Inducing Public Consent: US and UK Government docs reveal confidentiality agreements were made to Hide Injurious Reactions to COVID Shots from the Public
/STORY AT-A-GLANCE
U.S. and U.K. health officials discussed “anaphylactoid reactions” due to COVID-19 shots and emphasized their “mutual confidentiality agreement” regarding the topic
The news was revealed in 57 pages of heavily redacted U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) records via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
A government email exchange from May 14, 2021, also discusses concerns about administering COVID-19 shots along with other vaccines during pregnancy
Regulatory filings show Pfizer knew of its shots’ waning effectiveness in April 2021 but didn’t publicly acknowledge it until late July 2021
Preclinical studies for Pfizer’s COVID shots also warned of rhabdomyolysis, which is the breakdown of skeletal muscles, but the trial reported it was “completed with no safety concerns”
From [HERE] In the days leading up to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 shot, an agreement was made to keep serious adverse reactions under wraps. U.S. and U.K. health officials discussed “anaphylactoid reactions” due to COVID shots and emphasized their “mutual confidentiality agreement” regarding the topic.1
The news was revealed by Judicial Watch, which obtained 57 pages of heavily redacted U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) records 2 via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit. Initially, Judicial Watch submitted a FOIA request in August 2021 that specifically asked for: 3
“All emails sent to and from members of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee regarding adverse events, deaths and/or injuries caused by investigatory vaccines for the prevention or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19 currently produced by Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and/or Johnson & Johnson.”
The request was ignored, prompting the lawsuit that ultimately revealed the confidentiality agreement between U.S. and U.K. regulators. "Why are we engaged in a secret deal to keep secret information about adverse events related to the vaccines?" Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton asked. "I just think it's troubling. The documents speak for themselves." 4
US and UK Officials Make Pact to Keep Safety Issues Quiet
The pact was revealed in a series of email exchanges from December 2020. Initiated by Jonathan Mogford, policy director of the U.K.’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, and sent to FDA commissioner Janet Woodcock and Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Judicial Watch reported: 5
“As background, Mogford includes information on “two cases of anaphylactoid reactions in individuals with a strong past history of allergic reactions….” Marks replies to Mogford: “It would be very helpful if our Office of Vaccines could receive additional details [redacted] from MHRA [UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency] under the terms of our mutual confidentiality agreement.”
Mogford later replies, “… attached are [redacted] hope that’s helpful in the meantime. If I can just remind — information shared under our confidentiality agreement.””
An email exchange from May 14, 2021, also discusses concerns about administering COVID-19 shots along with other vaccines during pregnancy. According to Judicial Watch: 6
“The CDC’s Dr. Amanda Cohn emailed Office of Vaccines Research and Review Director Marion Gruber and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Peter Marks with the subject line “Coadministration of COVID-19 Vaccines with Other Vaccines During Pregnancy.”
Gruber writes, “I am fine with this language.” Marks then responds to Cohn and her CDC colleague, Sarah Mbaeyi, “I can live with this too. Please let me know if you want to connect about the adverse event issue later today. Seems like work is still ongoing, but let me know. Thanks.”
Cohn replies, “We have a meeting with Rochelle [presumably CDC Director Rochelle Walensky] at 3:30 about if we should say anything or wait until we have more definitive information. I will let you know where we land. I’m not sure there is a right answer.””
“It again took a lawsuit for the Biden administration to hand over, albeit heavily redacted, information regarding the safety of the COVID vaccines that the public has every right to know,” Fitton said in a news release. “This disturbing batch of new documents have uncovered a secret confidentiality agreement tied to COVID vaccine safety issues and emails that raise new questions about the vaccines and pregnancy.” 7
Pfizer Hid Data on Lack of Effectiveness
After initially claiming in late 2020 that its COVID-19 shots were 95% effective, Pfizer’s COVID shots turned out to have rapidly waning protection of just 39%. 8 That figure was reported in July 2021 by the Israeli Ministry of Health. 9 Pfizer echoed the “declining trend in vaccine efficacy” in late July 2021, 10 but regulatory filings from April 2021 show Pfizer knew of the shots’ failures months earlier.
“It’s clear from the documents that these analyses were almost 4 months old by the time they became public,” Peter Doshi, associate professor at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, told Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D., a former medical scientist with the University of Adelaide and former reporter for ABC News in Australia. 11
“It’s disappointing that neither Pfizer, nor regulators, disclosed these data until it was too obvious to ignore new outbreaks in Israel and Massachusetts, which made it clear that vaccine performance was not holding up,” he said. 12
Even Pfizer’s six-month phase III trial data, released April 1, 2021, stayed silent on the shots’ waning efficacy. 13 And, at that time, health officials were still claiming that the shot would stop COVID-19 transmission. In May 2021, Dr. Anthony Fauci stated “when you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health ... you become a dead end to the virus.”
As Doshi explained, “Publicly disclosing that efficacy waned so soon after authorization might have undermined the credibility of authorities, who’d been projecting great confidence about the vaccines’ ability to end the pandemic.”14
But instead of transparency and supporting informed consent so Americans could make their own choice about the shots with all the data, Demasi reported: 15
“Within weeks of Pfizer publishing its data on waning efficacy, President Biden ordered all federal workers (and employees of contractors) to get vaccinated within 75 days, otherwise they’d face punishment or have their employment terminated.”
Shots’ Effects on Brain Known Since 2020
mRNA COVID-19 shots teach your cells to produce a protein, or piece of protein, that triggers an immune response, including the production of antibodies. 16 However, because natural mRNA is easily broken down, this means the experimental gene therapy needs a special delivery system to make it to the body’s cells.
The shots use lipid nanoparticles that contain polyethylene glycol (PEG) 17 for this purpose. The mRNA is wrapped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that carry it to your cells, and the LNPs are “PEGylated” — that is, chemically attached to PEG molecules to increase stability. 18
Usually, if you were to inject RNA into your body, enzymes would immediately break it apart, but the COVID-19 shots are specifically designed so that doesn’t happen. While it was originally advertised that COVID-19 shots “stay in the arm,” Pfizer knew since at least November 2020 that the shots may influence the brain.
Pfizer contracted Acuitas Therapeutics to conduct animal studies, which found LNPs from COVID-19 shots rapidly traveled to other areas, including the brain, eyes, heart, ovaries and other organs.19 20
Naturopath Colleen Huber explained: 21
“Now that we have LNPs with their mRNA payload delivered past the BBB and into the brain, what do they do once they arrive to the fluid surrounding neurons? The rest is an easy journey for LNPs. Neurons take up LNPs — and they do so very efficiently, at 100 percent uptake, by means of apolipoprotein E, and usually without immune reaction at that point.
Apolipoprotein E is abundant in the brain — it is produced by astrocytes. The mechanism of uptake is endocytosis, in which the membrane of the neuron engulfs or swallows the approaching LNP. That has been observed since at least 2013. In this way, the Trojan Horse content of the LNP is delivered, because it was contained in a benign-seeming — to the neuronal membrane — package.”
A number of neurological injuries have been reported following COVID-19 shots, including ischemic stroke, Bell’s palsy, tinnitus and Guillain-Barré Syndrome. As for one mechanism of brain injury, Stephanie Seneff, a senior research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), believes genetic modifications introduced by COVID-19 shots may induce immune cells to release large quantities of exosomes into circulation.
Exosomes are extracellular vesicles that contain protein, DNA, RNA and other constituents, and may contain mRNA along with spike protein. According to Seneff and colleagues: 22
“[W]e present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.
We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites.
We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage.”
COVID Shots Melting Muscles
Preclinical studies for Pfizer’s COVID shots also warned of rhabdomyolysis, which is the breakdown of skeletal muscles. Writing in DailyClout, Dr. Robert Chandler reported:23
“The Pfizer documents 24
contain results from a 17-day study of repeat dose injections of BNT162b2 [Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot] in Wistar Han rats. Myonecrosis and inflammation were identified histopathologically. The appearance was described as “Jellied” (Table 3), which is what rhabdomyolysis might look like after 17 days.”
Despite this and other concerning findings, including fibrosis, inflammation and myofiber degeneration present at the injection site, Chandler explains, “How was this data presented at the December 10, 2020, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting regarding the Emergency Use Authorization for BNT162b2? … Completed with no safety concerns.” 25
A review of data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) also revealed a dramatic increase in reports of rhabdomyolysis following the rollout of COVID-19 shots. In fact, Chandler reveals: 26
“79% of all reported rhabdomyolysis cases occurred in the two complete years (2021 and 2022) after the EUA was approved in December of 2020 … A dramatic, 37-fold increase in the annual rate of cases of rhabdomyolysis occurred after mass inoculation with Spike Producing Genetic Therapy Products began in December 2020. COVID-19 (2020) did not cause an increase in rhabdomyolysis reporting in VAERS compared with years 2001-2020.”
A number of case reports have since been published of “COVID-19 mRNA vaccination-induced rhabdomyolysis,” including in a 16-year-old male two days after his first dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot 27 and a 21-year-old male one day after his first COVID-19 shot. 28
The findings that Pfizer and government officials were aware of serious adverse events and waning effectiveness of COVID-19 shots but neglected to share this with the public will only further undermine trust in public health authorities.
As Martin Kulldorff — co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, which scientifically critiqued the effects of prolonged lockdowns in response to COVID-19 — told Demasi, “In public health, it is important to be honest with the public. Pfizer should have reported the declining vaccine efficacy in its April 1, 2021, press release, which they clearly knew about at the time.” 29
Likewise with the numerous reports of adverse events linked to the shots, which have now been linked to an explosion of excess deaths.
Steve Kirsch: The FDA knew on September 17, 2021 that people who got COVID Injections were 2X more likely to be infected
/
From [HERE] Executive summary. The Cleveland Clinic study, which I fully explain in this article, shows that the more vaccines you get, the more likely you are to be infected with COVID.
This was not a fluke. As I pointed out in my article, the results were consistent with three other large studies, two of which (the Qatar and Pfizer studies) were general population and not just healthcare workers.
One of the two large confirming studies was the Pfizer Phase 3 trial participants themselves.
Did you know that Pfizer told the FDA in a document dated September 17, 2021 that people who were on the vaccine for a longer period were more likely to be infected with COVD than those who spent only about half the time in the vaccinated state. The difference between the infection rates of the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed was more than 2X. See this section of my article for details on data in the FDA document and the simple calculation to determine the relative infection rates.
The bottom line is that the FDA knew on Sept 17, 2021 that you were more likely to be infected with COVID if you were vaccinated. That’s the opposite of what they told us.
What do we do now?
We need to acknowledge our mistakes and take corrective action.
Every business who has a vaccine mandate should immediately issue a reverse mandate.
For example,
Hospitals should immediately fire anyone who is vaccinated with the COVID vaccine. Proof of being unvaccinated should be required to keep your job. Religious and medical exemptions should be honored so if anyone’s religious beliefs require them to be vaccinated, those people should be accommodated. Similarly, if anyone has a medical condition requiring them to be vaccinated, they should be given an exemption.
College campuses should not allow students who are vaccinated to enroll. In addition, all visitors to campus will need to show proof of unvaccination. In short, if you are vaccinated, you should no longer be allowed on campus.
Proof of unvaccination should be required to enter restaurants and attend public gatherings.
If you are not an American citizen, you should not be able to enter the US without proof of unvaccination.
Unvaccination should be required to hold elective office.
All emergency personnel (police, fire, paramedics) must be unvaccinated or face losing their job.
All doctors who advised their patients to get vaccinated should have their license to practice medicine revoked by the medical boards. Their board certifications and hospital privileges should be removed as well. After all, these physicians are a danger to society because they lack the ability to think for themselves and do what is best for their patients.
Doctors who write vaccine prescriptions for the COVID vaccine shall be investigated and may have their license to practice medicine revoked. After all, the COVID vaccine isn’t justifiable for any patient so you must be a very bad doctor who doesn’t believe in evidence-based medicine.
Other than as noted above, there should be no tolerance for the vaccinated. These people should have known better. They are a risk to society and prevent us from getting to herd immunity. They should be ostracized and excluded from all family events moving forward. [MORE]
Michael Palmer, MD: Alternate mechanisms of mRNA vaccine toxicity: which one is the main culprit?
/This paper summarizes the mode of action of mRNA vaccines, as well as three potential pathogenetic mechanisms that may account for the toxicity observed with the mRNA vaccines against COVID-19, namely: chemical toxicity of lipid nanoparticles, direct toxicity of the spike protein, whose expression is induced by the vaccines, and the destructive effects of the immune response to the spike protein. The case is made that of these mechanism the third is likely the most important one. If this conclusion is correct, then essentially the same level of toxicity must be expected with future mRNA vaccines against any other pathogenic microbes. [MORE]
Economist Toby Rogers Calls the Substantial Rising Autism Rates Among Black Children "Evidence of a Genocide." Data Shows Black and Hispanic Kids "are being poisoned at an astronomical rate"
/From [TOBY ROGERS] and [HERE] I. Introduction
The new autism numbers came out last Thursday. We all knew that they would be bad because nearly every prevalence report for the last 20 years has shown increasing rates. We also knew that once again the CDC and mainstream media would try to spin increasing prevalence as “good news” in the Orwellian way that they do.
Let’s walk through the two reports and then have a brief conversation about what we do about this.
II. The new numbers
There are several systems for tracking autism prevalence in the U.S. including the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network (ADDM), National Survey for Children’s Health (NSCH), and National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). There are also federal programs including the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) that have their own counts.
The two reports that came out on Thursday were from ADDM which tends to estimate lower autism prevalence (owing to slightly different research methods) than some of the other surveys.
There are 11 ADDM sites across the country (Arizona, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin). Every two years they conduct a study of autism rates in a defined geographic region within the state (in as few as one county in Arizona, to as many as 21 counties in Arkansas). ADDM sites generally measure autism rates in 8-year-olds (almost all children with autism will be diagnosed by that age and such “constant age tracking” allows for more accurate comparisons between different birth cohorts). They are very thorough — reviewing diagnostic evaluations and school records for every child in that defined region. It takes them three years to write up the report (which is extremely unfortunate given the stakes). The main study that was just released looked at children born in 2012 who were studied in 2020.
The headline was 1 in 36 children in the U.S. have autism which is an increase of 18% from the ADDM report (1 in 44) released just two years ago.
I was quoted in an article by Brenda Baletti at Children’s Health Defense about the new numbers, “1 in 36 Kids Have Autism, CDC Says — Critics Slam Agency’s Failure to Investigate Causes.”
Cynthia Nevison wrote a brilliant analysis of the latest reports that was published by Children’s Health Defense on Friday titled, “In New Autism Report, CDC Again Fails to Address Root Causes.”
Dr. Nevison also discussed the reports on the Friday Roundtable of CHD.tv.
III. Boys are 3.8 times more likely to have autism than girls
1 in 36 = 2.78% of all kids in the U.S. have autism, according to the main study. There is variability across the ADDM sites from a low of 2.31% in Maryland to a high of 4.49% in California. But remember, autism is 3.8 times higher among boys than girls. So the autism rate among boys in California in 2020 was 6.94%.
Every f*cking Democrat in California swore that vaccines were not linked to autism, they mandated one of the most extreme childhood vaccine schedules in the world in order for kids to go to school, and voilà 6.94% of boys in the state now have autism.
This is genocide, democide, and androcide. Yes, I am aware of the fact that these children are “just” poisoned and injured for life, not murdered outright (although the SIDS numbers are also appalling). But this is a systematic destruction of a people nonetheless.
IV. The way that the CDC has weaponized equity to promote genocide is sinister
In 2019, Cynthia Nevison was one of the first scholars to spot the fact that Black and Hispanic autism rates had surpassed autism rates in the White community (apologies for the capitalizations of the various races, not my preference, I get that race is a social construct, that’s just how they do it in these reports). During the battle against SB276 in 2019 (that removed all MEDICAL exemptions to vaccinations) we shared this information with elected officials including Lorena Gonzalez (who was chair of the California Latino Legislative Caucus at the time), but they voted to continue genociding their own base anyway.
Black and Hispanic autism rates exceed the rate in the White population in the most recent ADDM studies as well.
Hispanic autism rates are 30% higher in 8-year-olds (born in 2012) and 80% higher in 4-year-olds (born in 2016) as compared with White children of the same age.
Black autism rates are 20% higher for 8-year-olds (born in 2012) and 60% higher for 4-year-olds (born in 2016) as compared with White children of the same age.
SB277 (that removed the personal belief exemption to vaccine mandates) passed in 2015. So the 2016 birth cohort is the first post-SB277 generation. The autism numbers are every bit as horrifying as we predicted they would be and contradict Democratic claims about vaccine safety.
As Black and Hispanic rates were rising the CDC spun it as good news because they claimed it meant more Black and Hispanic kids had access to diagnostic testing. Now that Black and Hispanic autism rates exceed White rates that narrative does not make sense. Dr. Nevison explains:
The apparent underlying assumption was that there is a natural genetic level of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the population, which is reflected in White prevalence, and that all races and ethnicities will eventually stabilize at that level thanks to improved outreach and screening.
The new ADDM report recognizes that, “For the first time… the prevalence of ASD was lower among White children than among other racial and ethnic groups, reversing the direction of racial and ethnic differences in ASD prevalence observed in the past.” However, the authors neglect to acknowledge that this reversal undermines the hopeful interpretation of previous ADDM data and effectively turns the equity argument on its head.
But the CDC is sticking with the equity script regardless of the data. The last sentence of the main report states,
These data indicate that ASD is common across all groups of children and underscore the considerable need for equitable and accessible screening, services, and supports for all children.
That’s not actually what these data indicate. These data indicate that American children are being poisoned at an astronomical rate and Black and Hispanic children are being poisoned even more than White children at this point.
V. Higher socioeconomic status is now associated with lower autism rates — once again contradicting the official narrative
In 9 of the 11 ADDM sites, those in the highest third of income had the lowest autism rates (although only 3 of those results were statistically significant). Presumably, those with the most income have the greatest access to testing and diagnostic services — and yet their autism rates are the lowest. Ask yourself: what is different about White and wealthy populations as compared with the rest of the population?
VI. The data on 4-year-olds is even worse
And then there was the second report released on Thursday — early identification of autism among 4-year-olds in 2020. The study found an astonishing 4.64% of four-year-olds in San Diego have autism. But remember autism is more prevalent in boys than girls so this works out to a 7.2% autism rate for boys in San Diego. For Black and Hispanic boys the results are even worse. Dr. Nevison explains:
The race-specific prevalence of the boys was not explicitly stated, but one can back-calculate that it was about 8% for both Blacks and Hispanics.
As the 2016 birth cohort ages and is fully diagnosed, a substantially higher prevalence can be expected, likely exceeding 10% for Black and Hispanic boys in California.
Again, this is the first post-SB277 generation. The law was phased in over time so the 2018 birth cohort will likely have even higher autism prevalence. Then SB276 passed in 2019, removing all medical exemptions to vaccination, so autism prevalence in the 2020 birth cohort and beyond will likely be even worse (perhaps offset somewhat by lower vaccination rates during the pandemic).
San Diego is Lorena Gonzalez’s former Assembly District. Asm. Gonzalez spent the better part of her career in the Assembly ridiculing the parents of vaccine-injured children. And now the autism rates in her former assembly district are among the highest in the country — particularly for Hispanic and Black children.
VII. Not all of the data are released to the public
As bad as the public facing numbers are, there are additional “cross-tabs” — granular data by county or even subsets within a particular county — that are even worse. These cross-tabs are not released to the public. They will show that in many large cities, the autism rate among low income boys of color is 10% or higher. This is a genocide that is being conducted by mostly Democratic political leaders who claim that they care about equity.
Every politician in this country who cares about kids should demand the immediate release of ALL of the ADDM data.
VIII. What are the costs to society from this mass poisoning of children?
Nearly all of the major newspapers in the country wrote a story about the new autism prevalence numbers. None of those stories mentioned anything about the cost of autism. That’s odd, don’t you think?
There are 9 very good studies on the cost of autism:
• Cakir et al. 2020; and
• Blaxill, Rogers, and Nevison 2021 (author copy below).
Leigh & Du show autism costs of one trillion dollars a year in the U.S. by 2025.
Cakir et al. show autism costs of over seven trillion dollars over the period 2020 to 2029.
The study I worked on together with Mark Blaxill and Cynthia Nevison shows autism costs hitting one trillion dollars a year in the mid 2030s.
To put this in perspective, U.S. Defense Department spending is about $800 billion. So by all estimates autism costs in the U.S. will soon exceed U.S. Defense Department costs.
Autism is now an INDUSTRY that has become too big to question. Pharma makes $50 billion annually from the childhood vaccine schedule, then another $10 billion from psychopharmaceuticals to “treat” autism, but there are also billions of dollars of revenue generated from genetics research, psychological testing, support services, and applied behavioral analysis therapy amongst others. And this industry works behind the scenes to censor any discussion about root causes and costs.
The only narrative that is allowed in the public square is that:
Autism is a blessing™️;
Rising autism rates are Good News™️;
Rising Black and Hispanic autism rates are a Victory for Equity™️; and
The only problem here is those damn dirty anti-vaxxers, but otherwise we live in the Best of all Possible Worlds™️.
The reality of course is quite different:
Over 90% of autism cases are likely the result of toxic injury;
We know how to prevent autism — keep toxic chemicals out of kids’ bodies;
Rising autism rates are evidence of a crime against humanity; and
The costs are catastrophic and will cause economic and political collapse in the U.S. in our lifetime.
The reason Democrats kick vaccine-injured kids and their siblings out of school and then drive their families out of the state with these vaccine mandate bills is to reduce costs. (Is it conscious? Probably not, they are not that self-aware. But 95% of decisions are subconscious so whether they are conscious of what they are doing is really beside the point.) I imagine that as prevalence and costs increase they will resort to even more extreme measures to vilify, harass, and censor those who point out what is actually going on.
Of course the better alternative is to prevent autism altogether by banning toxic chemicals that cause developmental disabilities. But we cannot have that conversation in this country because Pharma is implicated and they control the entire system. [MORE]
Liberal Authorities Seek to Hire 87,000 Armed IRS Agents. Will this Army be Used Against Wealthy White Folks who Have Lawyers to Defend Them or Used Against Poor and Working People?
/
From [HERE] After Democrats rammed through the latest massive spending package earlier this year containing tens of billions of dollars for 87,000 more IRS agents, the agency is not wasting any time going on a hiring binge.
And it’s not one that will make Americans feel warm and fuzzy inside.
The Criminal Investigation (CI) division of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has posted job openings for special agents who can carry guns and make arrests in all 50 states. The CI division is responsible for investigating financial crimes, money laundering, tax-related identity theft, and terrorist financing, FOX Business reported this week.
Special agents within the division are authorized by law to carry and use firearms, making them the only IRS employees with this authority. The available positions are located throughout the U.S.
Under the job postings’ “major duties” section, the agency says that special agents “[c]arry a firearm; must be prepared to protect him/herself or others from physical attacks at any time and without warning and use firearms in life-threatening situations; must be willing to use force up to and including the use of deadly force.”
In addition, IRS-CI special agents must be “willing and able to participate in arrests, execution of search warrants, and other dangerous assignments.” The posting goes on to note that special agents are required to maintain “a level of fitness necessary to effectively respond to life-threatening situations on the job.”
Applicants must fulfill several additional eligibility criteria, such as holding U.S. citizenship, being aged between 21 when completing the training academy and 37 at the time of appointment. Moreover, prospective special agents in the IRS’ Criminal Investigation division are required to clear pre-employment medical and tax exams, as well as drug tests, and must be legally authorized to possess firearms, the financial news outlet reported further.
The IRS began accepting applications for the special agent role in mid-February and the job posting will remain open through the end of the year. The posting lists 360 vacancies in 249 locations across the country, with at least one position available in each state. The salary range for the role is between $52,921 and $94,228 annually, the report continued.
“The IRS faced criticism last year when a similar posting went live amid debate in Congress over Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act, which included $80 billion in increased funding for the IRS over a decade — much of which was intended to help the agency crack down on tax evasion,” FOX Business added.
According to the group Americans For Tax Reform, which generally opposes all tax increases:
Armed agents are sought at:
20 sites in Texas
18 sites in California
13 sites in each of Florida and New York
9 sites in each of Georgia, Pennsylvania, Illinois
8 sites in Ohio
7 sites in each of Tennessee, Michigan, New Jersey, Maryland
6 sites in each of Massachusetts, Missouri, Indiana, Virginia
5 sites in each of Arizona, Kentucky, Oregon, West Virginia
4 sites in each of North Carolina, South Carolina, Iowa, Wisconsin, Connecticut, Louisiana, Washington state and Alabama
3 sites in each of Minnesota, Oklahoma, Colorado, Mississippi, Arkansas, Utah, New Mexico
2 sites in each of Kansas, South Dakota, Nevada, New Hampshire
1 site in each of North Dakota, Alaska, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Maine, Montana, Nebraska, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wyoming.
“In order to carry or use an IRS-owned weapon, agents must: engage in handgun firing training at least once each quarter, shoot at least the minimum of 75 percentage points on the firearms qualifying test using the issued handgun during two nonconsecutive quarters, participate in biannual firearms building entry exercises, participate in an annual briefing on firearms safety and security policies and IRS-CI’s directives and procedures regarding the safe handling and storage of firearms, and participate in a briefing each quarter regarding the policy of discharging a firearm at a moving vehicle,” the group’s site noted further, referencing the agency’s firearms training standards.
It seems clear the IRS is building an army to go after ordinary earners, not wealthy Americans who are far fewer in number.
Clearview AI scraped 30 Billion Images from Facebook to build its facial recognition database and then Gave the Photos to Cops. Police have used the database a million times
/US police have used the database nearly a million times, the company’s CEO told the BBC.
One digital rights advocate told Insider the company is “a total affront to peoples’ rights, full stop.”
From [HERE] A controversial facial recognition database, used by police departments across the nation, was built in part with 30 billion photos the company scraped from Facebook and other social media users without their permission, the company’s CEO recently admitted, creating what critics called a “perpetual police line-up,” even for people who haven’t done anything wrong. The company, Clearview AI, boasts of its potential for identifying rioters at the January 6 attack on the Capitol, saving children being abused or exploited, and helping exonerate people wrongfully accused of crimes. But critics point to wrongful arrests fueled by faulty identifications made by facial recognition, including cases in Detroit and New Orleans. Clearview took photos without users’ knowledge, its CEO Hoan Ton-That acknowledged in an interview last month with the BBC. Doing so allowed for the rapid expansion of the company’s massive database, which is marketed on its website to law enforcement as a tool “to bring justice to victims.” Ton-That told the BBC that Clearview AI’s facial recognition database has been accessed by US police nearly a million times since the company’s founding in 2017, though the relationships between law enforcement and Clearview AI remain murky and that number could not be confirmed by Insider.
An Uncontrollable Group of Baltimore Cops Don’t Answer Calls or Investigate Crimes. Instead They Roam Black Neighborhoods Surveilling People They Deem Suspicious and Unlawfully Stop and Search Them
/
From [HERE] When Tyrie Washington saw Baltimore City Police roll past him a little after noon on a Thursday in July of 2020, he ran. He darted through an alley in West Baltimore—he knew the neighborhood well because he’d lived there for years—and then hopped a fence and hid.
From the passenger seat of an unmarked police car, Detective Alex Rodriguez spotted the 21-year-old Washington, crouched by a bush in the yard of a residence.
Moments earlier, Detective Drake Winkey of the Baltimore Police Department’s Northwest District Action Team (DAT) announced over the radio that someone was “running through the alley.”
Rodriguez got out of the car shouting, “Stop.” Washington jumped a fence, but fell to the ground. Rodriguez grabbed him.
“Stop bro, stop,” Rodriguez said. “Why you running?”
Out of breath, Washington articulated what he believed were his rights. “All right, I got my ID,” he told Rodriguez. “You’re not gonna search me.”
Washington was referring to his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. He believed that would prevent any search of his person and that all Rodriguez could lawfully do was ask for his ID.
Then Detective Israel Lopez—who pulled up with Det. Winkey moments earlier—announced “gun,” reached into Washington’s pants and removed a handgun.
“Y’all bitches don’t got nothing else to do?” Washington asked the three cops surrounding him. “[Than] lockin’ up people with guns on the streets?”
DAT Detective Darwin Noesi said. “Yeah.”
“Exactly,” Rodriguez chimed in. “People like you.”
The officers who arrested Washington were part of a District Action Team, a group of specialized units within the Baltimore Police Department, currently with 75 members in total. DAT officers do not answer calls or investigate homicides, but instead engage in proactive policing in neighborhoods they deem “high crime” areas. They look for people they perceive as suspicious and keep an eye out for crimes happening—or about to happen.
Each of the department’s nine districts has at least one DAT unit. The officers operate in marked and unmarked police vehicles; their uniform is tactical vests and other “plainclothes” gear. While DAT officers engage in tasks like foot patrols, traffic stops, and executing warrants, their primary focus is violence reduction through gun and drug enforcement.
District Action Team enforcement often looks like Washington’s arrest in 2020. Defense attorneys argue, however, that DAT officers circumvent Fourth Amendment protections and manufacture probable cause through a vast set of vague descriptors: “bulges” in clothing or backpacks, “furtive gestures,” nervousness including a “visible carotid artery,” clothing out of season, and running from police.
DAT was established in the summer of 2017, just months after the police disbanded the federally indicted gun- and drug-seizing unit Gun Trace Task Force (GTTF), whose members stole cash and drugs, dealt drugs, and planted evidence. Then-Police Commissioner Kevin Davis announced the new DAT squads would be a different kind of proactive policing than the plainclothes cops jumping out of unmarked cars to harass and arrest: “The ‘jump-out boys’ culture was just counterproductive to everything we have to do in the crime fight,” Davis said then. [MORE]
Unwanted Racist Returns to the Miami Police Dept to Provide UnDeclinable "Public Service" to Black Citizens b/c Cops Can't Be Hired or Fired or Controlled by the Community in the Free Range Prison
/From [HERE] About seven months after Police Chief Manny Morales fired Capt. Javier Ortiz — the embattled former union boss and longtime firebrand known for racist social media posts and accusations of excessive force — has been reinstated. Ortiz is temporarily returning to a desk job after he reached a settlement with police brass, according to an agreement obtained by the Miami Herald.
“The South Florida Police Benevolent Association, on behalf of Capt. Javier Ortiz, and the city of Miami have reached a resolution to all pending matters regarding the employment of Captain Ortiz,” said Steadman Stahl, president of the South Florida Police Benevolent Association. “Both parties believe that it is in the best interests of the citizens of the city of Miami and Captain Ortiz.”
The settlement agreement awards Ortiz several months of backpay but confines him to an administrative job directly under Morales where he will not receive a gun or a take-home car, and he has narrow restrictions on when he can use police powers. Ortiz has a base salary of $155,004 that is bolstered further by incentives like running certain task forces.
“He will only utilize his police power in the event someone is using or threatening to use deadly force if he reasonably believes he must act to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or another,” reads the settlement.
Another caveat: He’ll work the desk job during late-night hours.
The deal, signed by Ortiz and Miami City Manager Art Noriega on Tuesday, requires Ortiz to retire on Nov. 7, 2025. Oritz has also agreed to stay out of police union business and no longer work off-duty hours or overtime, and will return to his rank as captain. In exchange, he’s agreed to drop all pending litigation against the city.
Morales fired Ortiz in September, citing a “pattern of behavior and his failure to maintain a good moral character.”
State and federal authorities investigated Ortiz for two years over misconduct allegations. By April 2021, the investigation resulted in no criminal charges but highlighted a string of questionable arrests and “a pattern of abuse and bias against minorities, particularly African-Americans.”
Ortiz, a former SWAT commander, made numerous dubious arrests and the resulted in lawsuits and legal settlements totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars, according to the investigation done by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
In 2015, he made a social media post where he called Tamir Rice, the 12-year-old shot and killed by a Cleveland cop while playing with a toy gun, a thug.
Ortiz, along with other officers, was accused of beating a Francois, Alexandre, who was celebrating the Miami Heat’s NBA championship victory in the summer of 2013. Alexandre’s eye socket was broken in the ordeal, but Ortiz dodged any charges after a federal appeals court said Ortiz had “qualified immunity” when he subdued Alexandre.
[Where are 4th Amendment Rights When You Need Them?] Black Man Spends 30 Hours in Jail After Detroit Cops Use AI Technology to Misidentify Him [rights are myths, words on paper that protect no one]
/Can you imagine getting arrested and spending time in jail for a crime you never committed?
Well, that is exactly what happened to a Detroit man named Robert Williams after facial recognition technology misidentified him in a criminal case.
With the meteoric rise of Artificial Intelligence, which is defined as “the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, especially computer systems,” according to Tech Target, it’s no surprise that it’s becoming increasingly common to use facial recognition technology when it comes to solving crimes, right?
Well, in 2018, a Shinola store’s security cameras captured a person stealing watches, Newsweek reported. Then, a couple years later on Jan. 9, 2020, a Black man named Robert Williams was arrested in front of his wife and two young daughters for the crime — but he had nothing to do with it. Even worse, he wasn’t informed of the reason for his wrongful arrest, leading him to spend 30 hours behind bars.
“The day I was arrested, I had no idea it was facial recognition,” Williams told Newsweek. “I was arrested for no reason.”
Following Williams’ wrongful arrest, James E. White, chief of the Detroit Police Department, issued a statement that in part read: “There are a number of checks and balances in place to ensure ethical use of facial recognition, including: use on live or recorded video is prohibited; supervisor oversight; and weekly and annual reporting to the Board of Police Commissioners on the use of the software.”
Despite the police department’s statement, Alex Najibi at Harvard University shared that advocates worry facial recognition programs are not always fair, especially when it come to Black people: “In 18th century New York, ‘lantern laws’ required enslaved people to carry lanterns after dark to be publicly visible,” Najibi wrote. “Advocates fear that even if face recognition algorithms are made equitable, the technologies could be applied with the same spirit, disproportionately harming the Black community in line with existing racist patterns of law enforcement.” [MORE]
Sambo Eric Adams says "NYC is a Black Led City" [White Liberals Own All Major Real estate/business/banks/industry/utilities/resources/media and Blacks are Their workers/servants/tenants and customers
/
GOLDEN RETRIEVERS ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVES OF BLACK POWER. New York City Mayor Eric Adams on Wednesday doubled down on his accusation that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott purposefully sent non-white illegal migrants to "black-led cities." CNN anchor Abby Phillip said Abbott also sent migrants to Philadelphia, a city with a white mayor.
"I believe that he sent them to where black mayors are," Adams said. "I don't know if it's to undermine these large cities that are run by black mayors because of his political agenda, I don't know if he is doing it for race, but I'm giving the facts where he sent them to Washington, D.C. These are cities that have black mayors. That is a fact, that is not my opinion or defining why he's doing it, I'm laying out the facts."[MORE]
Never mind the fact that this simpleton probot is talking about excluding non-white immigrants for his white liberal masters but did he say a ‘black led city???’ Also recognize
Sambo Adams is a strawboss and golden retriever for white liberals who own and control NYC. NYC. Black rolebots and probots may hallucinate that cities like NYC, Memphis, Baltimore, Atlanta and DC are not actually run by white liberals but are in fact run by Blacks themselves. In reality however, Black people function as “the powerless class” who are in charge of nothing independently of elite, racist whites in the system of racism white supremacy. Neely Fuller observes that ‘in spite of all statements black people may make about themselves having economic and/or political independence and the like, in the final analysis, they are all victims of the white supremacy process.’ According to Neely Fuller in a White Supremacy System the most accurate way to describe what "class" people are in is to describe their power relationship to each other. In their relationship with whites, Blacks cannot be be "upper" or "middle" - but only under whites in a white over Black operating system of vast unequal power.
Fuller accurately explains, "in a socio-material system dominated by elite racists, all major decisions involving non-white people are made by elite racists. The elite racists are their bosses, their masters, and their major decision-makers. Whatever a Black person gets, and/or is allowed to keep, is the result of decisions made by elite racists. This is the functional meaning of White Supremacy (Racism) that many people — particularly non-white people — prefer not to acknowledge. Dr. Bobby Wright explains, 'everywhere one finds Whites and Blacks living in close proximity to each other, whether it is Chicago or Zimbabwe, the whites are in control. Yet Blacks rarely question this extraordinary universal phenomenon which defies every known statistical law of probability.'
The rebel Dr. Amos Wilson Amos asks Blacks,
‘Who has control of your food? Who has control of your electricity? Who has control of your water? Of your jobs? Who tells you what to wear when you go to work? Who tells you when to come to work...when to leave...when to go to lunch...how to speak...how to write...how to do this...how to do that...and how are these things taught, and how they are conditioned?"-- It is by reward and punishment. " You do this you get paid; you don't do this you don't get paid; you get a raise, you get docked. What we have here is reward and punishment according to their terms and criteria.’
To live under the power of another people is to be created by that people. To be rewarded or punished by that people is to be created by that people. We are living under them as the result of the exercise of the power of another people over us. Therefore, if we wish to change this situation (i.e., the conditions under which we live), then we must change the power relationships. If we are to prevent ourselves from being created by another people and are to engage in the act of self creation, then we must change the power relations.’
In liberal jurisdictions such as NYC elite white liberals control and own all major resources (such as banks, local mainstream media, all major real estate, political authorties, utilities and corporations etc), and anything of material value. Elite racists also function as the major decision makers in regards to what happens or does not happen to non-white people. Non-whites, particularly Blacks and Latinos, function in some capacity as their workers, helpers, servants, tenants, voters and customers.
As such, elite whites are the direct or indirect masters of Black people in all areas of people activity. This necessarily includes controlling and directing the power of the local government, funding its elected officials campaign coffers and controlling “choices” presented to the votary. There are no local governments in existence run by Black politicians on behalf of powerful Black elites, powerful Black corporations, powerful Black mainstream media or a powerful Black votary. It is fantasy for blacks to imagine that a black puppetician such as Muriel Bowser, the mayor of DC, is controlling D.C. on behalf of powerful Black interests who pull the strings behind the scenes or that powerful Black voters have concentrated their power into the white Mayor of Memphis and are really calling the shots– especially when it is undisputed that those who own or control major real estate, industry, corporate businesses, banks, wealth and material resources are overwhelmingly elite white liberals.
In general, Black puppeticians are literally creations of white liberals who must continually demonstrate their alignment with their liberal masters ideology to avoid being filtered out or easily replaced. Anon explains in ‘the system of white supremacy black individuals who derive their authority from powerful whites or powerful white institutions are forbidden from harming other whites (unless instructed to do so).
The Black electorant should witness that Minnesota, Atlanta, St. Louis, Cleveland, Baltimore, Detroit or NYC or many other places where cops murder Blacks in broad daylight are all dominated by liberal Democrats duly elected by a participating black votary. NYC, for instance is controlled by white liberal puppeticians and complementary Black rolebots. Among its leaders NYC has a Black mayor (Eric Adams), Black Attorney Generals (Alvin Bragg, Manhattan) (Letitia James Brooklyn), Black state Assembly Leader (Carl Heastie Bronx), Black Public Advocate (Jumaane Williams Brooklyn), Black DA (Darcel Clark, Bronx), Black Borough President (Donovan Richards Queens) and numerous Black judges. Add to this Black legislators who hold 13 of 51 seats on the City Council, 22 of 150 seats in the state Assembly, and eight of 63 seats in the state Senate. There are also four Black congressional representatives —Gregory Meeks, Hakeem Jeffries, Yvette Clarke, and Jamaal Bowman and hundreds of white liberal democrats all levels of government who dominate City politics and government agencies. Nevertheless, the quality of Black citizenship stays low; law abiding Blacks are frequently stopped and searched by police in their neighborhoods or cars, Blacks and Latinos make up 90% of all persons and arrested and charged with crimes, Rikers Jail is disproportionately packed with Blacks held pre-trial in reprehensible conditions, a majority of all homeless people are black, Black unemployment stays high, 63% of black families in New York are in the bottom half of the income distribution, blacks are routinely struck from juries and so on.
Led by white liberals black people are going in circles. According to the Urban League’s 2022 State of Black America, Black people haven’t progressed since 1965. The Black-White disparity persists across virtually every line or indicator of life and quality of life in the United States. Black people occupy the bottom of nearly every statistical category of life. [MORE] US Census data reveals that the unemployment gap between whites and blacks is virtually unchanged over the last 50 years. The income and wealth gaps have actually widened. So has the gap in educational attainment. The jobless rate among African-Americans has remained double to whites for over 5 decades. Among other things, according a to a NY Times analysis the race gap in higher education has also widened. The median Black household income was $43,862 versus $63,823 for Whites. Blacks still trail Whites in homeownership, the traditional path to wealth building in the country, and their homes were valued less than Whites. [MORE] Norman Kelley observed that despite Black people’s heavy involvement in the Democratic Party, schools have remained as segregated as before Brown v. Board of Education, which was decided 70 years ago. [MORE] According to NSBA nearly one third of Black students lived in poverty (32%), compared with 10% of white students in families living in poverty. While white liberals whine about Florida AP classes and captivate Blacks with fantasy talk about reparations, 80% of African-American fourth-graders can barely read and understand mathematics and only 19% were scored proficient in math. [MORE] According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) just 18% of Black eighth-graders reach reading “proficiency.” [MORE] And in 2015 NAEP found that only 17% of Black 12th graders were proficient at reading. [MORE] In 2017, Ballou High School in DC came under intense scrutiny for pushing failing students through to graduation in order to achieve a 100% graduation and college acceptance rate. Teachers stated that many of their 12th graders couldn’t read and write. In 2017-18, only 7% of public school teachers and 11% of public school principals were Black. [MORE] and [MORE]
The Black votary automatically presumes that most white liberals are not racist and do not practice racism. Said presumption appears to be the only substance of present day black politics – as “blackness” or authenticity is entirely measured by “non-republican-ness” and although whites are not subject to the system of racism white supremacy or the same socio-economic circumstances, white and black liberals are perceived to have the same common issues. According to this clogic Black voters are comfortable voting for white liberals and complimentary black rolebots without critical examination of their legislative records, campaign proposals or without regard as to whether they even have a particularized set of plans or any messaging for Black people. [MORE]
Hoax or Murder? White Man Not Arrested but Praised After Murdering Unconscious Black Man in "15 Minute Chokehold" on NYC Subway. “ExMarine” Knew Deadly Force Could Cause Death. Not Charged by Borg DA
/
THE SO-CALLED “WHITE MARINE” Daniel Penny KEPT CHOKING “JORDAN NEELY” AFTER HE STOPPED MOVING as 2 other WHITE MEN helpED to subdue him . . .THAT’S HEROIC? NEELY IS BEING DESCRIBED AS A “MICHAEL JACKSON IMPERSONATOR” WHO WAS LOCALLY KNOWN.
MIND BLOCKED RACISTS ARE FOCUSING ON HOW MANY TIMES NEELY HAD BEEN ARRESTED BUT THE ONLY RELEVANT LEGAL QUESTION HERE IS WHETHER THE USE OF DEADLY FORCE WAS NECESSARY AND WHETHER ‘THE WHITE MARINE” KNEW A PROLONGED CHOKEHOLD COULD CREATE A SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF DEATH. ACCORDING TO Juan Alberto Vázquez, THE ONLY PERSON WHO RECORDED IT, THE WHITE MARINE CAME UP FROM BEHIND AND PUT NEELY IN A CHOKEHOLD. WAS IT REASONABLE FOR THESE WHITE FOLKS TO BELIEVE A SMALL CHOKED OUT HOMELESS MAN POSED AND THEN CONTINUED TO POSE AN IMMINENT DANGER OF DEATH TO THEM? [UNLESS THIS IS A PSY-OP].
A person may use a reasonable amount of force in self-defense, including, in some circumstances, deadly force. A person may use deadly force in self-defense if s/he actually and reasonably believes at the time of the incident that s/he is in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm from which s/he can save himself/herself only by using deadly force against his/her assailant.
Even if the other person is the aggressor and [name of defendant] is justified in using force in self-defense, s/he may not use any greater force than s/he actually and reasonably believes to be necessary under the circumstances [to prevent the harm s/he reasonably believes is intended] [to save his/her life or avoid serious bodily harm].
OR MAYBE ITS A HOAX and all the people above are cops or CRISIS ACTORS.
MIND BLOCKED BLACK PEOPLE ARE FOCUSING ON EMOTIONS AND THEIR PRE-EXISTING BELIEFS. THAT IS, THIS STORY IS BEING TOLD IN ACCORD WITH THEIR BELIEFS AND FEARS ABOUT RACIAL VIOLENCE. AS SUCH, THE STORY MAY NOT BE IN ACCORD WITH THE REALITIES OF LIFE. LIKE many FALSE FLAGS, JUST A FEW DAYS AFTER THE INCIDENT THE MEDIA HAD A READY MADE BIO ABOUT THIS ‘HOMELESS BLACK MAN’ WHICH INCLUDES HIS MENTAL HELATH HISTORY, FAMILY DRAMA AND OF COURSE, ALL THE DETAILS IN HIS CRIMINAL RECORD. BLACK PEOPLE ARE TRAGICALLY KILLED EVERYDAY AND RARELY DOES THE MEDIA POP UP AND PROVIDE SUCH DETAILED INFO. AS WITH OTHER FALSE FLAGS THERE IS ALSO A LACK OF VIDEO; ONLY 1 VIDEO OF THE INCIDENT ON A TRAIN IN NYC? ADDITIONALLY, WHY DID THE TRAIN HAVE SUCH FEW PASSENGERS ON IT? According to Vázquez, the chokehold lasted for 15 minutes, three minutes of which are recorded. Is a 15 MINUTE CHOKEHOLD BY ‘A TRAINED MARINE’ EVEN possible?? and for what reason did “Vázquez” WAIT SO LONG TO START RECORDING? HE CLAIMS THE CHOKEHOLD LASTED 15 MINUTES SO WHAT WAS HE DOING DURING THOSE 12 MINUTES?
TYPICALLY, WHEN DOZENS of people witness someone killing another person in a public space, one of two things happens: The killer is arrested or they flee. The tabloids might dub them “subway killer.”
None of that happened on Monday after a 24-year-old white former U.S. Marine whose name has not been made public killed 30-year-old Jordan Neely, who was Black, on an F train in the NoHo area of Manhattan. The 24-year-old man did not flee. He was not arrested. And the tabloids — along with more respected news outlets — issued glowing appraisals of him.
The unusual treatment may have had something to do with the victim: Neely was unhoused and had a history of mental illness.
Police took the subway rider into custody briefly for questioning then released him shortly afterward.
For advocates working on issues of poverty and police abuses, there was a simple reason why Neely’s killing happened the way it did and why, in the aftermath, nothing seemed out of the ordinary when the killer was set free: fearmongering rhetoric about homelessness and crime from Democratic New York leaders Gov. Kathy Hochul and Mayor Eric Adams.
The treatment of the 24-year-old man showed how police identified with the intervention against an unhoused person. Neely’s entire medical and criminal history were released to the public, but police won’t give out any information about the alleged assailant. “They’re acting as if this Marine was a member of the force,” said Beth Haroules, director of disability justice litigation at the New York Civil Liberties Union, who testified in February before the New York City Council against Adams’s plan to forcibly hospitalize mentally ill people and remove them from subways. [MORE]
Black Rolebot DA Alvin Bragg Continues to Hook Up White Liberals at the Expense of Blacks: Racist Suspect Woman who Plowed into BLM Protestors Gets a 'No Jail Time' Plea Deal, Community Service
/From [HERE] A white woman who plowed her car into Black Lives Matter protestors in Midtown was berated by demonstrators outside Manhattan court Monday after she cut a sweetheart plea deal with prosecutors, dodging jail time.
Kathleen Casillo, 53, faced seven years in prison if convicted in the December 2020 incident that left six people injured — but was instead sentenced to five hours of community service as part of the agreement with the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.
Casillo was in her black BMW sedan with her 29-year-old daughter on Dec. 11, 2020 when she drove into a BLM protest on 39th Street and Third Avenue.
Under the deal, Casillo pleaded guilty to reckless endangerment, a misdemeanor, but that will get knocked down to a mere disorderly conduct violation if she fulfills her sentence and stays out of trouble for six months, prosecutors and her lawyer said.
“You f—ed people’s lives up, you’re a criminal,” one demonstrator screamed at Casillo following the plea hearing in Manhattan Supreme Court. “You’re a criminal and you have not taken responsibility.”
The woman slammed Casillo’s claims that she had hit the gas in panic because the protestors were being “aggressive.”
“They didn’t do anything,” the demonstrator said. “My husband’s back was turned when you hit him and sent him flying into the air. His back was turned. How was that aggressive?”
But Casillo’s defense lawyer said justice had been served.
MR. BRAGG CAME INTO OFFICE VOWING NOT TO CHARGE NUMEROUS NON-VIOLENT CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER. BUT HE MUST’VE MEANT TO PROMISE ‘NOT TO CHARGE WHITE FOLKS’ BECAUSE SOMEBODY IN HIS OFFICE IS FILLING UP MANHATTAN COURTROOMS AND RIKERS ISLAND JAIL WITH BLACK PEOPLE. BOB GANGI, DIRECTOR OF THE POLICE REFORM ORGANIZING PROJECT AND LONGTIME COURT WATCHER, SAYS HE’S SEEN LITTLE CHANGE FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE IN THE BACK ROW OF MANHATTAN ARRAIGNMENTS.
“THEY WERE STILL PROSECUTING LOW-LEVEL BROKEN-WINDOWS TYPE CASES, IT SEEMED TO US, AS OFTEN AS VANCE’S OFFICE WOULD DO,” GANGI SAID, REFERRING TO BRAGG’S IMMEDIATE PREDECESSOR AS MANHATTAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, CY VANCE JR. [MORE].
DATA FROM THE COURT MONITORING PROJECT DEMONSTRATE THAT THE NYPD TARGETS BLACKS AND LATINOS: AS BLACKS/LATINOS MAKE UP 90% OF ALL NYPD ARRESTS, MOSTLY FOR VICTIMLESS CRIMES. WORKING HAND IN HAND WITH THE NYPD, MR. BRAGG’S DA OFFICE IN MANHATTAN — ONE OF THE WEALTHIEST AND LEAST EQUAL PLACES IN THE COUNTRY — HAS CONVICTED BLACK PEOPLE OF FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS AT A RATE 21 TIMES GREATER THAN THAT OF WHITE PEOPLE OVER THE PAST TWO DECADES. THIS DISPARITY IS THE LARGEST OF ANY COUNTY IN THE STATE. [MORE]
