSELY AND GUILTLESSLY IT PROMULGATES AND JUSTIFIES ITS DOMINATION AND EXPLOITATION OF AFRICAN PEOPLES AT HOME AND ABROAD.” THE ABOVE GOES FOR RACIST LIBERAL AND CONSERVATIVE MEDIA [MORE] THE ONLY PURPOSE OF RACE IS TO PRACTICE RACISM. [MORE]

Determined by Politicians Rather than Judges, Mandatory Minimums Perpetuate Mass Incarceration, according to New Study [gullible scholars Don't Realize Decarceration is Incompatible w/White Supremacy]

From [TheSentencingProject] Eliminating mandatory minimum sentencing laws is essential to creating a more just and equitable criminal justice system. Widespread evidence shows that mandatory minimum sentences produce substantial harm with no overall benefit to crime control.1 Determined by lawmakers rather than judges, these sentences represent a uniquely American approach to sentencing that has accelerated prison growth. They constrain judicial discretion, deepen racial disparities in the criminal legal system, and cause far-reaching harm to individuals, families, and communities.2

Despite building bipartisan agreement that such sentences are a policy failure, mandatory minimum sentences continue to be promoted as a tool to combat crime, even as the public signals waning support. This fact sheet identifies the main issues associated with mandatory minimum sentences. It documents the modest progress toward ending them, as well as efforts to reinstate them, and offers solutions to hasten change that will aid in ending mass incarceration.

Overview

Mandatory minimums are legal provisions in each state and the federal government that require a specific minimum prison term for certain crimes, regardless of individual circumstances.3 A range of criminal legal experts from ideologically diverse backgrounds4 maintain that mandatory minimums are an overly harsh, disproportionate punishment.5

As crime rose in the 1980s and early 1990s, federal and state lawmakers scrambled to calm public concern.6 With some support from academics, community leaders from areas with rising crime, corrections, law enforcement, and the legal community, politicians built on growing momentum to end indeterminate sentences, consisting of a range of years with no set minimum, and instead opted for longer, determinate sentences upon conviction with a long, minimum term. By 1995, all 50 states and the federal government constrained judges’ discretion in sentencing by mandating minimum imprisonment terms for a wide variety of offenses.7These policies encompassed:

• Mandatory prison sentences for many drug-related crimes and longer, mandatory minimum sentences for violent crimes and repeat (i.e., habitual) offenses;

• “Three strikes” laws that lengthened sentences, requiring minimum sentences of 25 years to life imprisonment for some, usually serious, offenses;8 and

• “Truth-in-sentencing” laws, which required people to serve most of their sentences, typically 85%, before eligibility for release.9

Problems with Mandatory Minimums

Prosecutors hold the power

A deterrence rationale underpinned mandatory minimum sentences: individuals were expected to refrain from committing new crimes if sentences were lengthened, and such sentences would also “send a message” to those considering criminal acts. The laws were professed to target violent crime, but their broad authority resulted in far more drug and other nonviolent convictions than violent convictions. The use of mandatory minimums effectively vests prosecutors with powerful sentencing discretion. The prosecutor controls the decision to charge a person with a mandatory-eligible crime and, in some states, the decision to apply the mandatory minimum to an eligible charge.10 Rather than eliminate discretion in sentencing, mandatory minimums therefore moved this power from judges to prosecutors. The threat of mandatory minimums also encourages defendants to plead to a different crime to avoid a stiff, mandatory sentence.

Racial and ethnic disparities flourish

Studies show that Black people receive mandatory minimum sentences more frequently than whites.11 A 2019 study found that people of color in New York made up 91% of arrests for crimes that carry mandatory minimums, whereas whites made up only 7%.12 At the federal level, a 2017 United States Sentencing Commission report on drug sentences revealed that Black people were the most likely to have been sentenced under a mandatory minimum than any other group, and that, despite equal rates of using drugs,13 Black and Hispanic individuals comprised the majority of persons convicted of drug-related offenses (which are the most common federal offenses subject to mandatory minimums).14

The racial disparity associated with the sentencing of crack and powder cocaine offenses in the federal system after Congress passed the draconian Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 is well known. The law created a quantity-based 100:1 disparity between federal crack cocaine and powder cocaine offenses, imposing the same five and ten-year mandatory minimum penalties for selling five and 50 grams of crack cocaine as for 100 times the amount of powder cocaine. In 1986, before the law passed, the average federal drug sentence for African Americans was 11% higher than for whites but within four years, this average was 49% higher.15 A 2007 analysis by the United States Sentencing Commission showed that 82% of people convicted of crack-related offenses were Black, a stunning difference compared to whites (9%).16 This injustice was reduced, but not eliminated through the Fair Sentencing Act in 2010 which lowered the disparity to 18:1 from 100:1.

DECARCERATION IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH WHITE SUPREMACY’S GOAL OF PLACING LARGE NUMBERS OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE INTO GREATER CONFINEMENT.

RWS REQUIRES THE GREATER CONFINEMENT OF SUBSTANTIAL NUMBERS OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE. UNDECEIVER NEELY FULLER MAKES IT PLAIN THAT “THE WHITE SUPREMACISTS KNOW THAT A WORLD SYSTEM BASED ON RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY REQUIRES THAT SUBSTANTIAL NUMBERS OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE BE GREATLY RESTRICTED IN THEIR MOVEMENTS FROM PLACE TO PLACE. THE WHITE SUPREMACISTS RESTRICT THE MOVEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE SO AS TO KEEP THEM IDLE, AND/OR KEEP THEM FROM BECOMING CONSTRUCTIVELY SUFFICIENT.

THE RACISTS MAKE CERTAIN THAT LARGE NUMBERS OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE EXIST UNDER CONDITIONS THAT WILL MOST LIKELY CAUSE THEM TO DO THINGS THAT WILL GIVE RACISTS AN “EXCUSE” TO PUT THEM IN GREATER CONFINEMENT.” [MORE]

Prison conditions worsen

In addition to their profound racial differences, mandatory minimum sentences have contributed to prison overcrowding, which exacerbates extremely unsanitary and dangerous living conditions. Overcrowded prisons create resource deficits for rehabilitation, mental and behavioral health needs, and education needs. Eliminating mandatory minimums would allow the reallocation of resources that could instead go toward funding these services and programs, which have known community safety benefits.17

State and Federal Reforms Underway

After decades of lengthening prison terms to discourage engagement in crime, the failure of this approach is abundantly clear, and some jurisdictions are reversing course. A few notable reforms in recent years include:

• Almost half of all states, as well as the federal government, have reduced or eliminated some mandatory minimums related to drug offenses.18

• Colorado, Iowa, and Washington now forbid mandatory minimums for youth who are transferred to the adult system.19

• Mississippi scaled back its truth-in-sentencing law so that certain nonviolent offenses committed by someone without a criminal history could be reviewed after serving one fourth of their sentence instead of the previous mandate of needing to serve 85% of their sentence.20

While states have yet to address the overuse of mandatory minimum sentences for violent offenses, the limits put on harsh penalties for nonviolent and drug offenses is encouraging. But even here, reform of mandatory minimums has been too sporadic and insufficient to meaningfully pull the prison population back to its pre-mass incarceration levels. Reforms should be strengthened so they point the way toward a new paradigm of sentencing that allows individualized assessments, that includes regular review, and earned release as soon as possible.

Support for Misguided Policies Remains

We are now in the 50th year of the uniquely American reliance on mass incarceration.21 Experts agree that this has come about by politics, not crime, and many of the policies are related to mandatory minimum sentences.9 From perpetuating racial disparities, hindering rehabilitation, and straining resources, these policies have had significant negative consequences for individuals, families, and communities.

While inroads have been made to reverse or reform mandatory minimum laws in select states, we are nowhere near an end to the “get tough” politics that brought them about. Old rhetoric tends to resurface when crime worries rise. In 2022, the Tennessee legislature passed a new truth-in-sentencing law,23which requires individuals to serve 100% of their sentence upon conviction for eight separate felonies. The law is expected to increase the prison population considerably.24

A successful push in California for two new mandatory minimums followed another highly televised crime by Stanford University student Brock Turner in 2016.25 Because the sexual assault did not fall neatly in the state definition of rape, the two new laws expanded the definition of rape and prohibited the use of probation in a wider range of crimes of a sexual nature. The case exemplifies the understandable emotional public outcry for immediate action. It is important to remember, though, that the burden of such quickly developed laws is likely to fall disproportionately on non-white individuals, unlike this defendant, perpetuating the crisis of punitiveness toward Black and Brown communities.26 [MORE]

11th Circuit Affirms Sheriff Victor Hill’s Abuse Conviction: Black Strawboss Handcuffed Inmates to Restraint Chairs for Up to 6 Hours at a Time in Atlanta Area Jail

ALTHOUGH DO-GOODER REFORMERS OFTEN CLAIM DIVERSE POLICE FORCES ARE A CURE FOR POLICE BRUTALITY, BLACK COPS BRUTALIZE AND HARM BLACK PEOPLE AT A RATE NEARLY EQUAL TO WHITE COPS. SAID DO-GOODERS ARE DRUNK-OFF THEIR JESUSIZED BELIEF IN STATISM. SCHOLAR ALEX VITALE STATES, “REFORMERS OFTEN CALL FOR RECRUITING MORE OFFICERS OF COLOR IN THE HOPES THAT THEY WILL TREAT COMMUNITIES WITH GREATER DIGNITY, RESPECT, AND FAIRNESS. UNFORTUNATELY, THERE IS LITTLE EVIDENCE TO BACK UP THIS HOPE. EVEN THE MOST DIVERSE FORCES HAVE MAJOR PROBLEMS WITH RACIAL PROFILING AND BIAS, AND INDIVIDUAL BLACK AND LATINO OFFICERS APPEAR TO PERFORM VERY MUCH LIKE THEIR WHITE COUNTERPARTS.” HE STATES, “THERE IS NOW A LARGE BODY OF EVIDENCE MEASURING WHETHER THE RACE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OFFICERS AFFECTS THEIR USE OF FORCE. MOST STUDIES SHOW NO EFFECT. MORE DISTRESSINGLY, A FEW INDICATE THAT BLACK OFFICERS ARE MORE LIKELY TO USE FORCE OR MAKE ARRESTS, ESPECIALLY OF BLACK CIVILIANS.” [MORE] and [MORE]AND [MORE]

FUNKTIONARY EXPLAINS

Quisling – the name for a traitor, coined in April, 1940, meaning one who is content to accept the yoke of the conqueror for the sake of being given office and trinkets, even against the feeling and expression of the conquered people, and moreover, prepared to use the force continuum against his/her own people to impose the conquerors decrees. (See: SNAGs)

"The notion that '[n]o man is above the law and no man is below it' is fundamental to our democratic republic's continuing viability." So says the Eleventh Circuit(link is external) as its opening statement in affirming the conviction of Victor Hill, a former Clayton County, Ga. sheriff for gratuitously putting detainees in a restraint chair for hours at a time, causing extreme pain and lasting injuries.

The case is United States v. Victor Hill, 23-10934 (11th Cir. 2024).

The Dependent Media Pretends "Democratic" Israel was Forced Into "War" w/Another Nation in Order to Conceal its Ongoing Holocaust Against its Own Citizens who Have No Army, Navy or Air Force

BASIC REALITY CONCEALED BY AUTHORITY AND THEIR MEDIA From [HERE] ‣Israel and Gaza are not separate countries. Gaza is a small territory mostly surrounded by Israel and whose borders Israel controls (directly or in the case of one crossing, indirectly).

• ‣Gaza is often called an “open-air prison” -- for good reason.

• ‣Muslim, Christian, and Jewish Palestinian Arabs peacefully shared the land before Israel was created in 1948.

• ‣Israel was founded in 1948 by forcing non-Jewish Palestinians off the land.

• ‣Israel has been taking over more Palestinian land ever since...

• ‣The two “sides” are not evenly matched.

• ‣Palestinians are killed at massively higher rates than Israelis, and this has always been true.

• ‣Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank have often tried nonviolent resistance.

• ‣Numerous respected organizations have documented Israel’s systemic human rights abuses and violations of international law.

• ‣Israel relies on funding and diplomatic cover from the U.S. Its actions often harm the United States

• ‣On Oct. 7, hundreds broke out of Gaza, attacked Israeli soldiers & civilians, and some took hostages. Israel disseminated atrocity claims about the attack, many of them found to be without evidence and untrue.

• ‣Israel immediately began indiscriminately shelling Gaza, killing and maiming men, women, and children of all ages.

Happening Now in the "Grazed New World:" Video Shows IsrAliens Holocausting Humans in the North of Gaza as Sheeple in the US Believe Whatever The Dependent Media Tells Them to Believe

From [HERE] and [HERE] 10 women, 10 children and 8 men slaughtеred after Israel bоmbеd a family home in north Gaza

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Hagana, the – “Eastern ‘European’ Caucasians “Jewish,” i.e. (Kazzarian), guerrillas who in cahoots with the Rothschild parasitic hoodlum dynasty and the Royal Throne & Flush British Crown, established the so-called State of Israel, currently occupying (holed up) on the land of Palestine. (See: War, Zionism, Ideology, Religion & Racism White Supremacy)

HOIST:  House Of Israelien State Terrorism. The imperial United States and Britain propped up (hoisted and foisted) the illegal terrorist group-cum war nation State and continues to keep it propped up with a kickstand of annual multi-billion “dollar” gifts in the form of “credit,” media support, weapons, arms, logistics, intelligence and technology. [MORE]

improperty – claims or rights to ownership of land, resources or wealth that was achieved through deception, fraud, force, manipulation, coercion, threat, duress or unethical means. For example, the USA is the Improperty of the Native Americans; the State of Israel is the Improperty of the people of Palestine—as the 12 Tribes of Israel mentioned in the Bible is an allegory and not historical whatsoever. Misunderstood mythology is responsible for so much of the violence and bloodshed carried out in the name of both truth and religion—especially religious truth. (See: Tradition, The Bible, Twelve Tribes, Violence, Religious Truth, Religious Virus, Chosen People, Israel, Greed & Racism White Supremacy)

[racism is not bigotry or mere words or name calling] US Agency Sues Exxon for Discrimination after Racists Hung Nooses at Plant in an Apparent Threat to Murder Black Workers

From [HERE] Exxon Mobil Corp was sued for racial discrimination by a U.S. federal agency on Thursday, with charges alleging that the oil major failed to protect workers from harassment after nooses were found at one of its facilities in 2020.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) said in a statement that a Black employee at Exxon's chemical plant in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, found a hangman's noose at his work site in January 2020.

The EEOC said that at the time of this report, Exxon was already aware of three other such instances of nooses being displayed at the complex and a nearby refinery, and that a fifth noose was reported later in 2020.

According to the EEOC, Exxon investigated some of these incidents, but not all, and "failed to take measures reasonably calculated to end the harassment."

The federal agency alleged that Exxon's actions and omissions regarding the noose incidents "created a racially hostile work environment."

In Latest GOP Outreach Effort to the NGHR Voters [sleeping toms] Texas Governor Greg Abbott Pardons Racist Suspect Convicted in the 2020 Fatal Shooting of a Black Lives Matter Protester

From [HERE] Daniel Perry was convicted of murdering protester Garrett Foster in 2020, and has already been released from prison in Texas

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has officially pardoned U.S. Army Sgt. Daniel Perry, who was convicted of murdering Black Lives Matter protester Garrett Foster in 2020.

According to reports from the Austin American-Statesman, Perry — who was sentenced to 25 years in prison for Foster's murder in April 2023 — was released from prison in Rosharon, Texas, less than one hour after Abbott signed a pardon proclamation.

On Thursday, May 16, the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles wrote in a statement that it recommended Perry to be pardoned on the murder conviction.

"The members of the Board of Pardons and Paroles delved into the intricacies of Perry’s case. The investigative efforts encompassed a meticulous review of permanent documents, from police reports to court records, witness statements, and interviews with individuals linked to the case," the statement reads in part.

"After a thorough examination of the amassed information, the parole board reached a decision on May 16, 2024. The Board voted unanimously to recommend a full pardon and restoration of firearm rights."

5 yrs Later the Police Murder of Ronald Greene Still a Low Priority for Corpse Biden’s Justice Dept. White LA Cops Brutally Beat Shackled Black Man to Death w/Fists, Flashlights, Dragged Him Facedown

RONALD GREENE WAS A BLACK MAN WHO WAS TORTURED AND MURDERED BY WHITE TROOPERS IN LA. ON MAY 10, 2019, GREENE, WHO WAS UNARMED, DIED AFTER BEING ARRESTED BY LOUISIANA STATE POLICE FOLLOWING A HIGH-SPEED CHASE OUTSIDE MONROE, LOUISIANA. DURING THE ARREST, HE WAS STUNNED, PUNCHED, AND PLACED IN A CHOKEHOLD. HE WAS ALSO DRAGGED FACE DOWN WHILE HANDCUFFED AND SHACKLED, AND HE WAS LEFT FACE DOWN FOR AT LEAST NINE MINUTES. AT LEAST SIX WHITE TROOPERS WERE INVOLVED IN THE ARREST.

WHEN GREENE'S CORPSE WAS BROUGHT TO THE HOSPITAL, POLICE TOLD DOCTORS THAT HIS CAR HAD RUN INTO A TREE, A STORY A DOCTOR SAID "DOES NOT ADD UP", GIVEN THE NATURE OF GREENE'S INJURIES AND THE FACT THAT THERE WERE TWO STUN-GUN PROBES LODGED IN HIS BODY; POLICE LATER ACKNOWLEDGED THAT GREENE HAD DIED DURING A STRUGGLE, THOUGH WITHOUT MENTIONING ANY USE OF FORCE BY OFFICERS. ALTHOUGH AUTHORITIES REFUSED TO RELEASE BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE FOR TWO YEARS, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS OBTAINED AND PUBLISHED A PORTION OF IT IN MAY 2021. [MORE]

After White Cops Tortured/Brutally Murdered Ronald Green Uncivilized LA Authorities Hid Video/Reports, Begged DA Not to Charge, Lied About Cause of Death and Prevented Proper Autopsy. Feds Investigate

From [HERE] Mona Hardin has been waiting five long years for any resolution to the federal investigation into her son’s deadly arrest by Louisiana State Police troopers, an anguish only compounded by the fact that nearly every other major civil rights case during that time has passed her by.

The death of Ronald Greene in northern Louisiana on May 10, 2019, sparked outrage after The Associated Press published long-suppressed body-camera video showing white troopers converging on the Black motorist before stunning, beating and dragging him as he begged the racist suspects for his life.

Yet half a decade after Greene’s violent death, the federal investigation remains open and unresolved with no end in sight. And Hardin says she feels ghosted and forgotten by a Justice Department that no longer even returns her calls.

“Where’s Ronald Greene’s justice?” asked Hardin, who refuses to bury her son's cremated remains until she gets some measure of accountability. “I still have my boy in that urn, and that hurts me more than anything. We haven’t grieved the loss of Ronnie because we’ve been in battle.”

Justice Department spokesperson Aryele Bradford said the investigation remains ongoing and declined to provide further details.

Under federal law, no statute of limitations applies to potential civil rights charges in the case because Greene’s arrest was fatal. But prosecutors have wavered for years on whether to bring an indictment, having all but assured Greene’s family initially that an exhaustive FBI investigation would produce charges of some kind.

A federal prosecution seemed so imminent in 2022 that one state police supervisor told AP he expected to be indicted. The FBI had shifted its focus in those days from the troopers who left Greene handcuffed and facedown for more than nine minutes to state police brass suspected of obstructing justice by suppressing video evidence, quashing a detective’s recommendation to arrest a trooper and pressuring a state prosecutor.

Colorado Springs to Pay $2.1M After Slave Catcher Cops Beat Dalvin Gadson "Beyond Recognition" and Attempted to Murder Him to EnForce DUI Law. Black Veteran Pulled Over for Driving Slow on Empty Road

From [HERE] Colorado Springs city council members approved Tuesday a $2.1 million payment to settle a federal lawsuit against three police officers who were accused of beating a Black man “beyond recognition” during a traffic stop, leaving him with significant PTSD-like symptoms. 

Body camera footage released from the October 2022 stop shows officers telling Dalvin Gadson to get out of the car, after he was stopped for driving slowly and not having license plates. Gadson opens the driver’s side door, turns his body to face toward them and asks to stay seated inside.

The officers tell him he is under investigation for a DUI and needs to get out, but he objects. Then, an officer is seen reaching into the car to get him out and a struggle ensues. 

The federal lawsuit filed in 2022 alleges two officers punched Gadson in the face and one of them kneed him in the forehead, causing him to fall back into the car. 

Footage shows an officer punching Gadson repeatedly from the passenger side of the car. According to an arrest affidavit, the officer punched Gadson to prevent him from grabbing a 4-inch knife out of the console. The footage also shows an officer kick Gadson after he was pulled out of the car and on the ground. 

The settlement represented a milestone for Gadson and the people of Colorado Springs, Gadson’s attorneys said in a statement Tuesday afternoon. Gadson will continue to seek justice by working with the Department of Justice in its investigation of the incident, his attorneys said.

Gadson filed a civil rights complaint last year alleging the officers discriminated against him because of his race and used excessive force. 

“The settlement should stand as a warning to all those who think their badges entitle them to brutalize the men and women they’ve sworn to protect and serve. You are not above the law and if your own department refuses to hold you accountable, we will,” the attorneys wrote. [lol. Nothing like gullible Sleeping Toms. Authority, the implied power to rule over others is uncontrollable.]

The federal lawsuit names Colby J. Hickman, Matthew Anderson and Christopher Hummel for violating Gadson’s constitutional rights.

Prosecutors dismissed two felony assault charges against him and a misdemeanor charge for obstructing a peace officer and resisting arrest, online court records show. He pleaded guilty to a traffic offense for not having license plates properly displayed on his car. 

A Colorado Springs police spokesperson declined to comment on the settlement, but said all three officers were still employed by the department and are “in good standing.” 

Following an internal affairs investigation, Hummel received a 10-hour suspension for making “inappropriate and unprofessional” comments toward Gadson and was removed from his position as a police training officer, according to a July 2023 internal memo. Anderson was required to take a 10-hour training on the use of excessive force for failing to follow CSPD’s use of force policies. 

Video Shows NYPD Cops Shoot Win Rozari to Death in Front of His Mom/Brother as He Begged Cops Not to Shoot. AG Tish James Failed to File Charges [Negro Rolebot Only Serves Her Racist Liberal Masters]

From [HERE] The mother and brother of Win Rozario, a Queens teen in mental distress, begged police officers not to shoot before they fired multiple fatal rounds at him, according to video released by state Attorney General Letitia James on Friday. 

The distressing body camera footage — which took place in late March in Ozone Park after Rozario called 911 — comes less than a day after THE CITY reported the family was frustrated and had called on the police to release the videos and names of the officers.

NYPD Chief of Patrol John Chell has defended the killing, noting that the 19-year-old had grabbed a pair of scissors from a drawer and moved toward the officers.

The released footage confirms that, but it also shows how the situation rapidly escalated, with officers Matthew Cianfrocco and Salvatore Alongi tasing and then fatally shooting Rozario, all within three minutes of arriving at the home. The video released by the Attorney General’s Office lists only the officers’ last names.

On Friday afternoon, Rozario’s family said “the officers should be fired and prosecuted for murder as soon as possible.

“It’s been over a month since we lost Win,” the statement said. “And we miss him everyday.” 

Reliving the fatal shooting is “painful and traumatic” the family added, noting they wished the video didn’t need to be made public. 

“The video that was released makes it clear that Win should be alive but the police came and murdered him in our kitchen without any care for him or us,” the family said. “The police created a crisis and killed him in cold blood.”