Who Pulls the Strings on "Black" Puppetician Eleanor Holmes Norton? House Rep Proposes to Put Marijuana in the Capitol Garden While Delivering Little of Tangible Value to the Black Votary in DC

The U.S. Botanic Garden counts coffee and tobacco plants among its enormous botanical collection — and if Representative Eleanor Holmes Norton has anything to say about it, the country’s oldest public garden could soon display marijuana, too.

Norton, the District of Columbia’s nonvoting delegate to Congress, has long been a proponent of national marijuana legalization and has decried congressional oversight that blocks D.C. from taxing and regulating cannabis sales. 

Now, the Democrat has turned her advocacy towards the Botanic Garden on the grounds of the U.S. Capitol, reasoning with its Executive Director Susan Pell in a letter Wednesday that the push towards legalization makes weed deserving of a garden plot.

“As individual states and the country as a whole are moving toward the legalization of marijuana, having a display with male and female marijuana plants would be a historic opportunity to highlight the impact of marijuana on American society and, especially, the American economy,” the lawmaker wrote. [MORE]

New Report: The Most dangerous and Polluting Plants in Louisiana are in the Areas where Black People Live

From [HERE] Thirty years ago, a report called out Louisiana’s petrochemical industry for building plants in areas with a large Black population. On Monday, a new update to the report found that little had changed, and new plants in the state’s chemical corridor are still disproportionately planned near Black communities, according to an analysis by a New Orleans-based environmental justice nonprofit.

The Deep South Center for Environmental Justice’s new report builds on its research from the 1990s, mapping out locations of polluting facilities in the chemical corridor.

After plotting the sites of more than 100 plants against Census data, a clear pattern emerged: most of the facilities sat in areas that were 40% to 60% Black.

Three decades later, the center mapped the chemical corridor again and found that the trend has only continued along the 85-mile stretch of the Mississippi River between New Orleans and Baton Rouge. Overall the amount of pollution has decreased, but plants are still being planned in areas with a large Black population, and the risk of cancer and other health problems remains high.

The region itself also has a higher proportion of Black people than in the ‘90s, according to 2020 Census data. In areas like St. Charles Parish, the majority of plants sat in mostly white communities in 1990, but now the biggest polluters are “primarily” in areas with a 52% to 65% Black population.

“Nothing has changed. The data is still there. In fact, it's getting worse,” said Deep South Center of Environmental Justice founder Beverly Wright during a news conference Monday.

The 2023 update to those 1990 maps analyzed Environmental Protection Agency data on greenhouse gas and toxic air emissions overlaid with demographic data. The center worked with Intellectual Concepts, LLC to compile it. [MORE]

The Prison Litigation Reform Act makes it nearly impossible for people in prison to have their cases heard in court

In 2014, Abu Huraira, 45, was transferred to Georgia State Prison after 16 years in the custody of the Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC). On his arrival, prison officials failed to give him an initial medical screening, violating GDC policy. Because of that, Huraira went weeks without receiving medication for his chronic pain or dental care for a decaying tooth, despite submitting multiple requests to medical staff at the prison. Additionally, prison officials forced Huraira, a Muslim, to shave his beard using unsanitized clippers, exposing him to the risk of bloodborne diseases, and denied him access to Islamic prayer services, according to a lawsuit he later filed in federal court.

When Huraira sued GDC for violating his rights to medical care and religious liberty, GDC attorneys didn’t dispute the substance of his allegations. Instead, they argued that he had no right to sue at all because he had not filed a formal grievance with prison authorities. Even though Huraira told the court that corrections officers had refused to allow him to file a grievance, a federal judge ruled in GDC’s favor and dismissed Huraira’s lawsuit on the grounds that he had “failed to exhaust administrative remedies.”

All of this was possible thanks to a little-known federal law called the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). Signed into law in 1996 by President Bill Clinton, the PLRA sought to tamp down on “frivolous” lawsuits filed by prisoners by making it easier for courts to dismiss cases before they ever went to trial. The law also capped the amount of damages prisoners could collect from prison officials who violated their constitutional rights, discouraging professional attorneys from taking on prisoners’ cases.

As a result, the PLRA has made it virtually impossible for prisoners to hold corrections officials accountable for civil rights violations like excessive force or inadequate medical care. Without judicial oversight, corrections officials act with impunity because they rarely face consequences for violating prisoners’ rights. [MORE]

Black Family Sues Alabama Over ​‘Longest Known Execution in US History: Barbaric Authorities Murdered Joe Nathan James After Torturing Him, It Took 3 Hours to Set IV-line, repeatedly punctured him

From [HERE] On May 3, 2023, the family of Joe Nathan James (pictured) sued the state of Alabama for the pain and suffering it caused during his three-hour-long lethal injection in 2022. It is believed to be the longest known execution in U.S. history. The suit asserts that “the execution team failed to execute Mr. James in a manner that comports with the U.S. Constitution, the Alabama Constitution, and applicable state law.” 

Normally, the first part of the process is supposed to take minutes, but the team in James’ execution took hours to set the intravenous lines, repeatedly puncturing him in the process, in what the suit claims was a violation of his 8thamendment rights against cruel and unusual punishment. The team of pro-bono attorneys from Arnold & Porter representing the family stated: “We’re seeking compensation for his family because that’s the available remedy, but really, our goal in filing this lawsuit and working on behalf of Mr. James’ family is to invite some transparency, to shed some light for Alabama.”

The lawsuit also alleges that the lethal injection deviated from the established execution protocol because James was already unconscious during the reading of the death warrant and unable to speak his last words.The suit states: “Mr. James was deprived of his rights to be mentally present for the reading of the death warrant, to provide last words, and to be cognizant of his punishment before the lethal drugs were administered.”

The suit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, points to other failed execution attempts by Alabama, which resulted in a review of the state’s execution protocol. “Each of the individuals that Alabama failed to execute reported experiencing extreme pain from failed IV access attempts, and each of these individuals endured IV access attempts for less time than Mr. James,” the suit says. “The only reason that the public knows what happened to these individuals is because they survived efforts to execute them.”

The so-called "White Marine" Arraigned for Manslaughter after Putting "Jordan Neely" in a "15 Minute Chokehold" on NYC Subway. The Unknown Black Man who Assisted Him Not Charged for Unknown Reasons

From [HERE] Daniel Penny, the so-called “white Marine” veteran who choked and killed Jordan Neely, “a homeless Black man,” on the subway last week, surrendered on Friday to face a charge of second-degree manslaughter.

Mr. Penny, 24, dressed in a dark gray suit, walked through the front doors of the Police Department’s Fifth Precinct at around 8 a.m. Hands cuffed behind his back, Mr. Penny was led out of the precinct at 10:38 a.m. He was put into a waiting black police car to be taken to Manhattan Criminal Court, where he was to be arraigned later Friday.

Mr. Penny encountered Jordan Neely, 30, on an F train on May 1 and allegedly held him in a chokehold for fifteen minutes, killing him. Unknown witnesses said that Mr. Neely was acting in a “hostile and erratic manner” toward other passengers on the train, according to the police, but there has been no indication that he physically attacked anyone before Mr. Penny began choking him. [MORE]

The unknown Black man who helped “Penny” by holding Neely down was not charged by the DA for unknown reasons. In its attempt to racialize the incident, The Dependent Media has purposefully overlooked the unknown Black man who clearly aided and abetted “the white marine” for over three minutes during the “15 minute chokehold.”

Other than the man who briefly recorded the incident there have been no first hand accounts about the “15 minute” chokehold provided to the public. As stated above, the police told the media that unnamed persons told them that ‘he acted hostile’ and ‘then was attacked.’ The man who recorded the incident said he couldn’t see how it started because the train was too crowded.

Due to the omission of information, odd occurences, along with the triple and quadruple layers of hearsay this episode has characteristics similar to a false flag.

The only video of the incident is only 3 minutes. Unedited video is here

Israel Gaza Kill and Maim: 13 Murdered, Including 4 Children in Air Raids on Palestinians in Latest Massacre by IsrAlien Terrorcrats in Free Range Prison Disguised as Democracy

Israel Gaza Kill and Maim. From [HERE] and [HERE] Israel has killed at least 13 Palestinians in its latest air strikes against the besieged Gaza Strip, including civilians, four women and four children, local medical sources have confirmed. The air strikes were carried out simultaneously in the southern Gaza city of Rafah and the centre of Gaza city at about 2:30 am today.

According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, 20 people were wounded in the air strikes, including three children and seven women. Some of the wounded are in a serious condition.

Local sources pointed out that the air strike in Gaza City targeted a residential building, killing dentist Jamal Khaswan, the Director of Al-Wafa Hospital, and his family, as well as Tareq Izzidine, an Islamic Jihad official, and his family. Another strike in the city targeted the house of Khalil Al-Bahtini, an Islamic Jihad operative, killing him along with two family members.

The attack in Rafah targeted the house of Jihad Ghannam, also an Islamic Jihad official, and one member of his family. There were no casualties reported after several other bombings in Khan Younis.

The Israeli occupation forces said that forty aircraft took part in the operation code-named "the Arrow and Shield". The operation was apparently planned last Tuesday and its time and targets were confirmed on Friday.

The Palestinian factions mourned the martyrs and pledged a "fierce" response. Israel said that any rocket fire from Gaza will lead to a wide-scale operation that might last for days. It closed schools in settlements near Gaza, asked settlers to evacuate, closed the crossings into the Gaza Strip and asked hospitals to move vital services to fortified rooms.

Extreme far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir congratulated Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the attacks in Gaza. His party also announced that it will return to voting with the right-wing coalition government in the parliament, the Knesset.

Opposition politicians Yair Lapid and Benny Gantz also announced their full support for any military offensive against the Palestinians in Gaza.

Evictions Causing a Substantial Increase in DC Homelessness (86% Black). Is it White Republican or White Liberal Landlords Forcing Blacks to Look for the Grate Outdoors? (DC is Only 5% Republican)

In Washington, DC, African Americans make up 86.4 percent of the homeless population, while representing only 46.6 percent of THE city’s population. According to the National Alliance to End Homelessness, this imbalance is not improving over time. the vast majority of the landlords are white LIBERALS. VOTER REGISTRATION IN DC IS ONLY 5% REPUBLICAN.

From [HERE] Homelessness in the District has increased from last year, according to annual Point-in-Time Count results the D.C. Department of Human Services (DHS) announced Friday.

That increase follows several consecutive years of declining numbers. Last year was the lowest count in 17 years: the 2022 point-in-time survey identified 4,410 people living outside or in shelters – a 13.7% drop from 2021.

That record low was made possible by federal emergency spending during the COVID-19 pandemic, including through the American Rescue Plan Act and emergency rental assistance programs to help people pay rent. But as federal protections have winded down, evictions have also gone up.

This year the District counted 4,922 unhoused people – an 11.6% increase from 2022, with a 12.1% increase among families and a 10.2% increase among single “unaccompanied individuals.”

Of those 4,922 people, 50% are experiencing homelessness in D.C. for the first time.

That’s driven up overall numbers. While there’s been a 57% increase in people who were able to transition out of homelessness from last year, DHS says the number of people who became homeless for the first time is outpacing the number of those who found housing. Those counted as experiencing homelessness for the first time might include residents who moved to D.C. while already experiencing homelessness, in addition to those who were already D.C. residents
The population of people who are experiencing homelessness is also skewing younger than in previous years, and there’s a higher prevalence this year of substance use. [MORE]

All photos above are the exclusive property of the undeceiver, Vincent Brown

KY Gov's Race: Is GOP candidate Daniel Cameron a Sambo? Yes. Unqualified OpporTomist Failed to Charge Cops Who Murdered Breonna Taylor. TokenNegro Treats Matters Important to Black People w/Frivolity

WHAT EXACTLY DO BLACK CONSERVATIVES CONSERVE?? FUNKTIONARY EXPLAINS:

BLACK CONSERVATIVE - A LOST SHEEP IN MASTER'S CLOTHING. A BLACK CONSERVATIVE TYPICALLY HAS NOTHING OF HIS OWN TO CONSERVE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF HIS OR HER OWN DOUBLE-CONSCIOUSNESS. SO-CALLED "BLACK CONSERVATIVES" DODGE THE REALITY OF THEIR FOLLY AND POSIT IS THAT WHAT THEY TRULY ARE CONSERVING IS TRADITIONAL "VALUES" AS IF VALUES EVER HAD ANYTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH MORALITY OR ETHICS. A BLACK CONSERVATIVE UNKNOWINGLY PRESERVES THE DIFFERENTIAL POWER-RELATIONS AND DYNAMICS BETWEEN THOSE OF AFRICAN DESCENT HE AND THEIR BOSSES, THE OVERRULING OVERCLASS ELITE. [MORE]

Daniel Cameron has been hailed as a “rising star” in the Republican Party for years. A standout appearance at the 2020 Republican National Convention exposed the first-term Kentucky attorney general to a wider audience, which he’s bolstered in the years since with frequent appearances on Fox News. He’s the first Black person independently elected to statewide office in Kentucky history.

Cameron is a so-called Black conservative who was endorsed and heavily promoted by racist suspects Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell. In fact, Mitch McConnell “hand-picked” his former staffer Cameron to run for Attorney General to strengthen his own political empire before his own re-election in 2020.

As explained by Martin Luther King Jr., ‘elite racists often appoint unqualified negros into positions of authority so that matters of great importance to Blacks will be handled frivolously.

Prior to Cameron’s election as AG in 2019 he had never tried a case of any kind, never represented an actual client in a court case and had no courtroom experience. He also never argued a legal brief before either the appellate court or the Supreme Court — at the state level or federal level. Cameron’s only experience was working as general counsel for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell for 2 years, working as a law clerk and working for a law firm that focused on lobbying - positions that have no meaningful relevance to prosecutorial trial and appellate work. [MORE] and [MORE].

After being sworn in on December 17, 2019, one of the first major things the newly elected AG did was call for halting abortions in Kentucky during the coronavirus pandemic, arguing it was an elective medical procedure that should fall under the statewide ban for the duration of the pandemic. [MORE] Cameron said he has not personally experienced the kind of racism the demonstrators are marching against. [MORE]

On May 13th Attorney General Daniel Cameron was named as a Special Prosecutor in the investigation into the death of Louisville EMT Breonna Taylor. The Republican was appointed by democrat Gov. Andy Beshear after calls for investigations grew in Kentucky and nationwide. During his run for AG Cameron campaigned with white cops to create his image as a servant of authority. [MORE]

NEVER TRUST A BLACK PROBOT. HIS BUSINESS IS PROCESS. ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY, A PROBOT IS A PROPAGANDIZING PROGRAMMED ROBOT. A PROBOT IS A PROXYMORON WHO CONVEYS PROGRAMMED DISINFORMATION IN COMPUTERIZED LANGUAGE AND BUREAUCRATESE JARGON. A PROBOT IS ONE WHO DISSEMINATES LIES, DISTORTIONS AND CONVENIENT MASS TRUTHS COMPOSED BY A SUPERIOR OVERRULING ELITE. [MORE] THEY FUNCTION WITH AN EXTREMELY LOW LEVEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS AS THEY VIEW OBEDIENCE TO AUTHORITY AS A MORAL VIRTUE AND PLACE FORM OVER SUBSTANCE, RULES OVER REASON AND LAW OVER HUMANITY. A BLACK PROBOT IS CAPABLE OF ADVOCATING FOR WIDESPREAD AGGRESSION AND DESTRUCTION IF THE RULES SAY SO. ELITES RACISTS PUT THEM ON THE FRONT LINES.

Getting Shot to Death by White Cops While You Sleep Not a Big Deal to a Sleeping Tom Cameron. Cameron failed to bring charges against officers who killed Taylor while she slept in her Louisville apartment – where they fired 32 shots -- on March 13, 2020. Her death sparked national outrage and protests.

The officers were accused of having used a fraudulently obtained no-knock warrant in a drug investigation for which Taylor was not a suspect. The U.S. Justice Department indicted four of those officers on August 4 for violating Taylor’s civil rights and conspiracy, obstruction and unconstitutional use of force.

“The recent federal indictments of four Louisville Metro Police officers involved in the Breonna Taylor killing has highlighted, demonstrated, and proven the insufficiency of the state investigation led by the Attorney General of the Commonwealth and an absence of an understanding of the Commonwealth’s criminal laws,” the NAACP said in a press release.

“The NAACP wrote ‘the insufficiency of the investigation and the lack of understanding of Kentucky criminal statutes were the results of the current Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky in his own words ‘backing the blue,’ not justice," the Louisville Courier-Journal reported. [MORE] and [MORE]

Where are Witnesses to the 15 Min Chokehold and Other Videos? Man who Only Filmed the Last 3 Min says He Heard Jordan Neely's Jacket Zipper hit the floor on Crowded Train but Didn't See Incident Start

LIKE HE SAID ‘TRAIN WAS CROWDED’ and IT ONLY WENT to 1 STOP’ DURING THE 15 MINUTE CHOKEHOLD. Thus far, besides a 3 minute video, apparently all the information about the incident is actually coming from the NYPD. The NYPD is relaying hearsay from unnamed witnesses to the media who parrot the information to the viewing public. However, actual first hand witness accounts from persons who were present before and during the so-called 15 minute chokehold have not been presented by the media. All media info so far is just “according to police” and “witnesses reportedly said.” Wikipedia for instance explains,

According to police, (unknown) witnesses said Neely was acting in a "hostile and erratic" manner, and yelled that he was hungry and thirsty, [4] and that he would hurt anyone on the train.[5] Freelance journalist and witness Juan Alberto Vázquez (who recorded the incident, more on him later), said that Neely did not physically attack anyone,[6] but other (unknown) witnesses reported (to the police) Neely throwing trash at passengers.[7] Penny approached Neely from behind, placing him in a chokehold until Neely was unconscious. [8] According to Vázquez, the chokehold lasted for 15 minutes, three minutes of which are recorded.[9][10][11]  Neely died on the subway car's floor.[14] 

Two other “eyewitnesses” spoke to Gothamist but ‘by the time they saw Neely, they said he wasn’t moving. [MORE]

Without first hand media accounts we are unable to independently assess the demeanor, appearance, tone of voice, credibility and veracity of the witnesses. We also cannot corroborate details given by the unknown witnesses because their statements are usually summarized by the media or cops. Instead we must trust the police - who lie often.

According to the NYPD the incident started inside a subway train car on the way from the ‘Second Ave‘ station to the Broadway–Lafayette Street station. It’s not clear what time the train arrived but by the time the video starts only 6 or 7 people are on the train. Vázquez says everyone got off when it got to the station. Apparently, no one on the crowded train called the police when the “white marine” began to apply the chokehold on the train (before it got to the station). No one on the crowded train filmed any of the first 12 minutes of the incident. Unless the train was full of old, white people, it is not probable that young or Black passengers would not have recorded it.

Although the NYPD explains that there are no cameras on the trains, there are cameras on the subway platforms in all NYC subway stations and specifically, there are cameras on the platform at the Broadway–Lafayette Street station. [MORE] and [MORE]. Said cameras probably would have captured excited passengers exiting the train and shown police entering the train. Cameras from the Second Ave station may have shown Neely enter the train. No such video has been provided by media or cops. Such video is not relevant to the elements of the crime here but would tend to show that this incident actually occurred.

In the interview below of Juan Alberto Vázquez, the man who filmed the video of the incident, he said could not see the “white marine” initially put Neely in a chokehold because the train was too crowded. He stated that the marine came from behind Neely and the next thing he could see was that he was in a chokehold. Vázquez claims that when the train arrived he got out and tried to talk to the conductor and then went back onto the train and that’s when he started to film.

BW is not asserting that this is a false flag but so far it shares some false flaggot characteristics - particularly with the lack of video despite the presence of a large number of people, lack of first hand witness accounts, reliance on police accounts, instant biographies and mini-media stories/photos created for the villain “white marine” and the victim “homeless Black man” ‘who impersonated Michael Jackson.’ Also, not so sure “a 15 minute chokehold” is actually possible. Some people become unconscious in three to four seconds. If the flow continues to be restricted, a person can die within three to four minutes. [MORE] Here, a chokehold by a so-called Marine, evidently trained in strangulation and combat methods, was applied for 15 minutes to an unwell, frail, weak,“homeless Black man” who couldn’t have weighed more than 150 lbs. Sounds like it might be some bullshit. Like false flags, while glossing over details the Dependent media and police are only focusing on the emotive facts; protests from lathered-up liberals and rants by lathered-up racist suspect conservatives. One should be cautious especially where police and media present facts in accord with the appetite of the listener, not necessarily in accord with reality. Why would police or media make it up? Many reasons -but especially because sheeple will believe it and use their imaginations to fill in the missing details in accord with their beliefs and dogma. As explained by Osho Rajineesh, 'a mind that is filled with belief is a mind which can project anything according to that belief.' FUNKTIONARY explains, “belief” is any conclusion based on a fundamental assumption; the evidence of things not seen, no longer actively sought or belief is the psychological calm of imagined certitude safely beyond de-stabilizing doubt and troublesome reality-entanglement. [MORE]

INTERVIEW with Juan Alberto Vázquez From [HERE] There were dozens of people who witnessed the murder of Jordan Neely — but only one, freelance journalist Juan Alberto Vasquez, recorded it and uploaded it to Facebook. By doing so, he inadvertently placed himself at the center of an ongoing debate about what bystanders should do when witnessing a violent confrontation. Curbed spoke to Vasquez about what he saw that day and what he experienced and thought about in the aftermath.

Where were you headed on the subway? 

I was on my way from Brooklyn to Yonkers. I had some interviews to do up there. Right at Broadway-Lafayette, where everything took place, is where I was going to switch trains to get on the 6 and go to Grand Central and head up to Yonkers.

So when did you first notice that something was going on?  

Actually, something really curious happened. I’ve made that transfer at Lafayette various times, and I know the stairs to the 6 are on one end of the platform. But I get confused about whether I should be at the front or back of the F train to be closest. So, on this occasion, working off the idea that I should be at the front, I moved train cars at every stop to make my way there. But it turns out I was wrong — the stairs are closest at the back. If I’d gotten it right, I would’ve been at the back of the train and I wouldn’t have seen anything.

So then what happened? 

We stopped at Second Ave., and I saw someone running toward the doors. The door was just about to close — three, five inches away from closing — when Jordan stuck his hand between them. Can you believe that? The irony. The irony that I’d mistakenly swapped cars and the irony that if he’d gotten there a single second later, the door would have closed and he wouldn’t have gotten in.

But he stopped the door from closing and he got on the train. And he stood in the middle of the train car, and then he started yelling that he didn’t have food, that he didn’t have water. From what I understood, he was yelling that he was tired, that he didn’t care about going to jail.

Was this when you began recording? 

I tried to start filming from that moment, but I didn’t because I couldn’t see anything — it was too crowded. And then I heard him take off his jacket.  He bundled it up and just threw it on the floor, very violently. You could hear the sound of the zipper hitting the floor. At that moment, when he threw the jacket, the people who were sitting around him stood up and moved away. He kept standing there and he kept yelling.

When did you see the man who restrained him? 

It’s at that moment that this man came up behind him and grabbed him by the neck, and I think — I didn’t see, but I think — that move of grabbing him by the neck also led him to grab Neely by the legs with his own. They both fell. And then in like 30 seconds, I don’t know, we got to Broadway-Lafayette, and they were just there on the floor. You ask how many people out of 100 would have dared to do something like that, and I think that 98 will say: “No, I would wait to see one more sign that indicates aggression.”

What happened at the subway station? 

When the two doors opened, everyone rushed out, obviously afraid, because now there was an actual fight. I got out, and I was watching them on the floor with this other man helping to hold Neely down. And then there’s just this confusion over what to do, all these people standing around on the platform, and some of them were yelling, “Call the police, call the police.” There were a couple of people who approached the blond guy, they say he’s a marine, and asked him, “What’s going on?” And he told them to call the police.

Obviously, the conductor had no idea what was going on. He was just going to close the doors and keep going. But there were people who stood between the doors and said, “No! Don’t close the doors!” I went over to the conductor too, and he was saying over the speaker, “Police, police!” But obviously there weren’t any police in the station. So I went back to where the scene was. And that’s when I started to film.

So the video you posted to Facebook started at this point. 

I started to film from outside, through the window of the subway car, and then went back inside. They were just lying there. Then, when Jordan tried to escape again, they rolled over, and I could see his face and his attempts to escape. Then he wasn’t moving anymore, and we were all looking at each other, like, “What’s going on? Did he faint? What happened?” I got off the train, and I filmed another 30-second video where you can see it’s the F train. In that second video, you can see Neely is lying down and two guys are standing over him — the one who grabbed him and one other man. The second guy, he wanted to help. You can see in my first video that he never touches Jordan and never tries to restrain him; he is simply trying to listen to him and trying to tell the other one not to squeeze him so hard.

I had to leave and was walking toward the 6. And at that moment, I heard the patrol cars arriving. I didn’t stay when the police arrived.

What were you thinking about when you left? 

I wanted to believe he had fainted. But I wasn’t going to get involved in trying to free him or trying to help him, because you don’t know at what point you’re going to get involved in something bigger.

Why do you think this situation escalated?

Jordan wasn’t asking for money. Jordan wasn’t asking for food. He was lamenting that he didn’t have any, he was lamenting that he was fed up, that he didn’t mind going to jail, and, up until that point, everything was fine. As far as I saw, he stood still and that encouraged people to stay calm, to stay in their place. When he raised his jacket, that’s when people panicked a little and those who were around him moved. But he didn’t move either. These people who were standing between us, that couple did not move at all. They were just standing, watching him. They stayed there as if to say: “Well, until we see that there is some kind of risk.” To me, when Jordan throws his jacket, it is a way of saying: “There could be an act of violence here,” because those things do happen all the time, because just a year ago, there was a guy who went in and shot a lot of people on the train. And obviously, the marine, in the end, went too far. But the police also went too far in not arriving on time.

This is a difficult question, and I don’t know if you can really answer it, but I’m just going to ask you. Lots of people feel like you could have done something. Do you feel that way now?

I am an immigrant — my wife got a visa almost six years ago, and we came here. I was a reporter at Milenio in Mexico for 20 years. So, for a year, I was here learning a little English, taking care of my children. I kind of became Mr. Mom. And eventually I started doing little freelance jobs. And look, as an immigrant, we are in a situation that sometimes ties us down. We do not have the same rights. People always advise that you not get involved. Why get involved in something that could cause problems with your immigration status? You know that here in the U.S., if you so much as miss a stop sign, it could become a reason to be deported or not granted a permit.

On the other hand, at some point in all this, I had the impulse to do something, whether to ask the other guy to let him go or whether to help Jordan escape or whether to say: “Let him go and between us, we can control him.” But, at some point I also got nervous, which is why I went in and out of the train car. And when I came back, I saw that there were two other people involved. Then I said to myself: “Well, let them help and let them try to resolve the matter.”

But I don’t regret it. I regret giving my name to the New York Post, because from then on, there was all this persecution by the media. I mean, I should have given them the interview but without my name. Now it’s too late. They already know who I am. People have even come and knocked on my door.

Ultimately, I wasn’t thinking that anybody was going to die. I can’t have regrets for something I didn’t know. [MORE]

U.S. Supreme Court Deals Another Blow to the Unelected Agency Rulers Making Law w/o Public Participation, Input and Review On Behalf of Themselves as They Rule Over the Federal Administrative State

From [HERE] The U.S. Supreme Court last week decisively blocked yet another unconstitutional action by a federal agency.  

The cases at issue are Axon Enterprise v. FTC and SEC v. Cochran.  The private parties in these suits challenged both the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the broad grounds that they operate in an unconstitutional manner and in violation of our Separation of Powers doctrine.

In these cases, the Supreme Court answered a simple question: do private parties have to go through the lengthy and costly administrative process before they can seek review of their constitutional challenge in a federal court?  The Court—all nine justices in a rare display of unanimity— said “no” holding that private parties can take a constitutional challenge to the federal agency itself directly to federal court without first ‘exhausting the administrative process and remedies’ as required by the agency’s own regulation.

This is a very important decision that holds great promise for individual liberty.

Why do I say that?

Because the U.S. Supreme Court is pushing back on the decisions of federal agencies that were never really second-guessed with federal courts simply holding that, as long as the agency interpretation of the statute at issue was “reasonable,” a federal court would not reverse the agency’s ruling. 

Well, this allows federal agencies to exercise an interpretive power that produces the functional equivalent of legislation that overrules even state law, as well as the judicial power the agency often uses to pronounce ‘legislation’ as constitutional—powers not intended by Congress in the legislation that created the federal law.

There is no place in our constitutional scheme for powerful federal agencies to decide what the laws applicable to their agencies mean, but for many years the federal courts and Congress gave up their most important role—interpreting statutes and adjudicating agency disputes—instead choosing to defer to “agency expertise.”

This is quite dangerous because federal agencies have often abused their authority while being largely unaccountable to Congress and the courts. [MORE]

DNA testing has Exonerated 35 People from Death Row and Other Facts to Know About DNA and Wrongful Convictions in this System of Injustice [racism/white supremacy]

From [HERE] The groundbreaking discovery of DNA’s unique double-helix structure is celebrated annually on April 25, World DNA Day. 

DNA — or deoxyribonucleic acid — is in every cell of every living organism and contains the “blueprint” for building and maintaining living beings. And even though humans share 99.9% of their DNA with one another, the 0.1% of DNA that varies from person to person can tell us a lot about each individual, and can be used to help identify people who have committed crimes as well as exonerate wrongly convicted people.

The emergence of DNA technology, which has the ability to provide irrefutable proof of wrongful convictions, inspired Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld to co-found the Innocence Project in 1992. Since then, the organization has used DNA technology and litigation to help free and exonerate hundreds of innocent people.

Here are five crucial facts about DNA and wrongful conviction you should know:

 575 people have been exonerated based on DNA testing in the U.S.

According to the National Registry of Exonerations, 575 wrongly convicted people have been exonerated based on DNA tests that demonstrated their innocence since 1989. That includes 196 Innocence Project clients.

 DNA testing in one case can cost up to $50,000.

While genetic DNA tests like 23andMe are fairly affordable, the kinds of DNA tests used in criminal cases can be very costly. Testing in a single case can cost anywhere between $5,000 and $50,000. This is often because multiple types of DNA tests may need to be conducted on a single piece of evidence, several pieces of evidence may each need to be tested, or very specialized testing may be necessary.

 DNA testing has exonerated 35 people from death row.

Nearly three dozen people sentenced to death have been exonerated based on DNA evidence, according to the National Registry of Exonerations. That includes Kirk Bloodsworth, the first person to spend time on death row and be exonerated by DNA evidence in the U.S. Mr. Bloodsworth spent nearly nine years wrongly incarcerated and is the founder of Witness to Innocence. [MORE]

Florida Authorities say They Can Put People to Death Even for Non-Homicide Crimes, Despite Supreme Ct Precedent Stating Otherwise

From [DPIC] On May 1, 2023, the state of Florida adopted legislationallowing the death penalty for sexual abuse of a child where no death occurred. This statute is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008). Excerpts from that opinion and from an amicus brief cited by the Court follow:

Excerpts from KENNEDY v. LOUISIANA (2008): Opinion of the Court

STANDARDS OF DECENCY

“Evolving standards of decency must embrace and express respect for the dignity of the person, and the punishment of criminals must conform to that rule.”

“Evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society counsel us to be most hesitant before interpreting the Eighth Amendment to allow the extension of the death penalty, a hesitation that has special force where no life was taken in the commission of the crime. It is an established principle that decency, in its essence, presumes respect for the individual and thus moderation or restraint in the application of capital punishment.”

RISK OF DEHUMANIZING PUNISHMENT

“When the law punishes by death, it risks its own sudden descent into brutality, transgressing the constitutional commitment to decency and restraint.”

BASIC HOLDING

“Based both on consensus and our own independent judgment, our holding is that a death sentence for one who raped but did not kill a child, and who did not intend to assist another in killing the child, is unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.”

NATIONAL CONSENSUS

“The evidence of a national consensus with respect to the death penalty for child rapists, as with respect to juveniles, mentally retarded offenders, and vicarious felony murderers, shows divided opinion but, on balance, an opinion against it.”

“[N]o individual has been executed for the rape of an adult or child since 1964, and no execution for any other nonhomicide offense has been conducted since 1963.”

INCREASING HARM TO THE CHILD

“It is not at all evident that the child rape victim’s hurt is lessened when the law permits the death of the perpetrator. Capital cases require a long-term commitment by those who testify for the prosecution, especially when guilt and sentencing determinations are in multiple proceedings. In cases like this the key testimony is not just from the family but from the victim herself.”

“During formative years of her adolescence… (the victim) was required to discuss the case at length with law enforcement personnel. In a public trial she was required to recount once more all the details of the crime to a jury as the State pursued the death of her stepfather.”

RISK OF MISTAKE

“There are, moreover, serious systemic concerns in prosecuting the crime of child rape that are relevant to the constitutionality of making it a capital offense. The problem of unreliable, induced, and even imagined child testimony means there is a ‘special risk of wrongful execution’ in some child rape cases.”

RISK OF ENDANGERING THE VICTIM

“In addition, by in effect making the punishment for child rape and murder equivalent, a State that punishes child rape by death may remove a strong incentive for the rapist not to kill the victim. Assuming the offender behaves in a rational way, as one must to justify the penalty on grounds of deterrence, the penalty in some respects gives less protection, not more, to the victim, who is often the sole witness to the crime.” 

SUMMARY

“Each of these propositions, standing alone, might not establish the unconstitutionality of the death penalty for the crime of child rape. Taken in sum, however, they demonstrate the serious negative consequences of making child rape a capital offense. These considerations lead us to conclude, in our independent judgment, that the death penalty is not a proportional punishment for the rape of a child.”

AMICUS BRIEF OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS:

INCREASING UNDERREPORTING OF THE CRIME

“Executing child rapists will likely worsen the problem of underreporting that already frustrates efforts to combat child sexual offenses. The overwhelming majority of sexual abuse is committed by family members or close family friends. These relationships lead many victims—as well as family members who witness or suspect the abuse—to remain silent rather than to report the crime.”

MAGNIFYING THE TRAUMA

“Louisiana’s law would magnify the trauma that child victims experience in the criminal justice process. Even ordinary trials are highly traumatic for child victims. Death penalty trials, with their vastly increased publicity, expansive hearings, and multiplying pre-trial and post- conviction proceedings, will intensify that trauma by increasing the scope and duration of the child victim’s participation in the criminal justice system. Not only is increased exposure to trials known to hinder child victims’ healing process, but the imposition of a death sentence will add to the guilt child victims sometimes feel and may preclude the possibility of a future therapeutic meeting between the victim and his or her abuser.”

What was on the Menu When Puppetician Ron DeSantis Had Dinner with His Billionaire IsrAlien Masters?

From [HERE] Florida Governor and presumptive presidential nominee Ron DeSantis was spotted dining in Jerusalem this week with Israeli-American billionaire Miriam Adelson.

She was among several major Republican donors at the dinner hosted Wednesday by Larry Mizel, an American businessman who helped found the Museum of Tolerance where the meal was being held. Mizel was the finance chairman for Donald Trump’s presidential campaign office in Colorado during the 2016 race.

DeSantis sat in between Mizel and Adelson, according to Axios, which broke the story.

Miriam and her late husband, casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, backed DeSantis during his successful 2018 gubernatorial run, donating $500,000 to the Friends of Ron DeSantis PAC.

DeSantis is likely seeking Adelson’s support once again, as he is expected to announce his candidacy for president in the coming weeks, though he faces an uphill battle. [MORE]

[Yurugu vs Yurugu '24, Who Will be Master?] "Just Brutal:" George Stephanopoulos, Dumbocrats Stunned by Corpse Biden’s Horrible Polling Against Trump in 2024 Matchup

From [HERE] A new poll from ABC showing Joe Biden’s approval numbers tanking across all metrics left “This Week” host George Stephanopoulos stunned.

“This is just brutal for President Biden,” Stephanopoulos admitted on Sunday in response to the poll.

ABC political director Rick Klein responded, “Absolutely George, and you talked earlier about that record low approval rating for President Biden, it’s actually six points down just since February.”

“And the skepticism over his leadership extends deep inside his own party only 36 percent of Democrats think that their party should nominate Joe Biden for a second term,” he continued. “58 percent say they would support someone else, prefer someone else. That’s despite the fact that the entire DNC, most of the Democratic establishment has rallied behind President Biden and you’re seeing real weaknesses in the coalition that powered Joe Biden to the presidency back in 2020.”

Treasury Secretary Yellen Sends Message of Western Imperialism to China (talking about ‘It can Develop, as long as it Accepts American Leadership’). But Does China Also Believe in White Supremacy?

From [HERE] Recently, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen made her first remarks on US economic engagement with China in nearly two years.

She rejected the idea that a war between the US and China is “increasingly inevitable,” that there is “no reason to fear healthy economic competition with any country,” and that “China’s economic growth need not be incompatible with US economic leadership.”

Yellen also said that the primary goal of the US is always to safeguard its “national security” and thus it’s not really out to hamper the rise of China or its economy. But actions speak louder than words, and her comments come on the back of the US attempting to cripple China’s entire semiconductor industry, forcing third-party countries to abide by those restrictions as well, adding numerous Chinese companies to its trade-restrictions entity list, using allegations of forced labour to opportunistically undermine certain Chinese industries and, of course, maintaining broad Trump-era tariffs on Chinese exports to the US.

It might be asked, what form of economic engagement is there to be had? Because the rhetoric, hyperbole and extremity from Washington could not be less conducive to an economic relationship with China, what with terms such as ‘decoupling’ being thrown around, and the existence of an entire US congressional committee purely to produce anti-China legislation. The Biden administration, for that matter, is so sensitive to appearing ‘weak’ on China, that it will capitulate to any popular trend that gains enough political clout, such as calls to ban the popular TikTok app.

The US is so wrapped up on its protectionist, America First doctrine that it cannot be seen to be making concessions. And, looking at Yellen’s choice of words, we see the “catch” – China is only permitted to grow on the condition that it accepts “US economic leadership” – in other terms, the US’ political, economic, and military dominance.

This isn’t about reaching a consensus or agreement between the two parties; it is about Washington unilaterally imposing its demands on Beijing and requiring that it step down from certain ambitions. This is classic Western imperialism when it comes to China. Economic engagement with China and its massive market is great, provided that it is the Americans who are setting the terms and reaping the profits. The idea of the Chinese asserting their own sovereign rights and interests is not an option. [MORE]

9 out of 10 Haitians seeking asylum in Mexico lack the resources to cover their basic necessities

More than nine in 10 Haitians seeking asylum in Mexico lack the resources to cover basic necessities such as food, shelter, and medical care, the International Rescue Committee (IRC) aid group said on Thursday, April 27th.

Tens of thousands of Haitians have been displaced in recent months as heavily armed gangs have expanded their control over the country, where there are frequent reports of kidnappings, sexual violence, and violent turf wars.

This month, the head of the Mexican refugee agency COMAR told Reuters that asylum claims by Haitians were on track to surpass the record 52,000 recorded in 2021.

However, the IRC found through interviews with household leaders representing about 450 people that more than 90% lacked a steady income to cover essential needs.

More than seven in 10 said they struggled to access reliable information in Haitian Creole, particularly about legal pathways to migration and their rights in Mexico.

Language barriers, discrimination, and lack of space made accessing shelters difficult, the IRC said, causing many migrants to live on the streets or in makeshift camps. Nearly half said they needed help to afford enough food. [MORE]