Witness Testifies to Grand Jury: Border Patrol Beat Hogtied, Handcuffed Latino Man to Death

From [HERE] A man who saw an undocumented immigrant from Mexico get shot with a stun gun by U.S. border authorities said he testified Thursday to a federal grand jury amid signs that prosecutors are considering criminal charges in the immigrant's death after more than two years of silence on the politically charged case. Humberto Navarrete said that he testified for about 90 minutes at a San Diego courthouse and told the grand jury he thought the border officials' actions were excessive. The grand jury questioned Navarrete about what he saw and viewed a grainy video that he took on his cellphone.

Navarrete's video, which he released immediately after the May 2010 incident at San Diego's San Ysidro port of entry, captured audio of a man believed to be Anastasio Hernandez pleading for help and passers-by asking border authorities to leave him alone. "He was lying face-down on the ground, surrounded by agents," Navarrete, a 26-year-old San Diego resident, said he told the grand jury. The U.S. Justice Department's civil rights division has been presenting evidence to the grand jury on Hernandez's death, family attorney Eugene Iredale told the AP.

Hernández was caught trying to enter the United States from Mexico near San Diego. He had previously lived in the United States for 25 years and was the father of five U.S.-born children. But instead of deportation, Hernández-Rojas’s detention ended in his death. A number of border officers were seen beating him, before one tasered him at least five times. He died shortly afterward. The agents say they confronted Hernández-Rojas because he became hostile and resisted arrest. But previously undisclosed videos recorded by eyewitnesses on their cellphones show a different story. "All eyewitnesses that we spoke to basically tell the same story of a man hogtied and handcuffed behind his back, not resisting, being beaten repeatedly by batons, by kicks, by punches, by the use of a taser, for almost 30 minutes until he died," says reporter John Carlos Frey as part of a joint investigation by the PBS broadcast, "Need to Know," and the Investigative Fund of the Nation Institute. [MORE] 

A person other than Iredale who is close to the Hernandez family said a man who was with Navarrete that night also was expected to testify Thursday. The person, who spoke directly with the witness, requested anonymity because grand jury proceedings are supposed to be secret.

Mitchell Rivard, a Justice Department spokesman, said the case remains under investigation and declined further comment.

Agents shot Hernandez, 42, with a stun gun at the busy border crossing while returning him to Tijuana, Mexico. Mexican President Felipe Calderon joined a chorus of critics who complained of excessive force by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials, none of whom have been publicly identified.

An autopsy by the San Diego County coroner's office found Hernandez died of a heart attack, with a heart condition and methamphetamine use listed as contributing factors. The autopsy said Hernandez was unresponsive shortly after he was shot with a stun gun, apparently three or four times.

The coroner's report, citing a San Diego police detective, said Hernandez was "agitated and confrontational" after he was detained by Border Patrol agents crossing the border illegally and became "suddenly violent" when his handcuffs were removed at the border crossing.

It is unclear if the evidence being presented to the grand jury will lead to criminal charges or who is the target of the investigation. Still, the convening of a grand jury suggests the government is interested in bringing charges.

"When a prosecutor looks at a case, you can decide no crime has been committed, you close the case and move on. That obviously hasn't happened in this case," said Peter Nunez, a former U.S. attorney in San Diego who is not involved in the case. "The fact that there's a grand jury means it has progressed to the next level, if you will."

Nunez cautioned that prosecutors may have determined there wasn't enough evidence to justify charges but sought political cover with a grand jury.

"This case has so much publicity attached to it," he said. "You can see a prosecutor saying, 'There's not enough evidence to justify criminal charges ... I'm going to present the case to the grand jury, with the idea that the grand jury may decide not to indict.' The prosecutors are shielded from criticism to some degree."

Hernandez's widow welcomed news of the grand jury investigation.

"It has been more than two years of waiting. I believe this is a step toward justice," Maria Pugo, 41, said at a news conference Thursday with migrant activists who also applauded the move and said they hoped for an indictment.

"We're pleased with this initial step in the right direction," said Andrea Guerrero, executive director of Equality Alliance. "It's long overdue."

The investigation attracted renewed scrutiny and criticism less than three months ago after another eyewitness video that aired on PBS appeared to show Hernandez being shot with a stun gun while lying on the ground, surrounded by about a dozen agents. Sixteen members of Congress wrote Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to say Hernandez's death "may be emblematic of broader structural problems."

It is extremely rare for U.S. border authorities to face criminal charges for deaths or injuries to migrants. In April, federal prosecutors said there was insufficient evidence to pursue charges against a Border Patrol agent in the 2010 shooting death of a 15-year-old Mexican in Texas.