Addressing Black People's Needs or Getting $ and Trinkets while Serving Elite Liberals? Feds indict Jackson Mayor Lumumba, Black DA, Other Rolebots w/Conspiracy, Bribery, Fraud and Money Laundering

From [HERE] A federal indictment released Thursday revealed the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has charged the Jackson, Mississippi, mayor, two council members, and the district attorney with conspiracy, bribery, fraud, and money laundering.

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri reported in a DOJ press release that the charges are tied to alleged acts involving a real estate development scheme.

“Officials who abuse their positions of authority to enrich themselves undermine public confidence in government,” Argentieri said. “The Justice Department is committed to restoring that confidence by working with its law enforcement partners to investigate and prosecute public corruption.”

The alleged scheme involved Jackson city officials accepting money from FBI agents posing as real estate developers. The indictment paints Hinds County District Attorney Jody Owens as the ring-leader of the operation, claiming he facilitated large payments from the “developers” to public officials for access to a federally subsidized development project in downtown Jackson.

The indictment alleges that Owens first met agents in August 2023. In October of that year, Owens flew to Nashville with “the developers” on a private jet paid for by the FBI. Prosecutors claim during that meeting Owens said he and colleague Sherik Smith “own enough of the city,” and had “a bag of…information on all the city councilmen,” which allowed them to sway council votes.

In December 2023 Owens flew on a private jet to Florida, where he and Smith accepted $125,000 from investigators. In January Owens allegedly involved Jackson council President Aaron Banks and former council vice president Angelique Lee. Banks ultimately received $25,000 from agents, as well as payments for a protective detail and employment for a family member. Prosecutors state Lee accepted $10,000 to pay off campaign debt, $3,000 in cash, and over $6,000 in luxury goods.

In February prosecutors allege Owens introduced the “developers” to Mayor Chokwe Lumumba. In March agents gave Owens $50,000 to deliver to Lumumba and the following month, and the two flew with agents to Florida, where parties agreed to break the payment into five equal amounts and conceal the money as campaign contribution checks.

Prosecutors allege that in May, the FBI met with Owens to ask about his involvement in the bribery scheme and made false statements during the interview.

Throughout the investigation, Owens is alleged to have told agents things like, “I don’t [care] where the money comes from. … My job … is to get this deal done. … That’s why we have a business, [t]o clean money, right?” and “we got to stay away from the b-word. Fund is not the b-word. The b-word is a bad word. We don’t even say it.”

Owens, Lumumba, Banks, and Lee each face multiple counts of bribery, conspiracy, fraud, and money laundering. Owens and Lumumba each face three charges with a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison.

Voters Oust Oakland Mayor Sheng Thao After FBI Raid Amid Corruption Scandal - She Blames the GOP even though the City is Only 4% Republican

From [HERE] Voters ousted Oakland’s corrupt leftist mayor Sheng Thao on Monday in a rare recall.

Sheng Thao spoke out after the FBI raided on her home over the summer and blamed a “radical right-wing” conspiracy for wanting to push her out of office.

FBI agents were seen taking boxes full of items from Sheng Thao’s home in June.

The June FBI raids spanned across several locations, including the residences of Andy Duong, his father David Duong, Mayor Thao, and the offices of CWS. The raids brought to light alleged financial dealings and contributions made to various political campaigns in the Oakland and South Bay areas.

Sheng Thao blamed Republicans for the raid.

“There are a lot of radical right wing forces that know they will never win an election in Oakland fair and square,” she said.

“I want to know how the TV cameras knew to show up on my sleepy residential street so early in the morning to capture footage of the raid. And I want to know why Fox News and Breitbart were so prepared to fan the flames and to tell a story that they want to tell, to bend the facts to shape the narrative,” she said. [MORE]

Liberal California Voters Approve of Forced Prison Labor by Rejecting Ballot Measure that Sought to Ban It. Disproportionately Effects Blacks, who are 6% of CA Population but 28% of All in CA Prisons

From [HERE] California announced on Sunday the unofficial result that voters in the state have rejected Proposition 6, which would have amended the state constitution to bar state prisons from forcing inmates to work. Currently, if prisoners refuse to work, it is legal for prisons to impose disciplinary measures.

The ballot measure was rejected by a margin of 53.8 percent to 46.2 percent during the general election on November 5. The results of the vote will not be made official until the election results are certified on December 13th.

Supporters of the measure argue that the legality of forced labor is a continuation of the legacy of slavery in the US. Black people in the US continue to endure significantly higher rates of incarceration than the general population. This means that Black people statistically are more likely to be subjected to forced prison labor than the white population, reflecting an ongoing history of forced Black labor. In addition to reconciling with this history, supporters contend that abolishing involuntary labor would allow prisoners to prioritize rehabilitation, saving the state money in the long term by reducing rates of reoffending.

While there was no funded campaign against the proposition, the ballot measure noted that abolishing involuntary labor in state prisons would cost the state up to “tens of millions of dollars annually.” Forced labor is used in many US prisons to punish convicts and offset the costs of running the prison system.

Involuntary labor is also currently allowed in federal prisons by the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution, which banned slavery but continued to allow involuntary servitude as a punishment for those “duly convicted” of a crime.

The International Labour Organization’s Forced Labour Conventions allows mandatory prison labor that is limited to punishment for criminals convicted in a court of law as long, as convicts are not forcefully hired out to private entities.

New Research Shows COVID Injections Increase the Risk of Getting COVID because They Destroy Key Protective Antibodies

From [STEVEKIRSCH] Any competent virologist will tell you that if you want to reduce the risk of infection of a respiratory virus, increasing the level of mucosal IgA antibodies is required. And you want to increase the receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies especially because these antibodies prevent the virus from attaching to the entry point receptors (ACE2) on your cells.

So any vaccine that reduces your risk of infection has to increase the secretory IgA antibodies that target the RBD on the virus.

Well you’ll never guess what happens to these critical “first line of defense” antibodies after you get vaccinated.

So I’ll tell you now: in everyone they drop, and in most people, they drop to unmeasurable levels.

That’s right. This paper clearly and unambiguously showed that the COVID “vaccines” make you more susceptible to getting COVID, not less. It’s a disaster. And it was as clear as night vs. day 2.5 years ago when this paper came out. If anyone was paying attention that is.

Of course, the authors didn’t notice. Nothing in the abstract about this finding.

Nobody in the medical community noticed.

Nobody in the mainstream media or the medical media noticed it either.

And, AFAIK, nobody in the anti-vaccine community noticed as well.

As far as I know, I’m the first one to point this out.

This paper should have ENDED the COVID vaccine program 2.5 years ago.

It should have led to the CDC warning people that they lied to people about reducing the risk of infection. They should have warned the public that getting the COVID vaccine will increase your risk of getting COVID.

It’s all in one chart. You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to figure it out.

I’ll show you the chart and explain what it means.

The papers

Paper in Nature published 25 April 2022: Systemic and mucosal IgA responses are variably induced in response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination and are associated with protection against subsequent infection

There is also a newer paper published two years later (23 April 2024): Serum and Salivary IgG and IgA Response After COVID-19 Messenger RNA Vaccination. This isn’t nearly as good as the previous paper (it doesn’t look at absolute levels, it doesn’t look at RBD antibodies which are key), but it shows very clearly that Pfizer didn’t move the relative IgA levels at all.

Dr Mike Yeadon, Former Pfizer VP: COVID Injections were intentionally Designed to Injure, Kill and Cause Infertility

From [HERE] Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former vice president of Pfizer, is a professional research scientist with over 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology.  Applying his experience and knowledge to the contents of the covid injections, Dr. Yeadon can work out the intentions of the “vaccine” designers.  He explained how he was able to do this and what the only conclusions could be during a presentation to the Impfopfer Resistance Conference held in Vienna, Austria, on 9 November 2024.  Impfopfer (English: Vaccine Victim) is Austria’s largest association for those who have suffered or are suffering from vaccine harm.

Dr. Yeadon explained to the conference that it is formally impossible to invent, research, test, evaluate, manufacture, gain authorisation for and launch a complex new biological product in under a year, regardless of the amount of money and people involved, due to a series of linear steps in the process that cannot be completed in such a short time frame as 12 months or less.  The process necessarily takes several years.

Complex biological products, such as the so-called vaccines, have numerous features that would give rise to toxicities, which professionals in the industry would know about. So, these features have been built-in by choice, Dr. Yeadon explained.

The covid “vaccines” are gene-based products, containing a string of genetic information, which is a brand new technology, and there were no products like that in routine use anywhere in the world.

The gene-based injections cause the body to make a protein based on the genetic code.  The effect of the injections is that the body is forced to manufacture a foreign protein, the spike protein, which is known to be acutely toxic to blood cells, prompting blood clots, and to nerve cells, causing them to malfunction.

Additionally, the body recognises this spike protein as foreign and launches an autoimmune reaction to attack the cells that produce it, which can lead to various health issues depending on where the reaction occurs in the body.  This autoimmune reaction can occur in any cell, tissue or organ in the body where the injected dose lands, and can cause conditions such as myocarditis, heart attack, stroke or neurological conditions.

That the instructions for spike protein were included in the “vaccines” is not a mistake. The person who chose the spike protein sequence knew of its toxic properties – it’s not an accident, but a deliberate choice, Dr. Yeadon said.

The spike protein is not the only egregious ingredient in the covid injections. The genetic code for the spike protein is enveloped in a lipid nanoparticle (“LNP”).  LNPs are tiny particles of fat that allow the payload to disproportionately deposit in the ovaries.

Dr. Yeadon highlighted that science papers published as early as 2012 showed that LNPs lead to a disproportionate deposition of the payload into the ovaries when injected into animals and people.

“I remember the day I read that paper, I really couldn’t sleep,” Dr. Yeadon said. “The person who chose to use lipid nanoparticles to formulate the Moderna and Pfizer products knew perfectly well that what they would do is allow them to drift all through your body, through membranes as if they weren’t there, and disproportionately deposit in your ovaries.”

“Given I’ve told you the first two things – which is that will induce your body to attack every cell in the body that follows the [genetic] instructions [of the “vaccine”] and that instruction by the way is to make a poison – you should no longer be surprised that people have been injured and killed and had their fertility reduced,” he said.

[MoTeaSuh Tribe Sad because Massa' Sad] Maj Toure on How The Black Boule Cost Kamala Harris the Election as the Quisling's Campaign is Summarily Crushed

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

Quisling – the name for a traitor, coined in April, 1940, meaning one who is content to accept the yoke of the conqueror for the sake of being given office and trinkets, even against the feeling and expression of the conquered people, and moreover, prepared to use the force continuum against his/her own people to impose the conquerors decrees. (See: SNAGs)

The Moteasuh Tribe – the miseducated coin-operated buck-dancing, sole-shuffling, politically dis-appointed kneegrows who pander to Massah’s agenda—Mo’ Tea Sir? This tribe of sorry-ass kneegrows follow the dictates and even orchestrates the marching bandits of racism white supremacy as spewed forth from the mouthpieces of political power within the borders of the Witches Castle. It’s the Condi-Clarence-Powell complex—that is, those who do Massah’s bidding as if you weren’t kidding yourself that you were doing otherwise. Keep your eyes on the lies, the liars, and the disguise

Black Voters Didn't Lose Anything. Kamala is a Frivolous SNigger, Way Out of Her Depth. Liberals Have a Roster of Other Tokens Who Can Also Grimace and Point and Give Them Nothing for Their Vote

Despite their ONGOING DETERIORATING AND poor social and economic condition, Black voters rarely demand anything in exchange for their votes. Claud Anderson explains, “Both White and Black candidates for public office, various political parties, and this nation, all get a free ride with Black voters.”

Anderson STATED, “Black voters are led to believe there are two purposes to vote: 1) to elect the White candidate who is best able to lead and control resources or 2) to elect the Black candidate who is most deserving of a public job and personal recognition. The most we get is personal satisfaction that the candidate we supported won. We play politics just to play. Others play for the benefits of winning or being in the winner's circle. We often support campaign issues that do not benefit us. Blackness is excluded, but we hope that through some miraculous twinge of conscience, once in office the former candidate will offer us some spoils as supporters. We demand nothing and that is basically exactly what we get. We have yet to learn to play politics by the basic rules. We should stay out of any political game that promises that we will get nothing even when our candidate wins.“ THE GREAT REBEL AND UNdeceiver Steve Cokely called SUCH nonsense “playing for your sandwich.”

From [HERE] She’s wildly, catastrophically, incontestably out of her depth.

Over the last couple of years, as familiarity has bred contempt, and contempt has bred exasperation, I have got into the habit of distilling into uncustomarily blunt terms what I think of our most prominent political aspirants. My modest verdict on the incumbent president, Joe Biden, was that he was “an asshole.” My considered take on his predecessor, Donald Trump, was that he is “a lunatic.” Herewith, to complete the trilogy, I will offer another candid take: Kamala Harris is an idiot.

Like the little boy staring at the naked emperor in the famous fairy tale of yore, I can scarcely believe what I am seeing before my eyes. Since she replaced Joe Biden on the ticket, reporters have struggled mightily to find kind ways of describing Harris’s ineluctable inability to convey anything comprehensible, complex, or concrete. Harris, the New York Times has variously proposed, has been “strategically vague,” “light on detail,” and “careful.” Alternatively, she has “put her own stamp on the art of the dodge”; learned to respond “to unpleasant questions without answering them”; and shown an ability to “avoid delineating her stance on some issues.” And yet, if one were to search for a single world to sum up her candidacy, that word, apparently, would be “joy.”

I disagree. I think that word would be “idiot.” Harris isn’t “vague” or “careful” or disinclined to “delineate her stance.” She’s wildly, catastrophically, incontestably out of her depth. She’s not “light”; she’s dull. She’s not a “dodger”; she’s a fool. She’s not “joyful”; she’s imbecilic. As Gertrude Stein once said of Harris’s hometown, Oakland, there’s no “there there.” She’s a nullity, a vacuum, an actress, an empty canvas that is incapable of absorbing paint. Search through Harris’s historical press clippings and you will be astonished by the vastness of space, for, in more than two decades of analysis and reporting, Harris has not once been credited with a single valuable or original idea. What you see on TV is what you get in private: a broken battery-operated toy that can’t talk, that can’t argue, that can’t laugh in the right places, and that badly malfunctions if expected to transcend the superficial. Asked by Stephanie Ruhle what would happen to her plan to “raise corporate taxes” and make “billionaires and the top corporations” pay “their fair share” if the “GOP takes control of the Senate,” Harris seemed unable to process the concept. “But we’re going to have to raise corporate taxes,” she replied. “And we’re going to have to raise — we’re going to have to make sure that the biggest corporations and billionaires pay their fair share. That’s just it.”

Shakespeare observed that the wish is father to the thought. Add in the corollary that the thought is the father of the word, and one begins to understand Harris’s problem — which is that she has no useful thoughts because she has no useful wishes, and she has no useful words because she has no useful thoughts. “Why,” asks the commentariat, “has she not improved her answers over time?” The answer is simple: Because she has not improved her thinking over time. It may be true that, in addition to being an idiot, Harris is “nervous,” or “overwhelmed,” or “indecisive,” but, properly understood, those are less separate diagnoses than symptoms of the same underlying ill. The word-salads; the awkward cackle; the stunned repetition of agnostic phrases — they are all byproducts of Harris’s debilitating suspicion that she has no earthly clue what she’s doing. She can’t debate policy because she’s never examined policy. She can’t sell a worldview because she’s never had a worldview. She can’t deftly navigate a paradox or a hypocrisy or a surprise, because, like a man attempting to cover up his infidelities, her political promiscuity has left her tangled in a web of no rhyme, reason, or design. Harris’s aim in each and every moment is to get through the next minute, the next hour, or the next day without being conclusively exposed as a cipher.

Last week, Harris was asked on The View what she would do differently than Joe Biden, and, though that remains the key issue in the election, it became clear that she’d never considered the matter before it hit her ears. A few hours later, when talking to Stephen Colbert, she still didn’t have an answer to the layup. She won’t have one tomorrow, or next week, or next year, either. This is who she is, who she was, and who she will always be. She cannot outrun it. If Americans notice prior to November 5, she will lose and retire in ignominy. If they notice a little later, she will win but be disdained within a matter of weeks. Donald Trump’s gift to the nation was to prove to a new generation that character is destiny. Kamala Harris is set to confirm that idiocy is, too.

Dumbocrats Lose Their Half $Billion Bet that Women Voters are Only Concerned w/a Court Created “Right” to End the “Potential Life” of an Unborn Baby in the 3rd Trimester

From [HERE] It is no exaggeration to say that Kamala ran on abortion. Turns out, Americans don’t love it as much as she thought.

Americans have remained pretty consistent on their position regarding abortion, which is one of nuanced toleration. There is, of course, a stark difference between the public tolerating an issue and championing it, and Democrats could not grasp this. Progressive organizations literally paraded abortion pills, revered “Freeda Womb,” and distributed abortion-related paraphernalia on the streets. Kamala’s campaign was nothing short of an abortion-themed “pride parade,” and voters didn’t want to join.

Democrats love to claim that a vote against unrestricted abortion is a vote against women. A political illustration went viral before the election, displaying a father at the voting booth, glancing back guiltily at his young daughter. The girl asks, “Who are you voting for, Daddy?” to which the flannel-wearing father responds, “You.” The cartoon implied that fathers ought to vote for Kamala so their daughters will keep their “right” to an abortion.

The best response I have seen was a short post on X, “Your daughter is capable of so much more than aborting her kids.”

The Democrats bet way too heavily that women across the country would vote solely on “reproductive rights,” i.e., for unlimited abortion access. After the Dobbs decision of 2022, the Left has tried to turn abortion “rights” into a rallying call for all women, as though all women support third-trimester abortions.

Harris supporters used images of the Handmaid’s Tale, rhetoric of sexual slaver, and tragic stories of pregnant women dying from medical malpractice in an attempt to fearmonger Harris all the way into the Oval Office. Further, Kamala’s campaign also spent an unprecedented amount on pro-abortion messaging. [MORE]

Liberal Authorities Left White Man to Die in Hennepin County Jail. Ignored for Several Days as He Crawled on His Hands and Knees, Begged for Medical Help in Slow Torturous Death: Gov To Pay $3.4M

From [HERE] Hennepin County will pay $3.4 million to settle a lawsuit brought by the family of Lucas Bellamy, the son of St. Paul Penumbra Theatre founder Louis Bellamy, after he was left to die in a Hennepin County jail despite crawling on his hands and knees and begging for help while in custody over several days in 2022.

A court filing for the distribution of wrongful death proceeds notes, “This settlement is believed to be one of the largest settlements ever reached in Minnesota for a death occurring in a jail.”

Messages were left with spokespeople for Hennepin County and Hennepin Healthcare, both named as defendants in the lawsuit, for reaction to the settlement.

The lawsuit was brought in January by Louis Bellamy. It stated that his son pleaded repeatedly to be taken to the hospital, but deputies and medical staff ignored those pleas. Lucas Bellamy, who was 41, was found unresponsive in his cell on July 21, 2022. He died from a perforated bowel.

The lawsuit read, “Lucas spent the last day of his life ... desperately begging nurses and jail guards to see a doctor.” It also stated a that Hennepin Healthcare provider had ordered that he return to the emergency department “for any new concerning symptoms.”

Lucas Bellamy (right) squatting from pain in a Hennepin County jail cell.

The suit continued to say that instead of getting care, “Hennepin Healthcare and county employees left Lucas to crawl around on the floor like he was subhuman, like he was an animal, while he slowly and painfully died from the effects of the hole in his intestine.”

The lawsuit named as individual defendants nurses Roselene Omweri, Kay Willis and Michelle Diaz, and Deputy Lucas Weatherspoon.

State records also show all three nurses hold active licenses with no disciplinary history. Weatherspoon is now an officer with the Minneapolis Police Department.

Family members said Bellamy was in jail after being arrested in Maple Plain. Court records show he was charged with fleeing police in a suspected stolen vehicle and possessing brass knuckles. His family added that his death was likely connected to chronic drug abuse.

Bellamy’s father, mother and sister spoke at a media briefing after the suit was filed and touched on their grief and disgust with the treatment of their loved one depicted in the jail video.

“I’ve seen tragedy on the stage,” Louis Bellamy said, “and I can tell you, honestly, that I could not have built anything more callous, more disrespectful to … humanity, human existence than what I witnessed on that tape.”

Liberal Prosecutors Fail to Charge Anonymous White DC Park Officer who Killed Dalaneo Martin: Cop Crept Into the Backseat of Parked Car, Woke Up Black Teen Then Shot Him in the Back, Posed No Threat

From [HERE] A U.S. Park Police officer will not face charges, federal prosecutors in Washington DC announced Thursday, citing insufficient evidence. The US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had opened a civil investigation into the fatal shooting of 17-year-old Dalaneo Martin on March 18, 2023. The announcement comes two days after the US Park Police released police bodycam footage of the shooting.

the shooting, which occurred when Washington Metropolitan Police and US Park Police were called to a neighborhood in northeast Washington, D.C. on the morning of March 18. Once there, officers found Martin in the driver’s seat of a suspected stolen car with the ignition on. The video shows the teen was asleep in the drivers seat of the car. The seat is reclined all the way down

“Here’s the plan,” one of the officers is heard saying in the video. “He’s knocked out. The back window is just plastic. I’m going to try to cut that out quietly. If he gets startled, doesn’t wake up, then we’re going to try to get in there, grab him before he puts that car in gear.” In response, another officer said, “If he takes off, he takes off. Just don’t get caught inside of that car.”

It’s not clear why the police didn’t simply just gently knock on the window to wake up the teen.

The U.S. attorney’s office in a statement said the decision not to charge the unidentified officer in the 2023 death of the driver, Dalaneo Martin, followed a “careful, thorough and independent review” of materials that determined the office could not prove “beyond a reasonable doubt that the United States Park Police Officer is criminally liable for Mr. Martin’s death.”

“This decision is deeply troubling and sends a disturbing message to our community that it is okay for officers to use deadly force against children in the community,” Andrew O. Clarke, one of the Martin family’s attorneys, said in a statement Thursday. “Dalaneo was never posed a direct threat to the officer’s safety or to others in the vicinity. Yet, seconds later, he paid the ultimate price in an encounter that never should have ended in the use of lethal force.”

The Martin family is represented by a group of attorneys including Clark, William H. “Billy” Murphy, who secured a $6.4 million settlement with the city of Baltimore following the in-custody death of Freddie Gray, and Ben Crump, who oversaw a $27 million settlement with Minneapolis following the 2020 death of George Floyd.

Police later discovered a firearm inside the vehicle. Senior D.C. officials said at the time the officers did not know about the gun until after the vehicle had crashed.

After Martin was struck, the vehicle continued to travel northbound on 36th Street, where it crashed into the side of a house. The Park Police body-cam footage ends with the officers rendering aid to Martin, who can be seen lying on grass near the vehicle.

Martin’s family on Thursday criticized authorities for not releasing the name of the officer who shot him.

“I am heartbroken but we will not allow this decision to deter us from seeking justice,” Terra Martin, Martin’s mother, said in a statement.

At Any Rate, Puerto Rico Actually Has a Serious Trash Problem Due to Limited Landfill, No Recycling and Poor Waste Management [racism is not words, NGHR is what is being Done to Us, not said about us]

Speech by Itself Cannot be Racism. It is Conduct (Evicting, Miseducating, Incarcerating, Denying, Firing, Deceiving, etc) Elite WHITES Use Their Weaponized Definition of Racism to TRY TO Salvage Kamala's Campaign

Once we understand what a "nigger" is, we will understand that a made-up word DOES NOT DEFINE WHO WE ARE; it defines WHAT IS BEING DONE TO US.

From [HERE] Puerto Rico is grappling with a pressing trash problem that’s not just a visual blight, but a serious threat to its stunning landscapes, marine life, and the environment. The urgency of this crisis is underscored by its far-reaching impacts on health, tourism, and the economy. Let’s delve into the reasons behind this crisis, its profound effects on Puerto Rico, and the ongoing efforts to restore the island to its former glory. 

Trash Problem Overview

The Puerto Rico trash problem has been growing for decades. With a population of around 3.2 million, the island generates about 3.7 million tons of waste yearly. Despite being small, the island’s landfills are full and there’s no proper recycling infrastructure. This trash crisis affects everything from health to the economy so solutions are crucial for Puerto Rico’s future.

Why So Much Trash in Puerto Rico?

Here are the main reasons:

1. Limited Landfill Space: Puerto Rico’s landfills have been full for years and many are already at capacity.

2. No Recycling Programs: Recycling is scarce and only 10% of waste is recycled on the island.

3. High Consumption: Like everywhere else, Puerto Rico has a high consumption of goods, plastic, and single-use items.

4. Tourism: Tourism brings millions of visitors to the island every year and more trash.

5. Weak Waste Management Infrastructure: Hurricanes and other natural disasters have weakened the waste infrastructure making cleanup efforts harder.

These two factors create a cycle of waste accumulation and put a lot of pressure on the environment and the people of Puerto Rico. [MORE]

Trump Flipped the Single Most Latino County in America

From [HERE] President-elect Donald Trump’s overwhelming victory on Tuesday confirms it: the Obama coalition is dead and buried.

After former President Barack Obama’s 2008 and 2012 victories brought together an incredibly diverse voter base of various identity groups, Democrats thought they had it made. Even 2016 didn’t dissuade them from this notion — many considered that election an outlier bump in the road.

However, Trump’s 2024 victory shattered that coalition, not because of the victory itself but because of how it was achieved.

Trump didn’t just bring out white voters — he won over unprecedented numbers of minorities as well.

This included, perhaps most notably, Hispanics.

Nowhere was this better exemplified than in Starr County, Texas, the most Hispanic county in America.

No Republican has won the county, the population of which is 97 percent Hispanic, in over a century, since 1892 to be precise.

But that all changed on Tuesday.

Trump won 57.7 percent of the county’s vote compared to Vice President Kamala Harris’ 41.8 percent, according to Newsweek.

This is a big shift from even the past two elections.

In 2020, President Joe Biden won Starr County by grabbing 52 percent of the vote. The 2016 Democratic victory (of the county, that is) was even more decisive with Hillary Clinton garnering a whopping 79 percent.

But this year, it shifted over to Trump’s column as did many once-blue counties across the United States.

This shift in Hispanic support wasn’t isolated to one red-state county. From 2020 to 2024, Hispanic support for Trump jumped from 32 percent to 46 percent.

That’s a 14-point swing!

Trump also won 39 percent of the Asian vote, 13 percent of the black vote (including 21 percent of black men) and a solid majority — 65 percent — of the American Indian vote.

People of all backgrounds, colors and creeds came out to vote for Donald Trump. [MORE]

Kamala Harris Campaign $20 Million in Debt After Blowing Over $1 Billion

From [HERE] and [HERE] Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign fell $20 million in debt during the final week of her campaign, according to several sources.

Christopher Cadelago, the California bureau chief for Politico wrote in a post on X that Harris’s campaign had “ended with at least $20 million in debt,” according to two sources familiar with the situation.

“Harris raised over $1 billion and had $118 million in the bank as of Oct. 16,” Cadelago added in his post.

A Kamala campaign staffer confirmed to Breitbart News that reports that Harris’s campaign was “$20 million” in debt are “real,” adding that Jen O’Malley Dillon, the Harris campaign chair reportedly “blew through a billion dollars in a few months.”

The concerts that the Harris campaign held with celebrities such as Katy Perry, Lizzo, Eminem, and Bruce Springsteen were reportedly “all Jen’s idea,” the campaign staffer explained.

“Jen blew through a billion dollars in a few months, and it was all Jen’s idea to do all the concerts,” the campaign staffer said.

As a result of being $20 million in debt, Rob Flaherty, the deputy campaign manager for Harris’s campaign is reportedly “currently shopping around the Kamala fundraising email list to anyone who wants” to try to raise the money back for the campaign, the staffer told Breitbart News. [MORE]

Exit Polling Data Shows 1 in 5 Black Men and 45% of All Latinos Voted for Trump

From [HERE] and [HERE] Veteran pollster Henry Olsen told The Post that under Trump’s leadership the GOP had been welcoming in working-class voters only “in fits and starts” until last night.

As for the Harris campaign, Olsen added, the Democratic nominee “was not hitting her targets” early on last night, including shoring up suburban women and retaining high levels of support among black and Hispanic voters.

“She could have minimized some of the loss of the black community by making it up in the suburbs with women,” he said. “But when the votes came in it was quite clear she was not running up the score.” 

Strikingly, Trump’s support among white voters dropped by 3 percentage point from 2016 — and Harris gained 8 points among white voters.

In total, 12% of black voters reported casting ballots for Trump in 2024, compared with just 8% eight years earlier. Twenty percent of black men said they supported the former president over Harris.

Asian voters voted for Trump by 38%, which was a nine-percentage-point increase from 2016. That’s the same margin that left the Democratic party by 2024.

Among Latinos, 45% broke for him this cycle, whereas just 29% voted for him in 2016 — a 16 percentage point shift.

A majority (54%) of Latino men helped fuel that rise for the soon-to-be 47th president.

The share of the electorate who is Latino has also grown significantly — from less than 12% in 2016 to 14.7% this year.

Going Too Far to Help Her White Liberal Masters? Black FEMA Supervisor Who Ordered Workers to Deny Storm Assistance to Homes of Trump Supporters is Relieved of Duty

From [HERE] FEMA official Marn’i Washington ordered her staff to avoid assisting homes with Trump flags in their yards following the aftermath of a recent hurricane in Florida. Marn’i wanted them to suffer for their support for Donald Trump.

A whistleblower came forward with text messages revealing FEMA official Marn’i Washington ordered relief workers to purposely skip over homes in Florida displaying Trump signs in the aftermath of Hurricane Milton.

According to internal messages obtained by The Daily Wire, FEMA discriminated against Trump supporters in need of help in the aftermath of the most recent hurricanes that passed through the Southeast.

“Whistleblowers say that relief workers were told it was “best practice” to pass over houses “advertising Trump.”” The Daily Wire reported.

The workers would enter into the system that they made no contact with the residents, blaming the directive: “Trump sign, no contact per leadership” [MORE]

Poll Shows Brandon Johnson is the Most Unpopular Mayor in Chicago History: Disapproval Rating at 80%, Approval Rating at 14%

From [HERE] A brief Corner note to point out that congratulations are in order for Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson, now the most unpopular mayor in the history of the city. Yes, a new local poll (from Change Research, and with a solid sample size) is out today with numbers for several local Chicago politicians, and they are grim: The only real question is the extent to which we here hate every single miserable last person or institution in this city and state. Chicago Teachers Union president Stacy Davis Gates (who sends her kid to private school, incidentally) is about as well liked as cholera, with a sparkling -8 approval rating. The Chicago public-school system itself scores -16 net favorability, which at least leaves it better positioned than the CTU (at -21 favorability) and Brandon Johnson’s handpicked new school board (at -34).

Bringing up the rear in this list of utterly unloved political hacks is none other than Mayor Johnson himself, with an approval rating of only 14 percent. And it’s not as if people have failed to form an opinion about him; his disapproval rating is now an incomprehensible 79 percent. Even more hilariously, a full 51 percent of all voters specifically view Johnson “very unfavorably.” I wasn’t exaggerating when I said that the City of Chicago has never had a mayor it despises more universally than Brandon Johnson. [MORE]

Elite Liberals Run Out of Utility for Their Black Strawboss, London Breed, Ousted as Mayor of San Francisco

From [HERE] London Breed, San Francisco’s first Black female mayor, who steered the city through the pandemic but also saw its quality of life sink, conceded her re-election race on Thursday.

Ms. Breed said in a news conference at City Hall that she had called Daniel Lurie, an heir to the Levi Strauss fortune who has never held elected office, to congratulate him on his win.

“Being mayor of San Francisco has been the greatest honor of my lifetime,” she told journalists in a meeting room off her office. “I’m beyond grateful to our residents for the opportunity to serve the city that raised me.”

The Associated Press had not yet called the race, though local news outlets did. Ms. Breed said she thought it would take “a miracle” to change the outcome at this point.

In the months and years following the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic and racial-justice riots of 2020, San Francisco became a poster child for blue-city decline and disorder. Downtown offices emptied, blowing a hole in the city’s budget. Businesses fled amid increasing crime. Massive homeless camps took over sidewalks, giving residents and tourists another reason to avoid downtown.

In 2020, Breed caved to the anti-police fever, slashing the police and sheriff’s office budgets, and redirecting $120 million to racial-justice causes. Breed said that the city was “prioritizing investments in the African American community around housing, mental health and wellness, workforce development, economic justice, education, advocacy and accountability.”

More recently, Breed has backed tough-on-crime ballot initiatives to increase police powers and require welfare recipients to undergo drug screenings. She has also has cracked down on homeless camps and beefed up a program to bus the homeless out of the city, angering many far-left homeless advocates. [MORE]

Arizona Rejects Restrictions on Governor's Emergency Powers [the power to act on "important matters" free of accountability or timely legal checks reveals true nature of demockery]

From [HERE] Arizonans voted against Proposition 135, a ballot measure that would have enshrined an "Emergency Declarations Amendment" to the constitution limiting the ability of their governor to extend emergency declarations among others. 56.8 percent of Arizona voters went against the proposition, with 68 percent of the vote counted as of press time.

Two years ago, Governor Doug Ducey signed a similar bill limiting the duration of a state of emergency to 30-day increments, which are eligible for extensions up to 120 days without the legislature's approval. Proposition 135 would have set a hard cap of 30 days for states of emergency and prohibited the governor from extending them without approval from state lawmakers. Absent a decision from the state legislature, the declared state of emergency would automatically end after the allotted 30 days.

Under the ballot measure, certain types of emergencies—like a state of war, fire, and floods—would not be subject to the 30-day limit. Additionally, the legislature would have had the authority to alter or limit the governor's powers when lawmakers extend an emergency declaration.

Apart from the amendment's effects on emergency declarations, it also required the governor to call a special session upon the petition of "at least one-third of each house of the legislature," according to the ballot's language. Under current law, two-thirds of lawmakers in both chambers must vote in favor of a special session to force the governor to call one. 

Republican lawmakers holding majorities in both chambers voted in 2023 for the amendment to be included on the 2024 ballot; no Democrats voted to include the ballot measure. The bill's sponsor, state representative Joseph Chaplik (R–Scottsdale), cited the 700-day plus COVID-19 emergency order as a key reason for his support of the measure, according to The Arizona Republic. Rep. Chaplik told The Arizona Republic that the proposition would have allowed special sessions to occur immediately following a governor's "abuses [of] their emergency power."

Opponents of Proposition 135 cited concerns over the state's ability to respond to emergencies. Requiring legislative approval might have slowed down the resources that states of emergency are meant to help allocate. The allocation of state resources, temporary suspension of regulations, enhanced information gathering, and speedy authorization of stricter public safety measures are all reasons states of emergency are declared. [MORE]