New Minneapolis Prosecutor Sparks Hope of Reopening Case of Terrance Franklin: Family Says Police Murdered Black Man to Cover-Up a Cop's Errant Gun Discharge that Injured Other Officers

From [HERE] Last month, in the weeks leading up to the third anniversary of the murder of George Floyd, the Minneapolis City Council voted to settle two additional lawsuits brought by other Black people whom former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin kneeled on. The largest payout, $7.5 million, went to John Pope, who was 14 and in his bedroom in 2017 when Chauvin pressed his knee on the boy’s back and neck for 15 minutes. A magistrate took the unusual step of ordering the body camera footage made public, calling it a “premonition of the same force later used” on Floyd.

The footage also showcased the troubling command culture of the Minneapolis Police Department. After Chauvin has had his knee on Pope for more than 10 minutes, his sergeant walks in, sees what’s happening, appears to ask if Chauvin needs a break, nods, and walks out.

The sergeant, Lucas Peterson, by then had already caused the death of a Black suspect in a choke hold, and filed a false report in another case, claiming a Black woman had assaulted his partner. He was also one of two officers who, four years earlier, had shot and killed a 22-year-old Black man named Terrance Franklin.

But if the Franklin case escaped scrutiny at the time, many things changed after Chauvin killed Floyd. This past November, voters in Hennepin County, Minn., elected a chief prosecutor, Mary Moriarty, who campaigned on a promise of prosecuting police, and, local police chiefs tell TIME, specifically called out Franklin’s death.

The killing of Terrance Franklin by Minneapolis police in 2013 was the result of a confluence of things, according to Mike Paddin, his family’s attorney. Padden surmised that the cops were mad at Franklin because they thought he had tried to run over an officer when he took off and led them on a chase through South Minneapolis. They needed a scapegoat to cover up for an errant discharge of an MP5 submachine gun.

“I think in their mindset, this was not premeditated, this was a quick knee-jerk reaction,” said Padden. “They grabbed him, took him into that little room, closed the door, and straight-up executed him.”

Franklin was killed on May 10, 2013, after officers cornered him in a South Minneapolis home following a police chase. He was pursued by police after they approached him for questioning as a possible burglary suspect. After seeing an officer draw her weapon on him, Franklin drove away and later fled on foot.

Once Franklin was located by a police K9 unit in the basement of an Uptown home, MPD officers descended onto the scene and surrounded the home. At this point, SWAT officers Mark Durand, Michael Meath, Ricardo Muro, and Lucas Peterson had entered the home.

What happened after this is contested by Franklin’s family, but the officers involved in the killing allege that Franklin attacked the K9 and knocked officer Meath across the room.

He then turned to punch Peterson and grabbed Durand’s MP5 submachine gun, pulled the trigger, and injured officers. Peterson then recounts how he lunged at Franklin and managed to fire several rounds into his skull with another round coming from the injured Meath.

None of the officers were immediately interviewed after they killed Franklin. Two were taken to the hospital and weren’t interviewed for two weeks, while the others gave their statements days later. MPD policy allows its officers to talk to each other and corroborate their stories and bars them from being interviewed for days.

Later that year, a grand jury found that there was not enough evidence to bring charges against the officers involved in Franklin’s death. At the time, MPD investigated its own officers when there was a police-involved shooting and they concluded that the officers, in this case, acted within their rights and cleared them of any wrongdoing.

Though it wasn’t documented in Primeau’s report, Padden believes that MPD officers used the N-word towards Franklin in the moments leading up to his death and displayed racial hostility. 

Padden had also hired R. Steven Rogers, a local private investigator, and Richard Ernest, a firearm forensics expert, to add to the investigation. The two worked together to reconstruct Franklin’s shooting by creating a 3-D model that depicted what took place according to crime-scene investigators and the medical examiner’s notes.

Franklin had been shot a total of 10 times. Five of those shots were to his head. An image from the crime scene shows two bullet holes on a door an inch apart. Investigators inferred that these two bullets, which came from different guns, were shot at the same time.

Another photo from the crime scene was of a single dreadlock from Franklin that had been left on the floor. This painted a grim picture for Padden and his team about what took place in that basement.

The lawsuit also alleged that it was Durand who had fired his own gun that injured his fellow officers and that killing Franklin was a means to a coverup. To explain how Franklin’s DNA was found on the MP5’s trigger, Padden and his team reasoned that after Durand had handed off his gun to an MPD officer, that same officer placed his fingers on Franklin’s body to detect a pulse without a glove. 

The officer would go on to say that he had worn gloves when touching Franklin but removed them when handling the gun that contained his DNA as well. Franklin’s hands were not tested for gunshot residue on the MP5.

Officer Peterson’s involvement in Franklin’s killing raised many questions for Padden and those who were familiar with his history in the department. Peterson had been the subject of 13 excessive force complaints, many of which the city had settled for hundreds of thousands of dollars. This includes the case of Christopher Burns who died from cardiac arrest after being placed under a chokehold by Peterson. [MORE]

Bodycam Shows Asheville Slave Catchers Slowly Creep Toward Black Man in Parking Lot as They Interrogate and Examine His Tattoos. The Costumed Gang Then Pounce on Him Searching for a Gun He Didn’t Have

ALL FORCE USED OFFENSIVELY IS EXCESSIVE, IMMORAL. From [HERE] The city, through the Asheville Police Department, has released body camera footage showing the violent May 13 arrest of Devon Whitmire, 27, after video footage taken by bystanders led to outrage among those who said police used excessive force.

Edited body camera footage can be viewed on the city's YouTube channel.

Video Shows 3 White Asheville Cops Attack a Black Man w/a Broken Arm, Pin Him by Holding His Neck Down in the Street, Searching for a Gun He Didn't Have. Liar Cops Then Claim He Assaulted Them

EXCESSIVE FORCE? Putting your hands on another human being, not in self-defense but offensively, without their consent and ‘manipulating their body in disregard of their volition is evil’, whether its done by citizens or representatives of “authority” wearing blue costumes. Contrary to legal truths, the government’s implied AND HYPOTHESIZED power (THE BELIEF IN authority) to initiate unprovoked acts of violence on citizens is immoral, evil AND THERE IS NO RATIONAL BASIS FOR ITS EXISTENCE. [MORE]

FUNKTIONARY EXPLAINS, AUTHORITY ‘is very simply one man violently controlling the life and property of another man.’ THE UNDECEIVER JEREMY LOCKE explains, “SLAVERY IS NOT A CONCEPT OF TOTALITY . . . THE ULTIMATE SLAVERY IS MURDER . . .SLAVERY IS FOUND BOTH IN THE PARTIAL AND COMPLETE DESTRUCTION OF FREEDOM.” THE USE OF UNPROVOKED FORCE AGAINST ANOTHER PERSON IS AN ATTEMPT TO DOMINATE OR CONTROL THEM AND IT IS A FORM OF SLAVERY. [MORE] CERTAINLY, GOVERNMENT RULE OR MISRULE BASED SOLELY ON FORCE AND VIOLENCE IS SLAVERY [MORE] but go on indulging in fantastic illusions and truths conflicting with reality.

Boy Gets Niggerization Lesson [don't call cops, they aren’t here to help you]: Fam says a Mississippi Cop Attempted to Murder 11 yr Old by Shooting Him in the Chest, posed no threat. Cop Not Charged

From [HERE] A Black family has demanded a police officer be dismissed and charged with aggravated assault for shooting an 11-year-old boy when police responded to the child’s own domestic disturbance call at his home.

Aderrien Murry, who called police at the request of his mother, was unarmed and following instructions from Indianola officer Greg Capers. Then Capers shot him in the chest early last Saturday morning, seriously wounding him, family attorney Carlos Moore said.

The boy had called police to the home after his mother, Nakala Murry, was threatened by a man at 4am local time, but Capers “escalated the situation”, Moore said. The man was believed to be a former partner of Nakala Murry, various media reports suggested.

Nakala Murry said her son was “blessed” to be alive but he did not understand why an officer shot him.

“This was the worst moment in my life and I feel like nobody cares. That’s my child, y’all,” Nakala Murry said, as she cried in the lobby of the local city hall during a sit-in protest on Thursday against the police action.

Moore called for body-cam video to be released and objected to Capers being placed on paid leave pending the investigation.

“We are demanding justice. An 11-year-old Black boy in the city of Indianola came within an inch of losing his life,” Moore said. “He had done nothing wrong and everything right.”

Moore added to NBC: “The main question [Aderrien] has been asking is why did this happen to me? The child suffered a collapsed lung, lacerated liver and fractured ribs. … He’s blessed to have survived but he’s still in pain emotionally and mentally.”

Murry was taken to the University of Mississippi medical center for treatment. He stayed there for five days and was released and returned back home on Wednesday.

Nakala Murry told the cable news outlet that the man had arrived at her house “irate” and she was worried about her safety. Then when the police officer arrived he already had his gun drawn when he was at the front door, she further recounted.

Moore said two officers responded, and one kicked the front door before the mother opened it. She told them the intruder had left the home but three children were inside, Moore said, adding that Nakala Murry told him Capers yelled that anyone inside should come out with their hands up.

He said that Aderrien walked into the living room with nothing in his hands, and Capers shot him in the chest.

The Indianola city attorney, Kimberly Merchant, confirmed to the Enterprise-Tocsin newspaper in Indianola that Capers is the officer who fired the shot.

NYPD Cop Charged with Assault for ‘Rapidly Punching’ a Homeless Black Man 6X in the Face, while he was lying on the ground’ and not Under Arrest

From [HERE] The Manhattan District Attorney has indicted a New York police officer for repeatedly punching a man who was acting “erratically” in the face and knocking him unconscious during an encounter in the West Village in November 2021, which “caused the victim to suffer substantial pain.”

NYPD Officer Juan Perez, 42, pleaded not guilty to a misdemeanor assault charge in court Wednesday and “categorically denies the allegations put forth by the district attorney,” his lawyer, James Kilduff, told CNN.

Prosecutors said the victim also sustained a broken nose and bruising around the eyes.

“Police officers are often put in challenging situations, but they must use their training appropriately and treat the residents of New York City with respect,” Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg said in a statement.

On November 10, 2021, Perez responded to a call about a man acting erratically and throwing water on pedestrians at a location in the West Village, prosecutors said in a statement of facts provided by the DA’s office.

When officers arrived, they witnessed a standoff between three men, one of whom was holding a large bottle of alcohol above his head, the statement of facts details.

The man told police he was being harassed.

Perez told the man to sit and took the bottle from his hand. The man complied but continued talking to Perez and repeatedly tried to stand up, according to the statement of facts.

Perez called for an ambulance, believing the man was intoxicated, prosecutors said in a news release from the DA’s office. After a continued verbal back and forth, Perez is accused by prosecutors of pushing the man against a wall to handcuff him.

The man was not under arrest at the time, the statement of facts details, adding that the victim told Perez he was placing the wrong person under arrest.

Both Perez and the man fell to the ground and began to struggle. Perez’s partner then helped subdue the man, according to the news release, which says Perez “proceeded to rapidly punch the victim six times in the face, while he was lying on the ground defenseless.”

“He was brought to the hospital, where he was diagnosed with a broken nose and significant swelling,” the release said.

The man was unconscious for at least one minute and while later testing showed the man was intoxicated, “all objective evidence makes clear that he was also in the throes of a serious psychiatric crisis,” prosecutors said in the statement of facts.

Much of the incident was captured on police body-worn cameras and video from bystanders. “Based on testimony and video about the above events, the Grand Jury returned an indictment, necessarily finding that the defendant was not justified in his use of force,” the statement of facts reads.

CNN’s Chief Law Enforcement and Intelligence Analyst John Miller said cases where officers are criminally charged are relatively rare, as prosecutors are often reluctant to take on cases involving allegations of police brutality.

Miller said there are some cases that cross the line where the use of force is so egregious, it defies reasonable explanation. If an incident is captured on video, it makes for a stronger case, Miller said.

The NYPD said Perez has been suspended without pay – an automatic action in New York City once a police officer is arrested and charged, Miller noted.

Perez is next scheduled to appear in court on August 2.

"PUT YOUR HANDS ON YOUR FACE!" Uncontrollable Public Masters Lose Control in Aurora, a Liberal City. On Video a Gang of White Cops Terrorize and Attack a Black Man who Tried to Give Them His License

From [HERE] A Black man is suing eight, white Aurora police officers who he claims violated his civil rights in a traffic stop that turned violent.

Aurora is another white liberal, “progressive” city where they murder and harm Black people.

The new 22-page lawsuit includes screenshots of body camera video from May 2021. They show Preston Nunn III during a traffic stop, which escalated into a violent arrest that hurt him.

Aurora officers stopped Nunn after they say he drove into the officers’ lane when they were conducting a separate traffic stop.

According to the lawsuit, instead of allowing Nunn to show his license and registration, Aurora officers pointed a gun at his head, tackled him, slammed his head into the ground, applied a chokehold, handcuffed him, used a Taser on him twice, tried to hogtie him and ultimately arrested him.

The lawsuit alleges officers used excessive force, in violation of Nunn’s constitutional rights.

“The only plausible explanation for this senseless escalation is that Mr. Nunn, a Black man, was treated differently by the Aurora officers due to his race,” the lawsuit claims.

Eight officers are named in the lawsuit.

Video of arrest means some things ‘can’t be denied’

FOX31 legal analyst Chris Decker said the video is important to the case.

“We can argue about what we see, we can argue about what it means that we’re seeing, but certain things simply can’t be denied when you have a videotape,” Decker said.

The lawsuit mentions a 2021 report from the Colorado attorney general. The report found the Aurora Police Department had a pattern and practice of racially biased policing against Black people and of using excessive force.

“If this is an agency that has a pattern of practice where they have not engaged in correct corrective processes to properly train and make sure that their officers are not engaged in excessive force, that both changes the nature of the claim and the amount of the potential damages,” Decker said. “It would allow Mr. Nunn to reach the agencies above and beyond the individual officers.”

An Aurora Police spokesperson said they are not able to comment on pending litigation but the officers involved are still working for the department.

Comply w/Authority or Go to Jail or Die are the Only Choices in the Free Range Prison: Impatient Colorado Cops Murdered a White Man to Make Him Comply w/Order to Get Out of Car. Case Settled for $19M

From [HERE] Last year, Christian Glass, a young man of just 22, lost his life in a cruel encounter with police, despite his innocence and despite his plea for assistance. Police responded to his 911 call, not with help, but with deadly force. The officers involved, ex-deputy Andrew Buen and Sgt. Kyle Gould, have since faced felony charges, and now, the taxpayers of Colorado are also paying for their crimes.

This week, the parents of Christian Glass, Simon and Sally Glass, will receive a staggering $19 million settlement, the largest in Colorado's history for a police-related killing. The previous record was a $15 million settlement in 2021 for the tragic death of Elijah McClain. While this is a monumental sum, it is, as Simon Glass poignantly puts it, "blood money."

"We have to do some good with it," Simon told Mountain Newsroom Reporter Spencer Wilson, mentioning that a foundation could be established to prevent further tragic shootings like this one. While this settlement will not return Christian to his parents, it serves as a stark reminder of the need for radical change within the American law enforcement system.

The settlement was split between multiple agencies:

  • Clear Creek County: $10 million

  • The Colorado State Office of Risk Management (on behalf of the Colorado State Patrol and Colorado Department of Revenue): $3 million

  • The town of Georgetown: $5 million

  • The city of Idaho Springs: $1 million

However, this isn't just about money. The Glass family, still in mourning, will see a public park dedicated to their son in Clear Creek County. It's hoped that this park will serve as both a loving tribute to Christian and a reminder of the accountability that the Clear Creek Sheriff's Office must hold.

While the settlement marks a significant moment in the pursuit of justice for Christian Glass, the criminal proceedings against Andrew Buen and Kyle Gould continue, with the next hearing scheduled for June 21. [MORE]

Seattle Police Killed More People while Under Federal Oversight, according to data analysis of Cops in white, liberal city

From [HERE] A data scientist says she’s found evidence that Seattle police killings have worsened since the federal government began monitoring the department a decade ago, an analysis that was criticized by a federal monitor just before a critical decision on the future of that oversight.

Sherry Towers, a data scientist who studies violence and extremism, says she wasn’t initially looking into Seattle police violence in particular when she came across the data.

But what she found alarmed her enough to send her findings to U.S. District Judge James Robart before a May 30 hearing that could result in the end of most federal oversight through the city’s decade-old consent decree.

Antonio Oftelie, who was appointed by Robart to monitor the Seattle Police Department’s compliance with the consent decree, said he welcomed input from community members, but he criticized key aspects of Towers’ analysis as “misleading” in a memo sent to the court.

At issue is a difference of opinion between consent decree stakeholders and Towers about how much police use of force is too much — and whether the city has done enough to leave federal oversight behind.

Towers, who is known for her 2015 study looking at the contagion effect of mass shootings, stands by the letter she sent to Robart on May 20, which claimed that Seattle’s rate of police shootings is significantly higher than elsewhere in the country. She started looking at national police killings data as part of a Department of Homeland Security-funded project, and she mentioned to a colleague following the progress of the consent decree that King County’s rate seemed higher than average.

Towers then used public data from Seattle police, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the FBI, as well as The Washington Post’s police shooting database, to conclude that about 1 in 10 people who have died by homicide in Seattle between 2013 and 2019 have been killed by a police officer.

“I could have just looked at the data and seen everything had gotten better, and that also would’ve warranted an email to the judge to say, just FYI, I’m a data analyst with experience in looking at crime data, and the data that I look at supports what the Seattle PD is saying,” Towers said. “But that’s not what I found.”

In his memo responding to Towers’ email, Oftelie said Towers’ analysis could not explain whether the shootings were justified. The vast majority of force assessed by the monitor found that it complied with the consent decree, he wrote.

When asked for comment, the police department referred The Seattle Times to the federal monitor’s memo, and said that it had made improvements in data transparency as a result of the consent decree.

In March, city of Seattle and Department of Justice lawyers asked Robart to find the Police Department in “substantial compliance” with the consent decree, established in 2012 after investigators found evidence of biased policing and that the department regularly used excessive force.

The city cited the federal monitor’s report showing a 60% decrease in use of the most serious types of force — including shootings — between 2014 and 2021.

Towers, however, said that fatal police shootings specifically have increased since the consent decree was established, and that racial disparities have gotten worse. She found that in the seven years before the 2012 settlement, Seattle police fatally shot 12 people, but between 2013 and 2019, officers killed 21 people. (The most recent year of SPD’s shootings-specific database available to the public is 2019.) Over the same time period, she also found that the percentage of fatal shootings of nonwhite people increased.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Washington filed a brief in the consent decree case making similar arguments about continued racial disparities in policing. The organization cited SPD’s 2019 use of force report that showed force was used on people of color more than 50% of the time, despite the city being 65% white.

Oftelie said in a Thursday interview he agrees racial disparities remained “an area of challenge that the city must continuously address.” He said he believes Seattle is now at the forefront of trying to figure out the root causes of those disparities — and is tracking data on them, unlike many police departments.

Oftelie also said it was important not to overlook a reduction in more common, lower-level types of force, which he sees as a good indicator of a change in Seattle police culture. That kind of force decreased by 48% from 2015 to 2021, though it spiked in 2018.

“Historically throughout the country, lower levels of force have been used to intimidate people, to make them not feel comfortable in certain communities, to send a signal from police to community,” Oftelie said.

“And so if you can reduce type one force as dramatically as Seattle has, that shows a real difference in culture, in policing, a difference in mindset in policing, because cops on the street with type one force, there’s deliberation there.”

Yet the federal monitor did not address Towers’ main point — that the share of police killings out of overall homicides in Seattle is worse compared with much of the rest of the country, and more than double the national average. Making comparisons to other jurisdictions was out of his purview, Oftelie said, and homicides aren’t a good proxy for how often situations involving a police shooting might occur.

The Seattle Times contacted five academics who study police violence, and all had different preferred methods for measuring it. Two said that Seattle’s rate of police violence compared with other cities nationwide is elevated, and another said this is true of police agencies across the West.

“The raw numbers indicate Seattle has a kind of high police homicide rate and could do better,” said Dan O’Flaherty, professor of urban economics at Columbia University.

‘I want my left eye back’: Protestors Silenced by Police Violence Speak Out. In 2020 Cops in Liberal Cities Violently Silenced the Speech of People who Begged Authorities to Stop Killing Black People

From [HERE] “You don’t recover from something like this. That’s not a thing you do,” said journalist Linda Tirado, who was partially blinded after being fired on by the police while covering the protests that engulfed Minneapolis for months after George Floyd was slowly murdered in plain public view by a senior police officer in the city.

Tirado is one of many who were injured in the protests that year and won a legal case against the city, which has already agreed to pay out at least $5.1m in settlements to demonstrators – using city funds – and is estimated to be facing an additional $100m more in potential payouts as a result of lawsuits.

Her settlement is just one of many that add up to what experts deem a record level of payouts across the US as a result of violent policing of the 2020 protests, with probably many more to come.

While photographing demonstrations, Tirado says an officer shot a projectile at her face. Bleeding profusely, Tirado was taken by protesters to a nearby hospital where she was rushed into surgery, but lost the sight in one eye.

She now deals with short-term memory loss, a lack of depth perception and other health issues. She can no longer drive and has trouble with simple tasks like cooking. She was awarded $600,000 by the city in May 2022, the Minnesota Reformer reported. The funds addressed her medical debt, but not the long-lasting impacts on her work and life.

“There is no [appropriate] amount. Because you know what I want? I want my left eye back,” Tirado said.

She added that the settlement legal process was emotionally invasive and traumatic and called the undertaking “the hardest thing you’ll ever do”.

During the mass demonstrations across the country against police violence, police injured many and, like Tirado, some were severely wounded by so-called “less-than-lethal” weapons, including rubber bullets and beanbag projectiles.

In a global report by Amnesty International, the organization said countries around the world, including the US, increasingly use ammunition against peaceful protesters that is less dangerous than actual bullets but can still cause permanent injury or death.

Anthony Evans said he was shot in the jaw by police firing just such a less-than-lethal round as he took part in a Black Lives Matter protest in Austin, Texas.

“We were never, like, cussing or yelling in their face or anything. It was all just peaceful,” said Evans.

Officers refused to provide Evans with medical assistance, he said. He walked seven miles home and drove himself to the hospital.

He was hospitalized for nearly a week and a half then endured several surgeries and an infection after doctors initially mistreated his shattered jaw, he said.

“It was a very arduous journey of just going through surgery after surgery,” said Evans, who ultimately had his jaw wired shut for more than five months and could only consume liquids.

He concluded: “Unfortunately, we were down there protesting police brutality – and we were met with more brutality by the police.”

Evans and other injured protesters in the city who sued have received a total of $17.3m in settlements so far, the Austin American-Statesman reported, and 19 Austin officers were indicted.

In New York, the city and its police department have agreed to pay upwards of $6m total to 320 protesters who were subject to excessive force during a June 2020 protest in a Bronx neighborhood – including being zip-tied, hit with batons and pepper-sprayed – while the police were surrounding and squeezing them together using a technique known as “kettling”.

The violence unleashed upon us that night was intentional, unwarranted and will be with me for the rest of my life

“The violence unleashed upon us that night was intentional, unwarranted and will be with me for the rest of my life,” said Charles Henry Wood, one of the plaintiffs, in a March statement.

Plaintiff Samira Sierra told New York magazine she was body-slammed by six officers and she remembers screams from protesters and then people passing out around her as they were crushed in.

Meanwhile, in Chicago, Jonathan Ballew, who reported on the protests there, said the lack of change within policing practices was the most difficult part of his experience.

Ballew was pepper-sprayed by a Chicago police officer. He later received $40,000 as part of a $115,000 settlement, along with another journalist. Separately, 60 protesters have filed a federal lawsuit against Chicago police officers, alleging abuse during the 2020 protests, the Chicago Tribune reported.

Ballew noted that police spending had sharply increased for many police departments and more people were actually killed by police after 2020 racial justice protests than in previous years.

“The increased police budgets, surveillance and police violence all seem to be back on the rise. It’s pretty disappointing,” he said, adding: “It seems like we’re repeating the same mistakes that led us to George Floyd.”

Its Now a Felony to Kill a Police Dog in Florida [like cops, K9's are Also Exempt from Normal Rules of Human Morality and Can Do Things that would be recognized as Unlawful if anyone else did them]

From [HERE] The Sunshine State is awful choosy about the lives it values within its borders. As for dogs, governor Ron DeSantis recently passed a law making it a felony to harm a K9, one that carries a maximum sentence of up to 15 years. Let me be clear, it should be a felony to kill a dog, whether that dog is a narc or not. The irony is that Florida’s police officers (and U.S. police officers in general) kill dogs all of the time, particularly dogs that live with residents of impoverished and over-policed communities.

The University of New Hampshire Law Review estimates that police officers across America kill an estimated 10,000 pet dogs while on duty each year. However, it is nearly impossible to obtain an accurate estimate because law enforcement agencies hardly ever bother to keep an accurate count of the amount of dogs they kill. While many cops claim that the decision to shoot a dog in the line of duty is usually a split-second decision made in self-defense, records show that many of these dogs are killed when officers “mistake the behavior of a friendly, curious dog for aggression.”[MORE]

The "White Marine's 15 Min Chokehold" May be Fake but his Record Setting Defense Fund is Real Proof Racists Believe Deadly Force Can Be Used on NGHRS when There is No Threat of Serious Bodily Harm

THE LATINO MAN WHO FILMED THE INCIDENT SAID THE “WHITE MARINE” PUT “JORDAN NEELY” IN A “15 MINUTE CHOKEHOLD” BY GRABBING HIM FROM BEHIND. AS SUCH, “THE WHITE MARINE” COULD HAVE ONLY BEEN ACTING IN SELF-DEFENSE OF OTHERS (NOT HIMSELF) WHEN HE USED DEADLY FORCE. THUS FAR, NO SPECIFIC FACTS INDICATE THAT NEELY PUT ANY PARTICULAR PASSENGER IN IMMINENT (MEANING IMMEDIATE) FEAR OF SERIOUS BODILY HARM. EVEN IF SUCH FACTS EXIST, ONCE THE THREAT DISSIPATED, DEADLY FORCE WAS NO LONGER JUSTIFIED. CLEARLY, NO ONE IN THE VIDEO IS FACING ANY HARM FROM NEELY.

THE “KILL A NGHR EXCEPTION” TO THE LAW OF SELF-DEFENSE. According to the co-founder of GiveSendGo, a crowdfunding platform, the so-called “Marine veteran Daniel Penny’s” legal fees campaign related to the “15 minute chokehold” incident involving the death of “Jordan Neely” on a “crowded” New York City subway has become one of the platform’s most successful fundraisers ever.

“It’s the No. 2 ever on GiveSendGo,” CFO Jacob Wells told Fox News Digital. “This definitely has sparked an emotional response with many people.”

Wells noted that at one point the fund was bringing in $1,000 per minute after Penny was charged with second-degree manslaughter by Manhattan prosecutors.

The legal defense fund has already raised more than $2.7 million. [MORE]

A TALE TOLD IN ACCORD WITH THE BELIEFS OF BOTH THE RACIST AND THE WOKE VIEWER IS ONE THAT THEY BOTH WANT TO BELIEVE. Besides a 3 minute video, all the information about the incident is actually only coming from the NYPD. The NYPD is relaying hearsay from unnamed witnesses to the media who parrot the information to the viewing public. However, actual first hand witness accounts from persons who were present before and during the so-called 15 minute chokehold have not been presented by the media. All media info so far is just “according to police” and “witnesses reportedly said.” As we know the NYPD are liars.

BW is not yet asserting that this is a false flag but so far it shares some false flaggot characteristics - particularly with the lack of video despite the presence of a large number of people, lack of first hand witness accounts, reliance on police accounts, instant biographies and mini-media stories/photos created for the villain “white marine” and the victim “homeless Black man” ‘who impersonated Michael Jackson.’ Also, not so sure “a 15 minute chokehold” is actually possible. Some people become unconscious in three to four seconds. If the flow continues to be restricted, a person can die within three to four minutes. [MORE] Here, a chokehold by a so-called Marine, evidently trained in strangulation and combat methods, was applied for 15 minutes to an unwell, frail, weak,“homeless Black man” who couldn’t have weighed more than 150 lbs. Sounds like it might be some bullshit. Like false flags, while glossing over details the Dependent media and police are only focusing on the emotive facts; protests from lathered-up liberals and rants by lathered-up racist suspect conservatives. One should be cautious especially where police and media present facts in accord with the appetite of the listener, not necessarily in accord with reality.

Why would police or media make it up? Many reasons -but mostly because sheeple will believe it and use their imaginations to fill in the missing details in accord with their beliefs and dogma. As explained by Osho Rajineesh, 'a mind that is filled with belief is a mind which can project anything according to that belief.' FUNKTIONARY explains, “belief” is any conclusion based on a fundamental assumption; the evidence of things not seen, no longer actively sought or belief is the psychological calm of imagined certitude safely beyond de-stabilizing doubt and troublesome reality-entanglement. [MORE]

Is Another Juneteenth Necessary? NBA Elites and Their B'Ignorant Massa’bators Crucify Ja Morant Over Gun Possession but Tennessee Protects the Right to Carry Guns, open and concealed, w/o a permit

ABOVE SNIGGER SHANNON. WHEN HE’S NOT OVER INDULGING IN LEBRONSEXUALITIS OR PROMOTING THE ONGOING SMILING FACE, HE’S SHADOWBOXING JA MORANT OR ANY OTHER BLACK INDIVIDUAL TARGETED BY RACIST PROPAGHANDI. SO WHAT JA MORANT THINKS GUNS ARE COOL? SELF-DEFENSE IS COOL NO DOUBT. AND MUCH COOLER THAN DIALING 911 FOR RACIST OR MENTACIDAL COPS TO COME ‘HELP YOU” OUT LIKE PUSSYCLOT SHANNON ADVOCATES. NICE JACKET SNIGGER.

On March 4, it was revealed that the NBA had launched an investigation into an Instagram Live video of Morant displaying a gun at a Colorado nightclub earlier that morning, just hours after a loss to the top-seeded Denver Nuggets.[93][94] Later that day, the Grizzlies announced that Morant would be away from the team for at least two games.[95] 

On March 15, Morant met with NBA commissioner Adam Silver in New York after exiting from his counseling program. Multiple other top NBA executives also attended the meeting.[99] The same day, the NBA announced that they had suspended Morant for eight games without pay for the nightclub incident. The suspension covered the six games that Morant had already missed as a result of his leave of absence from the Grizzlies, meaning he would be eligible to return to playing as soon as March 20.[102]

On May 14, two months after the first suspension, he was suspended from all team activities by the Grizzlies for flashing a gun during an Instagram Live session on his friend Davonte Pack's account.[103][104] Following the incident, NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said he was "shocked" and that the league and the team would assess the extent of further disciplinary actions.[103]

WHATS REALLY WRONG? BLACK PEOPLE CAN’T HAVE GUNS TO DEFEND THEMSELVES? There are no allegations that Morant bought his firearm unlawfully or that he committed any crimes with it. All indications are that he is a rich, law abiding resident of Memphis, TN. It is also not clear how the NBA could prove the guns in the videos were actually real firearms. At any rate, the auto-coon NBA negroes and other showcase Blacks parroting Massa’s dogma about gun control to Shadowbox Ja seem to be ‘bignorant’ of the following: Black people also have the right to bear and carry firearms on their person in public to defend themselves in case of public confrontation. A 2022 Supreme Court ruling made it plain; the 2nd Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms for self-defense in public. The Supreme Court clearly stated;

Nothing in the Second Amendment’s text draws a home/public distinction with respect to the right to keep and bear arms. As we explained in Heller, the “textual elements” of the Second Amendment’s operative clause— “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be in- fringed”—“guarantee the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation. Heller further confirmed that the right to “bear arms” refers to the right to “wear, bear, or carry . . . upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose . . . of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.”

This definition of “bear” naturally encompasses public carry. Most gun owners do not wear a holstered pistol at their hip in their bedroom or while sitting at the dinner table. Although individuals often “keep” firearms in their home, at the ready for self-defense, most do not “bear” (i.e., carry) them in the home beyond moments of actual confrontation. To confine the right to “bear” arms to the home would nullify half of the Second Amendment’s operative protections.

Moreover, confining the right to “bear” arms to the home would make little sense given that self-defense is “the central component of the [Second Amendment] right itself.” Heller, 554 U. S., at 599; see also McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767. After all, the Second Amendment guarantees an “individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” Heller, 554 U. S., at 592, and confrontation can surely take place outside the home.

Although we remarked in Heller that the need for armed self-defense is perhaps “most acute” in the home, id., at 628, we did not suggest that the need was insignificant else- where. Many Americans hazard greater danger outside the home than in it. See Moore v. Madigan, 702 F. 3d 933, 937 (CA7 2012) (“[A] Chicagoan is a good deal more likely to be attacked on a sidewalk in a rough neighborhood than in his apartment on the 35th floor of the Park Tower”). The text of the Second Amendment reflects that reality.

The Second Amendment’s plain text thus presumptively guarantees [individuals] a right to “bear” arms in public for self-defense.

Additionally, Tennessee became a permitless carry state in 2021, allowing for open and concealed carrying of handguns without a permit

Nevertheless liberal puppeticians and freedumb loving PropaGandhi work tirelessly to destroy said inalienable right.

Possessing a gun or defending yourself is not evil. So-called “gun rights” are especially important in a violent, racist society in which police routinely fail to protect Black people from criminals and have no legal obligation to do so anyway. [MORE]

When racist liberal authorities use Gun control measures that prevent Black or poor people from defending themselves in crime ridden areas they necessarily becomes accomplices to crime. Law abiding people comply with gun laws but criminals, who use guns to murder, assault, rob, deal drugs and rob and steal, don’t obey laws. As explained by Michael Huemer, “when the state deprives individuals of weapons, it can predict that some individuals will suffer murder, rape, or other serious crimes that would have been prevented if the victims had the means to defend themselves.” He further states, ‘the failure of police to protect people is one thing; actively intervening to stop them from protecting themselves is much worse. [MORE]

Only a NGHR would believe police primarily exist to protect and serve them. In fact, Black people are 3 times more likely than whites to be murdered by cops. Said factors exist in a legal context in which law enforcement is uncontrollable by citizens, generally unaccountable to them, can’t be hired or fired by citizens and has irresponsible, limitless power over people to take life on the street as they see fit while providing a compulsory “service” that citizens have no “right” to decline.

The inalienable or pre-existing right to bear and carry arms protects against the loss of all other freedoms. It may difficult for sleeping toms clinging to their cherished white liberal dogma to understand but the “2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed—where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once.” [MORE] The 2nd Amendment protects against overreaching government. Is that so hard to conceive when police murder Black men with impunity on a regular basis? As explained by Judge Alex Kozinski, “Disarmament was the tool of choice for subjugating both slaves and free blacks in the South.” 

Without the right to carry arms for self defense and defense against government tyranny all your other so-called “rights” can be turned on and off like a light by authorities. As explained by legal scholar Skylar Petit,

“All too many of the other great tragedies of history—Stalin's atrocities, the killing fields of Cambodia, the Holocaust, to name but a few—were perpetrated by armed troops against unarmed populations. Many could well have been avoided or mitigated, had the perpetrators known their intended victims were equipped with a rifle and twenty bullets apiece, as the Militia Act required here. If a few hundred Jewish fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto could hold off the Wehrmacht for almost a month with only a handful of weapons, six million Jews armed with rifles could not so easily have been herded into cattle cars.” [MORE]

Indeed, Historical Analysis Shows Disarmed Formerly Free People Have No Defense Against Slavery or Govt Violence.

All of the ten major tyrannical regimes of the twentieth century and beyond confiscated the weapons of the populations they planned to murder or terrorize en masse. How could governments kill or enslave so many people?  The governments had all the power - and the people - the victims - were unable to resist. The victims were unarmed.

Naomi Wolf recently observed that in formerly free countries, such as Australia, citizens were routinely arrested for leaving their homes during COVID quarantines during a so-called “emergency” deemed as such by a unilateral authority without public input or vote. Wolf stated, ‘You can hate guns. But it is becoming obvious even to us pacifists, vegans, and tree huggers, that formerly free people who are unarmed are defenseless against the criminal tyrannies exerting massive violence and control upon them.‘ [MORE]

The Same Electromagnetic Devices Causing Magnets to Stick to Meat are Inside the ‘mRNA COVID Shots.’ They are not Vaccines but Bioweapons Created to Kill, Cause Illness and Permanently Change Humans

Pfizer's mRNA nanoparticles are electromagnetic devices per their DoD contract and the FDA. No one agreed to be injected with devices that would kill surrounding cells and tissue when activated by EMF.

mRNA ‘vaccine technology’ is not only being put into our food supply, but also being produced by plants.

Please keep in mind that ‘spike proteins’ and ‘mRNA’ are electromagnetic nanotechnologies that host electromagnetic fields. When mRNA nanoparticles (or spike proteins) are used to contaminate meat, chicken, or pork, the nanoparticles will congregate together thereby creating a strong electromagnetic field that can attract metals. 

Biotech analyst Karen Kingston explained, You can test your meat for electromagnetic fields using a quarter, nickel, or magnet. I’ve also used a house key, and that worked as well.

Transcript of Karen Kington Interview with Brannon Howse - May 17, 2022 

Brannon Howse: Joining me now is Karen Kingston, former Pfizer employee. It's been a few weeks since we've had her with us. Karen, welcome back to Lindell TV. Thank you for joining us.

Karen Kingston : Thanks for having me, Brannon. It's good to be back.

Brannon Howse: Well, Karen, as always, you've sent over a wonderful PowerPoint presentation. So, what are we going to talk about tonight, Karen,

Karen Kingston: Talking about evidence… there's more than enough evidence that shows that these inoculations are bioweapons. Various databases has over a million serious adverse events over 25,000 deaths, worsened disease, Unintended Consequences of the COVID-19 Vaccines by Dr. Seneffe at MIT was published last year. And she goes through 25 ways that these vaccines can disable, disfigure, or kill people. And they've all come true.

In May of last year, I sent an email out to mainstream media, influencers, congressmen and congresswoman saying, look, here are the studies from the Wuhan Institute of Virology weaponizing the SARS-Cov-2 virus with HIV glycoprotein 120. Here are the patents that state thay they include advanced medical technologies that can track the biomarkers and can exchange data. And then I also included some of the serious adverse events that were reported with the FDA data and what happened, Brannon? Everyone started asking whether or not it came from a lab or nature!! (No one inquired about the evidence I sent on the mRNA bioweapons). [MORE]

COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are not vaccines at all, but quite literally bioengineering nanotechnologies that are categorized as electromagnetic devices by the FDA and US Department of Defense (DoD). [MORE] and [MORE]

When the new ‘mRNA vaccines’ first became available in December of 2020, the American people were told that the ‘mRNA vaccines’ contained lipids that served as a protective bubble around the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA that would make our bodies produce the spike protein. After being injected, our bodies would produce the spike protein and our immune system would produce antibodies so that we would NOT be able to get infected and NOT be able to infect other people with SARS-CoV-2. 

In 2020/2021, everyone thought the ‘mRNA vaccine’ pitch sounded reasonable, safe and pretty much in alignment with other biological vaccines from the past.

The only problem is that everything we were told about what the mRNA ‘vaccines’ ARE is a misnomer and a lie, down to the very term mRNA vaccine. The COVID-19 injections are not mRNA vaccines. The COVID-19 mRNA shots are nanotechnology injections.

For example, the lipids and phospholipids in the mRNA injections are not lipids. Lipids are are naturally occurring molecules that make up fatty compounds such as fats and cholesterol. Lipids are part of our cells’ membranes to help control what goes in and out of cells. The ‘lipids’ in the mRNA injections are electronically charged synthetic molecules (not natural) and can host electromagnetic fields. They are electronic devices. [MORE] and [MORE]

‘I was Just Following Master’s Science to Induce Public Consent and Get People Killed/Harmed:’ A Retrospective of Probots and Proxymorons Parroting Lies About the Unvaccinated and COVID Shot Safety

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Probot – a propagandizing programmed robot. A representative from an organization, agency or institution, especially the Internal Revenue Service, Pentagon, State Department, or Blight House, whose assignment is to make prepared statements and answer “cooked” (prepared) questions at news conferences, briefings and the like. A probot is a proxymoron who conveys programmed disinformation in computerized language and bureaucratese jargon. A probot is one who disseminates lies, distortions and convenient mass truths composed by a superior overruling elite. (See: Proxymoron)

proxymoron – one moron who speaks or acts on behalf of another pluperfect moron or a whole gang of morons. (See: Politician, Bureaucracium, Congressman, Moron-Majority, Delegate, Prozac, Oxymoron & TV)

Women of Color for Equal Justice Suit Against Mandates says mRNA Shots Don't Prevent or Stop COVID. So They are Treatments Not Vaccines and People Have a Right to Refuse Treatment and Experimental Vax

From [HERE] First lawsuit in the U.S. that challenges the constitutional authority of federal, state, and private employers to mandate any vaccine as a condition of employment.

  • 30 years ago, the Occupation Safety & Health Act (OSH Act) abrogated federal, state, and private sector authority to mandate any vaccine to control airborne communicable diseases even during a pandemic.

  • According to the Application submitted by WOC4EJ, all vaccines violate the OSH Act minimum environmental method standards because they are incapable of shielding employees from exposure to any airborne viral hazards in the atmosphere nor can they remove viral sprays or vapors from the atmosphere in any public place as required under 29 CFR 1910.132(a) and OSH Act Sect. 5 General Duty Clause because vaccines are manufactured for medicinal internal personal use only.

  • The OSH Act protects the fundamental right of all citizens to refuse vaccines and bans employer wrongful separation of employees for exercising their right.

  • The right to refuse and choose medical treatments is a fundamental right of every citizen based on a 100-year Supreme Court precedent that includes the right to choose Plant-Based Lifestyle Medicine

As thousands of Americans remain locked out of their careers despite the lift of the federal vaccine mandate due to the continued enforcement of state and private sector Covid-19 vaccine mandates, on May 18, 2023, the 127th year anniversary of the landmark case Plessy v. Ferguson – wherein the US Supreme Court declared on May 18, 1896 that separate and unequal facilities for African-Americans was constitutional, the U.S. Supreme Court will vote in private conference on whether to rule on the merits of an Emergency Application that asks the Court to forever ban vaccine mandates by any public or private employer, which have caused cause millions of employees to be separated from their jobs based on their unvaccinated status.

The application submitted by the Women of Color For Equal Justice (WOC4EJ), on behalf of New York City employees, asks the Court to declare that all vaccine mandates are illegal and have been unauthorized since 1970 because they violate the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) minimum safety standards as well as the Free Exercise and substantive Due Process clauses of the Constitution.

Excess Deaths are Exploding, Experts Pretend to be Stumped [genthanasia - a Slow Motion Extermination of Undesired Populations by Elites]

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • According to a May 11, 2023, report by the British Express, Britons are dying by the tens of thousands, “but no one knows why”

  • Between May and December 2022, there were 32,441 excess deaths in England and Wales, according to data released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), and that doesn’t include COVID-related deaths

  • In 2022, the No. 1 cause of excess deaths in the U.K. was signs and symptoms of “ill-defined conditions.” In England, this nebulous cause of death was 36.9% above the five-year average, and in Wales, it was 30.4% above average

  • The U.K. was the first European country to approve the Pfizer COVID jab and began its mass injection campaign December 8, 2020. It currently has the highest COVID-19 jab rate in all of Europe

  • The misuse of mechanical ventilation created the appearance that COVID was exceptionally deadly, which in turn helped promote acceptance of the experimental COVID shots that are now a leading cause of frequent sickness, chronic disability and excess deaths

From [HERE] According to a May 11, 2023, report by the British Express, 1 Britons are dying by the tens of thousands, “but no one knows why.” Between May and December 2022 alone, there were 32,441 excess deaths in England and Wales, according to data 2 released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), and that doesn’t include COVID-related deaths. As reported by the Express: 3

“Excess deaths are defined as the number of people who died above the five-year average — worked out excluding 2020 due to how COVID spiked death figures that year ... The shock revelation has raised alarm bells amid health professionals ...

Professor David Coleman, Emeritus Professor of Demography at Oxford University, told the Mirror that no one knew for certain what had caused so many deaths throughout last year.

He pointed out that, post COVID, the UK’s population had been changed through the deaths of a significant proportion of the elderly due to the virus. He explained: ‘Once those poor people have been packed off, the remaining population should be healthier, there should be a period afterwards where deaths are lower than usual but that hasn’t happened.’”

No. 1 Cause of Excess Deaths: ‘Ill-Defined Conditions’

According to the Express, two of the primary causes of excess deaths were ischemic heart diseases and dementia. This, the article suggests, might be an indication that obesity and an increasingly older population are to blame for the excess mortality.

However, if the population was altered due to a significant portion of the elderly dying from COVID in 2020, leaving a younger and supposedly healthier population, as stated by professor Coleman, those puzzle pieces don’t exactly fit together.

What’s more, the Express failed to specify that dementia and Alzheimer’s were only the leading causes of death during the month of December 2022. For 2022, the No. 1 cause of excess deaths was signs and symptoms of “ill-defined conditions.”4

In England, this nebulous cause of death was 36.9% above the five-year average, and in Wales, it was 30.4% above average. 5

Now, what does that remind you of? “Sudden adult death syndrome” perhaps — a historically rare cause of death that suddenly skyrocketed after the COVID jabs came on the scene.

As illustrated in the video above, during 2021 and into 2022, mainstream media kept drilling the false and incredibly offensive narrative that the unvaccinated were the enemy, that every COVID death meant they had blood on their hands and ought to be punished accordingly.

And now, as countries where most people have been jabbed experience skyrocketing excess death rates unrelated to COVID, they feign mind-numbing ignorance.

An experimental gene transfer injection was introduced as a vaccine and death rates continue to climb even as COVID is vanishing. What a mystery! Everyone is stumped. The scientific consensus is at a standstill. No one knows why people are dying.

Possibly, not enough people got the jab. That’s what the BBC insinuated in early 2023. 6

No one wants to admit that medical experimentation on the public was a terrible idea. No one wants to consider the possibility that too many took the toxic jab, and that’s why excess mortality is so far above norm.

As cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough has repeatedly stated, we had a clear safety signal all the way back in February 2021, and it’s only gotten more pronounced over time. Despite that, not a single safety review has been conducted, and our health authorities refuse to address the astronomical death toll.

UK Has Highest COVID Jab Rate in Europe

In the U.K., 2020 was the deadliest year on record since 1918. More than 695,000 deaths were logged that year. The culprit at that time was COVID, or suspected COVID. But what happened next?

The U.K. was the first European country to approve the Pfizer COVID jab and began its mass injection campaign December 8, 2020. It currently has the highest COVID-19 jab rate in all of Europe, in large part due to having “the most positive attitudes to vaccine safety in Europe,” according to Statista.

7 If the COVID shots were safe and protective, you’d expect excess mortality to decline from there on, but that didn’t happen. The third week of January 2021 saw a huge spike above norm, and the rate has dipped and peaked ever since.

8 In 2022, excess deaths exceeded 650,000, which was 9% higher than 2019. So, why are so many people dying? And why are so many dying from inexplicable causes or “ill-defined” conditions?

In January 2023, BBC news blamed the excess death rate in 2022 on “pandemic effects on health and NHS pressures.”

9 Ambulance response times were more than doubled, hospital waits were long, and “people are more likely to have heart problems and strokes in the weeks and months after catching COVID,” the BBC said.

The BBC also claimed there was “no evidence of vaccine effect,” and that cases of myocarditis and pericarditis were “too rare — and mostly not fatal — to account for the excess in deaths.”

But myocarditis and pericarditis are FAR from the only side effects caused by these shots, so the fact that these conditions aren’t among the top causes certainly doesn’t mean that the shots are safe and aren’t causing people to die prematurely.

Aside from foolhardy medical experimentation, the excess death rates may also have something to do with the fact that hospitals around the world have been killing “suspected” COVID patients with lethal treatment protocols, as detailed in “How COVID Patients Died for Profit.”

Massively Anomalous Data Put COVID Shots in the Crosshairs

In the March 24, 2023, “Ask Dr. Drew” interview above, Drew interviewed Ed Dowd, author of “Cause Unknown.” As noted by Dowd, data from the insurance industry, funeral home industry and various government databases strongly indicate that the COVID shots are killing people, primarily working age adults, many of whom had to get the shot to keep their jobs.

While some countries are now pulling back from the shots, in the U.S., the COVID injections have been added to the childhood and adult vaccination schedules, and no one has proposed removing them.

According to Dowd, Denmark, for example, stopped recommending COVID boosters for anyone younger than 50, as their excess deaths in 2021 and 2022 shot up to around 20% above norm. Clearly, decision-makers there connected the dots and decided it was better to be safe than sorry.

Dowd goes on to review absence rates and lost worktime data 10 for the U.S. Among full-time employees aged 25 to 54, there was a stark deviation in 2020, 2021 and 2022 from the 2002 through 2019 trend. In 2020, it was a three-standard deviation, which is reasonable considering governments were shutting down businesses. But then, in 2021, it rose to five standard deviations and in 2022, it skyrocketed to 11 standard deviations, which makes no sense whatsoever.

Compared to 2019, the absence rate for working age adults was only 3.6% higher in 2020, when lockdowns were in effect and many businesses were closed. In 2021, the absence rate was 10.7% higher than 2019, and in 2022, it was 28.6% higher. In short, in 2022, nearly one-third more employees missed days of work compared to 2019, which amounts to an enormous loss of productivity, and this at a time when there were no lockdowns in the U.S.

Looking at the number of hours lost per absence, the 2022 numbers were 13 standard deviations higher than 2019, which Dowd says is “unheard of.” Compared to the 2019 baseline, lost worktime rates were 28.6% higher in 2020 and 2021, and then suddenly jumped to 50% in 2022. This too equates to a major loss of productivity and therefore economic losses.

So, what is going on? In short, people are missing work due to vaccine-related sickness. As noted by Dowd, we have studies showing the shots impair your immune function, and these data show that, yes, people are getting sick and calling out from work at an unprecedented frequency and they’re out sick 50% longer than normal.

mRNA COVID Jabs Had No Effect on Mortality

In related news, we now also have evidence 11 showing the mRNA COVID jabs have no mortality benefit. As reported by Epoch Health:12

“The Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines did not impact overall mortality, a reanalysis of clinical trial data found.

The two vaccines, both based on messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, protected against deaths from COVID-19 but that effect was offset by vaccinated trial participants being more likely to die from cardiovascular problems, Christine Stabell Benn, a health professor at the University of Southern Denmark, and other researchers reported in April in the Cell journal.

13

The research analyzed data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reported by the companies that manufacture the vaccines. ‘In the RCTs with the longest possible blinded follow-up, mRNA vaccines had no effect on overall mortality despite protecting against some COVID-19 deaths.”

Meanwhile, the Johnson & Johnson shot, which uses an adenovirus-vector, was associated with lower non-COVID-19 mortality and overall mortality, but had NO effect on COVID-19 mortality. So, in essence, all the COVID shots are useless in one way or another. The mRNA versions cause greater overall mortality, and the adenovirus-vector ones don’t protect against COVID-related death. Take your pick.

Interestingly, out of all the brands, AstraZeneca’s adenovirus-vector shot performed the best, and that’s the one that was maligned the most by health regulators and media across the world, as it was associated with lethal blood clots early on.

More Evidence COVID Jab Does More Harm Than Good

Another reanalysis of randomized COVID jab trials concluded that the shots are far more likely to land you in the hospital than COVID-19 itself. This study, 14 which focused on serious adverse events highlighted in a World Health Organization-endorsed priority list 15 of potential adverse events relevant to the COVID-19 shots, found Pfizer’s shot was associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events at a rate of 10.1 events per 10,000.

The rate for Moderna’s jab was 15.1 events per 10,000. The researchers also stressed that this level of risk for a post-injection event was significantly greater than the risk reduction for COVID-related hospitalization, which was only 2.3 per 10,000 participants in the Pfizer trial and 6.4 per 10,000 in the Moderna trial.

In short, for every 800 jab recipients, one person will suffer a serious injury. Meanwhile, some 5,000 must get the Pfizer jab to prevent a single COVID hospitalization. This is what risk-benefit analysis is all about — comparing and weighing the benefit against the risk — and when it comes to the mRNA COVID shots, they clearly do more harm than good.

Considering the high rate of injury, is it hard to believe that people are calling out sick from work more often or that excess mortality is skyrocketing? There’s not a single piece of evidence so far that exonerates the COVID shots, yet the media want you to believe it’s an inexplicable mystery.